Application of parallel stent placement in the treatment of unruptured vertebrobasilar fusiform aneurysms

Intracranial-intracranial bypass strategies for the treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms: anatomical characteristics and surgical intervention

OBJECTIVE

The effectiveness of revascularization for complex aneurysms is well-established. This study aimed to describe the technical characteristics and clinical efficacy of intracranial-to-intracranial (IC-IC) bypass for the treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients with aneurysms who underwent a preplanned combination of surgical or endovascular treatment and IC-IC bypass at our institution between January 2006 and September 2023. IC-IC bypass techniques included four strategies: type A (end-to-end reanastomosis), type B (end-to-side reimplantation), type C (in situ side-to-side anastomosis), and type D (IC-IC bypass with a graft vessel).

RESULTS

During the study period, ten patients with aneurysms each underwent IC-IC bypass surgery. Aneurysms were located in the middle cerebral artery (60.0%), anterior temporal artery (10.0%), anterior cerebral artery (20.0%), and vertebral artery (10.0%). There were three saccular aneurysms (30.0%), two fusiform aneurysms (20.0%), one dissecting aneurysm (10.0%), and four pseudoaneurysms (40.0%). We performed the type A strategy on five patients (50.0%), type B on one (10.0%), type C on one (10.0%), and type D on three (30.0%). During a mean period of 68.3 months, good clinical outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score, 0-2) were observed in all patients. Follow-up angiography demonstrated complete aneurysmal obliteration in all patients and good bypass patency in nine of ten patients (90.0%).

CONCLUSION

The treatment of complex aneurysms remains a challenge with conventional surgical or endovascular treatments. IC-IC bypass surgery is a useful technique, associated with favorable clinical outcomes, for treating complex aneurysms.

Predictive Factors of Recurrence after Endovascular Treatment of Unruptured Vertebrobasilar Fusiform Aneurysms

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the predictive factors of recurrence after endovascular treatment (EVT) for unruptured vertebrobasilar fusiform aneurysms (VBFA).

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study evaluated 36 patients who underwent EVT of unruptured VBFA between 2008 and 2020. Variables influencing recurrence, such as size, type, thrombus, preoperative symptoms, and treatment methods, were analyzed. All patients were followed up using vessel imaging.

RESULTS

In total, 7 of 36 patients (19.4%) developed recurrence. The mean time from EVT to recurrence was 9.2 months (range 2-26.9 months). Maximum aneurysmal diameter on magnetic resonance imaging was decreased, increased, and remained unchanged in 1, 7, and 28 patients, respectively. Transitional type VBFA, brain compression symptoms, large aneurysmal diameter and length, preoperative modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≥ 2, sole stenting technique, and intra-aneurysmal thrombus significantly influenced the risk of recurrence. Post-EVT, 7 (19.4%) patients showed complete occlusion of the aneurysm on the immediate postoperative angiogram, and 22 (61.1%) patients showed complete occlusion on the 1‑year follow-up imaging. Good outcomes were observed in 32 patients (88.9%) at the last follow-up, with a mRS score of 0-1 after EVT.

CONCLUSION

EVT achieves good outcomes in unruptured VBFA. Transitional type VBFA, brain compression symptoms, large aneurysmal diameter and length, preoperative mRS score ≥ 2, sole stenting technique, and intra-aneurysmal thrombus are risk factors for aneurysm recurrence after EVT.

Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device Flow Diverter Placement for Recurrent Dolichoectatic Vertebrobasilar Artery Aneurysm Treated with Multiple Low-Profile Visualized Intraluminal Support Stents: A Case Study

Objective

We report a case of dolichoectatic vertebrobasilar aneurysms treated with multiple low-profile visualized intraluminal support (LVIS) stents followed by flow redirection endoluminal device (FRED) flow diverter to prevent the growth of the thrombosed aneurysm.

Case Presentation

A 71-year-old man developed diplopia due to oculomotor nerve palsy after 11 years of follow-up for an enlarging thrombosed dolichoectatic vertebrobasilar artery aneurysm. He initially had a fusiform thrombosed aneurysm from the right vertebral artery to the basilar artery. This lesion was tortuous and strongly compressed the pons. A total of 11 LVISs were deployed from the right posterior cerebral artery to the right vertebral artery. Six months after surgery, there was no enlargement of the thrombosed aneurysm on MRI and the contrast leakage out of the stent was markedly reduced in DSA compared to immediately after surgery. One year and seven months after surgery, contrast leakage out of the stent was increased in DSA. The FRED was placed within the overlapped LVISs, and contrast leakage was somewhat reduced. After 2 years and 7 months from the initial treatment, the contrast leakage was still observed. However, there was no enlargement of the aneurysm and no complications related to treatments were observed.

Conclusion

Treatment with multiple LVIS stents followed by FRED flow diverter treatment for dolichoectatic vertebrobasilar aneurysms (DVAs) may be one of the treatment options for controlling the growth of thrombotic aneurysms without complications, but the long-term prognosis of this case is unclear, and careful follow-up is mandatory.

Stent-alone treatment of unruptured vertebral artery fusiform aneurysms: A comparison of flow diverter and conventional stents

Background

Treatment of vertebral artery fusiform aneurysms (VAFAs) is complex and controversial. This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy between flow diverter and conventional stents in patients with VAFAs undergoing endovascular stent-alone treatment (SAT).

Methods

Thirty-six patients with 36 VAFAs who underwent SAT between January 2014 and December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Patient and aneurysm characteristics, procedural details, complications, and angiographic and clinical outcomes were compared between flow diverter stent patients (n = 22) and conventional stent patients (n = 14).

Results

More branches covered with stent were found in the conventional stent group (88.9 vs. 33.3%; p = 0.008). The number of stents placed was significantly higher in the conventional stent group (1.57 ± 0.76 vs. 1.09 ± 0.29; p = 0.016). The proportion of patients with significant or moderate stasis within the aneurysm immediately after stent placement was higher in the flow diverter stent group (95.5 vs. 57.1%; p = 0.004). The proportion of patients with complete obliteration or only a residual neck on follow-up angiography was significantly higher in the flow diverter stent group (86.3 vs 50.0%; p = 0.047). However, the incidence of parent artery stenosis or occlusion was also higher in the flow diverter stent group (27.3% vs. zero; p = 0.032). The rate of complications did not significantly differ between the groups.

Conclusions

SAT was safe and effective in patients with VAFAs. Flow diverter stents are associated with a significantly better complete occlusion rate than conventional stents; however, they are also associated with an increased risk of parent artery stenosis.

Conservative Therapy vs. Endovascular Approach for Intracranial Vertebrobasilar Artery Trunk Large Aneurysms: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study

Background

Intracranial vertebrobasilar trunk large (≥10 mm) aneurysms (IVBTLAs) are rare and challenging to manage. In this study, we describe the natural prognosis and evaluate the safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment of IVBTLAs compared with conservative therapy.

Methods

This prospective multicenter cohort study included patients with IVBTLAs, who chose either endovascular treatment (endovascular group) or conservative therapy (conservative group) after discussion with their doctors. The primary endpoint was the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) related to the target vessel, while secondary endpoints included target vessel-related mortality, major stroke, other serious adverse events, and aneurysm occlusion rate.

Results

In total, 258 patients were referred to our two centers for the management of vertebrobasilar aneurysms, and 69 patients had IVBTLAs. Among them, 51 patients underwent endovascular treatment, and 18 patients received conservative therapy. The incidence of target vessel-related SAEs was 15.7% (8/51) in the endovascular group and 44.4% (8/18) in the conservative group (P = 0.031). The target vessel-related mortality was 2.0% (1/51) in the endovascular group and 38.9% (7/18) in the conservative group (P < 0.001). The cumulative survival rates in the endovascular group and conservative group within 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year were 98.0% vs. 83.3%, P = 0.020; 98.0% vs. 66.7%, P = 0.001; and 98.0% vs. 35.6%, P < 0.001, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed conservative therapy, giant aneurysm, and ischemic onset as risks factor for SAEs.

Conclusions

Compared with conservative treatment, endovascular treatment of the IVBTLAs may be associated with a lower incidence of SAEs, with higher 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates. Conservative therapy, giant aneurysm, and ischemic onset were associated with a high risk of SAEs.