Preoperative retrolisthesis as a risk factor of postdecompression lumbar disc herniation

Acute disc herniation following surgical decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective comparison of mini-open and minimally invasive techniques

BACKGROUND

Disc herniation following decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis is a less familiar surgical complication. Previous studies suggested that open lumbar decompression techniques, associated with relative segmental instability especially in the presence of degenerated disc in older patients, are more likely to result in disc herniation compared to minimally invasive techniques. The current study compares the incidence of acute disc herniation following mini-open and minimally invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study reviewing 563 patients who underwent spinal decompression for symptomatic lumbar stenosis by mini-open bilateral partial laminectomy technique or minimally invasive laminotomy utilizing a tubular system. Demographic and clinical data were collected and compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Postoperative disc herniation rate was significantly lower in the minimally invasive group with 2 of 237 cases (0.8%) versus 19 of 326 cases (5.8%) in the mini-open group (p = 0.002). This finding was more noticeable following multi-level procedures with no case of postdecompression disc herniation in the minimally invasive group compared to 8 of 39 cases (20.5%) in the mini-open group (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of postoperative disc herniation following spinal decompression for symptomatic lumbar stenosis was 5.8% following mini-open bilateral partial laminectomy compared to only 0.8% after minimally invasive laminotomy (p = 0.002). These findings highlight the more extensive nature of mini-open surgery associated with relative segmental instability that poses a greater risk for postoperative disc herniation.

Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) clinical practice guidelines on the management of lumbar spinal stenosis, 2021 - Secondary publication

BACKGROUND

The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) guideline for the management of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) was first published in 2011. Since then, the medical care system for LSS has changed and many new articles regarding the epidemiology and diagnostics of LSS, conservative treatments such as new pharmacotherapy and physical therapy, and surgical treatments including minimally invasive surgery have been published. In addition, various issues need to be examined, such as verification of patient-reported outcome measures, and the economic effect of revised medical management of patients with lumbar spinal disorders. Accordingly, in 2019 the JOA clinical guidelines committee decided to update the guideline and consequently established a formulation committee. The purpose of this study was to describe the formulation we implemented for the revision of the guideline, incorporating the recent advances of evidence-based medicine.

METHODS

The JOA LSS guideline formulation committee revised the previous guideline based on the method for preparing clinical guidelines in Japan proposed by the Medical Information Network Distribution Service in 2017. Background and clinical questions were determined followed by a literature search related to each question. Appropriate articles based on keywords were selected from all the searched literature. Using prepared structured abstracts, systematic reviews and meta-analyses were performed. The strength of evidence and recommendations for each clinical question was decided by the committee members.

RESULTS

Eight background and 15 clinical questions were determined. Answers and explanations were described for the background questions. For each clinical question, the strength of evidence and the recommendation were both decided, and an explanation was provided.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2021 clinical practice guideline for the management of LSS was completed according to the latest evidence-based medicine. We expect that this guideline will be useful for all medical providers as an index in daily medical care, as well as for patients with LSS.

Comparison of Short-Term Clinical Results and Radiologic Changes Between Two Different Minimally Invasive Decompressive Surgical Methods for Lumbar Canal Stenosis: Lumbar Spinous Process Splitting Laminectomy and Trans-Interspinous Lumbar Decompression

STUDY DESIGN

A multicenter, retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the clinical and radiological effects of removing interspinous contextures in lumbar decompression surgery for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

There have seldom been reports that have compared both clinical results and radiological changes among minimally invasive decompression methods.

METHODS

Consecutive 52 patients underwent lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy (LSPSL), following which 50 patients underwent trans-interspinous lumbar decompression (TISLD). All patients presented with cauda equina type of lumbar spinal stenosis and underwent a minimum 1-year follow-up. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) score were evaluated to determine the extent of daily living activities. Propensity score (PS)-matched analysis was used to match patients' age and preoperative JOA scores between the two groups. Lumbar lordosis (LL), disc height (DH), segmental range of motion (ROM), and vertebral anterior translation were measured by functional lumbar lateral x-ray, and changes between preoperative and 1-year postoperative values were evaluated.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine pairs of patients were selected by PS-matching. Mean JOA scores increased from 14.4 to 23.5 (mean recovery rate was 62.3%) in the LSPSL group and from 14.0 to 23.2 (61.3%) in the TISLD group at preoperative and 1-year follow-up, respectively. There were no significant differences in clinical results and changes in LL, ROM, and vertebral anterior translation in each group. The DH at L4/5 level at 1-year after surgery revealed significant decrease in the TISLD group compared with the LSPSL group. There was a correlation between preoperative DH and DH decrease in the LSPSL group, but not in TISLD group.

CONCLUSION

Removal of interspinous contextures did not influence clinical outcomes at 1 year after surgery, but it may be likely to cause disc height loss when it applied at the L4/5 level.Level of Evidence: 3.

Risk factors for in-hospital mortality after spine surgery: a matched case-control study using a multicenter database

BACKGROUND/CONTEXT

It is yet unclear what preoperative and intraoperative factors affect mortality after spine surgery.

PURPOSE

To identify the preoperative and intraoperative risk factors for in-hospital mortality after spine surgery using a matched case-control study based on a multicenter database.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

A retrospective matched case-control study based on a registry of prospectively collected multicenter data.

PATIENT SAMPLE

We identified 25 patients who died in the hospital (the mortality group) from the 26,604 patients in the database who underwent spine surgery at our 27 affiliated institutions between 2012 and 2018. An age-, sex-, spinal disease-, and surgical procedure-matched control group of patients (n=100, 4:1 ratio with the mortality group) was selected from the same database.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Data relating to comorbidities, preoperative blood tests, operative factors, and perioperative complications.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all the medical records of each patient in the two groups to nullify the effects of overt risk factors such as age, sex, diseases, and surgical procedures. Risk factors for in-hospital mortality were initially evaluated by univariate analysis. Then, multivariate logistic regression models were generated to analyze independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 0.09% (25/26,604). Mortality was lowest in patients with degenerative cervical (0.04%, 2/5,027) or lumbar disease (0.03%, 5/15,630). In contrast, mortality was highest in patients with dialysis-related spondyloarthropathy (3.0%, 3/99), patients with infectious spondylodiscitis (1.5%, 6/401), and patients with metastatic spinal tumors (0.9%, 3/334). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that massive intraoperative hemorrhage (>2 L) (odds ratio [OR], 28.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.27-349), preoperative renal comorbidity (OR, 4.33; 95% CI, 1.38-13.6), and elevated preoperative aspartate aminotransferase levels (OR, 1.51 per 10 units; 95% CI, 1.04-2.20) were risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Spine surgery for patients with dialysis-dependency, infectious diseases or metastatic tumors had much more potential of in-hospital mortality compared with those for patients with degenerative diseases. Massive intraoperative hemorrhage and preoperative renal and liver comorbidities were identified as risk factors for in-hospital mortality in patients who underwent spine surgery.

Expression and Mechanism of Interleukin 1 (IL-1), Interleukin 2 (IL-2), Interleukin 8 (IL-8), BMP, Fibroblast Growth Factor 1 (FGF1), and Insulin-Like Growth Factor (IGF-1) in Lumbar Disc Herniation

BACKGROUND The expression and mechanism of IL-1, IL-2, IL-8, BMP, FGF1, and IGF-1 in Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats with lumbar disc herniation were investigated. MATERIAL AND METHODS Immunohistochemical methods were applied to identify IL-1, IL-2, IL-8, BMP, FGF1, and IGF-1. PI3K, AKT protein, and mRNA expression were detected and analyzed by Western blot analysis. We selected 30 healthy SD rats and divided them into 2 groups to construct an animal model that was validated by immediate CT scanning. Cartilage tissues from the lumbar disc herniation (experimental) group and control group were obtained and compared. RESULTS The expression of BMP was not significantly different between the control group and the experimental group (P>0.05). FGF1: There was no significant difference in the expression of FGF1 (P>0.05) between the control group and the experimental group. Compared with the control group, the expression of IGF-1 in the experimental group was significantly higher (P<0.05); the expression of IL-1 in the experimental group was significantly higher (P<0.05); and the expression of IL-2 in the experimental group was also significantly higher (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in IL-8 between the experimental group and the control group (P>0.05). The expression levels of PI3K and AKT protein and mRNA were significantly higher than those in healthy controls (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS After lumbar disc herniation occurred, the IGF-1 was first activated; the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway was later activated, which resulted in the expression of IL-1 and IL-2 inflammation-related factors being increased.

Postoperative Spinal Subdural Lesions Following Lumbar Spine Surgery: Prevalence and Risk Factors

Study Design

Retrospective case–control study

Purpose

To clarify the prevalence and risk factors for spinal subdural lesions (SSDLs) following lumbar spine surgery.

Overview of Literature

Because SSDLs, including arachnoid cyst and subdural hematoma, that develop following spinal surgery are seldom symptomatic and require reoperation, there are few reports on these pathologies. No study has addressed the prevalence and risk factors for SSDLs following lumbar spine surgery.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of the magnetic resonance (MR) images and medical records of 410 patients who underwent lumbar decompression surgery with or without instrumented fusion for degenerative disorders. SSDLs were classified into three grades: grade 0, no obvious lesion; grade 1, cystic lesion; and grade 2, lesions other than a cyst. Grading was based on the examination of preoperative and postoperative MR images. The prevalence of SSDLs per grade was calculated and risk factors were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results

Postoperative SSDLs were identified in 123 patients (30.0%), with 50 (12.2%) and 73 (17.8%) patients being classified with grade 1 and 2 SSDLs, respectively. Among these, one patient was symptomatic, requiring hematoma evacuation because of the development of incomplete paraplegia. Bilateral partial laminectomy was a significantly independent risk factor for SSDLs (odds ratio, 1.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.20–1.92; p<0.001). In contrast, a unilateral partial laminectomy was a protective factor (odds ratio, 0.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.03–0.46; p=0.002).

Conclusions

The prevalence rate of grade 1 SSDLs was 30%, with no associated clinical symptoms observed in all but one patient. Bilateral partial laminectomy increases the risk for SSDLs, whereas unilateral partial laminectomy is a protective factor.

Preoperative retrolisthesis as a predictive risk factor of reoperation due to delayed-onset symptomatic foraminal stenosis after central decompression for lumbar canal stenosis without fusion

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

For patients diagnosed with lumbar central canal stenosis with asymptomatic foraminal stenosis (FS), surgeons occasionally only decompress central stenosis and preserve asymptomatic FS. These surgeries have the potential risk of converting preoperative asymptomatic FS into symptomatic FS postoperatively by accelerating spinal degeneration, which requires reoperation. However, little is known about delayed-onset symptomatic FS postoperatively.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the rate of reoperation for delayed-onset symptomatic FS after lumbar central canal decompression in patients with preoperative asymptomatic FS, and determine the predictive risk factors of those reoperations.

STUDY DESIGN

This study is a retrospective cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Two hundred eight consecutive patients undergoing posterior central decompression for lumbar canal stenosis between January 2009 and June 2014 were included in this study.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The number of patients who had preoperative FS and the reoperation rate for delayed-onset symptomatic FS at the index levels were the outcome measures.

METHODS

Patients were divided into two groups with and without preoperative asymptomatic FS at the decompressed levels. The baseline characteristics and revision rates for delayed-onset symptomatic FS were compared between the two groups. Predictive risk factors for such reoperations were determined using multivariate logistic regression and receiver operating characteristics analyses.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, 118 patients (56.7%) had asymptomatic FS. Of those, 18 patients (15.3%) underwent reoperation for delayed-onset symptomatic FS at a mean of 1.9 years after the initial surgery. Posterior slip in neutral position and posterior extension-neutral translation were significant risk factors for reoperation due to FS. The optimal cutoff values of posterior slip in neutral position and posterior extension-neutral translation for predicting the occurrence of such reoperations were both 1 mm; 66.7% of patients who met both of these cutoff values had undergone reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that 15.3% of patients with preoperative asymptomatic FS underwent reoperation for delayed-onset symptomatic FS at the index levels at a mean of 1.9 years after central decompression, and preoperative retrolisthesis was a predictive risk factor for such a reoperation. These findings are valuable for establishing standards of appropriate treatment strategies in patients with lumbar central canal stenosis with asymptomatic FS.

Predictors of Reoperation after Microdecompression in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

OBJECTIVE

The risk factors of reoperation after microdecompression (MD) for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) are unclear. In this study, we presented the outcomes of MD for degenerative LSS and investigated the risk factors associated with reoperation.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted using the clinical records and radiographs of patients with LSS who underwent MD. For clinical evaluation, we used the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scoring system for low back pain, body mass index, and Charlson comorbidity index. For radiological evaluation, disc height, facet angle, and sagittal rotation angle were measured in operated segments. Also the Modic change and Pfirrmann grade for degeneration in the endplate and disc were scored.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients aged 69±9 years at index surgery were followed for 48±25 months. The average preoperative JOA score was 6.9±1.6 points. The score improved to 9.1±2.1 points at the latest follow-up (p<0.001). Seven patients (16.3%) underwent reoperation. Clinical and radiological factors except operation level and Pfirrmann grade showed a p-value >0.1. Patients with Pfirrmann grade IV and lower lumbar segment had a 29.1% rate of reoperation (p=0.001), whereas patients without these factors had a 0% rate of reoperation.

CONCLUSION

Moderate disk degeneration (Pfirrmann IV) in lower lumbar segments is a risk factor of disk herniation or foraminal stenosis requiring reoperation after MD in LSS.