Lateral access to paravertebral tumors

Minimally Invasive Approaches for Lumbosacral Plexus Schwannomas

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Lumbosacral plexus schwannomas (LSPSs) are benign, slow-growing tumors that arise from the myelin sheath of the lumbar or sacral plexus nerves. Surgery is the treatment of choice for symptomatic LSPSs. Conventional retroperitoneal or transabdominal approaches provide wide exposure of the lesion but are often associated with complications in the abdominal wall, lumbar or sacral plexus, ureter, and intraperitoneal organs. Advances in technology and minimally invasive (MIS) techniques have provided alternative approaches with reliable efficacy compared with traditional open surgery. We describe 3 MIS approaches using tubular retractor systems according to the lesion level.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, retrospective observational cohort study to evaluate the use of MIS tubular approaches for surgical resection of LSPSs. We included 23 lumbar and upper sacral plexus schwannomas. Clinical presentation, spinal level, surgical duration, degree of resection, days of hospitalization, pathological anatomy of the tumor, approach-related surgical difficulties, and outcomes were collected.

RESULTS

The posterior oblique approach was used in 43.5% of the cases, the transpsoas approach in 39.1%, and the transiliac in 17.4%. The mean operative time was 3.3 hours, and the mean hospitalization was 2.5 days. All tumors were WHO grade 1 schwannoma. Postoperative MRI confirms gross total resection in 91.3% of the patients. No patient requires instrumentation. The pros and cons of each approach were summarized.

CONCLUSION

The MIS approaches adapted to the lumbar level may improve surgeons' comfort allowing a safe resection of retroperitoneal LSPS.

Navigation and Robotic-Assisted Single-Position Prone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technique, Feasibility, Safety, and Case Series

BACKGROUND

Single-position prone lateral interbody fusion is a recently introduced technical modification of the minimally invasive retroperitoneal transpsoas approach for lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF). Several technical descriptions of single-position prone LLIF have been published with traditional fluoroscopy for guidance. However, there has been no investigation of either three-dimensional computed tomography-based navigation for prone LLIF or integration with robotic assistance platforms with the prone lateral technique. This study evaluated the feasibility and safety of spinal navigation and robotic assistance for single-position prone LLIF.

METHODS

Retrospective review of medical records and a prospectively acquired database for a single center was performed to examine immediate and 30-day clinical and radiographic outcomes for consecutive patients undergoing single-position prone LLIF with spinal navigation and/or robotic assistance.

RESULTS

Nine patients were treated, 4 women and 5 men. Mean age was 65.4 years (range, 46-75 years), and body mass index was 30.2 kg/m² (range, 24-38 kg/m²). The most common surgical indication was adjacent segment disease (44.4%), followed by pseudarthrosis (22.2%), spondylolisthesis (11.1%), degenerative disc disease (11.1%), and recurrent stenosis (11.1%). Postoperative approach-related complications included pain-limited bilateral hip flexor weakness (4/5) and pain-limited left knee extension weakness (4/5) in 1 patient (11.1%) and right lateral thigh numbness and dysesthesia in 1 patient (11.1%). All cages were placed within quarters 2-3, signifying the middle portion of the disc space. There were no instances of misguidance by navigation.

CONCLUSIONS

Integration of spinal navigation and robotic assistance appears feasible, accurate, and safe as an alternative to fluoroscopic guidance for single-position LLIF.

Direct Lateral Minimally Invasive Approach for Excision of a L1/L2 Neurofibroma-A Technical Note and Literature Review

A case of resection of a large dumbbell-shaped nerve sheath tumor at L1/L2 via a direct lateral minimally invasive approach is described. The tumor was removed via a lateral, subdiaphragmatic, rib-sparing, retropleural, retroperitoneal approach. The thoracolumbar junction can be challenging via the lateral approach and to the best of our knowledge this is the first report of excision of a paravertebral tumor via this approach. We believe this provided the benefits of direct operative trajectory and exposure, excellent tumor access, and avoided the need for facetectomy and extended spinal instrumentation across the thoracolumbar junction. Complete tumor excision was achieved with preserved motor function and improvement in radicular pain and sensory neurological deficit.

Minimally Invasive Lateral Retroperitoneal Approach for Resection of Extraforaminal Lumbar Plexus Schwannomas: Operative Techniques and Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Traditional approaches for retroperitoneal lumbar plexus schwannomas involve anterior open or laparoscopic resection. For select tumors, the lateral retroperitoneal approach provides a minimally invasive alternative.

OBJECTIVE

To describe a minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach for the resection of retroperitoneal schwannomas.

METHODS

A lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach was used to resect a 3.1 × 2.7 × 4.1 cm schwannoma embedded within the psoas muscle. A minimally invasive retractor system allows for appropriate visualization and complete resection with the aid of the microscope. The patient tolerated the procedure without complication and was discharged on postoperative day 2 in good condition at her neurological baseline.

RESULTS

The lateral retroperitoneal approach provides a minimally invasive alternative for select retroperitoneal schwannomas. In theory, this procedure allows for faster recovery and less blood loss compared to traditional open anterior approaches. For a subset of tumors, anterior laparoscopy may provide better access, but the lateral approach is well known to most neurosurgeons who perform lateral interbody fusions and can be easily tailored to extraforaminal tumor resection.

CONCLUSION

Retroperitoneal schwannomas pose a challenge due to their deep location. The lateral retroperitoneal approach provides a useful alternative for resection of a subset of retroperitoneal schwannomas.