1
|
Scalia G, Priola SM, Ranganathan S, Venkataram T, Orestano V, Marrone S, Chaurasia B, Maugeri R, Iacopino DG, Strigari L, Salvati M, Umana GE. Assessing the impact of mixed reality-assisted informed consent: A study protocol. Surg Neurol Int 2024; 15:88. [PMID: 38628537 PMCID: PMC11021117 DOI: 10.25259/sni_1021_2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Informed consent is a crucial aspect of modern medicine, but it can be challenging due to the complexity of the information involved. Mixed reality (MR) has emerged as a promising technology to improve communication. However, there is a lack of comprehensive research on the impact of MR on medical informed consent. The proposed research protocol provides a solid foundation for conducting future investigations and developing MR-based protocols that can enhance patients' understanding and engagement in the decision-making process. Methods This study will employ a randomized controlled trial design. Two arms will be defined: MR-assisted informed consent (MRaIC) as the experimental arm and conventional informed consent (CIC) as the control arm consent, with 52 patients in each group. The protocol includes the use of questionnaires to analyze the anxiety levels and the awareness of the procedure that the patient is going to perform to study the impact of MRaIC versus CIC before medical procedures. Results The study will evaluate the impact of MR on patients' information comprehension, engagement during the process of obtaining informed consent, emotional reactions, and consent decisions. Ethical concerns will be addressed. Conclusion This study protocol provides a comprehensive approach to investigate the impact of MR on medical informed consent. The findings may contribute to a better understanding of the effects of MR on information comprehension, engagement during the process of obtaining informed consent, psychological experience, consent decisions, and ethical considerations. The integration of MR technology has the potential to enhance surgical communication practices and improve the informed consent process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Scalia
- Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Head and Neck Sugery, Garibaldi Hospital, Catania, Italy
| | - Stefano Maria Priola
- Department of Neurosurgery, Health Sciences North, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sruthi Ranganathan
- Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 OQQ, United Kingdom
| | - Tejas Venkataram
- Department of Neurosurgery, Trauma Center, Gamma Knife Center, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy
| | - Valeria Orestano
- Psychology Center Orestano-Pittera, “l’Intreccio” Association, San Giovanni la Punta (CT), Italy
| | - Salvatore Marrone
- Neurosurgical Clinic, AOUP “Paolo Giaccone”, Post Graduate Residency Program in Neurologic Surgery, Department of Biomedicine Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics, School of Medicine, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Bipin Chaurasia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurosurgery Clinic, Birgunj, Nepal
| | - Rosario Maugeri
- Neurosurgical Clinic, AOUP “Paolo Giaccone”, Post Graduate Residency Program in Neurologic Surgery, Department of Biomedicine Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics, School of Medicine, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Domenico Gerardo Iacopino
- Neurosurgical Clinic, AOUP “Paolo Giaccone”, Post Graduate Residency Program in Neurologic Surgery, Department of Biomedicine Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics, School of Medicine, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Lidia Strigari
- Department of Medical Physics, University Hospital of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Maurizio Salvati
- Department of Neurosurgery, Policlinico “Tor Vergata”, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Emmanuele Umana
- Department of Neurosurgery, Trauma Center, Gamma Knife Center, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mirza AB, Khoja AK, Ali F, El-Sheikh M, Bibi-Shahid A, Trindade J, Rocos B, Grahovac G, Bull J, Montgomery A, Arvin B, Sadek AR. The use of e-consent in surgery and application to neurosurgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2023; 165:3149-3180. [PMID: 37695436 PMCID: PMC10624752 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-023-05776-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The integration of novel electronic informed consent platforms in healthcare has undergone significant growth over the last decade. Adoption of uniform, accessible, and robust electronic online consenting applications is likely to enhance the informed consent process and improve the patient experience and has the potential to reduce medico-legal ramifications of inadequate consent. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the utility of novel electronic means of informed consent in surgical patients and discuss its application to neurosurgical cohorts. METHODS A review of randomised controlled trials, non-randomised studies of health interventions, and single group pre-post design studies in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Random effects modelling was used to estimate pooled proportions of study outcomes. Patient satisfaction with the informed consent process and patients' gain in knowledge were compared for electronic technologies versus non-electronic instruments. A sub-group analysis was conducted to compare the utility of electronic technologies in neurosurgical cohorts relative to other surgical patients in the context of patient satisfaction and knowledge gain. RESULTS Of 1042 screened abstracts, 63 studies were included: 44 randomised controlled trials (n = 4985), 4 non-randomised studies of health interventions (n = 387), and 15 single group pre-post design studies (n = 872). Meta-analysis showed that electronic technologies significantly enhanced patient satisfaction with the informed consent process (P < 0.00001) and patients' gain in knowledge (P < 0.00001) compared to standard non-electronic practices. Sub-group analysis demonstrated that neurosurgical patient knowledge was significantly enhanced with electronic technologies when compared to other surgical patients (P = 0.009), but there was no difference in patient satisfaction between neurosurgical cohorts and other surgical patients with respect to electronic technologies (P = 0.78). CONCLUSIONS Novel electronic technologies can enhance patient satisfaction and increase patients' gain in knowledge of their surgical procedures. Electronic patient education tools can significantly enhance patient knowledge for neurosurgical patients. If used appropriately, these modalities can shorten and/or improve the consent discussion, streamlining the surgical process and improving satisfaction for neurosurgical patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Abbas Khizar Khoja
- Guy's, King's and St Thomas' School of Medical Education, King's College London, London, UK.
- King's College Hospital, Kings NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London, UK.
| | - Fizza Ali
- Guy's, King's and St Thomas' School of Medical Education, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | - Ammal Bibi-Shahid
- Guy's, King's and St Thomas' School of Medical Education, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | - Brett Rocos
- Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Gordan Grahovac
- King's College Hospital, Kings NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - Jonathan Bull
- Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Babak Arvin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Queens Hospital Romford, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hertzsprung N, Krantchev K, Picht T, Roethe AL, Rubarth K, Fuellhase J, Vajkoczy P, Acker G. Personalized surgical informed consent with stereoscopic visualization in neurosurgery-real benefit for the patient or unnecessary gimmick? Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2023; 165:1087-1098. [PMID: 36853569 PMCID: PMC10068664 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-023-05512-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Informed consent of the patient prior to surgical procedures is obligatory. A good and informative communication improves patients' understanding and confidence, thus may strengthen the patient-doctor relationship. The aim of our study was to investigate the usefulness of additional stereoscopic visualization of patient-specific imaging during informed consent conversation. METHODS Patients scheduled for a brain tumor surgery were screened for this study prospectively. The primary exclusion criteria were cognitive or visual impairments. The participants were randomized into two groups. The first group underwent a conventional surgical informed consent performed by a neurosurgeon including a demonstration of the individual MRI on a 2D computer screen. The second group received an additional stereoscopic visualization of the same imaging to explain the pathology more in-depth. The patients were then asked to fill in a questionnaire after each part. This questionnaire was designed to assess the potential information gained from the patients with details on the anatomical location of the tumor as well as the surgical procedure and possible complications. Patients' subjective impression about the informed consent was assessed using a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS A total of 27 patients were included in this study. After additional stereoscopic visualization, no significant increase in patient understanding was found for either objective criteria or subjective assessment. Participants' anxiety was not increased by stereoscopic visualization. Overall, patients perceived stereoscopic imaging as helpful from a subjective perspective. Confidence in the department was high in both groups. CONCLUSION Stereoscopic visualization of MRI images within informed consent conversation did not improve the objective understanding of the patients in our series. Although no objective anatomical knowledge gain was noted in this series, patients felt that the addition of stereoscopic visualization improved their overall understanding. It therefore potentially increases patient confidence in treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Hertzsprung
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kiril Krantchev
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Thomas Picht
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.,Cluster of Excellence: "Matters of Activity. Image Space Material", Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, 10099, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anna L Roethe
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rubarth
- Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.,Institute of Medical Informatics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Josch Fuellhase
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Vajkoczy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Güliz Acker
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany. .,BIH Academy, Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Edwards CS, Ammanuel SG, Silva ONN, Greeneway GP, Bunch KM, Meisner LW, Page PS, Ahmed AS. Academics versus the Internet: Evaluating the readability of patient education materials for cerebrovascular conditions from major academic centers. Surg Neurol Int 2022; 13:401. [PMID: 36128118 PMCID: PMC9479524 DOI: 10.25259/sni_502_2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background:
Health literacy profoundly impacts patient outcomes as patients with decreased health literacy are less likely to understand their illness and adhere to treatment regimens. Patient education materials supplement in-person patient education, especially in cerebrovascular diseases that may require a multidisciplinary care team. This study aims to assess the readability of online patient education materials related to cerebrovascular diseases and to contrast the readability of those materials produced by academic institutions with those of non-academic sources.
Methods:
The readability of online patient education materials was analyzed using Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) assessments. Readability of academic-based online patient education materials was compared to nonacademic online patient education materials. Online patient education materials from 20 academic institutions and five sources from the web were included in the analysis.
Results:
Overall median FKGL for neurovascular-related patient online education documents was 11.9 (95% CI: 10.8–13.1), reflecting that they are written at a 12th grade level, while the median FRE was 40.6 (95% CI: 34.1–47.1), indicating a rating as “difficult” to read. When comparing academic-based online patient education materials to other internet sources, there was no significant difference in FRE and FKGL scores (P = 0.63 and P = 0.26 for FKGL and FRE, respectively).
Conclusion:
This study demonstrates that online patient education materials pertaining to cerebrovascular diseases from major academic centers and other nonacademic internet sites are difficult to understand and written at levels significantly higher than that recommended by national agencies. Both academic and nonacademic sources reflect this finding equally. Further study and implementation are warranted to investigate how improvements can be made.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caleb Simpeh Edwards
- Department of Neurological Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco,
| | - Simon Gashaw Ammanuel
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics, Madison,
| | | | - Garret P. Greeneway
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics, Madison,
| | - Katherine M. Bunch
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics, Madison,
| | - Lars W. Meisner
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics, Madison,
| | - Paul S. Page
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics, Madison,
| | - Azam S. Ahmed
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics, Madison,
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Meyer EC, Carnevale FA, Lillehei C, Uveges MK. Widening the Ethical Lens in Critical Care Settings. AACN Adv Crit Care 2021; 31:210-220. [PMID: 32526004 DOI: 10.4037/aacnacc2020265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Elaine C Meyer
- Elaine C. Meyer is Faculty Associate, Center for Bioethics, and Associate Professor of Psychology, Harvard Medical School, 641 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115
| | - Franco A Carnevale
- Franco A. Carnevale is Full Professor, Ingram School of Nursing; Associate Member, Faculty of Medicine (Pediatrics); Adjunct Professor, Counselling Psychology; and Affiliate Member, Biomedical Ethics Unit, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Craig Lillehei
- Craig Lillehei is Chair of Surgical Education, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Melissa Kurtz Uveges
- Melissa Kurtz Uveges is Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wright JM, Raghavan A, Wright CH, Shammassian B, Duan Y, Sajatovic M, Selman WR. Back to the future: surgical rehearsal platform technology as a means to improve surgeon-patient alliance, patient satisfaction, and resident experience. J Neurosurg 2020; 135:384-391. [PMID: 33096533 DOI: 10.3171/2020.6.jns201865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2020] [Accepted: 06/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Informed consent, when performed appropriately, serves many roles beyond simply obtaining the prerequisite medicolegal paperwork to perform a surgery. Prior studies have suggested that patient understanding is poor when verbal communication is the sole means of education. Virtual reality platforms have proven effective in enhancing medical education. No studies exist that have demonstrated the utility of virtual reality-facilitated informed consent (VR-IC) in improving the physician-patient alliance. The aim of this study was to determine the utility of VR-IC among patients providing consent for surgery and the impact of this educational and information technology-based strategy on enhancing the physician-patient alliance, patient satisfaction, and resident-physician perception of the consent process. METHODS Prospective, single-site, pre- and postconsent surveys were administered to assess patient and resident perception of informed consent performed with the aid of VR-IC at a large tertiary academic medical center in the US. Participants were adult patients (n = 50) undergoing elective surgery for tumor resection and neurosurgical residents (n = 19) who obtained patient informed consent for these surgical procedures. Outcome measures included scores on the Patient-Doctor Relationship Questionnaire (PDRQ-9), the modified Satisfaction with Simulation Experience Scale, and the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Patient pre- and postconsent data were recorded in real time using a secure online research data platform (REDCap). RESULTS A total of 48 patients and 2 family members provided consent using VR-IC and completed the surveys pre- and postconsent; 47.9% of patients were women. The mean patient age was 57.5 years. There was a statistically significant improvement from pre- to post-VR-IC consent in patient satisfaction scores. Measures of patient-physician alliance, trust, and understanding of their illness all increased. Among the 19 trainees, perceived comfort and preparedness with the informed consent process significantly improved. CONCLUSIONS VR-IC led to improved patient satisfaction, patient-physician alliance, and patient understanding of their illness as measured by the PDRQ-9. Using VR-IC contributed to residents' increased comfort in the consent-gathering process and handling patient questions. In an era in which satisfaction scores are directly linked with hospital and service-line outcomes and reimbursement, positive results from VR-IC may augment physician and hospital satisfaction scores in addition to increasing measures of trust between physicians and patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Martha Sajatovic
- 3Neurological and Behavioral Outcomes Center, Department of Psychiatry, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center; and
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jones CA, Mehta C, Zwingerman R, Liu KE. Fertility patients' use and perceptions of online fertility educational material. FERTILITY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE 2020; 6:11. [PMID: 32695432 PMCID: PMC7368747 DOI: 10.1186/s40738-020-00083-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Background Online educational information is highly sought out by patients with infertility. This study aims to assess patient-reported usage and helpfulness of fertility educational material on a clinic website and social media accounts. Methods Educational material was created on common fertility topics in text and video format and posted on the clinic website and social media accounts. At the first consultation for infertility, patients were provided with a postcard directing them to material online. At the first follow-up appointment, patients were invited to fill out a survey assessing whether patients viewed the online educational material and if they found the information helpful. Results 98.4% (251/255) of patients completed the survey, of which 42.6% (106/249) looked at the online material. Of those who viewed the online information, 99.1% (115/116) found the information helpful or somewhat helpful and 67.6% (73/108) found reading the material online better prepared them for making fertility decisions at their doctor’s appointment Conclusion Patients found online fertility information on the clinic website and social media accounts useful for making fertility treatment decisions. Providing online educational material has the potential to improve patient care by empowering patients with the knowledge to make more informed treatment decisions, and improving the quality of the time spent with the physician.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Ann Jones
- Mount Sinai Fertility, Sinai Health System, 250 Dundas St. West, Suite 700, Toronto, Ontario M5T 2Z5 Canada.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, 123 Edward St., Suite 1200, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1E2 Canada
| | - Chaula Mehta
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, 123 Edward St., Suite 1200, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1E2 Canada
| | - Rhonda Zwingerman
- Mount Sinai Fertility, Sinai Health System, 250 Dundas St. West, Suite 700, Toronto, Ontario M5T 2Z5 Canada.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, 123 Edward St., Suite 1200, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1E2 Canada
| | - Kimberly E Liu
- Mount Sinai Fertility, Sinai Health System, 250 Dundas St. West, Suite 700, Toronto, Ontario M5T 2Z5 Canada.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, 123 Edward St., Suite 1200, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1E2 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
The Effect of an Educational and Interactive Informed Consent Process on Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Caused by Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2020; 45:193-200. [PMID: 31513103 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000003223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Prospective observational cohort study. OBJECTIVE In this study, an educational and interactive informed consent (EIC) program was proposed for patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL-CSM) to improve their comprehension level during the informed consent process. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA OPLL-CSM is a slow progressive disease, and it is difficult for patients to understand the disease. Few studies have evaluated very specific programs to improve the informed consent process for these patients. METHODS This prospective study evaluated patients with OPLL-CSM who either underwent the proposed EIC process (n = 63) or the standard consent process (n = 124). The standard consent process only included a physician-patient interview. During the EIC process, information was provided regarding OPLL-CSM through information booklets, a video, verbal information, and initial and second physician-patient interviews. After the second physician-patient interview, the patient was requested to answer 14 medical questions to assess their knowledge about OPLL-CSM. The proposed EIC process took approximately 90 minutes. They were asked to report the most useful educational method and the most effective method of reinforcing verbal communication. RESULTS The mean questionnaire scores were higher in the EIC group than in the control group (P < 0.001). Video was selected by 50/63 patients (79.4%) as the most useful EIC process method, and the most effective method of reinforcing verbal communication was video (n = 61; 96.8%). Patients in the EIC group reported having higher satisfaction with surgery (P = 0.024) than did those in the control group. CONCLUSION The proposed EIC process was shown to result in good patient comprehension and recall regarding OPLL-CSM. Using a video was the most informative and effective reinforcement of verbal communication. The enhanced educational group had better knowledge and improved satisfaction following surgery. The EIC process might help physicians educate and counsel patients regarding OPLL-CSM and its treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2.
Collapse
|
9
|
Buchlak QD, Kowalczyk M, Leveque JC, Wright A, Farrokhi F. Risk stratification in deep brain stimulation surgery: Development of an algorithm to predict patient discharge disposition with 91.9% accuracy. J Clin Neurosci 2018; 57:26-32. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.08.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2018] [Revised: 08/12/2018] [Accepted: 08/21/2018] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
|
10
|
Kim BJ, Hong YR, Han Y, Hwang YH, Ohk B, Park J. Age-Dependent Attitudes of Ischemic Patients Toward Disability After Decompressive Hemicraniectomy for Malignant Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction. World Neurosurg 2018; 114:e51-e59. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2017] [Revised: 02/05/2018] [Accepted: 02/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
11
|
Park J, Park H. Surgical Informed Consent Process in Neurosurgery. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2017; 60:385-390. [PMID: 28689386 PMCID: PMC5544373 DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2017.0101.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2017] [Accepted: 02/20/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The doctrine of informed consent, as opposed to medical paternalism, is intended to facilitate patient autonomy by allowing patient participation in the medical decision-making process. However, regrettably, the surgical informed consent (SIC) process is invariably underestimated and reduced to a documentary procedure to protect physicians from legal liability. Moreover, residents are rarely trained in the clinical and communicative skills required for the SIC process. Accordingly, to increase professional awareness of the SIC process, a brief history and introduction to the current elements of SIC, the obstacles to patient autonomy and SIC, benefits and drawbacks of SIC, planning of an optimal SIC process, and its application to cases of an unruptured intracranial aneurysm are all presented. Optimal informed consent process can provide patients with a good comprehension of their disease and treatment, augmented autonomy, a strong therapeutic alliance with their doctors, and psychological defenses for coping with stressful surgical circumstances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaechan Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, Research Center for Neurosurgical Robotic Systems, Kyungpook National University, Daegu,
Korea
| | - Hyojin Park
- Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan,
Korea
| |
Collapse
|