Changing of the guard: reducing infection when replacing neural pacemakers

Evolution of Deep Brain Stimulation Techniques for Complication Mitigation

Complication mitigation in deep brain stimulation has been a topic matter of much discussion in the literature. In this article, we examine how neurosurgeons as individuals and as a field generated and adapted techniques to prevent infection, lead fracture/lead migration, and suboptimal outcomes in both the acute period and longitudinally. The authors performed a MEDLINE search inclusive of articles from 1987 to June 2023 including human studies written in English. Using the Rayyan platform, two reviewers (J.P. and R.M.) performed a title screen. Of the 776 articles, 252 were selected by title screen and 172 from abstract review for full-text evaluation. Ultimately, 124 publications were evaluated. We describe the initial complications and inefficiencies at the advent of deep brain stimulation and detail changes instituted by surgeons that reduced them. Furthermore, we discuss the trend in both undesired short-term and long-term outcomes with emphasis on how surgeons recognized and modified their practice to provide safer and better procedures. This scoping review adds to the literature as a guide to both new neurosurgeons and seasoned neurosurgeons alike to understand better what innovations have been trialed over time as we embark on novel targets and neuromodulatory technologies.

Do Antibiotic-Impregnated Envelopes Prevent Deep Brain Stimulation Implantable Pulse Generator Infections? A Prospective Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Infection after deep brain stimulation (DBS) implanted pulse generator (IPG) replacement is uncommon but when it occurs can cause significant clinical morbidity, often resulting in partial or complete DBS system removal. An antibiotic absorbable envelope developed for cardiac implantable electronic devices (IEDs), which releases minocycline and rifampicin for a minimum of 7 days, was shown in the WRAP-IT study to reduce cardiac IED infections for high-risk cardiac patients. We aimed to assess whether placing an IPG in the same antibiotic envelope at the time of IPG replacement reduced the IPG infection rate.

METHODS

Following institutional ethics approval (UnitingCare HREC), patients scheduled for IPG change due to impending battery depletion were prospectively randomised to receive IPG replacement with or without an antibiotic envelope. Patients with a past history of DBS system infection were excluded. Patients underwent surgery with standard aseptic neurosurgical technique [J Neurol Sci. 2017;383:135-41]. Subsequent infection requiring antibiotic therapy and/or IPG removal or revision was recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 427 consecutive patients were randomised from 2018 to 2021 and followed for a minimum of 12 months. No patients were lost to follow-up. At the time of IPG replacement, 200 patients received antibiotic envelope (54 female, 146 male, mean age 72 years), and 227 did not (43 female, 184 male, mean age 71 years). The two groups were homogenous for risk factors of infection. The IPG replacement infection rate was 2.1% (9/427). There were six infections, which required antibiotic therapy and/or IPG removal, in the antibiotic envelope group (6/200) and three in the non-envelope group (3/227) (p = 0.66).

CONCLUSION

This prospective randomised study did not find that an antibiotic envelope reduced the IPG infection rate in our 427 patients undergoing routine DBS IPG replacement. Further research to reduce IPG revisions and infections in a cost-effective manner is required.

Topical Vancomycin for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection in Cranial Surgeries: Results of an Updated Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression

Background

Surgical site infection (SSI) rates (1-9%) remain high despite the widespread adoption of infection control bundles. Topical vancomycin has emerged as an effective strategy to reduce the rate of SSI in patients undergoing spinal surgery including instrumentation. However, its use and efficiency in cranial neurosurgery is not well established. The aim of this study is to study the efficacy of topical vancomycin in cranial neurosurgery.

Methods

A systematic search was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Data regarding type of surgery, use of implants, the dose of vancomycin, technique of administration in each study, outcomes, rate of SSI, and the interval between surgery and SSI; possible complications related to antibiotic use were collected.

Results

A total of 12 studies were included in the qualitative analysis with 3,446 patients. SSI developed in 1.6% of the patients in the vancomycin group as compared to 5.28% in the control group. The pooled risk ratio was 0.24 with 95% CI: 0.12-0.51 (P-value: <0.00001). The difference between the subgroups was significant (P-value: < 0.00001). The number needed to treat (NNT) was 27.2. The studies showed low heterogeneity with an I2 of 24%. Meta-regression analysis showed that the number of patients in a study, duration of follow-up, and year of publication did not contribute significantly to effect size.

Conclusion

The limited systemic absorption of vancomycin and broad-spectrum led to its widespread applicability in the prevention of SSI in all types of cranial neurosurgery. Cases with implantable pulse generators, cranioplasty, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion procedures have all demonstrated their unequivocal effectiveness.

A meta‐analysis examined the effect of intrawound vancomycin on surgical site wound infections in non‐spinal neurosurgical operation

To assess the impact of intrawound vancomycin on surgical site wound infections in non-spinal neurosurgical operations, we conducted a meta-analysis. A thorough review of the literature up to September 2022 showed that 4286 participants had a non-spinal neurosurgical operation at the start of the investigations; 1975 of them used intrawound vancomycin, while 2311 were control. Using dichotomous or contentious methods and a random or fixed-effect model, odds ratios (OR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated to evaluate the impact of intrawound vancomycin on surgical site wound infections in non-spinal neurosurgical operation. The intrawound vancomycin had significantly lower surgical site wound infections (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.19-0.40; P < .001) with low heterogeneity (I2 = 32%) compared with the control in non-spinal neurosurgical operation. The intrawound vancomycin had significantly lower surgical site wound infections compared with control in non-spinal neurosurgical operation. The low sample size of 2 out of 13 researches in the meta-analysis calls for care when analysing the results.

Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative illness with both motor and nonmotor symptoms. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established safe neurosurgical symptomatic therapy for eligible patients with advanced disease in whom medical treatment fails to provide adequate symptom control and good quality of life, or in whom dopaminergic medications induce severe side effects such as dyskinesias. DBS can be tailored to the patient's symptoms and targeted to various nodes along the basal ganglia-thalamus circuitry, which mediates the various symptoms of the illness; DBS in the thalamus is most efficient for tremors, and DBS in the pallidum most efficient for rigidity and dyskinesias, whereas DBS in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) can treat both tremors, akinesia, rigidity and dyskinesias, and allows for decrease in doses of medications even in patients with advanced stages of the disease, which makes it the preferred target for DBS. However, DBS in the STN assumes that the patient is not too old, with no cognitive decline or relevant depression, and does not exhibit severe and medically resistant axial symptoms such as balance and gait disturbances, and falls. Dysarthria is the most common side effect of DBS, regardless of the brain target. DBS has a long-lasting effect on appendicular symptoms, but with progression of disease, nondopaminergic axial features become less responsive to DBS. DBS for PD is highly specialised; to enable adequate selection and follow-up of patients, DBS requires dedicated multidisciplinary teams of movement disorder neurologists, functional neurosurgeons, specialised DBS nurses and neuropsychologists.

Intrathecal baclofen pumps: what the neurologist needs to know

Increasing numbers of patients have an intrathecal baclofen pump implanted as part of spasticity management. Neurologists may be asked about the management of these devices when patients attend emergency departments for unrelated illnesses. Occasionally, the intrathecal baclofen system itself will directly lead to an acute presentation. Furthermore, the presence of an intrathecal baclofen pump needs consideration when requesting investigations, particularly MR imaging. This review aims to increase understanding of intrathecal baclofen treatment, highlighting serious complications and outlining considerations for routine investigations. Neurologists may still need advice from the intrathecal baclofen specialist team.

Use of Topical Vancomycin Powder to Reduce Surgical Site Infections after Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery: UCSF Experience and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Surgical site infection (SSI) is the most common serious complication of deep brain stimulation (DBS) implantation surgery. Here, we report a single-surgeon experience on the efficacy of topical, intrawound vancomycin powder (VP) in reducing SSI for DBS surgery and present the first systematic review and meta-analysis examining the effect of topical vancomycin on SSI in patients after DBS surgery.

METHODS

For the retrospective review, all unique patients undergoing DBS surgery at UCSF for new hardware implantation or internal pulse generator (IPG) replacement by a single surgeon from September 2013 to March 2019, with at least 1 year of follow-up data, were included. For the meta-analysis, we included all primary studies that compared SSIs with and without application of topical vancomycin in DBS surgeries.

RESULTS

368 unique patients met inclusion criteria; 195 patients received topical VP (VP group) and 173 did not (control). 99/195 patients in the VP group underwent new DBS implantation and 96/195 had IPG replacement. 71/173 patients in the control group had new DBS implantation and 102/173 had IPG replacement. There were 10 total cases of SSI: 4 patients from the VP group (3 new implants and 1 IPG replacement) and 6 patients from the control group (3 new implants and 3 IPG replacements), resulting in SSI rates of 2.1 and 3.5%, respectively (p value = 0.337). Including our retrospective analysis, 6 studies met inclusion criteria for the systematic review and meta-analysis. In the 4 studies that examined primary DBS implants, 479 total patients received topical VP and 436 did not; mean odds ratio for SSI with topical vancomycin was 0.802 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.175-3.678). Across the 5 studies that examined IPG implantations or replacements, 606 total patients received topical VP while 1,173 patients did not; mean odds ratio for SSI with topical vancomycin was 0.492 (95% CI 0.164-1.475). In either case, topical VP application did not significantly decrease risk of SSI.

CONCLUSION

Surgical infections after DBS surgery are uncommon events, with studies demonstrating mixed results on whether topical vancomycin reduces this risk. Our single-institution retrospective analysis and systematic review of prior studies both demonstrated no significant SSI rate reduction with topical VP. This is likely due to low baseline SSI rates, resulting in a small effect size for prevention. Given the cost-effectiveness, simplicity, and low risk, topical, intrawound VP remains a treatment option to further reduce risk of SSI, particularly in settings with higher baseline infection rates.

High Frequency of Low-Virulent Microorganisms Detected by Sonication of Implanted Pulse Generators: So What?

INTRODUCTION

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has become a well-established treatment modality for a variety of conditions over the last decades. Multiple surgeries are an essential part in the postoperative course of DBS patients if nonrechargeable implanted pulse generators (IPGs) are applied. So far, the rate of subclinical infections in this field is unknown. In this prospective cohort study, we used sonication to evaluate possible microbial colonization of IPGs from replacement surgery.

METHODS

All consecutive patients undergoing IPG replacement between May 1, 2019 and November 15, 2020 were evaluated. The removed hardware was investigated using sonication to detect biofilm-associated bacteria. Demographic and clinical data were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 71 patients with a mean (±SD) of 64.5 ± 15.3 years were evaluated. In 23 of these (i.e., 32.4%) patients, a positive sonication culture was found. In total, 25 microorganisms were detected. The most common isolated microorganisms were Cutibacterium acnes (formerly known as Propionibacterium acnes) (68%) and coagulase-negative Staphylococci (28%). Within the follow-up period (5.2 ± 4.3 months), none of the patients developed a clinical manifest infection.

DISCUSSIONS/CONCLUSIONS

Bacterial colonization of IPGs without clinical signs of infection is common but does not lead to manifest infection. Further larger studies are warranted to clarify the impact of low-virulent pathogens in clinically asymptomatic patients.

Deep Brain Electrode Externalization and Risk of Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

When evaluating deep brain stimulation (DBS) for newer indications, patients may benefit from trial stimulation prior to permanent implantation or for investigatory purposes. Although several case series have evaluated infectious complications among DBS patients who underwent trials with external hardware, outcomes have been inconsistent.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a period of lead externalization is associated with an increased risk of infection.

METHODS

We conducted a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses compliant systematic review of all studies that included rates of infection for patients who were externalized prior to DBS implantation. A meta-analysis of proportions was performed to estimate the pooled proportion of infection across studies, and a meta-analysis of relative risks was conducted on those studies that included a control group of nonexternalized patients. Heterogeneity across studies was assessed via I2 index.

RESULTS

Our search retrieved 23 articles, comprising 1354 patients who underwent lead externalization. The pooled proportion of infection was 6.9% (95% CI: 4.7%-9.5%), with a moderate to high level of heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 62.2%; 95% CI: 40.7-75.9; P < .0001). A total of 3 studies, comprising 212 externalized patients, included a control group. Rate of infection in externalized patients was 5.2% as compared to 6.0% in nonexternalized patients. However, meta-analysis was inadequately powered to determine whether there was indeed no difference in infection rate between the groups.

CONCLUSION

The rate of infection in patients with electrode externalization is comparable to that reported in the literature for DBS implantation without a trial period. Future studies are needed before this information can be confidently used in the clinical setting.

Postoperative Externalization of Deep Brain Stimulation Leads Does Not Increase Infection Risk

OBJECTIVES

Externalization of deep brain stimulation (DBS) leads is performed to allow electrophysiological recording from implanted electrodes as well as assessment of clinical response to trial stimulation before implantable pulse generator (IPG) insertion. Hypothetically, lead externalization provides a route for inoculation and subsequent infection of hardware, though this has not been established definitively in the literature. We sought to determine if lead externalization affects the risk of infection in DBS surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We present our center's experience of lead externalization and surgical site infection (SSI) in DBS surgery for movement disorders. Patients were divided into two cohorts: one in which leads were not externalized and IPGs were implanted at the time of electrode insertion, and one in which leads were externalized for six days while patients underwent electrophysiological recording from DBS electrodes for research. We compare baseline characteristics of these two cohorts and their SSI rates.

RESULTS

Infective complications were experienced by 3/82 (3.7%) patients overall with one (1.2%) requiring complete hardware removal. These occurred in 1/36 (2.7%) in the externalized cohort and 2/46 (4.3%) in the nonexternalized cohort. The incidence of infection between the two cohorts was not significantly different (p = 1, two-tailed Fisher's exact test). This lack of significant difference persisted when baseline variation between the cohorts in age, hardware manufacturer, and indication for DBS were corrected by excluding patients implanted for dystonia, none of whom underwent externalization. We present and discuss in detail each of the three cases of infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that externalization of leads does not increase the risk of infective complications in DBS surgery. Lead externalization is a safe procedure which can provide a substrate for unique neurophysiological studies to advance knowledge and therapy of disorders treated with DBS.

Surgical management of adverse events associated with deep brain stimulation: A single-center experience

Objectives:

Deep brain stimulation is widely used to treat movement disorders and selected neuropsychiatric disorders. Despite the fact, the surgical methods vary among centers. In this study, we aimed to evaluate our own surgical complications and how we performed surgical troubleshooting.

Methods:

A retrospective chart review was performed to evaluate the clinical data of patients who underwent deep brain stimulation surgery and deep brain stimulation–related procedures at our center between October 2014 and September 2019. We reviewed surgical complications and how surgical troubleshooting was performed, regardless of where the patient underwent the initial surgery.

Results:

A total of 92 deep brain stimulation lead implantation and 43 implantable pulse generator replacement procedures were performed. Among the 92 lead implantation procedures, there were two intracranial lead replacement surgeries and one deep brain stimulation lead implantation into the globus pallidus to add to existing deep brain stimulation leads in the bilateral subthalamic nuclei. Wound revision for superficial infection of the implantable pulse generator site was performed in four patients. There was neither intracerebral hemorrhage nor severe hardware infection in our series of procedures. An adaptor (extension cable) replacement was performed due to lead fracture resulting from a head trauma in two cases.

Conclusion:

We report our experience of surgical management of adverse events associated with deep brain stimulation therapy with clinical vignettes. Deep brain stimulation surgery is a safe and effective procedure when performed by a trained neurosurgeon. It is important for clinicians to be aware that there are troubles that are potentially manageable with optimal surgical treatment.

Antibiotic Impregnated Catheter Coating Technique for Deep Brain Stimulation Hardware Infection: An Effective Method to Avoid Intracranial Lead Removal

BACKGROUND

Few studies have proposed alternative salvage methods of deep brain stimulation (DBS) intracranial lead once the infection has already occurred.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of antibiotic impregnated catheter coverage of DBS leads in case of hardware infection.

METHODS

Patients with a hardware infection and consequent partial removal of extension and internal pulse generator (IPG) were reviewed. To diagnose an infection, criteria provided by the Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection were used. We compared the intracranial lead salvage rate between the group that underwent antibiotic catheter lead protection (group A) and the group that did not (group B).

RESULTS

A total of 231 DBS surgeries and 339 IPG replacements were performed from January 2012 to January 2017. Twenty-three hardware-related infections (4%) were identified. Nineteen patients (82.6%) underwent partial hardware removal with an attempt to spare intracranial lead. Of these, 8 patients (42.1%) had antibiotic catheter lead coverage (group A) while 11 patients (57.9%) did not receive any antibiotic protection (group B). At 6-mo follow-up, 6 patients had the extension and IPG successfully re-implanted in group A, whereas only 1 patient was successfully re-implanted in group B (75 vs 9.1%; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The antibiotic impregnated catheter coating technique seems to be effective in avoiding intracranial lead removal in case of IPG or DBS extension-lead junction infection. This method does not require any surgical learning curve, it is safe and relatively inexpensive. Randomized, prospective, larger studies are needed to validate our results.

Reducing Intrathecal Baclofen Related Infections: Service Evaluation and Best Practice Guidelines

OBJECTIVES

Intrathecal baclofen (ITB) pumps are an effective treatment for spasticity; however infection rates have been reported in 3-26% of patients in the literature. The multidisciplinary ITB service has been established at The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, UCLH, Queen Square, London for over 20 years. Our study was designed to clarify the rate of infection in our ITB patient cohort and secondly, to formulate and implement best practice guidelines and to determine prospectively, whether they effectively reduced infection rates.

METHODS

Clinical record review of all patients receiving ITB pre-intervention; January 2013-May 2015, and following practice changes; June 2016-June 2018.

RESULTS

Four of 118 patients receiving ITB during the first time period (3.4%, annual incidence rate of infection 1.4%) developed an ITB-related infection (three following ITB pump replacement surgery, one after initial implant). Infections were associated with 4.2% of ITB-related surgical procedures. Three of four pumps required explantation. Following change in practice (pre-operative chlorhexidine skin wash and intraoperative vancomycin wash of the fibrous pocket of the replacement site), only one of 160 ITB patients developed infection (pump not explanted) in the second time period (0.6%, annual incidence rate 0.3%). The infection rate related to ITB surgical procedures was 1.1%. In cases of ITB pump replacement, the infection rate was reduced to 3.3% from 17.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that a straightforward change in clinical practice may lower infection rates in patients undergoing ITB therapy.

Infections in Deep Brain Stimulator Surgery

Introduction: Deep brain stimulation has emerged as an effective treatment for movement disorders such as Parkinson’s disease, dystonia, and essential tremor with estimates of >100,000 deep brain stimulators (DBSs) implanted worldwide since 1980s. Infections rates vary widely in the literature with rates as high as 25%. Traditional management of infection after deep brain stimulation is systemic antibiotic therapy with wound incision and debridement (I&D) and removal of implanted DBS hardware. The aim of this study is to evaluate the infections occurring after DBS placement and implantable generator (IPG) placement in order to better prevent and manage these infections.

Materials/Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 203 patients who underwent implantation of a DBS at a single institution. For initial electrode placement, patients underwent either unilateral or bilateral electrode placement with implantation of the IPG at the same surgery and IPG replacements occurred as necessary. For patients with unilateral electrodes, repeat surgery for placement of contralateral electrode was performed when desired. Preoperative preparation with ethyl alcohol occurred in all patients while use of intra-operative vancomycin powder was surgeon dependent. All patients received 24 hours of postoperative antibiotics. Primary endpoint was surgical wound infection or brain abscess located near the surgically implanted DBS leads. Infections were classified as early (<90 days) or late (>90 days). Infectious organisms were recorded based on intra-operative wound cultures. Number of lead implantations, IPG replacements and choice of presurgical, intra-operative, and postsurgical antibiotics were recorded and outcomes compared.

Results: Two hundred and three patients underwent 391 electrode insertions and 244 IPG replacements. Fourteen patients developed an infection (10 early versus 4 late); 12 after implantation surgery (3%) and 2 after IPG replacement surgery (0.8%). No intracranial abscesses were found. Most common sites were the chest and connector. Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) was the most common organism. Intra-operative vancomycin powder did not decrease infection risk. Vancomycin powder use was shown to increase risk of infection after electrode implantation surgery (Relative Risk 5.5080, p = 0.02063). Complete hardware removal occurred in eight patients, one patient had electrode only removal, three patients with I&D and no removal of hardware, and two patients with removal of IPG and extensor cables only. All patients were treated with postoperative intravenous antibiotics and no recurrent infections were found in patients with hardware left in place.

Discussion/Conclusion: Infections after DBS implantation and IPG replacement occurred in 3% and 0.8% of patients respectively in our study which is lower than reported historically. Early infections were more common. No intracranial infections were found. Intra-operative use of vancomycin was not shown to decrease risk of infection after electrode implantation surgery or IPG replacement. However, in our study it was shown to increase risk of infection after electrode implantation surgery. Treatment includes antibiotic therapy and debridement with or without removal of hardware. DBS hardware can be safely left in place in select patients who may have significant adverse effects if it is removed. 

Single-Center Complication Analysis Associated with Surgical Replacement of Implantable Pulse Generators in Deep Brain Stimulation

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Internal pulse generator (IPG) replacement is considered a relatively minor surgery but exposes the deep brain stimulation system to the risk of infectious and mechanical adverse events. We retrospectively reviewed complications associated with IPG replacement surgery in our center and reviewed the most relevant publications on the issue.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all the IPG replacements performed in our center from January 2003 until March 2018 was performed. A logistic regression model was used to analyze the risk factors associated with IPG infections at our center.

RESULTS

A total of 171 IPG replacements in 93 patients were analyzed. The overall rate of replacement complications was 8.8%, whereas the rate of infection was 5.8%. IPG removal was required in 8 out of 10 infected cases. An increased risk of infection was found in patients with subcutaneous thoracic placement of the IPG (OR 5.3, p = 0.016). The most commonly isolated germ was Staphylococcus coagulase negative (60%). We found a non-significant trend towards increased risk of infection in patients with more than 3 replacements (p = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Infection is the most frequent complication related to IPG replacement. Staphylococcus coagulase negative is the most commonly isolated bacteria causing the infection. According to our results, the subcutaneous thoracic placement represents a greater risk of infection compared to subcutaneous abdominal placement.

Reoperation for device infection and erosion following deep brain stimulation implantable pulse generator placement

OBJECTIVE

Infection and erosion following implantable pulse generator (IPG) placement are associated with morbidity and cost for patients with deep brain stimulation (DBS) systems. Here, the authors provide a detailed characterization of infection and erosion events in a large cohort that underwent DBS surgery for movement disorders.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed consecutive IPG placements and replacements in patients who had undergone DBS surgery for movement disorders at the University of Alabama at Birmingham between 2013 and 2016. IPG procedures occurring before 2013 in these patients were also captured. Descriptive statistics, survival analyses, and logistic regression were performed using generalized linear mixed effects models to examine risk factors for the primary outcomes of interest: infection within 1 year or erosion within 2 years of IPG placement.

RESULTS

In the study period, 384 patients underwent a total of 995 IPG procedures (46.4% were initial placements) and had a median follow-up of 2.9 years. Reoperation for infection occurred after 27 procedures (2.7%) in 21 patients (5.5%). No difference in the infection rate was observed for initial placement versus replacement (p = 0.838). Reoperation for erosion occurred after 16 procedures (1.6%) in 15 patients (3.9%). Median time to reoperation for infection and erosion was 51 days (IQR 24-129 days) and 149 days (IQR 112-285 days), respectively. Four patients with infection (19.0%) developed a second infection requiring a same-side reoperation, two of whom developed a third infection. Intraoperative vancomycin powder was used in 158 cases (15.9%) and did not decrease the infection risk (infected: 3.2% with vancomycin vs 2.6% without, p = 0.922, log-rank test). On logistic regression, a previous infection increased the risk for infection (OR 35.0, 95% CI 7.9-156.2, p < 0.0001) and a lower patient BMI was a risk factor for erosion (BMI ≤ 24 kg/m2: OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.1-8.6, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

IPG-related infection and erosion following DBS surgery are uncommon but clinically significant events. Their respective timelines and risk factors suggest different etiologies and thus different potential corrective procedures.

The Utility of Vancomycin Powder in Reducing Surgical Site Infections in Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery

BACKGROUND

The impact of vancomycin powder on reducing postoperative surgical site infections (SSIs) in spine surgery has been studied extensively and is considered standard of care at many institutions. More recently, vancomycin powder has been shown to reduce SSI in cranial neurosurgery; however, limited studies have been performed assessing its impact in reducing SSIs in deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the use of vancomycin powder as an adjunct to the current antibiotic prophylaxis regimen in DBS surgery in a large cohort of patients.

METHODS

All patients undergoing DBS-lead implantation surgery and chest generator placement or exchange were analyzed prior to and after the implementation of intrawound vancomycin powder, and the impact on infection rate and any complications were subsequently examined.

RESULTS

From 2015 to 2017, a total of 419 consecutive patients (159 in the pretreatment group, 260 in the post-treatment group) were included in the study. The rate of SSI prior to implementation of intrawound vancomycin was 3.1% (n = 5), which was reduced to 0.38% (n = 1) in the post-treatment group. No complications were noted as a direct result of using vancomycin powder.

CONCLUSION

Given its relatively low cost and side effect profile, the use of vancomycin powder may be an effective adjunct in reducing the rate of SSI in DBS surgery.