Comparative anatomical analysis of the transcallosal-transchoroidal and transcallosal-transforniceal-transchoroidal approaches to the third ventricle

Quantitative analysis of exposure and surgical maneuverability of three purely endoscopic keyhole approaches to the floor of the third ventricle

BACKGROUND

The quantitative anatomic analysis of comprehensively endoscopic approaches to the third ventricle is scarce at present. The objective of the study is to quantitatively assess and compare the exposure and microsurgical maneuverability of three absolutely endoscopic keyhole approaches, including interhemispheric transcallosal transchoroidal (TCTC), frontal transforminal transchoroidal (TFTC) and supraorbital subfrontal translamina terminalis (SFTL) approaches.

METHODS

Anatomical dissections and exposure of the important structures of the third ventricle were performed using six formalin-fixed cadaveric human heads (twelve sides) under endoscope. Tubular retractor system was used in the TFTC approach. Quantitative anatomical relationship between the important landmarks were obtained. Moreover, the exposure and surgical operability of three approaches were evaluated through applying the rating scale and accomplishing the quantitative anatomic analysis, area of surgical freedom and angle of attack.

RESULTS

The mediolateral, anteroposterior (AM: between aqueduct and mammillary body; IM: between infundibular recess and mammillary body) and superoinferior distance of TCTC, TFTC and SFTL approaches were 4.0±1.0, 4.2±0.4, 4.1±1.1 mm; 17.3±1.4, 17.6±0.5, 12.8±3.3 mm (AM); 7.7±0.3, 7.8±0.5 mm, not measured (IM); and 5.6±0.3, 7.8±0.8, 7.8±1.5 mm, respectively. Similar to TFTC, the exposed landmarks of TCTC were almost scored a "4" by three neurosurgeons except the infundibular recess scored a "3" according to the rating scale. During the SFTL approach, apart from the roof, the majority of the landmarks were scored a "4" except for the infundibular recess, which was scored a "3." The mean area of surgical freedom of TCTC (0° endoscope: 220±47; 30°: 247±56 mm2) was not significantly different from that of TFTC approach (0° endoscope: 216±49; 30°: 245±53 mm2) under same endoscope, P>0.05. Mean angle of attack of TCTC (0° endoscope: 21±4°; 30°: 26±4°) was significantly larger than that of TFTC approach (0° endoscope: 16±3°; 30°: 19±3°), P<0.05.

CONCLUSIONS

Purely endoscopic TCTC and TFTC approaches offer brilliant exposure of the anterior, middle and posterior third ventricle. TCTC approach may have better surgical maneuverability than TFTC approach. Despite the long working distance, the whole third ventricle are exposed well except for the roof in the SFTL approach, and surgical manipulation can be accomplished smoothly.

Anatomical step-by-step dissection of common approaches to the third ventricle for trainees: surgical anatomy of the anterior transcortical and interhemispheric transcallosal approaches, surgical principles, and illustrative pediatric cases

PURPOSE

To create a high-quality, cadaver-based, operatively oriented resource documenting the anterior transcortical and interhemispheric transcallosal approaches as corridors to the third ventricle targeted towards neurosurgical trainees at all levels.

METHODS

Two formalin-fixed, latex-injected specimens were dissected under microscopic magnification and endoscopic-assisted visualization. Dissections of the transcortical and transcallosal craniotomies with transforaminal, transchoroidal, and interforniceal transventricular approaches were performed. The dissections were documented in a stepwise fashion using three-dimensional photographic image acquisition techniques and supplemented with representative cases to highlight pertinent surgical principles.

RESULTS

The anterior transcortical and interhemispheric corridors afford excellent access to the anterior two-thirds of the third ventricle with varying risks associated with frontal lobe versus corpus callosum disruption, respectively. The transcortical approach offers a more direct, oblique view of the ipsilateral lateral ventricle, whereas the transcallosal approach readily establishes biventricular access through a paramedian corridor. Once inside the lateral ventricle, intraventricular angled endoscopy further enhances access to the extreme poles of the third ventricle from either open transcranial approach. Subsequent selection of either the transforaminal, transchoroidal, or interforniceal routes can be performed through either craniotomy and is ultimately dependent on individual deep venous anatomy, the epicenter of ventricular pathology, and the concomitant presence of hydrocephalus or embryologic cava. Key steps described include positioning and skin incision; scalp dissection; craniotomy flap elevation; durotomy; transcortical versus interhemispheric dissection with callosotomy; the aforementioned transventricular routes; and their relevant intraventricular landmarks.

CONCLUSIONS

Approaches to the ventricular system for maximal safe resection of pediatric brain tumors are challenging to master yet represent foundational cranial surgical techniques. We present a comprehensive operatively oriented guide for neurosurgery residents that combines stepwise open and endoscopic cadaveric dissections with representative case studies to optimize familiarity with third ventricle approaches, mastery of relevant microsurgical anatomy, and preparation for operating room participation.

Quantitative Anatomical Studies in Neurosurgery: A Systematic and Critical Review of Research Methods

BACKGROUND

The anatomy laboratory can provide the ideal setting for the preclinical phase of neurosurgical research. Our purpose is to comprehensively and critically review the preclinical anatomical quantification methods used in cranial neurosurgery.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. The PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Ovid EMBASE databases were searched, yielding 1667 papers. A statistical analysis was performed using R.

RESULTS

The included studies were published from 1996 to 2023. The risk of bias assessment indicated high-quality studies. Target exposure was the most studied feature (81.7%), mainly with area quantification (64.9%). The surgical corridor was quantified in 60.9% of studies, more commonly with the quantification of the angle of view (60%). Neuronavigation-based methods benefit from quantifying the surgical pyramid features that define a cranial neurosurgical approach and allowing post-dissection data analyses. Direct measurements might diminish the error that is inherent to navigation methods and are useful to collect a small amount of data.

CONCLUSION

Quantifying neurosurgical approaches in the anatomy laboratory provides an objective assessment of the surgical corridor and target exposure. There is currently limited comparability among quantitative neurosurgical anatomy studies; sharing common research methods will provide comparable data that might also be investigated with artificial intelligence methods.

Surgical approaches for the lateral mesencephalic sulcus

OBJECTIVE

The brainstem is a compact, delicate structure. The surgeon must have good anatomical knowledge of the safe entry points to safely resect intrinsic lesions. Lesions located at the lateral midbrain surface are better approached through the lateral mesencephalic sulcus (LMS). The goal of this study was to compare the surgical exposure to the LMS provided by the subtemporal (ST) approach and the paramedian and extreme-lateral variants of the supracerebellar infratentorial (SCIT) approach.

METHODS

These 3 approaches were used in 10 cadaveric heads. The authors performed measurements of predetermined points by using a neuronavigation system. Areas of microsurgical exposure and angles of the approaches were determined. Statistical analysis was performed to identify significant differences in the respective exposures.

RESULTS

The surgical exposure was similar for the different approaches-369.8 ± 70.1 mm2 for the ST; 341.2 ± 71.2 mm2 for the SCIT paramedian variant; and 312.0 ± 79.3 mm2 for the SCIT extreme-lateral variant (p = 0.13). However, the vertical angular exposure was 16.3° ± 3.6° for the ST, 19.4° ± 3.4° for the SCIT paramedian variant, and 25.1° ± 3.3° for the SCIT extreme-lateral variant craniotomy (p < 0.001). The horizontal angular exposure was 45.2° ± 6.3° for the ST, 35.6° ± 2.9° for the SCIT paramedian variant, and 45.5° ± 6.6° for the SCIT extreme-lateral variant opening, presenting no difference between the ST and extreme-lateral variant (p = 0.92), but both were superior to the paramedian variant (p < 0.001). Data are expressed as the mean ± SD.

CONCLUSIONS

The extreme-lateral SCIT approach had the smaller area of surgical exposure; however, these differences were not statistically significant. The extreme-lateral SCIT approach presented a wider vertical and horizontal angle to the LMS compared to the other craniotomies. Also, it provides a 90° trajectory to the sulcus that facilitates the intraoperative microsurgical technique.

Endoscopic management of a cavernous malformation on the floor of third ventricle and aqueduct of Sylvius: Technical case report and review of the literature

Background:

Intraventricular cavernous malformations are unusual intracranial vascular malformations; their deep anatomical location complicates their surgical management. Microsurgical approaches are the gold standard approaches for the resection of ventricular lesions, however, they imply considerable neurovascular risks.

Case Description:

A 51-year-old patient presented with acute headache, diplopia, vertigo, blurred vision, and a depressed level of consciousness. A ventricular hemorrhage was treated with a ventriculostomy and the patient was discharged without hydrocephalus. After 11 days, he developed ataxia, diplopia, and a depressed level of consciousness. The patient was diagnosed with hydrocephalus secondary to the previous third ventricle hemorrhage. An endoscopic exploration using a 30° rigid ventricular endoscope was performed; after the third ventriculostomy, an intraventricular cavernous malformation located on the floor of the third ventricle and the aqueduct of Sylvius was resected.

Conclusions:

Three days after the surgery, magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated a gross total resection and adequate third ventriculostomy flow. One year after the surgery, the patient was asymptomatic. Neuroendoscopy has evolved towards minimally invasiveness, and in selected cases is an equally effective surgical approach to ventricular lesions. It provides minimal cerebral cortex disruption and vascular manipulation.