Progression of trunk imbalance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with a thoracolumbar/lumbar curve: is it predictable at the initial visit?

Scoliosis and Lower Limb Inequality: To Lift or Not to Lift, That Is the Question

In subjects with scoliotic alterations of the spine, asymmetrical lengths of the lower limbs are frequently observed, a condition commonly referred to as leg length inequality (LLI) or discrepancy (LLD). This asymmetry can induce pelvic misalignments, manifested by an asymmetric height of the iliac crests, and consequently an alteration of the spine's axis. Although correcting this discrepancy might appear to be a straightforward solution, further investigation may reveal other indications. The purpose of this article is to aid clinicians confronted with the decision of whether to compensate for an LLI in individuals with scoliosis, encompassing both adolescents and adults. It presents a literature review on the incidence of LLIs in the general population, distinguishing between structural LLI (sLLI) and functional LLI (fLLI) types of LLIs, and quantifying their magnitude with clinical and instrumental evaluation. Additionally, it links these two types of LLIs to the type of scoliosis (structural or functional). From a clinical perspective, it also examines the compensatory mechanisms employed by the pelvis in the presence of structural or functional LLIs in order to draw useful indications for therapeutic decisions. Moreover, it proposes an additional evaluation parameter in the coronal plane, namely the central sacral vertical line (CSVL), to aid in the decision-making process regarding LLI compensation. Although this parameter has been documented in the literature, it has been little associated with LLIs. The findings indicate that scoliotic discrepancies should be compensated (conservatively or surgically) only when the imbalance of the femoral heads is on the same side as the imbalance of the sacrum and the iliac crests; this corrective action should result in a reduction of the overhang in the coronal plane.

Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Minimum Data Set: Towards Standardization of Data Elements in History and Physical Examination

INTRODUCTION

Nonoperative care represents a cornerstone of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) management, although no consensus exists for a minimal data set. We aimed to determine a consensus in critical data points to obtain during clinical AIS visits.

METHODS

A REDCap-based survey was distributed to Pediatric Orthopedic Society of America (POSNA), Pediatric Spine Study Group (PSSG), and International Society on Scoliosis Orthopedic and Rehabilitation Treatment (SOSORT). Respondents ranked the importance of data points in history, physical examination, and bracing during AIS visits.  Results: One hundred eighty-one responses were received (26% response rate), of which 86% were physicians and 14% were allied health professionals. About 80% of respondents worked at pediatric hospitals or pediatric spaces within adult hospitals, and 82% were academic, with the majority (57%) seeing 150+ unique AIS patients annually. Most respondents recommended six-month follow-up for patients under observation (60%) and bracing (54%). Most respondents (75%) considered family history and pain important (69%), with the majority (69%) asking about pain at every visit. Across all time points, Adam's forward bend test, shoulder level, sagittal contour, trunk shift, and curve stiffness were all considered critically important (>60%). At the first visit, scapular prominence, leg lengths, motor and neurological examination, gait, and iliac crest height were also viewed as critical. At the preoperative visit, motor strength and scapular prominence should also be documented. About 39% of respondents use heat sensors to monitor bracing compliance, and average brace wear since the prior visit was considered the most important (85%) compliance data point.

CONCLUSIONS

This study establishes recommendations for a 19-item minimum data set for clinical AIS evaluation, including history, physical exam, and bracing, to allow for future multicenter registry-based studies.

The Clinical and Imaging Outcome of the Tandem Growing Rod Technique in Early-Onset Scoliosis With the Proximal Upper Thoracic Curve Progression: A Modified Technique of Growing Rod

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

The orthopaedic ability of traditional GR for severe EOS is limited. The proximal upper thoracic curve may progress during the lengthening procedure, which may lead to coronal imbalance and inhibit the longitudinal growth of the spine. In this retrospective cohort study, we investigated the clinical outcome of tandem GR.

METHODS

We modified the traditional technique by using two groups of GR devices to control the major and the proximal upper thoracic curve, connected the two groups of GR in series, and named it tandem GR. The clinical and imaging outcomes of the new technique were evaluated and compared with traditional technique.

RESULTS

Twenty one patients were enrolled in the tandem GR group, and 30 patients were treated with traditional GR as the control. The baseline parameters were consistent between the two groups. In the tandem GR group, the secondary curve progressed from 24.9 ± 3.9° to 31.4 ± 3.2° (P = .006) in the procedure with the traditional GR and improved to 18.4 ± 4.5° (P = .001) after the switch. Meanwhile, the clavicular angle aggravated from 1.6 ± 1.0° to 2.6 ± .7° (P = .041), and improved to 1.7 ± .8° after changed to the tandem GR (P = .033). At the final of the follow-up, the secondary curve was higher in the control group (27.1 ± 8.3° vs 18.4 ± 4.5°, P = .034), the clavicle angle was 2.4 ± 1.1° in control and 1.7 ± .8° in the tandem GR group (P = .028), the T1-S1 height was 28.2 ± 4.8 cm in the control and 33.3 ± 3.0 cm in the tandem GR group (P = .027). The average growth rate was 1.0 ± .3 cm/year in the control and 1.2 ± .4 cm/year in the tandem GR group (P = .046).

CONCLUSION

Tandem GR can effectively improve the proximal upper thoracic curve progression during the treatment of EOS. Compared with the traditional GR, tandem GR can achieve better curve correction, better shoulder balance, and retains more capacity for longitudinal spine growth.

Influence of age and severity of Lenke 5 or 6 idiopathic scoliosis on postoperative quality of life in adult patients

INTRODUCTION

Thoracolumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis can continue to progress beyond skeletal maturity. Ideal timing of surgery remains undefined. Earlier intervention, with shorter instrumentation, incurs early partial loss of lumbar motion. Waiting for progression incurs a greater risk of extensive arthrodesis. The aim of the present study was to assess the quality-of-life impact of age and scoliosis severity at surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with Lenke 5 or 6 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, aged 16-45years, were analyzed based on a prospective clinical registry. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 scores were collected preoperatively and at 6months, 1year and 2years. Coronal and sagittal alignments were measured on full-spine radiographs, and curve flexibility was assessed on bending radiographs. A mixed linear model was used to assess the impact of age, Cobb angle and flexibility on quality of life.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients were included. Mean ODI was 20.5% preoperatively and 13.8% at 2years (p=0.017). Mean SRS-22 was 3.2 preoperatively and 3.9 at 2years (p<0.001). Mean Cobb angle was 56.6° preoperatively and 23.2° at 2years (p<0.001), with mean preoperative reducibility of 68.1%. Age and ODI correlated preoperatively (r=0.6; p<0.001) and at 6months (r=0.5; p=0.002), as did age and SRS-22 (r=-0.6; p<0.001 and r=-0.6; p<0.001, respectively). Linear regression found a significant negative correlation between thoracolumbar Cobb angle and change in SRS-22 at 6months.

DISCUSSION

In 16-45 year-olds with Lenke 5 or 6 idiopathic scoliosis, age influenced SRS-22 score. Younger patients had better quality of life both pre- and post-operatively. Curve magnitude influenced postoperative score. The present study suggests that early surgical correction in younger patients, where instrumentation can be shorter, does not impair quality of life.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; prospective registry study.

Predicting Progression in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis at the First Visit by Integrating 2D Imaging and 1D Clinical Information

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

OBJECTIVES

The prediction of curve progression in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) remains an unresolved area in orthopedic surgery. To make a rapid meaningful prediction, easily accessible multi-dimensional data at the patient's first consultation should be used. Current studies use clinical growth parameters and numerical values extracted from radiographs to compile a predictive model, leaving out the radiographs themselves. Such practice inevitably wastes a lot of information. Thus, this study aims to create a neural network that can predict AIS progression among patients with curves indicated for bracing by integrating both one-dimensional (1D) clinical and two-dimensional (2D) radiological data collected at the patient's first visit in a fully automated manner.

METHODS

513 idiopathic scoliosis patients indicated for and managed with bracing orthosis were recruited. After exclusion, 463 patients were included in deep learning analysis. Processed first-visit growth parameters and posteroanterior radiographs are used as training inputs and the curve progression outcomes obtained in follow ups are used as binary training outputs. The CapsuleNet architecture was modified and trained accordingly to make a prediction.

RESULTS

The final model achieved 90% sensitivity with an overall accuracy of 73.9% in the prediction of AIS in-brace curve progression by using first-visit multi-dimensional data, outperforming conventional convolutional neural networks.

CONCLUSIONS

This first-ever multidimensional-input model shows promise in serving as a screening tool for AIS in-brace curve progression. The incorporation of such a model into routine AIS diagnostic pipeline can assist orthopedics clinicians in personalizing the most appropriate management for each patient.

A deep convolutional neural network to predict the curve progression of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a pilot study

Background

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a three-dimensional spinal deformity that predominantly occurs in girls. While skeletal growth and maturation influence the development of AIS, accurate prediction of curve progression remains difficult because the prognosis for deformity differs among individuals. The purpose of this study is to develop a new diagnostic platform using a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) that can predict the risk of scoliosis progression in patients with AIS.

Methods

Fifty-eight patients with AIS (49 females and 9 males; mean age: 12.5 ± 1.4 years) and a Cobb angle between 10 and 25 degrees (mean angle: 18.7 ± 4.5) were divided into two groups: those whose Cobb angle increased by more than 10 degrees within two years (progression group, 28 patients) and those whose Cobb angle changed by less than 5 degrees (non-progression group, 30 patients). The X-ray images of three regions of interest (ROIs) (lung [ROI1], abdomen [ROI2], and total spine [ROI3]), were used as the source data for learning and prediction. Five spine surgeons also predicted the progression of scoliosis by reading the X-rays in a blinded manner.

Results

The prediction performance of the DCNN for AIS curve progression showed an accuracy of 69% and an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.70 using ROI3 images, whereas the diagnostic performance of the spine surgeons showed inferior at 47%. Transfer learning with a pretrained DCNN contributed to improved prediction accuracy.

Conclusion

Our developed method to predict the risk of scoliosis progression in AIS by using a DCNN could be a valuable tool in decision-making for therapeutic interventions for AIS.

The Effect of Bracing on Spinopelvic Rotation and Psychosocial Parameters in Adolescents with Idiopathic Scoliosis

Study Design

Retrospective study.

Purpose

To evaluate the effect of bracing on spinopelvic rotation and psychosocial parameters in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

Overview of Literature

Complex three-dimensional deformity in AIS is proposed to influence the spinopelvic parameters and psychosocial condition in adolescents; however, few studies have quantitatively evaluated these parameters.

Methods

Thirty AIS who were prescribed a brace were included in the study. The patients’ standing postero-anterior and total spine radiographs were used to measure the primary curve Cobb angle, vertebral rotation, and pelvic rotation. Apical vertebral rotation (AVR), upper AVR, and lower AVR were measured using the Nash-Moe method. Pelvic rotation was determined using the left-to-right hemipelvic width ratio. The curve pattern was classified as per the Lenke classification system. In all, 14 patients had a type I curve, five had type II, six had type III, one had type IV, and four had type V curves. Brace compliance was subjectively evaluated by interviewing the patients and their parents. The health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and stress level of the recruited patients were assessed using the Brace Questionnaire and Bad Sobernheim Stress Questionnaire, respectively.

Results

The Cobb angle significantly decreased with at least 6 months of brace use. AVR correction changed significantly; however, no such results were observed for upper and lower AVR. Pelvic rotation and psychosocial parameters were not significantly affected by brace use. No statistically significant correlation was observed between brace compliance and curve correction.

Conclusions

The Cobb angle and AVR are crucial measurements that help evaluate the treatment efficacy in AIS with small curves who undergo brace treatment. HRQOL and pelvic axial rotation are not influenced by the brace treatment.