Preoperative laboratory testing before pediatric neurosurgery: an NSQIP-Pediatrics analysis

Medical History and Preoperative Coagulation Profile as Predictors of Outcomes in Elective Spinal Surgery: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

In patients with unremarkable medical history, comprehensive preoperative hemostasis screening in elective neurosurgery remains debated. Comprehensive medical history has shown to be noninferior to coagulation profile to evaluate surgical outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the predictiveness of preoperative coagulation screening and medical history for surgical outcomes.

METHODS

Databases were searched until April 2023 for observational cohort studies that reported preoperative hemostasis screening and clinical history prior to elective neurosurgical procedures. Outcomes of interest included postoperative transfusion, mortality, and complications. Pooled relative risk ratios (RRs) were analyzed using random-effects models.

RESULTS

Out of 604 studies, 3 cohort studies met our inclusion criteria, adding a patient population of 83,076. Prolonged partial thromboplastin time (PTT; RR=1.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] =1.14, 1.77, P=0.002), elevated international normalized ratio (INR; RR=2.01, 95% CI=1.14, 3.55, P=0.02), low platelet count (RR=1.58, 95% CI=1.34, 1.86, P<0.00001), and positive bleeding history (RR=2.14, 95% CI=1.16, 3.93, P=0.01) were associated with postoperative transfusion risk. High PTT (RR=2.42, 95% CI=1.24, 4.73, P=0.010), High INR (RR=8.15, 95% CI=5.97, 11.13; P<0.00001), low platelet count (RR=4.89, 95% CI=3.73, 6.41, P<0.00001), and bleeding history (RR=7.59, 95% CI=5.84, 9.86, P<0.00001) were predictive of mortality. Prolonged PTT (RR=1.53, 95% CI=1.25, 1.86, P=<0.0001), a high INR (RR=3.41, 95% CI=2.63, 4.42, P=< 0.00001), low platelets (RR=1.63, 95% CI=1.40, 1.90, P=<0.00001), and medical history (RR=2.15, 95% CI=1.71, 2.71, P=<0.00001) were predictive of complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Medical history was a noninferior predictor to coagulation profile for postoperative transfusion, mortality, and complications. However, our findings are mostly representative of elective spinal procedures. Cost-effective alternatives should be explored to promote affordable patient care in patients with unremarkable history.

A Protocol for Reducing Intensive Care Utilization After Craniotomy: A 3-Year Assessment

BACKGROUND

Craniotomy patients have traditionally received intensive care unit (ICU) care postoperatively. Our institution developed the "Non-Intensive CarE" (NICE) protocol to identify craniotomy patients who did not require postoperative ICU care.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the longitudinal impact of the NICE protocol on postoperative length of stay (LOS), ICU utilization, readmissions, and complications.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, our institution's electronic medical record was queried to identify craniotomies before protocol deployment (May 2014-May 2018) and after deployment (May 2018-December 2021). The primary end points were average postoperative LOS and ICU utilization; secondary end points included readmissions, reoperation, and postoperative complications rate. End points were compared between pre- and postintervention cohorts.

RESULTS

Four thousand eight hundred thirty-seven craniotomies were performed from May 2014 to December 2021 (2302 preprotocol and 2535 postprotocol). Twenty-one percent of postprotocol craniotomies were enrolled in the NICE protocol. After protocol deployment, the overall postoperative LOS decreased from 4.0 to 3.5 days ( P = .0031), which was driven by deceased postoperative LOS among protocol patients (average 2.4 days). ICU utilization decreased from 57% of patients to 42% ( P < .0001), generating ∼$760 000 in savings. Return to the ICU and complications decreased after protocol deployment. 5.8% of protocol patients had a readmission within 30 days; none could have been prevented through ICU stay.

CONCLUSION

The NICE protocol is an effective, sustainable method to increase ICU bed availability and decrease costs without changing outcomes. To our knowledge, this study features the largest series of patients enrolling in an ICU utilization reduction protocol. Careful patient selection is a requirement for the success of this approach.

Postoperative Outcomes in Diabetic Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgery Patients: A National Database Study

BACKGROUND

Although the negative effects of diabetes mellitus (DM) on operative outcomes in orthopaedic surgery is a well-studied topic in adults, little is known about the impact of this disease in children undergoing orthopaedic procedures. This study aims to describe the postoperative complications in pediatric orthopaedic surgery patients with DM.

METHODS

Pediatric patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) were retrospectively identified while selecting for elective orthopaedic surgery cases from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric (ACS-NSQIP-Pediatric) database from 2012 to 2015. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to describe and assess outcomes when compared with nondiabetic patients undergoing similar procedures.

RESULTS

Of the 17,647 patients identified, 105 (0.60%) had DM. Of those 105 patients, 68 had IDDM and 37 had NIDDM. The median age of DM patients was 13.8 years (11.9 to 15.5 y) and 37.1% of all DM patients were male. Comparing DM to non-DM patients, no significant differences were noted in the overall complications (1.4% vs. 1.9%, P>0.05) or reoperation rates (1.2% vs. 1.9%, P>0.05); however, DM patients did have a higher occurrence of unplanned readmissions (4.8% vs. 1.7%; P=0.037). Diabetic patients were statistically more likely to have an unplanned readmission with 30 days (adjusted odds ratio=3.34; 95% confidence interval=1.21-9.24, P=0.021). when comparing IDDM to NIDDM, there was no significant difference in outcomes. Comparing NIDDM to non-DM patients, there was an increased incidence of nerve injury (5.6% vs. 0.18%; P=0.023), readmission rate (11.1% vs. 1.8%; P=0.043), and reoperation rate (11.1% vs. 1%; P=0.013) in nonspinal procedures and an increased incidence of pulmonary embolism (10% vs. 0%; P=0.002) in spinal arthrodesis procedures. NIDDM predicted longer hospital stays (adjusted odds ratio=1.49; 95% confidence interval=1.04, 2.14; P=0.028) compared with nondiabetic patients in extremity deformity procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

The 30-day complication, reoperation, and readmission rates for NIDDM patients were higher than that of non-DM patients. Furthermore, NIDDM is a predictor of longer hospital stays while DM is a predictor of unplanned readmissions. No statistical differences were noted when comparing outcomes of NIDDM to IDDM patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.