In vitro and in vivo testing of a novel local nicardipine delivery system to the brain: a preclinical study

Localized Nicardipine Release Implants for Prevention of Vasospasm After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Cerebral vasospasm largely contributes to a devastating outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), with limited therapeutic options.

Objective

To investigate the safety and efficacy of localized nicardipine release implants positioned around the basal cerebral vasculature at risk for developing proximal vasospasm after aSAH.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This single-masked randomized clinical trial with a 52-week follow-up was performed between April 5, 2020, and January 23, 2023, at 6 academic neurovascular centers in Germany and Austria. Consecutive patients with World Federation of Neurological Surgeons grade 3 or 4 aSAH due to a ruptured anterior circulation aneurysm requiring microsurgical aneurysm repair participated.

Intervention

During aneurysm repair, patients were randomized 1:1 to intraoperatively receive 10 implants at 4 mg of nicardipine each plus standard of care (implant group) or aneurysm repair alone plus standard of care (control group).

Main Outcome and Measures

The primary end point was the incidence of moderate to severe cerebral angiographic vasospasm (aVS) between days 7 and 9 after aneurysm rupture as determined by digital subtraction angiography.

Results

Of 41 patients, 20 were randomized to the control group (mean [SD] age, 54.9 [9.1] years; 17 female [85%]) and 21 to the implant group (mean [SD] age, 53.6 [11.9] years; 14 female [67%]). A total of 39 patients were included in the primary efficacy analysis. In the control group, 11 of 19 patients (58%) developed moderate or severe aVS compared with 4 of 20 patients (20%) in the implant group (P = .02). This outcome was paralleled by a lower clinical need for vasospasm rescue therapy in the implant group (2 of 20 patients [10%]) compared with the control group (11 of 19 patients [58%]; P = .002). Between days 13 and 15 after aneurysm rupture, new cerebral infarcts were noted in 6 of 19 patients (32%) in the control group and in 2 of 20 patients (10%) in the implant group (P = .13). At 52 weeks, favorable outcomes were noted in 12 of 18 patients (67%) in the control group and 16 of 19 patients (84%) in the implant group (P = .27). The adverse event rate did not differ between groups.

Conclusions and Relevance

These findings show that placing nicardipine release implants during microsurgical aneurysm repair can provide safe and effective prevention of moderate to severe aVS after aSAH. A phase 3 clinical trial to investigate the effect of nicardipine implants on clinical outcome may be warranted.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04269408.

A randomized, single ascending dose safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics study of NicaPlant® in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients undergoing clipping

Introduction

Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Post-hemorrhagic vasospasm with neurological deterioration is a major concern in this context. NicaPlant®, a modified release formulation of the calcium channel blocker nicardipine, has shown vasodilator efficacy preclinically and a similar formulation known as NPRI has shown anti-vasospasm activity in aSAH patients under compassionate use.

Research question

The study aimed to assess pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of NicaPlant® pellets to prevent vasospasm after clip ligation in aSAH.

Material and methods

In this multicenter, controlled, randomized, dose escalation trial we assessed the safety and tolerability of NicaPlant®. aSAH patients treated by clipping were randomized to receive up to 13 NicaPlant® implants, similarly to the dose of NPRIs previous used, or standard of care treatment.

Results

Ten patients across four dose groups were treated with NicaPlant® (3-13 implants) while four patients received standard of care. 45 non-serious and 13 serious adverse events were reported, 4 non-serious adverse events and 5 serious adverse events assessed a probable or possible causal relationship to the investigational medical product. Across the NicaPlant® groups there was 1 case of moderate vasospasm, while in the standard of care group there were 2 cases of severe vasospasm.

Discussion and conclusion

The placement of NicaPlant® during clip ligation of a ruptured cerebral aneurysm raised no safety concern. The dose of 10 NicaPlant® implants was selected for further clinical studies.

Inflammation and immune cell abnormalities in intracranial aneurysm subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH): Relevant signaling pathways and therapeutic strategies

Intracranial aneurysm subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a cerebrovascular disorder associated with high overall mortality. Currently, the underlying mechanisms of pathological reaction after aneurysm rupture are still unclear, especially in the immune microenvironment, inflammation, and relevant signaling pathways. SAH-induced immune cell population alteration, immune inflammatory signaling pathway activation, and active substance generation are associated with pro-inflammatory cytokines, immunosuppression, and brain injury. Crosstalk between immune disorders and hyperactivation of inflammatory signals aggravated the devastating consequences of brain injury and cerebral vasospasm and increased the risk of infection. In this review, we discussed the role of inflammation and immune cell responses in the occurrence and development of aneurysm SAH, as well as the most relevant immune inflammatory signaling pathways [PI3K/Akt, extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α), STAT, SIRT, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), NLRP3, TLR4/nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB), and Keap1/nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 (Nrf2)/ARE cascades] and biomarkers in aneurysm SAH. In addition, we also summarized potential therapeutic drugs targeting the aneurysm SAH immune inflammatory responses, such as nimodipine, dexmedetomidine (DEX), fingolimod, and genomic variation-related aneurysm prophylactic agent sunitinib. The intervention of immune inflammatory responses and immune microenvironment significantly reduces the secondary brain injury, thereby improving the prognosis of patients admitted to SAH. Future studies should focus on exploring potential immune inflammatory mechanisms and developing additional therapeutic strategies for precise aneurysm SAH immune inflammatory regulation and genomic variants associated with aneurysm formation.

Brain Oxygen-Directed Management of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Temporal Patterns of Cerebral Ischemia During Acute Brain Attack, Early Brain Injury, and Territorial Sonographic Vasospasm

BACKGROUND

Neurocritical management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage focuses on delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) after aneurysm repair.

METHODS

This study conceptualizes the pathophysiology of cerebral ischemia and its management using a brain oxygen-directed protocol (intracranial pressure [ICP] control, eubaric hyperoxia, hemodynamic therapy, arterial vasodilation, and neuroprotection) in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, undergoing aneurysm clipping (n = 40).

RESULTS

The brain oxygen-directed protocol reduced Lbo₂ (Pbto₂ [partial pressure of brain tissue oxygen] <20 mm Hg) from 67% to 15% during acute brain attack (<24 hours of ictus), by increasing Pbto₂ from 11.31 ± 9.34 to 27.85 ± 6.76 (P < 0.0001) and then to 29.09 ± 17.88 within 72 hours. Day-after-bleed, Fio₂ change, ICP, hemoglobin, and oxygen saturation were predictors for Pbto₂ during early brain injury. Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography velocities (>20 cm/second) increased at day 2. During DCI caused by territorial sonographic vasospasm (TSV), middle cerebral artery mean velocity (V_m) increased from 45.00 ± 15.12 to 80.37 ± 38.33/second by day 4 with concomitant Pbto₂ reduction from 29.09 ± 17.88 to 22.66 ± 8.19. Peak TSV (days 7-12) coincided with decline in Pbto₂. Nicardipine mitigated Lbo₂ during peak TSV, in contrast to nimodipine, with survival benefit (P < 0.01). Intravenous and cisternal nicardipine combination had survival benefit (Cramer Φ = 0.43 and 0.327; G² = 28.32; P < 0.001). This study identifies 4 zones of Lbo₂ during survival benefit (Cramer Φ = 0.43 and 0.3) TSV, uncompensated; global cerebral ischemia, compensated, and normal Pbto₂. Admission Glasgow Coma Scale score (not increased ICP) was predictive of low Pbto₂ (β = 0.812, R² = 0.661, F_1,30 = 58.41; P < 0.0001) during early brain injury. Coma was the only credible predictor for mortality (odds ratio, 7.33/>4.8∗; χ² = 7.556; confidence interval, 1.70-31.54; P < 0.01) followed by basilar aneurysm, poor grade, high ICP and Lbo₂ during TSV. Global cerebral ischemia occurs immediately after the ictus, persisting in 30% of patients despite the high therapeutic intensity level, superimposed by DCI during TSV.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose implications for clinical practice and patient management to minimize cerebral ischemia.

A Narrative Review on Translational Research in Acute Brain Injury

There has been a constant endeavor to reduce the mortality and morbidity associated with acute brain injury. The associated complex mechanisms involving biomechanics, markers, and neuroprotective drugs/measures have been extensively studied in preclinical studies with an ultimate aim to improve the patients' outcomes. Despite such efforts, only few have been successfully translated into clinical practice. In this review, we shall be discussing the major hurdles in the translation of preclinical results into clinical practice. The need is to choose an appropriate animal model, keeping in mind the species, age, and gender of the animal, choosing suitable outcome measures, ensuring quality of animal trials, and carrying out systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies before proceeding to human trials. The interdisciplinary collaboration between the preclinical and clinical scientists will help to design better, meaningful trials which might help a long way in successful translation. Although challenging at this stage, the advent of translational precision medicine will help the integration of mechanism-centric translational medicine and patient-centric precision medicine.

Nicardipine Prolonged Release Implants for Prevention of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia after Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

A paucity of treatments to prevent delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) has stymied recovery after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Nicardipine has long been recognized as a potent cerebrovascular vasodilator with a history off-label use to prevent vasospasm and DCI. Multiple centers have developed nicardipine prolonged release implants (NPRI) that are directly applied during clip ligation to locally deliver nicardipine throughout the vasospasm window. Here we perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess whether NPRI confers protection against DCI and improves functional outcomes after aSAH.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Ovid Embase, and Cochrane databases was performed for studies reporting the use of NPRI after aSAH published after January 1, 1980. We included all studies assessing the association of NPRI with DCI and or functional outcomes. Findings from studies with control arms were analyzed using a random effects model. A separate network meta-analysis was performed, including controlled NPRI studies, single-arm NPRI reports, and the control-arms of modern aSAH randomized clinical trials as additional comparators.

RESULTS

The search identified 214 unique citations. Three studies with 284 patients met criteria for the random effects model. The pooled summary odds ratio for the association of NPRI and DCI was 0.21 (95% CI 0.09-0.49, p = 0.0002) with no difference in functional outcomes (OR 1.80, 95% CI 0.63 - 5.16, p = 0.28). 10 studies of 866 patients met criteria for the network meta-analysis. The pooled summary odds ratio for the association of NPRI and DCI was 0.30 (95% CI 0.13-0.89,p = 0.017) with a trend towards improved functional outcomes (OR 1.68, 0.63 - 4.13 95% CI, p = 0.101).

CONCLUSIONS

In these meta-analyses, NPRI decreases the incidence of DCI with a non-significant trend towards improvement in functional outcomes. Randomized trials on the role of intrathecal calcium channel blockers are warranted to evaluate these observations in a prospective manner.

Imaging the Neuroimmune Dynamics Across Space and Time

The immune system is essential for maintaining homeostasis, as well as promoting growth and healing throughout the brain and body. Considering that immune cells respond rapidly to changes in their microenvironment, they are very difficult to study without affecting their structure and function. The advancement of non-invasive imaging methods greatly contributed to elucidating the physiological roles performed by immune cells in the brain across stages of the lifespan and contexts of health and disease. For instance, techniques like two-photon in vivo microscopy were pivotal for studying microglial functional dynamics in the healthy brain. Through these observations, their interactions with neurons, astrocytes, blood vessels and synapses were uncovered. High-resolution electron microscopy with immunostaining and 3D-reconstruction, as well as super-resolution fluorescence microscopy, provided complementary insights by revealing microglial interventions at synapses (phagocytosis, trogocytosis, synaptic stripping, etc.). In addition, serial block-face scanning electron microscopy has provided the first 3D reconstruction of a microglial cell at nanoscale resolution. This review will discuss the technical toolbox that currently allows to study microglia and other immune cells in the brain, as well as introduce emerging methods that were developed and could be used to increase the spatial and temporal resolution of neuroimmune imaging. A special attention will also be placed on positron emission tomography and the development of selective functional radiotracers for microglia and peripheral macrophages, considering their strong potential for research translation between animals and humans, notably when paired with other imaging modalities such as magnetic resonance imaging.

Twelve-year single critical care center experience of nicardipine prolonged-release implants in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage: a propensity score matching analysis

OBJECTIVE

To develop a nicardipine prolonged-release implant (NPRI) to prevent cerebral vasospasm in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage in 1999, which may be used during craniotomy, and report the results of our recent 12-year single critical care center experience.

METHODS

Of 432 patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage treated between 2007 and 2019, 291 were enrolled. 97 Patients were aged >70 years (33%), 194 were female (67%), 138 were World Federation of Neurological Societies grades 1, 2, and 3 (47%), 218 were Fisher group 3 (75%), and 243 had an anterior circulation aneurysm (84%). Using a propensity score matching method for these five factors, the severity of cerebral vasospasm, occurrence of delayed cerebral infarction, and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at discharge were analyzed.

RESULTS

One hundred patients each with or without NPRI were selected, and the ratios of coil/clip were 0/100 and 88/12, respectively. Cerebral vasospasm and delayed cerebral infarction were both significantly less common in the NPRI group (p=0.004, OR=0.412 (95% CI 0.223 to 0.760) and p=0.005, OR=0.272 (95% CI 0.103 to 0.714, respectively); a significant difference was seen in the mRS score at discharge by Fisher's exact test (p=0.0025). A mRS score of 6 (dead) was less common in the group with NPRI, and mRS scores of 0 and 1 were also less common. No side effects were seen.

CONCLUSIONS

NPRIs significantly reduced the occurrence of cerebral vasospasm and delayed cerebral infraction without any side effects. The NPRI and non-NPRI groups showed different patterns of short-term outcomes in the single critical care center, which might have been due to selection bias and patient characteristics. Differences in outcomes may become clear in comparisons with patients treated by craniotomy.