1
|
Salama H, Salama A, Oscher L, Jallo GI, Shimony N. The role of neuromodulation in the management of drug-resistant epilepsy. Neurol Sci 2024; 45:4243-4268. [PMID: 38642321 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-024-07513-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024]
Abstract
Drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) poses significant challenges in terms of effective management and seizure control. Neuromodulation techniques have emerged as promising solutions for individuals who are unresponsive to pharmacological treatments, especially for those who are not good surgical candidates for surgical resection or laser interstitial therapy (LiTT). Currently, there are three neuromodulation techniques that are FDA-approved for the management of DRE. These include vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation (DBS), and responsive neurostimulation (RNS). Device selection, optimal time, and DBS and RNS target selection can also be challenging. In general, the number and localizability of the epileptic foci, alongside the comorbidities manifested by the patients, substantially influence the selection process. In the past, the general axiom was that DBS and VNS can be used for generalized and localized focal seizures, while RNS is typically reserved for patients with one or two highly localized epileptic foci, especially if they are in eloquent areas of the brain. Nowadays, with the advance in our understanding of thalamic involvement in DRE, RNS is also very effective for general non-focal epilepsy. In this review, we will discuss the underlying mechanisms of action, patient selection criteria, and the evidence supporting the use of each technique. Additionally, we explore emerging technologies and novel approaches in neuromodulation, such as closed-loop systems. Moreover, we examine the challenges and limitations associated with neuromodulation therapies, including adverse effects, complications, and the need for further long-term studies. This comprehensive review aims to provide valuable insights on present and future use of neuromodulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- HusamEddin Salama
- Al-Quds University-School of Medicine, Abu Dis, Jerusalem, Palestine
| | - Ahmed Salama
- Al-Quds University-School of Medicine, Abu Dis, Jerusalem, Palestine
| | - Logan Oscher
- Department of Neurosurgery, Institute for Brain Protection Sciences, Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital, 600 5th Street South, St. Petersburg, FL, 33701, USA
| | - George I Jallo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Institute for Brain Protection Sciences, Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital, 600 5th Street South, St. Petersburg, FL, 33701, USA.
| | - Nir Shimony
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Surgery, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
- Le Bonheur Neuroscience Institute, Le Bonheur Children's Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
- Semmes-Murphey Clinic, Memphis, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Samanta D, Aungaroon G, Albert GW, Karakas C, Joshi CN, Singh RK, Oluigbo C, Perry MS, Naik S, Reeders PC, Jain P, Abel TJ, Pati S, Shaikhouni A, Haneef Z. Advancing thalamic neuromodulation in epilepsy: Bridging adult data to pediatric care. Epilepsy Res 2024; 205:107407. [PMID: 38996686 DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2024] [Revised: 06/27/2024] [Accepted: 07/01/2024] [Indexed: 07/14/2024]
Abstract
Thalamic neuromodulation has emerged as a treatment option for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) with widespread and/or undefined epileptogenic networks. While deep brain stimulation (DBS) and responsive neurostimulation (RNS) depth electrodes offer means for electrical stimulation of the thalamus in adult patients with DRE, the application of thalamic neuromodulation in pediatric epilepsy remains limited. To address this gap, the Neuromodulation Expert Collaborative was established within the Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium (PERC) Epilepsy Surgery Special Interest Group. In this expert review, existing evidence and recommendations for thalamic neuromodulation modalities using DBS and RNS are summarized, with a focus on the anterior (ANT), centromedian(CMN), and pulvinar nuclei of the thalamus. To-date, only DBS of the ANT is FDA approved for treatment of DRE in adult patients based on the results of the pivotal SANTE (Stimulation of the Anterior Nucleus of Thalamus for Epilepsy) study. Evidence for other thalamic neurmodulation indications and targets is less abundant. Despite the lack of evidence, positive responses to thalamic stimulation in adults with DRE have led to its off-label use in pediatric patients. Although caution is warranted due to differences between pediatric and adult epilepsy, the efficacy and safety of pediatric neuromodulation appear comparable to that in adults. Indeed, CMN stimulation is increasingly accepted for generalized and diffuse onset epilepsies, with recent completion of one randomized trial. There is also growing interest in using pulvinar stimulation for temporal plus and posterior quadrant epilepsies with one ongoing clinical trial in Europe. The future of thalamic neuromodulation holds promise for revolutionizing the treatment landscape of childhood epilepsy. Ongoing research, technological advancements, and collaborative efforts are poised to refine and improve thalamic neuromodulation strategies, ultimately enhancing the quality of life for children with DRE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debopam Samanta
- Division of Child Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
| | - Gewalin Aungaroon
- Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Division of Neurology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Gregory W Albert
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, USA
| | - Cemal Karakas
- Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Neurology, Norton Children's Hospital, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA
| | - Charuta N Joshi
- Division of Pediatric Neurology, Childrens Medical Center Dallas, UTSW, USA
| | - Rani K Singh
- Department of Pediatrics, Atrium Health-Levine Children's; Wake Forest University School of Medicine, USA
| | - Chima Oluigbo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - M Scott Perry
- Jane and John Justin Institute for Mind Health, Cook Children's Medical Center, Ft Worth, TX, USA
| | - Sunil Naik
- Department of Pediatrics and Neurology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA 17033, USA
| | - Puck C Reeders
- Brain Institute, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Puneet Jain
- Epilepsy Program, Division of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Taylor J Abel
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh
| | - Sandipan Pati
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, USA
| | - Ammar Shaikhouni
- Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Zulfi Haneef
- Neurology Care Line, VA Medical Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Macdonald-Laurs E, Dzau W, Warren AEL, Coleman M, Mignone C, Stephenson SEM, Howell KB. Identification and treatment of surgically-remediable causes of infantile epileptic spasms syndrome. Expert Rev Neurother 2024; 24:661-680. [PMID: 38814860 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2024.2360117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2024] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Infantile epileptic spasms syndrome (IESS) is a common developmental and epileptic encephalopathy with poor long-term outcomes. A substantial proportion of patients with IESS have a potentially surgically remediable etiology. Despite this, epilepsy surgery is underutilized in this patient group. Some surgically remediable etiologies, such as focal cortical dysplasia and malformation of cortical development with oligodendroglial hyperplasia in epilepsy (MOGHE), are under-diagnosed in infants and young children. Even when a surgically remediable etiology is recognised, for example, tuberous sclerosis or focal encephalomalacia, epilepsy surgery may be delayed or not considered due to diffuse EEG changes, unclear surgical boundaries, or concerns about operating in this age group. AREAS COVERED In this review, the authors discuss the common surgically remediable etiologies of IESS, their clinical and EEG features, and the imaging techniques that can aid in their diagnosis. They then describe the surgical approaches used in this patient group, and the beneficial impact that early epilepsy surgery can have on developing brain networks. EXPERT OPINION Epilepsy surgery remains underutilized even when a potentially surgically remediable cause is recognized. Overcoming the barriers that result in under-recognition of surgical candidates and underutilization of epilepsy surgery in IESS will improve long-term seizure and developmental outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Macdonald-Laurs
- Department of Neurology, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Neurosciences Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Winston Dzau
- Neurosciences Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Aaron E L Warren
- Department of Medicine (Austin Health), The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Matthew Coleman
- Neurosciences Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Cristina Mignone
- Department of Medical Imaging, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Sarah E M Stephenson
- Neurosciences Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Katherine B Howell
- Department of Neurology, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Neurosciences Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dabrowski A, Armstrong C. A pediatrician's guide to epilepsy surgery. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care 2024; 54:101578. [PMID: 38485613 PMCID: PMC11223955 DOI: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2024.101578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/06/2024]
Abstract
Surgical intervention for epilepsy emerged in the second half of the 20th century as an important option for pediatric patients with medically refractory epilepsy. Both the number of patients undergoing epilepsy surgery and the available surgical procedures for epilepsy have expanded in the last 3 decades, and now range from surgical resection to neuromodulatory device placement1,2 Studies showing that many patients who would be excellent candidates for surgery are still not being offered appropriate interventions have prompted an interest in ensuring that all providers who see patients with epilepsy are aware of the options for epilepsy surgery to facilitate earlier referrals when medications have not been effective3 In this article, we will introduce the pediatrician to the process involved in determining epilepsy surgery candidacy and to surgical outcomes, with the goal of empowering pediatric providers to refer their medically refractory epilepsy patients to a pediatric epilepsy center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ania Dabrowski
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Division of Neurology, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Caren Armstrong
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Division of Neurology, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bonda D, Kelly KA, Boop S, Feroze AH, Randle SC, Bindschadler M, Marashly A, Owens J, Lockrow J, Bozarth X, Novotny E, Friedman S, Goldstein HE, Grannan BL, Durfy S, Ojemann JG, Ko AL, Hauptman JS. Deep Brain Stimulation of Bilateral Centromedian Thalamic Nuclei in Pediatric Patients with Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome: An Institutional Experience. World Neurosurg 2024; 185:e631-e639. [PMID: 38403017 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.02.099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Revised: 02/16/2024] [Accepted: 02/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical management of pediatric patients with nonlesional, drug-resistant epilepsy, including patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS), remains a challenge given the lack of resective targets in most patients and shows seizure freedom rates <50% at 5 years. The efficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) is less certain in children than in adults. This study examined clinical and seizure outcomes for pediatric patients with LGS undergoing DBS targeting of the centromedian thalamic nuclei (CMTN). METHODS An institutional review board-approved retrospective analysis was performed of patients aged ≤19 years with clinical diagnosis of LGS undergoing bilateral DBS placement to the CMTN from 2020 to 2021 by a single surgeon. RESULTS Four females and 2 males aged 6-19 years were identified. Before surgery, each child experienced at least 6 years of refractory seizures; 4 children had experienced seizures since infancy. All took antiseizure medications at the time of surgery. Five children had previous placement of a vagus nerve stimulator and 2 had a previous corpus callosotomy. The mean length of stay after DBS was 2 days. No children experienced adverse neurologic effects from implantation; the mean follow-up time was 16.3 months. Four patients had >60% reduction in seizure frequency after surgery, 1 patient experienced 10% reduction, and 1 patient showed no change. No children reported worsening seizure symptoms after surgery. CONCLUSIONS Our study contributes to the sparse literature describing CMTN DBS for children with drug-resistant epilepsy from LGS. Our results suggest that CMTN DBS is a safe and effective therapeutic modality that should be considered as an alternative or adjuvant therapy for this challenging patient population. Further studies with larger patient populations are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Bonda
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA; Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA; Division of Pediatric Neurology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Katherine A Kelly
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Scott Boop
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Abdullah H Feroze
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Stephanie C Randle
- Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA; Division of Pediatric Neurology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Mike Bindschadler
- Center for Respiratory Therapy and Biologics, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Ahmad Marashly
- Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA; Division of Pediatric Neurology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - James Owens
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Neurology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Jason Lockrow
- Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA; Division of Pediatric Neurology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Xiuhua Bozarth
- Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA; Division of Pediatric Neurology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Edward Novotny
- Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA; Division of Pediatric Neurology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA; Neurosciences Center, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Seth Friedman
- Center for Respiratory Therapy and Biologics, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Hannah E Goldstein
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA; Neurosciences Center, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA; Division of Neurosurgery, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Benjamin L Grannan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Sharon Durfy
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jeffrey G Ojemann
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA; Neurosciences Center, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA; Division of Neurosurgery, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Andrew L Ko
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jason S Hauptman
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA; Neurosciences Center, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA; Division of Neurosurgery, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gouveia FV, Warsi NM, Suresh H, Matin R, Ibrahim GM. Neurostimulation treatments for epilepsy: Deep brain stimulation, responsive neurostimulation and vagus nerve stimulation. Neurotherapeutics 2024; 21:e00308. [PMID: 38177025 PMCID: PMC11103217 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurot.2023.e00308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Revised: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Epilepsy is a common and debilitating neurological disorder, and approximately one-third of affected individuals have ongoing seizures despite appropriate trials of two anti-seizure medications. This population with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) may benefit from neurostimulation approaches, such as vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation (DBS) and responsive neurostimulation (RNS). In some patient populations, these techniques are FDA-approved for treating DRE. VNS is used as adjuvant therapy for children and adults. Acting via the vagus afferent network, VNS modulates thalamocortical circuits, reducing seizures in approximately 50 % of patients. RNS uses an adaptive (closed-loop) system that records intracranial EEG patterns to activate the stimulation at the appropriate time, being particularly well-suited to treat seizures arising within eloquent cortex. For DBS, the most promising therapeutic targets are the anterior and centromedian nuclei of the thalamus, with anterior nucleus DBS being used for treating focal and secondarily generalized forms of DRE and centromedian nucleus DBS being applied for treating generalized epilepsies such as Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Here, we discuss the indications, advantages and limitations of VNS, DBS and RNS in treating DRE and summarize the spatial distribution of neuroimaging observations related to epilepsy and stimulation using NeuroQuery and NeuroSynth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nebras M Warsi
- Neuroscience and Mental Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Neurosurgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Hrishikesh Suresh
- Neuroscience and Mental Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Neurosurgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Rafi Matin
- Neuroscience and Mental Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - George M Ibrahim
- Neuroscience and Mental Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Neurosurgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mertens A, Boon P, Vonck K. Neurostimulation for childhood epilepsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 2024; 66:440-444. [PMID: 37448317 DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.15692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023]
Abstract
The experience with neurostimulation for childhood epilepsy is far less extensive than for adults. Nevertheless, the implementation of these techniques could be of great value, especially considering the detrimental effects of ongoing seizures on the developing brain. In this review, we discuss the available evidence for neurostimulation for childhood epilepsy. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is the most studied neurostimulation modality in children. Based on mostly retrospective, open-label studies, we can conclude that VNS has a similar safety and efficacy profile in children compared to adults. Although there is little available evidence for deep brain stimulation (DBS) and responsive neurostimulation (RNS) in children, both DBS and RNS show promise in reducing seizure frequency with few complications. The implementation of non-invasive techniques with a more appealing safety profile has gained interest. Small randomized control trials and open-label studies have investigated transcranial direct current simulation for childhood epilepsy, demonstrating promising but inconsistent findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann Mertens
- Department of Neurology, 4Brain, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Paul Boon
- Department of Neurology, 4Brain, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Kristl Vonck
- Department of Neurology, 4Brain, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Li X, Liu H, Zhang T. Resting-state functional MRI study of conventional MRI-negative intractable epilepsy in children. Front Hum Neurosci 2024; 18:1337294. [PMID: 38510512 PMCID: PMC10951396 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1337294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective The study aimed at investigating functional connectivity strength (FCS) changes in children with MRI-negative intractable epilepsy (ITE) and evaluating correlations between aberrant FCS and both disease duration and intelligence quotient (IQ). Methods Fifteen children with ITE, 24 children with non-intractable epilepsy (nITE) and 25 matched healthy controls (HCs) were subjected to rs-fMRI. IQ was evaluated by neuropsychological assessment. Voxelwise analysis of covariance was conducted in the whole brain, and then pairwise comparisons were made across three groups using Bonferroni corrections. Results FCS was significantly different among three groups. Relative to HCs, ITE patients exhibited decreased FCS in right temporal pole of the superior temporal gyrus, middle temporal gyrus, bilateral precuneus, etc and increased FCS values in left triangular part of the inferior frontal gyrus, parahippocampal gyrus, supplementary motor area, caudate and right calcarine fissure and surrounding cortex and midbrain. The nITE patients presented decreased FCS in right orbital superior frontal gyrus, precuneus etc and increased FCS in bilateral fusiform gyri, parahippocampal gyri, etc. In comparison to nITE patients, the ITE patients presented decreased FCS in right medial superior frontal gyrus and left inferior temporal gyrus and increased FCS in right middle temporal gyrus, inferior temporal gyrus and calcarine fissure and surrounding cortex. Correlation analysis indicated that FCS in left caudate demonstrated correlation with verbal IQ (VIQ) and disease duration. Conclusion ITE patients demonstrated changed FCS values in the temporal and prefrontal cortices relative to nITE patients, which may be related to drug resistance in epilepsy. FCS in the left caudate nucleus associated with VIQ, suggesting the caudate may become a key target for improving cognitive impairment and seizures in children with ITE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Heng Liu
- Department of Radiology, Medical Imaging Center, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China
| | - Tijiang Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Medical Imaging Center, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sharma A, Parfyonov M, Tiefenbach J, Hogue O, Nero N, Jehi L, Serletis D, Bingaman W, Gupta A, Rammo R. Predictors of therapeutic response following thalamic neuromodulation for drug-resistant pediatric epilepsy: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. Epilepsia 2024; 65:542-555. [PMID: 38265348 DOI: 10.1111/epi.17883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Revised: 12/02/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2024]
Abstract
We sought to perform a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis to identify predictors of treatment response following thalamic neuromodulation in pediatric patients with medically refractory epilepsy. Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Ovid, Embase, and Cochrane) were searched, with no language or data restriction, to identify studies reporting seizure outcomes in pediatric populations following deep brain stimulation (DBS) or responsive neurostimulation (RNS) implantation in thalamic nuclei. Studies featuring individual participant data of patients with primary or secondary generalized drug-resistant epilepsy were included. Response to therapy was defined as >50% reduction in seizure frequency from baseline. Of 417 citations, 21 articles reporting on 88 participants were eligible. Mean age at implantation was 13.07 ± 3.49 years. Fifty (57%) patients underwent DBS, and 38 (43%) RNS. Sixty (68%) patients were implanted in centromedian nucleus and 23 (26%) in anterior thalamic nucleus, and five (6%) had both targets implanted. Seventy-four (84%) patients were implanted bilaterally. The median time to last follow-up was 12 months (interquartile range = 6.75-26.25). Sixty-nine percent of patients achieved response to treatment. Age, target, modality, and laterality had no significant association with response in univariate logistic regression. Until thalamic neuromodulation gains widespread approval for use in pediatric patients, data on efficacy will continue to be limited to small retrospective cohorts and case series. The inherent bias of these studies can be overcome by using individual participant data. Thalamic neuromodulation appears to be a safe and effective treatment for epilepsy. Larger, prolonged prospective, multicenter studies are warranted to further evaluate the efficacy of DBS over RNS in this patient population where resection for curative intent is not a safe option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akshay Sharma
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Cleveland Clinic Epilepsy Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Maksim Parfyonov
- Cleveland Clinic Epilepsy Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Jakov Tiefenbach
- Center for Neurologic Restoration, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Olivia Hogue
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Neil Nero
- Education Institute, Floyd D. Loop Alumni Library, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Lara Jehi
- Cleveland Clinic Epilepsy Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Demitre Serletis
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Cleveland Clinic Epilepsy Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - William Bingaman
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Cleveland Clinic Epilepsy Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Ajay Gupta
- Cleveland Clinic Epilepsy Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Richard Rammo
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Cleveland Clinic Epilepsy Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Center for Neurologic Restoration, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Warren AEL, Tobochnik S, Chua MMJ, Singh H, Stamm MA, Rolston JD. Neurostimulation for Generalized Epilepsy: Should Therapy be Syndrome-specific? Neurosurg Clin N Am 2024; 35:27-48. [PMID: 38000840 PMCID: PMC10676463 DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2023.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2023]
Abstract
Current applications of neurostimulation for generalized epilepsy use a one-target-fits-all approach that is agnostic to the specific epilepsy syndrome and seizure type being treated. The authors describe similarities and differences between the 2 "archetypes" of generalized epilepsy-Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsy-and review recent neuroimaging evidence for syndrome-specific brain networks underlying seizures. Implications for stimulation targeting and programming are discussed using 5 clinical questions: What epilepsy syndrome does the patient have? What brain networks are involved? What is the optimal stimulation target? What is the optimal stimulation paradigm? What is the plan for adjusting stimulation over time?
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron E L Warren
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Steven Tobochnik
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Melissa M J Chua
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hargunbir Singh
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michaela A Stamm
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - John D Rolston
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Intracranial neuromodulation is an evolving therapy for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is now available as a therapy for patients with DRE and focal-onset seizures in select health care systems; however, there remains a substantial need of efficacy data before DBS can be more widely adopted into routine clinical practice. This review and commentary focuses on a particular shifting paradigm: DBS as a therapy for children with generalized-onset seizures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rory J Piper
- Developmental Neurosciences, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK; Department of Neurosurgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK.
| | - George M Ibrahim
- Division of Neurosurgery, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Martin M Tisdall
- Developmental Neurosciences, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK; Department of Neurosurgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Katlowitz KA, Curry DJ, Weiner HL. Novel Surgical Approaches in Childhood Epilepsy: Laser, Brain Stimulation, and Focused Ultrasound. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg 2024; 49:291-306. [PMID: 38700689 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-42398-7_13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
Pediatric epilepsy has a worldwide prevalence of approximately 1% (Berg et al., Handb Clin Neurol 111:391-398, 2013) and is associated with not only lower quality of life but also long-term deficits in executive function, significant psychosocial stressors, poor cognitive outcomes, and developmental delays (Schraegle and Titus, Epilepsy Behav 62:20-26, 2016; Puka and Smith, Epilepsia 56:873-881, 2015). With approximately one-third of patients resistant to medical control, surgical intervention can offer a cure or palliation to decrease the disease burden and improve neurological development. Despite its potential, epilepsy surgery is drastically underutilized. Even today only 1% of the millions of epilepsy patients are referred annually for neurosurgical evaluation, and the average delay between diagnosis of Drug Resistant Epilepsy (DRE) and surgical intervention is approximately 20 years in adults and 5 years in children (Solli et al., Epilepsia 61:1352-1364, 2020). It is still estimated that only one-third of surgical candidates undergo operative intervention (Pestana Knight et al., Epilepsia 56:375, 2015). In contrast to the stable to declining rates of adult epilepsy surgery (Englot et al., Neurology 78:1200-1206, 2012; Neligan et al., Epilepsia 54:e62-e65, 2013), rates of pediatric surgery are rising (Pestana Knight et al., Epilepsia 56:375, 2015). Innovations in surgical approaches to epilepsy not only minimize potential complications but also expand the definition of a surgical candidate. In this chapter, three alternatives to classical resection are presented. First, laser ablation provides a minimally invasive approach to focal lesions. Next, both central and peripheral nervous system stimulation can interrupt seizure networks without creating permanent lesions. Lastly, focused ultrasound is discussed as a potential new avenue not only for ablation but also modulation of small, deep foci within seizure networks. A better understanding of the potential surgical options can guide patients and providers to explore all treatment avenues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kalman A Katlowitz
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Daniel J Curry
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Howard L Weiner
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ghatan S. Pediatric Neurostimulation and Practice Evolution. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2024; 35:1-15. [PMID: 38000833 DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2023.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2023]
Abstract
Since the late nineteenth century, the prevailing view of epilepsy surgery has been to identify a seizure focus in a medically refractory patient and eradicate it. Sadly, only a select number of the many who suffer from uncontrolled seizures benefit from this approach. With the development of safe, efficient stereotactic methods and targeted surgical therapies that can affect deep structures and modulate broad networks in diverse disorders, epilepsy surgery in children has undergone a paradigmatic evolutionary change. With modern diagnostic techniques such as stereo electroencephalography combined with closed loop neuromodulatory systems, pediatric epilepsy surgery can reach a much broader population of underserved patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saadi Ghatan
- Neurological Surgery Icahn School of Medicine at Mt Sinai, New York, NY 10128, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Piazza MG, Varga G, Welch W, Abel TJ. The Utility of Responsive Neurostimulation for the Treatment of Pediatric Drug-Resistant Epilepsy. Brain Sci 2023; 13:1455. [PMID: 37891823 PMCID: PMC10605851 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13101455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Revised: 10/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) has a strongly negative impact on quality of life, as well as the development of pediatric patients. Surgical treatments have evolved over time, including more invasive craniotomies for resection or disconnection. More recently, neuromodulation techniques have been employed as a less invasive option for patients. Responsive neurostimulation (RNS) is the first closed-loop technology that allows for both treatment and device data collection, which allows for an internal assessment of the efficacy of treatment. This novel technology has been approved in adults and has been used off label in pediatrics. This review seeks to describe this technology, its history, and future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin G. Piazza
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA; (M.G.P.); (G.V.)
| | - Gregory Varga
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA; (M.G.P.); (G.V.)
| | - William Welch
- Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA;
| | - Taylor J. Abel
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA; (M.G.P.); (G.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ghosh S, Sinha JK, Ghosh S, Sharma H, Bhaskar R, Narayanan KB. A Comprehensive Review of Emerging Trends and Innovative Therapies in Epilepsy Management. Brain Sci 2023; 13:1305. [PMID: 37759906 PMCID: PMC10527076 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13091305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Revised: 09/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Epilepsy is a complex neurological disorder affecting millions worldwide, with a substantial number of patients facing drug-resistant epilepsy. This comprehensive review explores innovative therapies for epilepsy management, focusing on their principles, clinical evidence, and potential applications. Traditional antiseizure medications (ASMs) form the cornerstone of epilepsy treatment, but their limitations necessitate alternative approaches. The review delves into cutting-edge therapies such as responsive neurostimulation (RNS), vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), and deep brain stimulation (DBS), highlighting their mechanisms of action and promising clinical outcomes. Additionally, the potential of gene therapies and optogenetics in epilepsy research is discussed, revealing groundbreaking findings that shed light on seizure mechanisms. Insights into cannabidiol (CBD) and the ketogenic diet as adjunctive therapies further broaden the spectrum of epilepsy management. Challenges in achieving seizure control with traditional therapies, including treatment resistance and individual variability, are addressed. The importance of staying updated with emerging trends in epilepsy management is emphasized, along with the hope for improved therapeutic options. Future research directions, such as combining therapies, AI applications, and non-invasive optogenetics, hold promise for personalized and effective epilepsy treatment. As the field advances, collaboration among researchers of natural and synthetic biochemistry, clinicians from different streams and various forms of medicine, and patients will drive progress toward better seizure control and a higher quality of life for individuals living with epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shampa Ghosh
- GloNeuro, Sector 107, Vishwakarma Road, Noida 201301, India
- ICMR—National Institute of Nutrition, Tarnaka, Hyderabad 500007, India
| | | | - Soumya Ghosh
- GloNeuro, Sector 107, Vishwakarma Road, Noida 201301, India
| | | | - Rakesh Bhaskar
- School of Chemical Engineering, Yeungnam University, 280 Daehak-Ro, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk 38541, Republic of Korea
| | - Kannan Badri Narayanan
- School of Chemical Engineering, Yeungnam University, 280 Daehak-Ro, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk 38541, Republic of Korea
- Research Institute of Cell Culture, Yeungnam University, 280 Daehak-Ro, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk 38541, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Fisher RS. Deep brain stimulation of thalamus for epilepsy. Neurobiol Dis 2023; 179:106045. [PMID: 36809846 DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2023.106045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2022] [Revised: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Neuromodulation (neurostimulation) is a relatively new and rapidly growing treatment for refractory epilepsy. Three varieties are approved in the US: vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation (DBS) and responsive neurostimulation (RNS). This article reviews thalamic DBS for epilepsy. Among many thalamic sub-nuclei, DBS for epilepsy has been targeted to the anterior nucleus (ANT), centromedian nucleus (CM), dorsomedial nucleus (DM) and pulvinar (PULV). Only ANT is FDA-approved, based upon a controlled clinical trial. Bilateral stimulation of ANT reduced seizures by 40.5% at three months in the controlled phase (p = .038) and 75% by 5 years in the uncontrolled phase. Side effects related to paresthesias, acute hemorrhage, infection, occasional increased seizures, and usually transient effects on mood and memory. Efficacy was best documented for focal onset seizures in temporal or frontal lobe. CM stimulation may be useful for generalized or multifocal seizures and PULV for posterior limbic seizures. Mechanisms of DBS for epilepsy are largely unknown, but animal work points to changes in receptors, channels, neurotransmitters, synapses, network connectivity and neurogenesis. Personalization of therapies, in terms of connectivity of the seizure onset zone to the thalamic sub- nucleus and individual characteristics of the seizures, might lead to improved efficacy. Many questions remain about DBS, including the best candidates for different types of neuromodulation, the best targets, the best stimulation parameters, how to minimize side effects and how to deliver current noninvasively. Despite the questions, neuromodulation provides useful new opportunities to treat people with refractory seizures not responding to medicines and not amenable to resective surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert S Fisher
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences and Neurosurgery by Courtesy, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, 213 Quarry Road, Room 4865, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bergeron D, Iorio-Morin C, Bonizzato M, Lajoie G, Orr Gaucher N, Racine É, Weil AG. Use of Invasive Brain-Computer Interfaces in Pediatric Neurosurgery: Technical and Ethical Considerations. J Child Neurol 2023; 38:223-238. [PMID: 37116888 PMCID: PMC10226009 DOI: 10.1177/08830738231167736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Revised: 02/11/2023] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/30/2023]
Abstract
Invasive brain-computer interfaces hold promise to alleviate disabilities in individuals with neurologic injury, with fully implantable brain-computer interface systems expected to reach the clinic in the upcoming decade. Children with severe neurologic disabilities, like quadriplegic cerebral palsy or cervical spine trauma, could benefit from this technology. However, they have been excluded from clinical trials of intracortical brain-computer interface to date. In this manuscript, we discuss the ethical considerations related to the use of invasive brain-computer interface in children with severe neurologic disabilities. We first review the technical hardware and software considerations for the application of intracortical brain-computer interface in children. We then discuss ethical issues related to motor brain-computer interface use in pediatric neurosurgery. Finally, based on the input of a multidisciplinary panel of experts in fields related to brain-computer interface (functional and restorative neurosurgery, pediatric neurosurgery, mathematics and artificial intelligence research, neuroengineering, pediatric ethics, and pragmatic ethics), we then formulate initial recommendations regarding the clinical use of invasive brain-computer interfaces in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Bergeron
- Division of Neurosurgery, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | | | - Marco Bonizzato
- Electrical Engineering Department, Polytechnique Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada
- Neuroscience Department and Centre
interdisciplinaire de recherche sur le cerveau et l’apprentissage (CIRCA), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Guillaume Lajoie
- Mathematics and Statistics Department, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada
- Mila - Québec AI Institute, Montréal,
Québec, Canada
| | - Nathalie Orr Gaucher
- Department of Pediatric Emergency
Medicine, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Bureau de l’Éthique clinique, Faculté
de médecine de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Éric Racine
- Pragmatic Research Unit, Institute de
Recherche Clinique de Montréal (IRCM), Montreal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Medicine and Department
of Social and Preventative Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Alexander G. Weil
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department
of Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine (CHUSJ), Département de
Pédiatrie, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Neuroscience, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Brain and Development Research Axis,
CHU Sainte-Justine Research Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Grogan DP, Skelton HM, Fernandez AM, Gutekunst CANE, Gross RE. The laterodorsal tegmentum and seizure regulation: Revisiting the evidence. J Neurosci Res 2023; 101:256-262. [PMID: 36349730 DOI: 10.1002/jnr.25144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Electrical deep brain stimulation (DBS) is now a routine treatment option for patients suffering from medically refractory epilepsy. DBS of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT) has proven to be effective but, despite its success, few patients experience complete cessation of seizure activity. However, improving the therapy is challenging because the mechanism underlying its action remains largely unknown. One angle on improving the effectiveness of ANT stimulation is to better understand the various anatomic regions that send projections to and through this area. Here, the authors utilized a connectomic atlas of the mouse brain to better understand the regions projecting to the ANT and were particularly interested by the presence of robust cholinergic projections from the laterodorsal tegmentum (LDT). A subsequent review of the literature resulted in limited studies, which presented convincing evidence supporting this region's role in seizure control present in acute rodent models of epilepsy. It is thus the purpose of this paper to encourage further research into the role of the LDT on seizure mitigation, with mechanistic effects likely stemming from its cholinergic projections to the ANT. While previous studies have laid a firm foundation supporting the role of this region in modulation of seizure activity, modern scientific methodology has yet to be applied to further elucidate the mechanisms and potential benefits associated with LDT stimulation in the epileptic population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dayton P Grogan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Henry M Skelton
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Alejandra M Fernandez
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Robert E Gross
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Department of Neurology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ali I, Houck KM, Sully K. Neuromodulation in Children with Drug-Resistant Epilepsy. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC EPILEPSY 2023. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1760293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
AbstractThe introduction of neuromodulation was a revolutionary advancement in the antiseizure armamentarium for refractory epilepsy. The basic principle of neuromodulation is to deliver an electrical stimulation to the desired neuronal site to modify the neuronal functions not only at the site of delivery but also at distant sites by complex neuronal processes like disrupting the neuronal circuitry and amplifying the functions of marginally functional neurons. The modality is considered open-loop when electrical stimulation is provided at a set time interval or closed-loop when delivered in response to an incipient seizure. Neuromodulation in individuals older than 18 years with epilepsy has proven efficacious and safe. The use of neuromodulation is extended off-label to pediatric patients with epilepsy and the results are promising. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), responsive neurostimulation (RNS), and deep brain stimulation (DBS) are Food and Drug Administration-approved therapeutic techniques. The VNS provides retrograde signaling to the central nervous system, whereas DBS and RNS are more target specific in the central nervous system. While DBS is open-loop and approved for stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus, the RNS is closed-loop and can stimulate any cortical or subcortical structure. We will review different modalities and their clinical efficacy in individuals with epilepsy, with a focus on pediatric patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irfan Ali
- Section of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Neuroscience, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Kimberly M. Houck
- Section of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Neuroscience, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Krystal Sully
- Section of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Neuroscience, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Almojuela A, Xu Q, O'Carroll A, Ritchie L, Serletis D. Paediatric epilepsy surgery: Techniques and outcomes. J Paediatr Child Health 2022; 58:1952-1957. [PMID: 36197046 DOI: 10.1111/jpc.16236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2022] [Revised: 07/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Epilepsy is a neurological condition characterised by recurrent and persistent seizures. For paediatric patients, achieving early seizure freedom can have positive impacts on cognition, development, social integration and mental health, leading to improved quality of life. In general, one third of patients with epilepsy are refractory to medication; for these patients, epilepsy surgery may offer the only chance for improved seizure control. Epilepsy surgery as a therapeutic intervention has become increasingly accepted in the past few decades, with more diverse options available (including neuromodulatory and minimally invasive techniques). In this context, we discuss here the pre-operative workup for paediatric patients with medically refractory epilepsy and provide an updated review on current and emerging surgical therapies for this condition. We also discuss the clinical, neuropsychological, quality of life and economic impacts of epilepsy surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alysa Almojuela
- Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Qi Xu
- Section of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Aoife O'Carroll
- Section of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Lesley Ritchie
- Department of Clinical Health Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Demitre Serletis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.,Cleveland Clinic Epilepsy Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Shlobin NA, Wang A, Phillips HW, Yan H, Ibrahim GM, Elkaim LM, Wang S, Liu X, Cai L, Nguyen DK, Fallah A, Weil AG. Sensorimotor outcomes after resection for perirolandic drug-resistant epilepsy: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2022; 30:410-427. [PMID: 35932272 DOI: 10.3171/2022.6.peds22160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The prevalence of long-term postoperative sensorimotor deficits in children undergoing perirolandic resective epilepsy surgery is unclear. The risk of developing these deficits must be weighed against the potential reduction in seizure frequency after surgery. In this study, the authors investigated the prevalence of sensorimotor deficits after resective surgery at ≥ 1 year postoperatively. METHODS A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases. Subgroups of patients were identified and categorized according to their outcomes as follows: group A patients were denoted as seizure free with no postoperative sensorimotor deficits; group B patients experienced seizure recurrence with no deficit; group C patients were seizure free with deficits; and group D patients were not seizure free and with deficits. Rates of sensory deficits were examined in patients undergoing postcentral gyrus resection, and rates of motor deficits were aggregated in patients undergoing precentral gyrus resection. RESULTS Of 797 articles resulting from the database searches, 6 articles including 164 pediatric patients at a mean age of 7.7 ± 5.2 years with resection for drug-resistant perirolandic epilepsy were included in the study. Seizure freedom was observed in 118 (72.9%) patients at a mean follow-up of 3.4 ± 1.8 years. In total, 109 (66.5%) patients did not develop sensorimotor deficits at last follow-up, while 55 (33.5%) had permanent deficits. Ten (14.3%) of 70 patients with postcentral gyrus resection had permanent sensory deficits. Of the postcentral gyrus resection patients, 41 (58.6%) patients were included in group A, 19 (27.1%) in group B, 7 (10.0%) in group C, and 3 (4.3%) in group D. Forty (37.7%) of 106 patients with precentral resections had permanent motor deficits. Of the precentral gyrus resection patients, 50 (47.2%) patients were in group A, 16 (15.1%) in group B, 24 (22.6%) in group C, and 16 (15.1%) in group D. Patients without focal cortical dysplasia were more likely to have permanent motor deficits relative to those with focal cortical dysplasia in the precentral surgery cohort (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS In total, 58.6% of patients were seizure free without deficit, 27.1% were not seizure free and without deficit, 10.0% were seizure free but with deficit, and 4.3% were not seizure free and with deficit. Future studies with functional and quality-of-life data, particularly for patients who experience seizure recurrence with no deficits (as in group B in the present study) and those who are seizure free with deficits (as in group C) after treatment, are necessary to guide surgical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan A Shlobin
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Andrew Wang
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - H Westley Phillips
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Han Yan
- 3Division of Neurosurgery, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario
| | - George M Ibrahim
- 3Division of Neurosurgery, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Lior M Elkaim
- 4Division of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Shuang Wang
- 5Pediatric Epilepsy Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoyan Liu
- 5Pediatric Epilepsy Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Lixin Cai
- 5Pediatric Epilepsy Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Dang K Nguyen
- 6Division of Neurology, University of Montreal Hospital Centre (CHUM), Montreal
- 7CHUM Research Centre, Montreal
- 9Department of Neuroscience, University of Montreal; and
| | - Aria Fallah
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Alexander G Weil
- 8Division of Neurosurgery, Sainte-Justine University Hospital and University of Montreal Hospital Centre (CHUM), Montreal
- 9Department of Neuroscience, University of Montreal; and
- 10Sainte-Justine Research Centre, University of Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Elkaim LM, Niazi F, Levett JJ, Bokhari R, Gorodetsky C, Breitbart S, Alotaibi F, Alluhaybi AA, Weil AG, Fallah A, Alotaibi NM, Ibrahim GM. Deep brain stimulation in children and youth: perspectives of patients and caregivers gleaned through Twitter. Neurosurg Focus 2022; 53:E11. [DOI: 10.3171/2022.7.focus22276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
This study aims to glean patient and caregiver perspectives surrounding deep brain stimulation (DBS) in children and youth through an analysis of patterns of social media usage.
METHODS
The authors performed a comprehensive search of the Twitter Application Programming Interface (API) database for all tweets about DBS use in children and youth, with no date restriction. Data pertaining to each tweet were extracted for analysis. Results were analyzed using qualitative and quantitative methodologies. These included thematic analysis of tweets, accounts, and descriptive statistics. Sentiment analysis of extracted tweets was also performed. A multivariable regression model was used to identify predictors of higher engagement metrics (likes, retweets, and quotes).
RESULTS
A comprehensive search of the Twitter database yielded 877 tweets from 816 unique accounts meeting study inclusion criteria. Most tweets were from patients or caregivers, researchers, or news media outlets. The most common themes among analyzed tweets were research discussing novel findings (45.2%) or personal experiences of patients or caregivers (27.4%). Sentiment analysis showed that 54.5% of tweets were positive, 35.1% were neutral, and 10.4% were negative. The presence of pictures or videos increased the tweet engagement count by an average of 10.5 (95% CI 7.3–13.6). Tweets about personal patient experiences (β = 6, 95% CI 0.95–12) and tweets tagging other accounts (β = 3.2, 95% CI 0.63–5.8) were also significantly associated with higher engagement metrics.
CONCLUSIONS
The current study is the first to assess patient and caregiver perspectives surrounding pediatric DBS through a comprehensive analysis of social media usage. Given the nascent field, social media presents an opportunity to share experiences and promote patient and healthcare professional education surrounding pediatric DBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lior M. Elkaim
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montréal, Québec
| | - Farbod Niazi
- Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec
| | - Jordan J. Levett
- Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec
| | - Rakan Bokhari
- Department of Surgery, Montréal General Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Québec
| | - Carolina Gorodetsky
- Division of Neurology, Hospital for Sick Children, Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Ontario
| | - Sara Breitbart
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Fahad Alotaibi
- Department of Neurosurgery, National Neuroscience Institute, King Fahad Medical City and College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdulelah A. Alluhaybi
- Department of Neurosurgery, National Neuroscience Institute, King Fahad Medical City and College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Alexander G. Weil
- Division of Neurosurgery, Sainte Justine Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada; and
| | - Aria Fallah
- Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Naif M. Alotaibi
- Department of Neurosurgery, National Neuroscience Institute, King Fahad Medical City and College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - George M. Ibrahim
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Falls N, Arango JI, Adelson PD. Responsive neurostimulation in pediatric patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Neurosurg Focus 2022; 53:E9. [DOI: 10.3171/2022.7.focus22339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
Medically refractory epilepsy remains a therapeutic challenge when resective surgery is not a practical option and indirect neurostimulation efficacy may be limited. In these instances responsive neurostimulation (RNS) has been used in adults, with good outcomes in most patients. However, the utility of RNS in children and young adults has not been systematically explored. In this study, the authors present a single institution’s experience with RNS in pediatric patients.
METHODS
A single-center retrospective chart review of patients who underwent RNS implantation at Phoenix Children’s Hospital during the 4-year period between January 2018 and December 2021 was performed.
RESULTS
Following evaluation for epilepsy surgery, 22 patients underwent RNS implantation using different anatomical targets depending on the predetermined epileptic focus/network. In the cohort, 59% of patients were male, the mean age at implantation was 16.4 years (range 6–22 years), and the mean follow-up time was 2.7 years (range 1.0–4.3 years). All patients had a preoperative noninvasive evaluation that included MRI, video-electroencephalography, and resting-state functional MRI. Additionally, 13 patients underwent invasive monitoring with stereo-electroencephalography to help determine RNS targets. All patients had variable positive responses with reduction of seizure frequency and/or intensity. Overall, seizure frequency reduction of > 50% was seen in the majority (86%) of patients. There were two complications: one patient experienced transitory weakness and one generator failed, requiring replacement. A patient died of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy 3 years after implantation despite being seizure free during the previous year.
CONCLUSIONS
RNS used in children with medically refractory epilepsy improved seizure control after implantation, with decreases in seizure frequency > 50% from preoperative baseline in the majority of patients. Preliminary findings indicate that functional MRI and stereo-electroencephalography were helpful for RNS targeting and that RNS can be used safely even in young children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Falls
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute at Phoenix Children’s Hospital, Phoenix; and
- University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Jorge I. Arango
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute at Phoenix Children’s Hospital, Phoenix; and
| | - P. David Adelson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute at Phoenix Children’s Hospital, Phoenix; and
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Joris V, Weil AG, Fallah A. Brain Surgery for Medically Intractable Epilepsy. Adv Pediatr 2022; 69:59-74. [PMID: 35985717 DOI: 10.1016/j.yapd.2022.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
This review covers the broad topic of brain surgery in the treatment of pediatric intractable epilepsy. The authors review the latest advancements in the presurgical workup as well as the mandatory tests needed to explore the epilepsy workup in these children. They describe the different types of epilepsy from a surgical standpoint (temporal, extratemporal, multifocal, and hemispheric epilepsies) and various surgical procedures that can be proposed depending on the clinical scenario: lesionectomies, lobectomies, hemispherectomies, neuromodulation, and palliative surgeries. They also describe the key differences of the pediatric patient as compared with the adult patient in such pathologic conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Joris
- Fellow, Department of Neurosurgery, Sainte-Justine University Hospital Centre, 3175 Chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, Quebec H3T 1C5, Canada
| | - Alexander G Weil
- Associate Professor, Department of Neurosurgery, Sainte-Justine University Hospital Centre, 3175 Chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, Quebec H3T 1C5, Canada
| | - Aria Fallah
- Associate Professor, Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, 300 Stein Plaza, Suite 525, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Agashe S, Burkholder D, Starnes K, Van Gompel JJ, Lundstrom BN, Worrell GA, Gregg NM. Centromedian Nucleus of the Thalamus Deep Brain Stimulation for Genetic Generalized Epilepsy: A Case Report and Review of Literature. Front Hum Neurosci 2022; 16:858413. [PMID: 35669200 PMCID: PMC9164300 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.858413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
There is a paucity of treatment options for cognitively normal individuals with drug resistant genetic generalized epilepsy (GGE). Centromedian nucleus of the thalamus (CM) deep brain stimulation (DBS) may be a viable treatment for GGE. Here, we present the case of a 27-year-old cognitively normal woman with drug resistant GGE, with childhood onset. Seizure semiology are absence seizures and generalized onset tonic clonic (GTC) seizures. At baseline she had 4–8 GTC seizures per month and weekly absence seizures despite three antiseizure medications and vagus nerve stimulation. A multidisciplinary committee recommended off-label use of CM DBS in this patient. Over 12-months of CM DBS she had two GTC seizure days, which were in the setting of medication withdrawal and illness, and no GTC seizures in the last 6 months. There was no significant change in the burden of absence seizures. Presently, just two studies clearly document CM DBS in cognitively normal individuals with GGE or idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) [in contrast to studies of cognitively impaired individuals with developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEE)]. Our results suggest that CM DBS can be an effective treatment for cognitively normal individuals with GGE and underscore the need for prospective studies of CM DBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shruti Agashe
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
- *Correspondence: Shruti Agashe,
| | - David Burkholder
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Keith Starnes
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | | | | | | | - Nicholas M. Gregg
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
- Nicholas M. Gregg,
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Gummadavelli A, Englot DJ, Schwalb JM, Wu C, Gonzalez-Martinez J, Niemat J, Gerrard JL. ASSFN Position Statement on Deep Brain Stimulation for Medication-Refractory Epilepsy. Neurosurgery 2022; 90:636-641. [PMID: 35271523 PMCID: PMC9514731 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000001923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Neuromodulation has taken a foothold in the landscape of surgical treatment for medically refractory epilepsies and offers additional surgical treatment options for patients who are not candidates for resective/ablative surgery. Approximately one third of patients with epilepsy suffer with medication-refractory epilepsy. A persistent underuse of epilepsy surgery exists. Neuromodulation treatments including deep brain stimulation (DBS) expand the surgical options for patients with epilepsy and provide options for patients who are not candidates for resective surgery. DBS of the bilateral anterior nucleus of the thalamus is an Food and Drug Administration-approved, safe, and efficacious treatment option for patients with refractory focal epilepsy. The purpose of this consensus position statement is to summarize evidence, provide recommendations, and identify indications and populations for future investigation in DBS for epilepsy. The recommendations of the American Society of Functional and Stereotactic Neurosurgeons are based on several randomized and blinded clinical trials with high-quality data to support the use of DBS to the anterior nucleus of the thalamus for the treatment of refractory focal-onset seizures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhijeet Gummadavelli
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA;
| | - Dario J. Englot
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA;
| | - Jason M. Schwalb
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA;
| | - Chengyuan Wu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA;
| | - Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA;
| | - Joseph Niemat
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| | - Jason L. Gerrard
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Yang JC, Bullinger KL, Isbaine F, Alwaki A, Opri E, Willie JT, Gross RE. Centromedian thalamic deep brain stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy: single-center experience. J Neurosurg 2022; 137:1591-1600. [PMID: 35395630 DOI: 10.3171/2022.2.jns212237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Neuromodulation of the centromedian nucleus of the thalamus (CM) has unclear effectiveness in the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy. Prior reports suggest that it may be more effective in the generalized epilepsies such as Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS). The objective of this study was to determine the outcome of CM deep brain stimulation (DBS) at the authors' institution. METHODS Retrospective chart review was performed for all patients who underwent CM DBS at Emory University, which occurred between December 2018 and May 2021. CM DBS electrodes were implanted using three different surgical methods, including frame-based, robot-assisted, and direct MRI-guided. Seizure frequency, stimulation parameters, and adverse events were recorded from subsequent clinical follow-up visits. RESULTS Fourteen patients underwent CM DBS: 9 had symptomatic generalized epilepsy (including 5 with LGS), 3 had primary or idiopathic generalized epilepsy, and 2 had bifrontal focal epilepsy. At last follow-up (mean [± SEM] 19 ± 5 months, range 4.1-33 months, ≥ 6 months in 11 patients), the median seizure frequency reduction was 91%. Twelve patients (86%) were considered responders (≥ 50% decrease in seizure frequency), including 10 of 12 with generalized epilepsy and both patients with bifrontal epilepsy. Surgical adverse events were rare and included 1 patient with hardware breakage, 1 with a postoperative aspiration event, and 1 with a nonclinically significant intracranial hemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS CM DBS was an effective treatment for drug-resistant generalized and bifrontal epilepsies. Additional studies and analyses may investigate whether CM DBS is best suited for specific epilepsy types, and the relationship of lead location to outcome in different epilepsies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Katie L Bullinger
- 2Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; and
| | | | | | - Enrico Opri
- 2Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; and
| | - Jon T Willie
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Robert E Gross
- Departments of1Neurosurgery and.,2Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; and
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Warsi NM, Yan H, Suresh H, Wong SM, Arski ON, Gorodetsky C, Zhang K, Gouveia FV, Ibrahim GM. The anterior and centromedian thalamus: anatomy, function, and dysfunction in epilepsy. Epilepsy Res 2022; 182:106913. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2022.106913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2021] [Revised: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
|
29
|
Yan H, Siegel L, Breitbart S, Gorodetsky C, Fasano A, Rahim A, Loh A, Kulkarni AV, Ibrahim GM. An open-label prospective pilot trial of nucleus accumbens deep brain stimulation for children with autism spectrum disorder and severe, refractory self-injurious behavior: study protocol. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2022; 8:24. [PMID: 35109924 PMCID: PMC8808966 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-022-00988-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Children and youth with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) may manifest self-injurious behaviors (SIB) that may become severe and refractory with limited pharmacologic or behavioral treatment options. Here, we present the protocol of a prospective, mixed-methods study to assess the safety and efficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) for children and youth with ASD and severe, refractory SIB. METHODS This is a prospective, single-center, single-cohort, open-label, non-randomized pilot trial of 6 patients. Participants will be recruited through specialized behavioral clinics with persistent severe and refractory SIB following standard and intensive interventions. Following NAcc-DBS, participants will be enrolled in the study for 12 months. The primary objectives of the study are safety and feasibility, assessed by rate of recruitment and identification of factors impacting adherence to follow-up and study protocol. Potential treatment efficacy will be assessed by changes in the Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale in ASD (CYBOCS-ASD), the Behavior Problems Index (BPI), the Inventory of Statements about Self-Injury (ISAS) and the Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) questionnaires. Additional clinical outcomes will be assessed, including measures of participant and caregiver quality of life, actigraph measurements, and positron emission tomography (PET) changes following DBS. DISCUSSION This study will be the first to evaluate the effect of DBS of the NAcc on a pediatric population in a controlled, prospective trial. Secondary outcomes will improve the understanding of behavioral, neuro-imaging, and electrophysiologic changes in children with ASD and SIB treated with DBS. This trial will provide an estimated effect size of NAcc-DBS for severe refractory SIB in children with ASD in preparation for future comparative trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION Registration on ClinicalTrials.gov was completed on 12 June 2019 with the Identifier: NCT03982888 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Han Yan
- Division of Neurosurgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Room 1503, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada.,Institute of Health of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Lauren Siegel
- Neurosciences and Mental Health Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Room 1503, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada
| | - Sara Breitbart
- Division of Neurosurgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Room 1503, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada.,Neurosciences and Mental Health Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Room 1503, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada
| | | | - Alfonso Fasano
- Division of Neurology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.,Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease, Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Clinic, Toronto Western Hospital, UHN, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Division of Neurology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Krembil Brain Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,CenteR for Advancing Neurotechnological Innovation to Application (CRANIA), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Aliya Rahim
- Neurosciences and Mental Health Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Room 1503, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada.,Surrey Place, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alvin Loh
- Surrey Place, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Developmental Paediatrics, Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Abhaya V Kulkarni
- Division of Neurosurgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Room 1503, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada.,Institute of Health of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - George M Ibrahim
- Division of Neurosurgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Room 1503, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada. .,Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. .,Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. .,Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Khan M, Paktiawal J, Piper RJ, Chari A, Tisdall MM. Intracranial neuromodulation with deep brain stimulation and responsive neurostimulation in children with drug-resistant epilepsy: a systematic review. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2022; 29:208-217. [PMID: 34678764 DOI: 10.3171/2021.8.peds21201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In children with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), resective, ablative, and disconnective surgery may not be feasible or may fail. Neuromodulation in the form of deep brain stimulation (DBS) and responsive neurostimulation (RNS) may be viable treatment options, however evidence for their efficacies in children is currently limited. This systematic review aimed to summarize the literature on DBS and RNS for the treatment of DRE in the pediatric population. Specifically, the authors focused on currently available data for reported indications, neuromodulation targets, clinical efficacy, and safety outcomes. METHODS PRISMA guidelines were followed throughout this systematic review (PROSPERO no. CRD42020180669). Electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, OpenGrey, and CINAHL Plus, were searched from their inception to February 19, 2021. Inclusion criteria were 1) studies with at least 1 pediatric patient (age < 19 years) who underwent DBS and/or RNS for DRE; and 2) retrospective, prospective, randomized, or nonrandomized controlled studies, case series, and case reports. Exclusion criteria were 1) letters, commentaries, conference abstracts, and reviews; and 2) studies without full text available. Risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane ROBINS-I (Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions) tool. RESULTS A total of 35 studies were selected that identified 72 and 46 patients who underwent DBS and RNS, respectively (age range 4-18 years). Various epilepsy etiologies and seizure types were described in both cohorts. Overall, 75% of patients had seizure reduction > 50% after DBS (among whom 6 were seizure free) at a median (range) follow-up of 14 (1-100) months. In an exploratory univariate analysis of factors associated with favorable response, the follow-up duration was shorter in those patients with a favorable response (18 vs 33 months, p < 0.05). In the RNS cohort, 73.2% of patients had seizure reduction > 50% after RNS at a median (range) follow-up of 22 (5-39) months. On closer inspection, 83.3% of patients who had > 50% reduction in seizures actually had > 75% reduction, with 4 patients being seizure free. CONCLUSIONS Overall, both DBS and RNS showed favorable response rates, indicating that both techniques should be considered for pediatric patients with DRE. However, serious risks of overall bias were found in all included studies. Many research needs in this area would be addressed by conducting high-quality clinical trials and establishing an international registry of patients who have undergone pediatric neuromodulation, thereby ensuring robust prospective collection of predictive variables and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehdi Khan
- 1University College London Medical School, London, United Kingdom
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom; and
| | - Jaber Paktiawal
- 2Medical University Pleven, Pleven, Bulgaria
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom; and
| | - Rory J Piper
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom; and
- 4Developmental Neuroscience, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Aswin Chari
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom; and
- 4Developmental Neuroscience, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Martin M Tisdall
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom; and
- 4Developmental Neuroscience, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Hu B, Wang Z, Xu M, Zhu L, Wang D. The inhibition mechanism of epilepsy disease in a computational model. Technol Health Care 2022; 30:155-162. [PMID: 35124593 PMCID: PMC9028747 DOI: 10.3233/thc-228015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The mechanism of prevention and treatment of epilepsy is a hot issue in theoretical research. OBJECTIVE: In this paper, we studied the control mechanism of the generalized spike-and-wave discharges (GSWD) by different types of external electrical stimulation acting on the subthalamic nucleus (STN) in a computational model. METHODS: Firstly, we analyzed the pathological mechanism of seizures, which were induced by different parameters in the thalamocortical (TC) circuit. Then, a voltage V was exerted in the STN. At last, we used the sine wave and square wave current stimulation in the STN. RESULTS: We found that seizures can be inhibited by tuning stimulus intensity into suitable range, and the direction of adjustment depended on the size of the parameter. We observed that the seizure can also be inhibited by tuning different parameters in current. CONCLUSIONS: Different inhibition mechanisms can be explained in this model, which may provide theoretical evidences for selecting the optimal treatment scheme in the clinical.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bing Hu
- Corresponding authors: Bing Hu and Dingjiang Wang, Department of Applied Mathematics, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310023, China. E-mail: @126.com
| | | | | | | | - Dingjiang Wang
- Corresponding authors: Bing Hu and Dingjiang Wang, Department of Applied Mathematics, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310023, China. E-mail: @126.com
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Camacho‐Conde JA, Gonzalez‐Bermudez MDR, Carretero‐Rey M, Khan ZU. Brain stimulation: a therapeutic approach for the treatment of neurological disorders. CNS Neurosci Ther 2022; 28:5-18. [PMID: 34859593 PMCID: PMC8673710 DOI: 10.1111/cns.13769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Revised: 10/28/2021] [Accepted: 11/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Brain stimulation has become one of the most acceptable therapeutic approaches in recent years and a powerful tool in the remedy against neurological diseases. Brain stimulation is achieved through the application of electric currents using non-invasive as well as invasive techniques. Recent technological advancements have evolved into the development of precise devices with capacity to produce well-controlled and effective brain stimulation. Currently, most used non-invasive techniques are repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), whereas the most common invasive technique is deep brain stimulation (DBS). In last decade, application of these brain stimulation techniques has not only exploded but also expanded to wide variety of neurological disorders. Therefore, in the current review, we will provide an overview of the potential of both non-invasive (rTMS and tDCS) and invasive (DBS) brain stimulation techniques in the treatment of such brain diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose Antonio Camacho‐Conde
- Laboratory of NeurobiologyCIMESUniversity of MalagaMalagaSpain
- Department of MedicineFaculty of MedicineUniversity of MalagaMalagaSpain
| | | | - Marta Carretero‐Rey
- Laboratory of NeurobiologyCIMESUniversity of MalagaMalagaSpain
- Department of MedicineFaculty of MedicineUniversity of MalagaMalagaSpain
| | - Zafar U. Khan
- Laboratory of NeurobiologyCIMESUniversity of MalagaMalagaSpain
- Department of MedicineFaculty of MedicineUniversity of MalagaMalagaSpain
- CIBERNEDInstitute of Health Carlos IIIMadridSpain
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Riva A, Golda A, Balagura G, Amadori E, Vari MS, Piccolo G, Iacomino M, Lattanzi S, Salpietro V, Minetti C, Striano P. New Trends and Most Promising Therapeutic Strategies for Epilepsy Treatment. Front Neurol 2021; 12:753753. [PMID: 34950099 PMCID: PMC8690245 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.753753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Despite the wide availability of novel anti-seizure medications (ASMs), 30% of patients with epilepsy retain persistent seizures with a significant burden in comorbidity and an increased risk of premature death. This review aims to discuss the therapeutic strategies, both pharmacological and non-, which are currently in the pipeline. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE databases were screened for experimental and clinical studies, meta-analysis, and structured reviews published between January 2018 and September 2021. The terms “epilepsy,” “treatment” or “therapy,” and “novel” were used to filter the results. Conclusions: The common feature linking all the novel therapeutic approaches is the spasmodic rush toward precision medicine, aiming at holistically evaluating patients, and treating them accordingly as a whole. Toward this goal, different forms of intervention may be embraced, starting from the choice of the most suitable drug according to the type of epilepsy of an individual or expected adverse effects, to the outstanding field of gene therapy. Moreover, innovative insights come from in-vitro and in-vivo studies on the role of inflammation and stem cells in the brain. Further studies on both efficacy and safety are needed, with the challenge to mature evidence into reliable assets, ameliorating the symptoms of patients, and answering the challenges of this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonella Riva
- Pediatric Neurology and Muscular Diseases Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy.,Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Alice Golda
- Pediatric Neurology and Muscular Diseases Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy
| | - Ganna Balagura
- Department of Functional Genomics, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Elisabetta Amadori
- Pediatric Neurology and Muscular Diseases Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy.,Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Maria Stella Vari
- Pediatric Neurology and Muscular Diseases Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy
| | - Gianluca Piccolo
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Michele Iacomino
- Unit of Medical Genetics, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy
| | - Simona Lattanzi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Neurological Clinic, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Salpietro
- Pediatric Neurology and Muscular Diseases Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy.,Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Carlo Minetti
- Pediatric Neurology and Muscular Diseases Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy.,Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Pasquale Striano
- Pediatric Neurology and Muscular Diseases Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy.,Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Hect JL, Fernandez LD, Welch WP, Abel TJ. Deep brain stimulation of the centromedian thalamic nucleus for the treatment of FIRES. Epilepsia Open 2021; 7:187-193. [PMID: 34862854 PMCID: PMC8886094 DOI: 10.1002/epi4.12568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Revised: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Febrile infection‐related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES) is a rare, life‐threatening complication of febrile illness in previously healthy individuals followed by super‐refractory status epilepticus. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been demonstrated to be a promising therapy for the treatment of intractable epilepsy. Here, we present a pediatric patient with FIRES whose seizures were mitigated by acute DBS of the bilateral centromedian thalamic nucleus (CMTN). This is a previously healthy 11‐year‐old female who presented emergently with altered mental status, fever, and malaise after 1 week of lethargy, anorexia, fever, and abdominal pain. The patient began having seizures shortly after admission. After thorough workup for encephalitis and other potential etiologies, this patient was diagnosed with FIRES due to super‐refractory status epilepticus. Status epilepticus persisted despite pharmacologic management, immunotherapy, and vagus nerve stimulation. DBS of the bilateral CMTN (CM‐DBS) was pursued after 56 days of hospitalization, and she demonstrated considerable improvement in baseline mental status 30 days after DBS insertion. This report highlights application of CM‐DBS for super‐refractory status epilepticus in FIRES. This region is a diffusely connected brain region and has been shown to modulate neural networks contributing to seizure propagation and consciousness; therefore, neurostimulation is a potential therapeutic intervention for patients with super‐refractory status epilepticus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasmine L Hect
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Luis D Fernandez
- Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - William P Welch
- Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Taylor J Abel
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh Swanson School of Engineering, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Arski ON, Wong SM, Warsi NM, Martire DJ, Ochi A, Otsubo H, Donner E, Jain P, Kerr EN, Smith ML, Ibrahim GM. Spectral changes following resective epilepsy surgery and neurocognitive function in children with epilepsy. J Neurophysiol 2021; 126:1614-1621. [PMID: 34550020 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00434.2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Decelerated resting cortical oscillations, high-frequency activity, and enhanced cross-frequency interactions are features of focal epilepsy. The association between electrophysiological signal properties and neurocognitive function, particularly following resective surgery, is, however, unclear. In the current report, we studied intraoperative recordings from intracranial electrodes implanted in seven children with focal epilepsy and analyzed the spectral dynamics both before and after surgical resection of the hypothesized seizure focus. The associations between electrophysiological spectral signatures and each child's neurocognitive profiles were characterized using a partial least squares analysis. We find that extent of spectral alteration at the periphery of surgical resection, as indexed by slowed resting frequency and its acceleration following surgery, is associated with baseline cognitive deficits in children. The current report provides evidence supporting the relationship between altered spectral properties in focal epilepsy and neuropsychological deficits in children. In particular, these findings suggest a critical role of disrupted thalamocortical rhythms, which are believed to underlie the spectral alterations we describe, in both epileptogenicity and neurocognitive function.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Spectral alterations marked by decelerated resting oscillations and ectopic high-frequency activity have been noted in focal epilepsy. We leveraged intraoperative recordings from chronically implanted electrodes pre- and postresection to understand the association between these electrophysiological phenomena and neuropsychological function. We find that the extent of spectral alteration, indexed by slowed resting frequency and its acceleration following resection, is associated with baseline cognitive deficits. These findings provide novel insights into neurocognitive impairments in focal epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia N Arski
- Program in Neuroscience and Mental Health, Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Simeon M Wong
- Program in Neuroscience and Mental Health, Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nebras M Warsi
- Program in Neuroscience and Mental Health, Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Neurosurgery, Hospital for Sick Children, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daniel J Martire
- Program in Neuroscience and Mental Health, Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ayako Ochi
- Division of Neurology, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hiroshi Otsubo
- Division of Neurology, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Elizabeth Donner
- Division of Neurology, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Puneet Jain
- Division of Neurology, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Elizabeth N Kerr
- Division of Psychology, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mary Lou Smith
- Division of Psychology, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - George M Ibrahim
- Program in Neuroscience and Mental Health, Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Neurosurgery, Hospital for Sick Children, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Matern TS, DeCarlo R, Ciliberto MA, Singh RK. Palliative Epilepsy Surgery Procedures in Children. Semin Pediatr Neurol 2021; 39:100912. [PMID: 34620461 DOI: 10.1016/j.spen.2021.100912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2021] [Revised: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Surgical treatment of epilepsy typically focuses on identification of a seizure focus with subsequent resection and/or disconnection to "cure" the patient's epilepsy and achieve seizure freedom. Palliative epilepsy surgery modalities are efficacious in improving seizure frequency, severity, and quality of life. In this paper, we review palliative epilepsy surgical options for children: vagus nerve stimulation, responsive neurostimulation, deep brain stimulation, hemispherotomy, corpus callosotomy, lobectomy and/or lesionectomy and multiple subpial transection. Reoperation after surgical resection should also be considered. If curative resection is not a viable option for seizure freedom, these methods should be considered with equal emphasis and urgency in the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Michael A Ciliberto
- Department of Pediatrics, Stead Family Children's Hospital/University of Iowa
| | - Rani K Singh
- Department of Pediatrics, Atrium Health System/Levine Children's Hospital.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Neuromodulation for Intractable Childhood Epilepsy. Semin Pediatr Neurol 2021; 39:100918. [PMID: 34620463 DOI: 10.1016/j.spen.2021.100918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Revised: 08/07/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
In the past few years significant advances made in the field of neuromodulation have led to practical therapeutic strategies for children with medically refractory epilepsy. Here, we briefly discuss the various options that are currently available including vagus nerve stimulation, responsive neurostimulation, deep brain stimulation, chronic subthreshold cortical stimulation, as well as repetitive transcranial magnetic and transcranial direct current stimulation. The current indications, proposed mechanisms, method of administration, efficacy, adverse effects, and mention of clinical trials currently in enrollment or development are discussed.
Collapse
|
38
|
Guglielmi G, Eschbach KL, Alexander AL. Smaller Knife, Fewer Seizures? Recent Advances in Minimally Invasive Techniques in Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery. Semin Pediatr Neurol 2021; 39:100913. [PMID: 34620456 DOI: 10.1016/j.spen.2021.100913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Revised: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Children with drug-resistant epilepsy are at high risk for developmental delay, increased mortality, psychiatric comorbidities, and requiring assistance with activities of daily living. Despite the advent of new and effective pharmacologic therapies, about one in 5 children will develop drug-resistant epilepsy, and most of these children continue to have seizures despite trials of other medication. Epilepsy surgery is often a safe and effective option which may offer seizure freedom or at least a significant reduction in seizure burden in many children. However, despite published evidence of safety and efficacy, epilepsy surgery remains underutilized in the pediatric population. Patient and family fears about the risks of surgery may contribute to this gap. Less invasive surgical techniques may be more palatable to children with epilepsy and their caregivers. In this review, we present recent advances in minimally invasive techniques for the surgical treatment of epilepsy as well as intriguing possibilities for the future. We describe the indications for, benefits of, and limits to minimally-invasive techniques including Stereo-encephalography, laser interstitial thermal ablation, deep brain stimulation, focused ultrasound, stereo-encephalography-guided radiofrequency ablation, endoscopic disconnections, and responsive neurostimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gina Guglielmi
- Graduate Medical Education, Neurological Surgery Residency, Carle BroMenn Medical Center, Normal IL; Section of Pediatric Neurology, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora CO; Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine, Aurora CO; Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora CO; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine, Aurora CO
| | - Krista L Eschbach
- Graduate Medical Education, Neurological Surgery Residency, Carle BroMenn Medical Center, Normal IL; Section of Pediatric Neurology, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora CO; Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine, Aurora CO; Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora CO; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine, Aurora CO
| | - Allyson L Alexander
- Graduate Medical Education, Neurological Surgery Residency, Carle BroMenn Medical Center, Normal IL; Section of Pediatric Neurology, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora CO; Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine, Aurora CO; Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora CO; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine, Aurora CO.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Sohanian Haghighi H, Markazi AHD. Control of epileptic seizures by electrical stimulation: a model-based study. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2021; 7. [PMID: 34488206 DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ac240d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
High frequency electrical stimulation of brain is commonly used in research experiments and clinical trials as a modern tool for control of epileptic seizures. However, the mechanistic basis by which periodic external stimuli alter the brain state is not well understood. This study provides a computational insight into the mechanism of seizure suppression by high frequency stimulation (HFS). In particular, a modified version of the Jansen-Rit neural mass model is employed, in which EEG signals can be considered as the input. The proposed model reproduces seizure-like activity in the output during the ictal period of the input signal. By applying a control signal to the model, a wide range of stimulation amplitudes and frequencies are systematically explored. Simulation results reveal that HFS can effectively suppress the seizure-like activity. Our results suggest that HFS has the ability of shifting the operating state of neural populations away from a critical condition. Furthermore, a closed-loop control strategy is proposed in this paper. The main objective has been to considerably reduce the control effort needed for blocking abnormal activity of the brain. Such an energy reduction could be of practical importance, to reduce possible side effects and increase battery life for implanted neurostimulators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Amir H D Markazi
- 1School of Mechanical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran 16844, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND A large number of patients have epilepsy that is intractable and adversely affects a child's lifelong experience with addition societal burden that is disabling and expensive. The last two decades have seen a major explosion of new antiseizure medication options. Despite these advances, children with epilepsy continue to have intractable seizures. An option that has been long available but little used is epilepsy surgery to control intractable epilepsy. METHODS This article is a review of the literature as well as published opinions. RESULTS Epilepsy surgery in pediatrics is an underused modality to effectively treat children with epilepsy. Adverse effects of medication should be weighed against risks of surgery as well as risks of nonefficacy. CONCLUSIONS We discuss an approach to selecting the appropriate pediatric patient for consideration, a detailed evaluation including necessary evaluation, and the creation of an algorithm to approach patients with both generalized and focal epilepsy. We then discuss surgical options available including outcome data. New modalities are also addressed including high-frequency ultrasound and co-registration techniques including magnetic resonance imaging-guided laser therapy.
Collapse
|
41
|
Piper RJ, Tangwiriyasakul C, Shamshiri EA, Centeno M, He X, Richardson MP, Tisdall MM, Carmichael DW. Functional Connectivity of the Anterior Nucleus of the Thalamus in Pediatric Focal Epilepsy. Front Neurol 2021; 12:670881. [PMID: 34408719 PMCID: PMC8365837 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.670881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: Whilst stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus has shown efficacy for reducing seizure frequency in adults, alterations in thalamic connectivity have not been explored in children. We tested the hypotheses that (a) the anterior thalamus has increased functional connectivity in children with focal epilepsy, and (b) this alteration in the connectome is a persistent effect of the disease rather than due to transient epileptiform activity. Methods: Data from 35 children (7–18 years) with focal, drug-resistant epilepsy and 20 healthy children (7–17 years) were analyzed. All subjects underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) whilst resting and were simultaneously monitored with scalp electroencephalography (EEG). The fMRI timeseries were extracted for each Automated Anatomical Labeling brain region and thalamic subregion. Graph theory metrics [degree (DC) and eigenvector (EC) centrality] were used to summarize the connectivity profile of the ipsilateral thalamus, and its thalamic parcellations. The effect of interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) captured on EEG was used to determine their effect on DC and EC. Results: DC was significantly higher in the anterior nucleus (p = 0.04) of the thalamus ipsilateral to the epileptogenic zone in children with epilepsy compared to controls. On exploratory analyses, we similarly found a higher DC in the lateral dorsal nucleus (p = 0.02), but not any other thalamic subregion. No differences in EC measures were found between patients and controls. We did not find any significant difference in DC or EC in any thalamic subregion when comparing the results of children with epilepsy before, and after the removal of the effects of IEDs. Conclusions: Our data suggest that the anterior and lateral dorsal nuclei of the thalamus are more highly functionally connected in children with poorly controlled focal epilepsy. We did not detect a convincing change in thalamic connectivity caused by transient epileptiform activity, suggesting that it represents a persistent alteration to network dynamics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rory J Piper
- Department of Neurosurgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.,Department of Neurosurgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.,Wellcome EPSRC Centre for Medical Imaging, Department of Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Chayanin Tangwiriyasakul
- Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.,School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Elhum A Shamshiri
- San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System (SFVAHCS), San Francisco, CA, United States.,Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.,Sierra Pacific Mental Illness Research Education and Clinical Centers, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Maria Centeno
- Epilepsy Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Xiaosong He
- Department of Psychology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Mark P Richardson
- Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Martin M Tisdall
- Department of Neurosurgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom
| | - David W Carmichael
- Wellcome EPSRC Centre for Medical Imaging, Department of Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
Epilepsy in children continues to present a major medical and economic burden on society. Left untreated, seizures can present the risk of sudden death and severe cognitive impairment. It is understood that primary care providers having concerns about abnormal movements or behaviors in children will make a prompt referral to a trusted pediatric neurologist. The authors present a brief introduction to seizure types, classification, and management with particular focus on what surgery for epilepsy can offer. Improved seizure control and its attendant improvements in quality of life can be achieved with timely referral and intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis E Bello-Espinosa
- Division Head Pediatric Neurology, Arnold Palmer Hospital for Children, Leon Neuroscience Center of Excellence, 100 West Gore Street, Orlando, FL 32806, USA.
| | - Greg Olavarria
- Pediatric Neurosurgery, Arnold Palmer Hospital for Children, 100 West Gore Street, Suite 403, Orlando, FL 32806, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Mortazavi A, Elliott RJS, Phan TN, Schreiber J, Gaillard WD, Oluigbo CO. Responsive neurostimulation for the treatment of medically refractory epilepsy in pediatric patients: strategies, outcomes, and technical considerations. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2021; 28:54-61. [PMID: 33930869 DOI: 10.3171/2020.11.peds20660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Children with medically refractory partial-onset epilepsy arising from eloquent cortex present a therapeutic challenge, as many are not suitable for resective surgery. For these patients, responsive neurostimulation may prove to be a potential tool. Although responsive neurostimulation has demonstrated utility in adults, little has been discussed regarding its utility in the pediatric population. In this study, the authors present their institution's experience with responsive neurostimulation via the RNS System through a case series of 5 pediatric patients. METHODS A single-center retrospective study of patients who underwent RNS System implantation at Children's National Hospital was performed. RESULTS Five patients underwent RNS System implantation. The mean patient age at treatment was 16.8 years, and the average follow-up was 11.2 months. All patients were considered responders, with a seizure frequency reduction of 64.2% without adverse events. CONCLUSIONS All 5 patients experienced medium-term improvements in seizure control after RNS System implantation with decreases in seizure frequency > 50% from baseline preoperative seizure frequency. The authors demonstrated two primary configurations of electrode placement: hippocampal or amygdala placement via an occipitotemporal trajectory, as well as infratemporal surface electrodes and surface electrodes on the primary motor cortex. No adverse events were experienced in this case series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Tiffany N Phan
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - John Schreiber
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - William D Gaillard
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - Chima O Oluigbo
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Wu YC, Liao YS, Yeh WH, Liang SF, Shaw FZ. Directions of Deep Brain Stimulation for Epilepsy and Parkinson's Disease. Front Neurosci 2021; 15:680938. [PMID: 34194295 PMCID: PMC8236576 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.680938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment for movement disorders and neurological/psychiatric disorders. DBS has been approved for the control of Parkinson disease (PD) and epilepsy. OBJECTIVES A systematic review and possible future direction of DBS system studies is performed in the open loop and closed-loop configuration on PD and epilepsy. METHODS We searched Google Scholar database for DBS system and development. DBS search results were categorized into clinical device and research system from the open-loop and closed-loop perspectives. RESULTS We performed literature review for DBS on PD and epilepsy in terms of system development by the open loop and closed-loop configuration. This study described development and trends for DBS in terms of electrode, recording, stimulation, and signal processing. The closed-loop DBS system raised a more attention in recent researches. CONCLUSION We overviewed development and progress of DBS. Our results suggest that the closed-loop DBS is important for PD and epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying-Chang Wu
- Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Ying-Siou Liao
- Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Hsiu Yeh
- Institute of Basic Medical Science, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Sheng-Fu Liang
- Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
- Institute of Medical Informatics, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Fu-Zen Shaw
- Institute of Basic Medical Science, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
- Department of Psychology, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Shan W, Mao X, Wang X, Hogan RE, Wang Q. Potential surgical therapies for drug-resistant focal epilepsy. CNS Neurosci Ther 2021; 27:994-1011. [PMID: 34101365 PMCID: PMC8339538 DOI: 10.1111/cns.13690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Revised: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Drug-resistant focal epilepsy (DRFE), defined by failure of two antiepileptic drugs, affects 30% of epileptic patients. Epilepsy surgeries are alternative options for this population. Preoperative evaluation is critical to include potential candidates, and to choose the most appropriate procedure to maximize efficacy and simultaneously minimize side effects. Traditional procedures involve open skull surgeries and epileptic focus resection. Alternatively, neuromodulation surgeries use peripheral nerve or deep brain stimulation to reduce the activities of epileptogenic focus. With the advanced improvement of laser-induced thermal therapy (LITT) technique and its utilization in neurosurgery, magnetic resonance-guided LITT (MRgLITT) emerges as a minimal invasive approach for drug-resistant focal epilepsy. In the present review, we first introduce drug-resistant focal epilepsy and summarize the indications, pros and cons of traditional surgical procedures and neuromodulation procedures. And then, focusing on MRgLITT, we thoroughly discuss its history, its technical details, its safety issues, and current evidence on its clinical applications. A case report on MRgLITT is also included to illustrate the preoperational evaluation. We believe that MRgLITT is a promising approach in selected patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, although large prospective studies are required to evaluate its efficacy and side effects, as well as to implement a standardized protocol for its application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Shan
- Department of NeurologyBeijing Tiantan HospitalCapital Medical UniversityBeijingChina
- National Center for Clinical Medicine of Neurological DiseasesBeijingChina
- Beijing Institute for Brain DisordersBeijingChina
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Neuro‐modulationBeijingChina
| | - Xuewei Mao
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Industrial Control TechnologySchool of AutomationQingdao UniversityQingdaoChina
| | - Xiu Wang
- National Center for Clinical Medicine of Neurological DiseasesBeijingChina
| | - Robert E. Hogan
- Departments of Neurology and NeurosurgerySchool of MedicineWashington University in St. LouisSt. LouisMOUSA
| | - Qun Wang
- Department of NeurologyBeijing Tiantan HospitalCapital Medical UniversityBeijingChina
- National Center for Clinical Medicine of Neurological DiseasesBeijingChina
- Beijing Institute for Brain DisordersBeijingChina
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Neuro‐modulationBeijingChina
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Welch WP, Hect JL, Abel TJ. Case Report: Responsive Neurostimulation of the Centromedian Thalamic Nucleus for the Detection and Treatment of Seizures in Pediatric Primary Generalized Epilepsy. Front Neurol 2021; 12:656585. [PMID: 33995254 PMCID: PMC8113700 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.656585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Up to 20% of pediatric patients with primary generalized epilepsy (PGE) will not respond effectively to medication for seizure control. Responsive neurostimulation (RNS) is a promising therapy for pediatric patients with drug-resistant epilepsy and has been shown to be an effective therapy for reducing seizure frequency and severity in adult patients. RNS of the centromedian nucleus of the thalamus may help to prevent loss of awareness during seizure activity in PGE patients with absence seizures. Here we present a 16-year-old male, with drug-resistant PGE with absence seizures, characterized by 3 Hz spike-and-slow-wave discharges on EEG, who achieved a 75% reduction in seizure frequency following bilateral RNS of the centromedian nuclei. At 6-months post-implant, this patient reported complete resolution of the baseline daily absence seizure activity, and decrease from 3-4 generalized convulsive seizures per month to 1 per month. RNS recordings showed well-formed 3 Hz spike-wave discharges in bilateral CM nuclei, further supporting the notion that clinically relevant ictal discharges in PGE can be detected in CM. This report demonstrates that CM RNS can detect PGE-related seizures in the CM nucleus and deliver therapeutic stimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William P Welch
- Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Jasmine L Hect
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Taylor J Abel
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.,Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh Swanson School of Engineering, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Mithani K, Neudorfer C, Boutet A, Germann J, Elias GJB, Weil AG, Donner E, Kalia S, Lozano AM, Drake JM, Widjaja E, Ibrahim GM. Surgical targeting of large hypothalamic hamartomas and seizure-freedom following MR-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy. Epilepsy Behav 2021; 116:107774. [PMID: 33549939 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.107774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Revised: 12/29/2020] [Accepted: 12/30/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Large hypothalamic hamartomas (HH) are often associated with difficult-to-treat, refractory seizures. Although magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) has emerged as a useful tool to treat these challenging lesions, postoperative outcomes are variable and potentially related to differences in surgical targeting. PURPOSE We sought to identify differences in the anatomic localization of laser ablations that either did or did not result in seizure freedom. METHODS Four children who underwent MRgLITT for large HH (3 seizure-free and 1 not seizure-free) were included in the analysis. Ablation volumes were segmented, normalized, and overlaid on a high-resolution hypothalamic atlas. For each lesion, the size, spatial extent, and degree of overlap with key hypothalamic nuclei and surrounding brain regions were computed and compared between ablations that did and did not result in seizure freedom. RESULTS Ablation masks that resulted in seizure freedom were smaller and located more centrally than the ablation mask that did not. In addition, ablation masks that resulted in seizure freedom overlapped with regions including the paraventricular nucleus, the posterior hypothalamus and the zona incerta, fornix, and mammillothalamic tract, whereas the single non-seizure-free ablation did not. CONCLUSION Differences in the size, position, and anatomical localization of ablation volumes may be a potential contributor to the variability in postoperative outcomes of large HH treated with MRgLITT. A novel, high-resolution MRI atlas of the hypothalamus identifies a number of regions at the interface of large HH that are preferentially disconnected in seizure-free patients. This method of anatomical localization not only serves as a potential clinical tool for surgical targeting but may also provide novel insights into the mechanisms of epileptogenesis in hypothalamic hamartomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karim Mithani
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Alexandre Boutet
- University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Alexander G Weil
- Division of Neurosurgery, CHU-Ste Justine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Elizabeth Donner
- Division of Neurology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Suneil Kalia
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andres M Lozano
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - James M Drake
- Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Division of Neurosurgery, Hospital for Sick Children, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Elysa Widjaja
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - George M Ibrahim
- Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Division of Neurosurgery, Hospital for Sick Children, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Yan H, Siegel L, Breitbart S, Gorodetsky C, Gonorazky HD, Yau I, Go C, Donner E, Kalia SK, Fasano A, Weil AG, Fallah A, Ibrahim GM. The Child & Youth CompreHensIve Longitudinal Database for Deep Brain Stimulation (CHILD-DBS). Childs Nerv Syst 2021; 37:607-615. [PMID: 32935233 DOI: 10.1007/s00381-020-04880-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2020] [Accepted: 09/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a common tool for the treatment of movement disorders in adults; however, it remains an emerging treatment modality in children with a growing number of indications, including epilepsy and dystonia. The Child & Youth CompreHensIve Longitudinal Database of DBS (CHILD-DBS) study aims to prospectively collect relevant data on quality of life (QoL), safety, efficacy, and long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes following DBS in children. METHODS Data are collected and managed using the Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap). This database aims to collect multicentre comprehensive and longitudinal clinical, QoL, imaging and electrophysiologic data for children under the age of 19 undergoing DBS. RESULTS Both general and indication-specific measures are collected at baseline and at four time points postoperatively: 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years. The database encompasses QoL metrics for children, including the PedsQL (Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory, generic), QOLCE (Quality of Life in Childhood Epilepsy Questionnaire, parent-rated), CHU 9D (Child Health Utility 9D), and KIDSCREEN. Caregiver clinical and QoL metrics, including QIDS (Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology), GAD-7 (Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale), and CarerQoL-7D (The Care-related Quality of Life Instrument), are similarly prospectively collected. Healthcare resource utilization is also assessed before and after DBS. Lastly, stimulation parameters and radiographic and electrophysiologic data are collected within the database. CONCLUSIONS The development of the current prospective paediatric DBS database with carefully selected physical and psychosocial outcomes and assessments will complement existing efforts to enhance and facilitate multisite collaboration to further understand the role of DBS in childhood.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Han Yan
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Division of Neurosurgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lauren Siegel
- Neurosciences and Mental Health Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sara Breitbart
- Division of Neurosurgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Carolina Gorodetsky
- Division of Neurology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hernan D Gonorazky
- Division of Neurology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ivanna Yau
- Division of Neurology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cristina Go
- Division of Neurology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Elizabeth Donner
- Division of Neurology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Suneil K Kalia
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Canada.,Krembil Brain Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,CenteR for Advancing Neurotechnological Innovation to Application (CRANIA), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alfonso Fasano
- Krembil Brain Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease, Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Clinic, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Division of Neurology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,CenteR for Advancing Neurotechnological Innovation to Application (CRANIA), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alexander G Weil
- Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Division of Neurosurgery and Pediatrics, Sainte Justine Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Aria Fallah
- Department of Neurosurgery, UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - George M Ibrahim
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. .,Division of Neurosurgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. .,Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. .,Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Harris WB, Phillips HW, Fallah A, Mathern GW. Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery in Focal and Generalized Epilepsy: Current Trends and Recent Advancements. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC EPILEPSY 2021. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1722298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
AbstractFor a subset of children with medically intractable epilepsy, surgery may provide the best chances of seizure freedom. Whereas the indications for epilepsy surgery are commonly thought to be limited to patients with focal epileptogenic foci, modern imaging and surgical interventions frequently permit successful surgical treatment of generalized epilepsy. Resection continues to be the only potentially curative intervention; however, the advent of various neuromodulation interventions provides an effective palliative strategy for generalized or persistent seizures. Although the risks and benefits vary greatly by type and extent of intervention, the seizure outcomes appear to be uniformly favorable. Advances in both resective and nonresective surgical interventions provide promise for improved seizure freedom, function, and quality of life. This review summarizes the current trends and recent advancements in pediatric epilepsy surgery from diagnostic workup and indications through surgical interventions and postoperative outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William B. Harris
- John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu, Hawai'i
| | - H. Westley Phillips
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California Los Angeles, California, United States
| | - Aria Fallah
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California Los Angeles, California, United States
| | - Gary W. Mathern
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California Los Angeles, California, United States
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, California, United States
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Stevens I, Gilbert F. Ethical examination of deep brain stimulation's 'last resort' status. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2021; 47:medethics-2020-106609. [PMID: 33441307 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2020] [Revised: 10/26/2020] [Accepted: 11/01/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) interventions are novel devices being investigated for the management of severe treatment-resistant psychiatric illnesses. These interventions require the invasive implantation of high-frequency neurostimulatory probes intracranially aiming to provide symptom relief in treatment-resistant disorders including obsessive-compulsive disorder and anorexia nervosa. In the scientific literature, these neurostimulatory interventions are commonly described as reversible and to be used as a last resort option for psychiatric patients. However, the 'last resort' status of these interventions is rarely expanded upon. Contrastingly, usages of DBS devices for neurological symptoms (eg, Parkinson's disease, epilepsy or dystonia) have paved the way for established safety and efficacy standards when used earlier in a disease's timeline. As DBS treatments for these neurological diseases progress to have earlier indications, there is a parallel ethical concern that early implementation may one day become prescribed for psychiatric illnesses. The purpose of this article is to build off contemporary understandings of reversible neurostimulatory interventions to examine and provide clarifications on the 'last resort' status of DBS to better address its ethically charged use in psychiatric neurosurgery. To do this, evaluative differences between DBS treatments will be discussed to demonstrate how patient autonomy would be a paramount guiding principle when one day implementing these devices at various points along a psychiatric disease's timeline. In presenting the clarification of 'last resort' status, the ethical tensions of early DBS interventions will be better understood to assist in providing psychiatric patients with more quality of life years in line with their values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian Stevens
- Philosophy & Gender Studies, University of Tasmania School of Humanities, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Frederic Gilbert
- Philosophy & Gender Studies, University of Tasmania School of Humanities, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| |
Collapse
|