Long-term 3D CT follow-up after endoscopic sagittal craniosynostosis repair

Exploring Different Management Modalities of Nonsyndromic Craniosynostosis

Craniosynostosis is an atypical skull shape characterized by the premature fusion of cranial sutures. It is one of the most common congenital anomalies encountered by craniofacial surgeons, with a prevalence of one in every 2000-2500 births. It is classified into two main types: syndromic and nonsyndromic. In syndromic, the patient presents with other abnormalities involving the trunk, face, or extremities. While in nonsyndromic the only anomy is the premature fusion, which usually involves one suture; the most common subtypes are unicoronal, sagittal, bicoronal, metopic, and lambdoid. As a consequence, premature fusion before its natural time restricts the space for the brain to grow, increases intracranial pressure, causes damage to the brain tissue, and affects the development of the child. This review comprehensively provides a detailed overview of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis and aims to highlight the importance of early and accurate diagnosis, and determining the most suitable intervention, whether surgical or conservative modalities. The optimal treatment approach produces the most favorable aesthetic and functional outcomes.

A Systematic Review of Idiopathic Secondary Stenosis Following Index Surgery for Craniosynostosis

BACKGROUND

Primary craniosynostosis is a congenital craniofacial disorder in which cranial sutures prematurely close. Iatrogenic secondary stenosis is abnormal cranial suture closure caused by surgical manipulation of the suture. In contrast, idiopathic secondary stenosis develops in a suture that did not undergo surgical manipulation. The objective of this systematic review was to consolidate and characterize the incidence, classification, and management of idiopathic secondary stenosis in the literature.

METHODS

Literature from PubMed, Web Of Science, and EMBASE from 1970 to March 2022 was reviewed. The following information was extracted for individual patients: incidence of idiopathic secondary stenosis, index primary craniosynostosis, primary surgical correction, presenting signs of secondary stenosis, management, and further complications.

RESULTS

Seventeen articles detailing 1181 patients were included. Ninety-one developed idiopathic secondary stenosis (7.7%). Only 3 of these patients were syndromic. The most common index craniosynostosis was sagittal synostosis (83.5%). The most common suture undergoing idiopathic secondary stenosis was the coronal suture (91.2%). Patients presented at a median age of 24 months. The most common presenting sign was a radiologic finding (85.7%), although some patients presented with headache or head deformity. Only 2 patients, both syndromic, had complications following surgical correction of secondary stenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Idiopathic secondary stenosis is a rare, long-term complication following index surgical repair of craniosynostosis. It can occur following any surgical technique. It most commonly affects the coronal suture but can affect any of the sutures, including pansynostosis. Surgical correction is curative in nonsyndromic patients.

Persistent Cranial Defects After Endoscopic Sagittal Synostosis Surgery

INTRODUCTION

Incomplete cranial ossification is a rare complication of calvarial-vault remodeling for sagittal synostosis often requiring reoperation. Studies show an incidence ranging from 0.5% to 18%.

METHODS

Infants with sagittal synostosis who underwent endoscopic sagittal synostectomy and barrel stave osteotomies with postoperative orthotic helmeting between 2003 and 2021 were included with minimum follow-up until the completion of helmeting.

RESULTS

Of 90 patients, 86 met inclusion; 3 had defects (3.5%). Patients with and without cranial defects had no difference in age of surgery (113 versus 131 d), duration helmeting (6.6 versus 7.0 mo), or perioperative/postoperative complications. Two underwent reoperation for recurrence. Patients with cranial defects manifested the evidence of developmental concerns more than patients without (100% versus 16.9%).The average cranial defect size was 19.33 cm 2 and age at surgery 4.29 years. All were managed with cranial particulate bone grafting with addition of bone matrix and SonicWeld plate. The first had 6×6 cm posterior defect requiring cranioplasty at 4.86 years with excellent healing. The second had a 3×6 cm posterior and 1×1 cm anterior defect, underwent cranioplasty at 4.14 years with persistent 4×6 defect, requiring repeat cranioplasty at 5.3 years. The third had a 3×5 cm posterior defect and underwent cranioplasty at 3.88 years with continued defect, planning for repeat intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest documented series of reoperations for incomplete ossification after endoscopic sagittal synostectomy with postoperative helmet treatment. The authors report a 3.5% rate of cranial defects, managed with bone grafting, bone matrix, and absorbable plates. Patients with poor ossification may have a propensity toward developmental concerns.

Modified endoscopic strip craniectomy technique for sagittal craniosynostosis: provides comparable results and avoids bony defects

PURPOSE

This study describes a modified technique addressing bony defects and incomplete ossification after endoscopic strip craniectomy (ESC) for SC followed by postoperative helmet therapy (PHT). The study aims to delineate quantitative and qualitative outcomes of this modified ESC technique followed by PHT and discern the optimal duration of PHT following ESC. A secondary aim is to address the effects of the technique on bony defects.

METHODS

Patients undergoing ESC followed by PHT between 2017 and 2021 were included. Patient sex, age at surgery, duration of surgery, red blood cell transfusion, length of hospital stay, PHT duration, cephalic index (CI) at multiple time points, and bony defect information were collected. Descriptive and correlative analysis was done.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients (25 male, 6 female) were operated in study period. Mean age at surgery was 12.81 weeks, mean duration of surgery was 57.50 min, average transfused RBC volume was 32 cc, mean length of hospital stay was 1.84 days, mean PHT duration was 33.16 weeks, and mean follow-up time was 63.42 weeks. Mean preoperative CI was 70.6, and mean CI at the end of PHT was significantly higher, being 77.1. Maximum improvement in CI (CI_max) took place at week 22.97. PHT duration did not have a correlation with CI at last follow up. There were no bony defects.

CONCLUSION

Modified ESC technique is effective in successful correction of sagittal craniosynostosis. CI_max already takes place, while PHT is continuing, but there is no certain time point for dishelmeting. The technique avoided bony defects and incomplete ossification.

Long-term Outcomes of Non-syndromic and Syndromic Craniosynostosis: Analysis of Demographic, Morphologic, and Surgical Factors

In this study, we analyzed the outcomes of patients (followed for 5–38 years, average 17.3 years) with craniosynostosis and evaluated their long-term prognosis. In all, 51 patients who underwent surgery for craniosynostosis between 1982 and 2015, including 12 syndromic and 39 non-syndromic cases, were included. The average age at the initial surgery was significantly lower in the syndromic group than that in the non-syndromic group (9.8 months old vs. 19.9 months, respectively). The surgical procedures did not significantly differ between the two groups, but repeat surgery was significantly more common in the syndromic group than in the non-syndromic group (4 children [30.8%] and 3 children [7.7%], respectively). The children requiring repeat surgery tended to be younger at the initial surgery than those who did not. Those patients who required repeat surgery did not have significantly different surgical procedures initially. The incidence of developmental retardation was 49.0% (43.5% in the non-syndromic group and 66.7% in the syndromic group), and only two children in the non-syndromic group displayed recovery. This study is the first to analyze the prognosis for patients who were followed for at least 5 years after cranioplasty. Repeat surgery was common, especially in syndromic patients. Severity of skull deformity and early initial surgery may be important factors determining the need for repeat surgery. Developmental retardation was also common, and improvement was rare even after surgery.

Neosagittal Suture Formation after Endoscopic Sagittal Strip Craniectomy: A Case Report and Literature Review

The fate of the excised synostotic suture in craniosynostosis remains relatively understudied. The purpose of this report is to describe a case of neosagittal suture formation following endoscopic excision of a pathology-proven synostotic suture, with CT demonstration of complete reossification in the areas adjacent to the neosagittal suture. We additionally review the existing literature on neosuture formation that has been published over the past 50 years. We conclude that continued investigation is warranted, both through histological comparison of normal and neosutures and through studies to determine clinical risk factors, as this may improve our understanding of the underlying mechanism of pathologic premature suture fusion in craniosynostosis.