Use of the train-of-five bipolar technique to provide reliable, spatially accurate motor cortex identification in asleep patients

Threshold Interphase Delay for Bipolar Pulses to Prevent Cancellation Phenomenon during Electrochemotherapy

Electroporation-based procedures employing nanosecond bipolar pulses are commonly linked to an undesirable phenomenon known as the cancelation effect. The cancellation effect arises when the second pulse partially or completely neutralizes the effects of the first pulse, simultaneously diminishing cells' plasma membrane permeabilization and the overall efficiency of the procedure. Introducing a temporal gap between the positive and negative phases of the bipolar pulses during electroporation procedures may help to overcome the cancellation phenomenon; however, the exact thresholds are not yet known. Therefore, in this work, we have tested the influence of different interphase delay values (from 0 ms to 95 ms) using symmetric bipolar nanoseconds (300 and 500 ns) on cell permeabilization using 10 Hz, 100 Hz, and 1 kHz protocols. As a model mouse hepatoma, the MH-22a cell line was employed. Additionally, we conducted in vitro electrochemotherapy with cisplatin, employing reduced interphase delay values (0 ms and 0.1 ms) at 10 Hz. Cell plasma membrane permeabilization and viability dependence on a variety of bipolar pulsed electric field protocols were characterized. It was shown that it is possible to minimize bipolar cancellation, enabling treatment efficiency comparable to monophasic pulses with identical parameters. At the same time, it was highlighted that bipolar cancellation has a significant influence on permeabilization, while the effects on the outcome of electrochemotherapy are minimal.

Motor Mapping of the Brain: Taniguchi Versus Penfield Method

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) techniques continue to prove useful as an adjunct in select surgeries for reducing the incidence of various postoperative deficits in motor function through the monitoring of motor evoked potentials (MEPs). The Penfield and Taniguchi methods of direct electrical cortical stimulation (DECS) stand in contrast to each other. Penfield’s method uses lower-frequency stimulation over a longer duration, while Taniguchi’s method uses a relatively higher frequency over a short duration. DECS motor mapping is considered suitable for tumor resections, aneurysm surgeries, arteriovenous malformation, and epilepsy surgeries. While subcortical motor mapping works efficiently with both methods, it aligns with Taniguchi’s method more effectively. Taniguchi’s method has a lower risk of seizures relative to Penfield’s method. While only cortical neurons are excited in Penfield’s stimulation technique, Taniguchi’s technique excites the whole corticospinal tract (CST), so it can be used for mapping in a stand-alone fashion. The Penfield technique remains the method of choice for language mapping. In all motor mapping, Train-of-Four (TOF) stimulation during the surgical procedure ensures that the patient’s muscles are not unduly relaxed.

Safe Surgery for Glioblastoma: Recent Advances and Modern Challenges

One of the major challenges during glioblastoma surgery is balancing between maximizing extent of resection and preventing neurological deficits. Several surgical techniques and adjuncts have been developed to help identify eloquent areas both preoperatively (fMRI, nTMS, MEG, DTI) and intraoperatively (imaging (ultrasound, iMRI), electrostimulation (mapping), cerebral perfusion measurements (fUS)), and visualization (5-ALA, fluoresceine)). In this review, we give an update of the state-of-the-art management of both primary and recurrent glioblastomas. We will review the latest surgical advances, challenges, and approaches that define the onco-neurosurgical practice in a contemporary setting and give an overview of the current prospective scientific efforts.

Subcortical Stimulation in Brain Tumor Surgery: A closer look beneath the surface

INTRODUCTION

Maximizing a patient's onco-functional balance is the central tenet of brain tumor surgery. As a result, numerous surgical adjuncts have been developed to facilitate identification of the tumor-brain interface and preservation of functional anatomy. Among these, intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IONM) with direct cortical and subcortical stimulation remains the gold standard for real time, functional mapping of motor and language activity. However, stimulation techniques are not standardized and vary significantly across institutions. This is particularly true with subcortical stimulation for mapping of motor function.

METHODS

We review the state of subcortical IONM and mapping techniques. Historical and predicate literature were reviewed as well as new and emerging techniques. We discuss their evolution, clinical utility, and limitations to direct future research and application.

RESULTS

We evaluate and discuss the background and current clinical use of direct cortical and subcortical stimulation techniques and protocols and identify current trends and limitations. We focus specifically on methods of subcortical stimulation given the heterogeneity in the published literature. We also suggest directions to optimize the clinical utility of these tools.

CONCLUSION

Despite significant heterogeneity in published techniques, trends support the use of the Taniguchi method for subcortical stimulation. Novel dynamic stimulation techniques may improve accuracy. Prospective studies to define standardized guidelines are needed.

Motor Evoked Potential Warning Criteria in Supratentorial Surgery: A Scoping Review

During intraoperative monitoring of motor evoked potentials (MEP), heterogeneity across studies in terms of study populations, intraoperative settings, applied warning criteria, and outcome reporting exists. A scoping review of MEP warning criteria in supratentorial surgery was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Sixty-eight studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria. The most commonly used alarm criteria were MEP signal loss, which was always a major warning sign, followed by amplitude reduction and threshold elevation. Irreversible MEP alterations were associated with a higher number of transient and persisting motor deficits compared with the reversible changes. In almost all studies, specificity and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) were high, while in most of them, sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value (PPV) were rather low or modest. Thus, the absence of an irreversible alteration may reassure the neurosurgeon that the patient will not suffer a motor deficit in the short-term and long-term follow-up. Further, MEPs perform well as surrogate markers, and reversible MEP deteriorations after successful intervention indicate motor function preservation postoperatively. However, in future studies, a consensus regarding the definitions of MEP alteration, critical duration of alterations, and outcome reporting should be determined.

Brain connectomics applied to oncological neuroscience: from a traditional surgical strategy focusing on glioma topography to a meta-network approach

The classical way for surgical selection and planning in cerebral glioma mainly focused on tumor topography. The emerging science of connectomics, which aims of mapping brain connectivity, resulted in a paradigmatic shift from a modular account of cerebral organization to a meta-network perspective. Adaptive behavior is actually mediated by constant changes in interactions within and across large-scale delocalized neural systems underlying conation, cognition, and emotion. Here, to optimize the onco-functional balance of glioma surgery, the purpose is to switch toward a connectome-based resection taking account of both relationships between the tumor and critical distributed circuits (especially subcortical pathways) as well as the perpetual instability of the meta-network. Such dynamic in the neural spatiotemporal integration permits functional reallocation leading to neurological recovery after massive resection in structures traditionally thought as "inoperable." This better understanding of connectome increases benefit/risk ratio of surgery (i) by selecting resection in areas deemed "eloquent" according to a localizationist dogma; (ii), conversely, by refining intraoperative awake cognitive mapping and monitoring in so-called non-eloquent areas; (iii) by improving preoperative information, enabling an optimal selection of intrasurgical tasks tailored to the patient's wishes; (iv) by developing an "oncological disconnection surgery"; (v) by defining a personalized multistep surgical strategy adapted to individual brain reshaping potential; and (vi) ultimately by preserving environmentally and socially appropriate behavior, including return to work, while increasing the extent of (possibly repeated) resection(s). Such a holistic vision of neural processing can enhance reliability of connectomal surgery in oncological neuroscience and may also be applied to restorative neurosurgery.

Functional Mapping for Glioma Surgery, Part 2: Intraoperative Mapping Tools

Intraoperative functional mapping of tumor and peri-tumor tissue is a well-established technique for avoiding permanent neurologic deficits and maximizing extent of resection. Motor, language, and other cognitive domains may be assessed with intraoperative tasks. This article describes techniques used for motor and language mapping including awake mapping considerations in addition to less traditional intraoperative testing paradigms for cognition. It also discusses complications associated with mapping and insights into complication avoidance.

Surgical Management of Brain Metastases in the Perirolandic Region

Brain metastases (BM) are the most frequent intracranial tumors, which may result in significant morbidity and mortality when the lesions involve the perirolandic region. Surgical intervention for BM in the perirolandic region is still under discussion even though prompt relief of mass effect and avoidance of necrosis together with brain edema may not be achieved by radiotherapy. More recently, several researchers attempt to evaluate the benefit of surgery for BM within this pivotal sensorimotor area. Nevertheless, data are sparse and optimal treatment paradigm is not yet widely described. Since the advance in intraoperative neuroimaging and neurophysiology, resection of BM in the perirolandic region has been proven to be safe and efficacious, sparing this eloquent area while retaining reasonably low morbidity rates. Although management of BM becomes much more tailored and multimodal, surgery remains the cornerstone and principles of resection as well as indications for surgery should be well defined. This is the first review concerning the characteristics of BM involving the perirolandic region and the current impact of surgical therapy for the lesions. Future perspectives of advanced neurosurgical techniques are also presented.