Early experience with a novel net temporary bridging device (Cascade) to assist endovascular coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms

Enhancing thromboresistance of neurovascular nickel-titanium devices with responsive heparin hydrogel coatings

BACKGROUND

Neurointerventional devices, particularly laser-cut thin-strut stents made of self-expanding nickel-titanium alloy, are increasingly utilized for endovascular applications in intracranial arteries and dural venous sinuses. Preventing thrombosis and stroke necessitates systemic anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapies with the risk of bleeding complications. Antithrombotic coatings present a promising solution.

METHODS

In this study, we investigated the potential of hydrogels composed of four-armed poly(ethylene glycol) (starPEG) and heparin, with or without coagulation-responsive heparin release, as coatings for neurovascular devices to mitigate blood clot formation. We evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of these coatings on neurovascular devices through in vitro Chandler-Loop assays and implantation experiments in the supra-aortic arteries of rabbits.

RESULTS

Stable and coagulation-responsive starPEG-heparin hydrogel coatings exhibited antithrombotic efficacy in vitro, although with a slightly reduced thromboprotection observed in vivo. Furthermore, the hydrogel coatings demonstrated robustness against shear forces encountered during deployment and elicited only marginal humoral and cellular inflammatory responses compared with the reference standards.

CONCLUSION

Heparin hydrogel coatings offer promising benefits for enhancing the hemocompatibility of neurointerventional devices made of self-expanding nickel-titanium alloy. The variance in performance between in vitro and in vivo settings may be attributed to differences in low- and high-shear blood flow conditions inherent to these models. These models may represent the differences in venous and arterial systems. Further optimization is warranted to tailor the hydrogel coatings for improved efficacy in arterial applications.

The Stream Device-A Retrospective Review of 51 Cases

Mechanical thrombectomy is the gold-standard treatment for patients that have suffered large-vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke. Various different stent-retrievers, aspiration catheters, and techniques have been developed to perform this procedure. We present our initial results regarding the Stream device.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database at our high-volume centre to identify all patients treated with the Stream device between February 2021 and January 2023. We recorded baseline demographics, NIHSS, ASPECT scores, eTICI scores, complications, and 90-day mRS.

RESULTS

We identified 51 patients, 49.0% of whom were male (n = 25), with a median age of 73 (range: 51-89) and a median NIHSS score of 17 (range 4-22), and 68.6% received IV tPA. The median ASPECT score was 10 (range 6-10). Hyperdense clots were seen in 34 cases (66.7%), with a mean clot length of 12 ± 6.2 mm (range 2-26 mm). Clots were located in the anterior circulation in 49 patients. The standard Stream device was used in 78.4% of cases, with Stream 17 being used in 19.6% of cases. The FPE was observed in 25.5% of cases (n = 13), with the mFPE being seen in 31.4% of cases (n = 16). A final eTICI score of ≥2b was achieved in 90.2% of cases (n = 46), and eTICI 2c/3 was seen in 84.3% of cases (n = 43). Furthermore, 24 h CT scans showed that the median ASPECT score was 8 (range 0-10). Good functional outcomes at 90 days (mRS ≤ 2) were achieved in 21.6% of cases (n = 11).

CONCLUSIONS

The Stream device shows acceptable rates of FPE and mFPE compared to existing devices. Further larger studies are required alongside an understanding of the optimal technique for this device's use.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of Comaneci/Cascade temporary neck bridging devices for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms

Background

The temporary neck bridging devices represented by Comaneci and Cascade are a type of promising endovascular device for the treatment of intracranial bifurcation or wide-necked aneurysms. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess the efficacy and safety of Comaneci/Cascade devices for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms.

Methods

We performed a systematic literature search on articles in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science that evaluated the efficacy and safety of Comaneci/Cascade devices for endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms, based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analytics (PRISMA) guideline. We extracted the characteristics and treatment related information of patients included in the study, recorded the rate of technical success, procedural related complications, and angiographic outcomes. The angiographic outcome was evaluated based on Raymond Roy classification, and adequate occlusion was defined as Raymond Ray I + II.

Results

Nine studies comprising 253 patients with 255 aneurysms were included. Among them, eight studies were conducted in Europe, one study was conducted in the USA. All these studies were retrospective. 206 aneurysms (80.78%) were ruptured. The vast majority of patients with ruptured aneurysms did not receive antiplatelet therapy. The rate of technical success was 97.1% (95% CI, 94.9 to 99.3%, I2 = 0%). The rate of periprocedural clinical complications was 10.9% (95% CI, 5.4 to 22.1%, I2 = 54%). The rate of complete occlusion (RR1) and adequate occlusion (RR1 + RR2) on immediate angiography after the procedure were 77.7% (95% CI, 72.7 to 83.2%, I2 = 35%) and 98% (95% CI, 95.9 to 100%, I2 = 0%) respectively. The rate of complete occlusion (RR1) and adequate occlusion (RR1 + RR2) on the last follow-up angiography were 81.2% (95% CI, 69.2 to 95.2%, I2 = 81%) and 93.7% (95% CI, 85.6 to 100%, I2 = 69%) respectively, with follow-up range from 3 to 18 months. 22/187 (11.76%) cases of aneurysms progressed during the follow-up period. 39/187 (20.86%) cases of aneurysms received additional treatment during the follow-up period. No fatal complications occurred during the treatment.

Conclusion

The Comaneci/Cascade device can be used as an auxiliary treatment for intracranial aneurysms, with a good occlusion effect, but the incidence of complications still needs to be monitored.

Comprehensive review of the recent advances in devices for endovascular treatment of complex brain aneurysms

The International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) showed superiority for endovascular treatment of ruptured aneurysms and technology has since moved on rapidly. Many approaches and technology now exist for the endovascular management of ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms, which reflects their varied nature - there is no one-size-fits-all technique. We aim to provide an overview of the various classes of device and the major developments over the past decade. Coiling is the oldest of the technology and continues to demonstrate high levels of occlusion and acceptable risks, making it the default treatment choice, particularly in the acutely ruptured aneurysm setting. Advances on coiling include the use of adjuncts such as balloons, stents and fully retrievable temporary neck-bridging devices, which have facilitated the treatment of more complex aneurysms. Flow divertors have also revolutionised complex aneurysm treatment with small added risk in acute aneurysm treatment and seek to remodel the aneurysm-vessel interface without accessing the aneurysm sac. The latest development and most promising avenue appears to be intrasaccular flow disrupting devices like WEB, Contour and Neqstent that provide excellent opportunities to treat wide neck complex aneurysm with minimal mortality and morbidity and good occlusion rates and may in future replace a significant number of stent-assisted coiling too.

Neurovascular Neck-Bridging device in treatment of wide-necked splenic artery aneurysms

We report the cases of 2 female patients, 45-year-old and 49-year-old, affected by wide-necked splenic aneurysm. We embolized the 2 lesions assisted by a new scaffolding neurovascular device, the Cascade Net, an innovative –occlusive remodeling device for temporary bridging in endovascular coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms. Visceral artery aneurysms are rare with an estimated prevalence of 2%-3% in imaging series and up to 10% in autopsy series. Most are asymptomatic and their diagnosis is occasionally. Aneurysm spontaneous rupture has been demonstrated in 2%-10% of cases and it can result in significant morbidity and mortality. Conservative management and open repair were the preferred treatment options for many years. Endovascular repair has been increasingly used since 2000; and the most widespread method of treatment has been coiling. Because of tortuosity of the parent artery, wide neck, and unfavorable locations at arterial branch points, 6% of Visceral and renal artery aneurysms VRAA cannot be adequately treated by simple coiling and requires parent artery remodeling through balloon occlusion, stent placement or parent vessel occlusion, leading to, in the latter situation, a compromised organ perfusion. Increasingly, balloon-assisted, and stent-assisted approaches as well as novel scaffolding neurovascular devices such as the Cascade Net, have allowed wide necked aneurysms to be bridged during endovascular treatment with smaller delivery system, averting parent artery occlusion and risk of distal embolization.

The Cascade device - In vitro tests to assess coil protrusion into the parent vessel

BACKGROUND

Balloon and stent-assisted coiling of aneurysms have increased the number of aneurysms available for endovascular treatment. Newer devices that allow flow within the parent vessel but coverage at the neck have recently entered the market. The Cascade is a new non-occlusive fully retrievable neck-bridging support device that has been designed to provide temporary support during coil embolisation of intracranial aneurysms.

METHODS

Using a silicone aneurysm model three different aneurysms were catheterised with the coiling microcatheter placed in three different positions within each aneurysm - at the neck, centrally, and looped within the aneurysm. Multiple different coils were then deployed within each aneurysm with the Cascade device deployed across the neck to provide protection. In total 480 attempted coilings were performed. Aneurysm flow was used to calculate the change in intra-aneurysmal flow with the Cascade device deployed across the neck of the aneurysm.

RESULTS

We did not observe a single episode of coil protrusion through the Cascade mesh nor did we observe any coil protrusion into the parent vessel when the Cascade was deployed across the neck. There was an average flow velocity reduction of 23% with the Cascade device deployed across the neck of the aneurysm.

CONCLUSION

The Cascade device offers robust protection of the aneurysmal neck and parent vessel as well as inducing significant intra-aneurysmal flow velocity reduction.