1
|
Alvi MA, Kwon BK, Hejrati N, Tetreault LA, Evaniew N, Skelly AC, Fehlings MG. Accuracy of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in the Diagnosis of Intraoperative Neurological Decline in the Setting of Spinal Surgery-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Global Spine J 2024; 14:105S-149S. [PMID: 38632716 PMCID: PMC10964897 DOI: 10.1177/21925682231196514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. OBJECTIVES In an effort to prevent intraoperative neurological injury during spine surgery, the use of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) has increased significantly in recent years. Using IONM, spinal cord function can be evaluated intraoperatively by recording signals from specific nerve roots, motor tracts, and sensory tracts. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies to evaluate the efficacy of IONM among patients undergoing spine surgery for any indication. METHODS The current systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis statement for Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (PRISMA-DTA) and was registered on PROSPERO. A comprehensive search was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE and SCOPUS for all studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of neuromonitoring, including somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP), motor evoked potential (MEP) and electromyography (EMG), either on their own or in combination (multimodal). Studies were included if they reported raw numbers for True Positives (TP), False Negatives (FN), False Positives (FP) and True Negative (TN) either in a 2 × 2 contingency table or in text, and if they used postoperative neurologic exam as a reference standard. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated to evaluate the overall efficacy of each modality type using a bivariate model adapted by Reitsma et al, for all spine surgeries and for individual disease groups and regions of spine. The risk of bias (ROB) of included studies was assessed using the quality assessment tool for diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2). RESULTS A total of 163 studies were included; 52 of these studies with 16,310 patients reported data for SSEP, 68 studies with 71,144 patients reported data for MEP, 16 studies with 7888 patients reported data for EMG and 69 studies with 17,968 patients reported data for multimodal monitoring. The overall sensitivity, specificity, DOR and AUC for SSEP were 71.4% (95% CI 54.8-83.7), 97.1% (95% CI 95.3-98.3), 41.9 (95% CI 24.1-73.1) and .899, respectively; for MEP, these were 90.2% (95% CI 86.2-93.1), 96% (95% CI 94.3-97.2), 103.25 (95% CI 69.98-152.34) and .927; for EMG, these were 48.3% (95% CI 31.4-65.6), 92.9% (95% CI 84.4-96.9), 11.2 (95% CI 4.84-25.97) and .773; for multimodal, these were found to be 83.5% (95% CI 81-85.7), 93.8% (95% CI 90.6-95.9), 60 (95% CI 35.6-101.3) and .895, respectively. Using the QUADAS-2 ROB analysis, of the 52 studies reporting on SSEP, 13 (25%) were high-risk, 10 (19.2%) had some concerns and 29 (55.8%) were low-risk; for MEP, 8 (11.7%) were high-risk, 21 had some concerns and 39 (57.3%) were low-risk; for EMG, 4 (25%) were high-risk, 3 (18.75%) had some concerns and 9 (56.25%) were low-risk; for multimodal, 14 (20.3%) were high-risk, 13 (18.8%) had some concerns and 42 (60.7%) were low-risk. CONCLUSIONS These results indicate that all neuromonitoring modalities have diagnostic utility in successfully detecting impending or incident intraoperative neurologic injuries among patients undergoing spine surgery for any condition, although it is clear that the accuracy of each modality differs.PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42023384158.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed Ali Alvi
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Brian K Kwon
- International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Nader Hejrati
- Division of Neurosurgery, Krembil Neuroscience Centre, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Nathan Evaniew
- McCaig Institute for Bone and Joint Health, Department of Surgery, Orthopaedic Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | | | - Michael G Fehlings
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Neurosurgery, Krembil Neuroscience Centre, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Neurosurgery and Spine Program, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chang KE, Mesregah MK, Fresquez Z, Stanton EW, Buser Z, Wang JC. Use of graft materials and biologics in spine deformity surgery: a state-of-the-art review. Spine Deform 2022; 10:1217-1231. [PMID: 35733056 DOI: 10.1007/s43390-022-00529-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2021] [Accepted: 05/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of the current review is to summarize the current evidence on graft materials used in fusion procedures for spinal deformity corrections. METHODS PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant published observational studies and clinical trials using osteobiologics and biomaterials in spinal deformity surgery. RESULTS The use of autograft in deformity correction surgeries has been reported in a limited number of studies, with the harvest sites including iliac crest, ribs, and local bone. Various allografts and biologics have been used in the treatment of spinal deformities including idiopathic and degenerative scoliosis, either as stand alone or in combination with autograft. Limited number of studies reported no differences in fusion rates or outcomes. Use of rh-BMP2 in anterior, posterior or front/back approaches showed higher fusion rates than other graft materials in patients with spinal deformities. Due to the limited number of quality studies included in the review, as well as alternative factors, such as costs, availability, and surgeon expertise/preference, no definitive conclusion or recommendations can be made as to the ideal graft choice in spinal deformity surgery. CONCLUSIONS Most commonly used grafts included autograft, allograft and rh-BMP2, with new biologics and biomaterials constantly emerging in the market. Limited number of high-quality comparative studies and heterogeneity in study design prevented direct comparisons that can lead to meaningful recommendations. Further studies are needed to prove superiority of any single graft material and/or biologic that is also cost-effective and safe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ki-Eun Chang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1450 San Pablo St., HC4, Suite 5400A, Los Angeles, CA, 90003, USA
| | - Mohamed Kamal Mesregah
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1450 San Pablo St., HC4, Suite 5400A, Los Angeles, CA, 90003, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Shibin el Kom, Egypt
| | - Zoe Fresquez
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1450 San Pablo St., HC4, Suite 5400A, Los Angeles, CA, 90003, USA
| | - Eloise W Stanton
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1450 San Pablo St., HC4, Suite 5400A, Los Angeles, CA, 90003, USA
| | - Zorica Buser
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1450 San Pablo St., HC4, Suite 5400A, Los Angeles, CA, 90003, USA.
| | - Jeffrey C Wang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1450 San Pablo St., HC4, Suite 5400A, Los Angeles, CA, 90003, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lau D, Guo L, Deviren V, Ames CP. Utility of intraoperative neuromonitoring and outcomes of neurological complication in lower cervical and upper thoracic posterior-based three-column osteotomies for cervical deformity. J Neurosurg Spine 2021:1-9. [PMID: 34624840 DOI: 10.3171/2021.5.spine202057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE For severe and rigid adult cervical deformity, posterior-based three-column osteotomies (3COs) are warranted, but neurological complications are relatively high with such procedures. The performance measures of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) during cervicothoracic 3CO have yet to be studied, and there remains a paucity of literature regarding the topic. Therefore, the authors of this study examined the performance of IONM in predicting new neurological weakness following lower cervical and upper thoracic 3CO. In addition, they report the 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year outcomes of patients who experienced new postoperative weakness. METHODS The authors performed a retrospective review of a single surgeon's experience from 2011 to 2018 with all patients who had undergone posterior-based 3CO in the lower cervical (C7) or upper thoracic (T1-4) spine. Medical and neuromonitoring records were independently reviewed. RESULTS A total of 56 patients were included in the analysis, 38 of whom had undergone pedicle subtraction osteotomy and 18 of whom had undergone vertebral column resection. The mean age was 61.6 years, and 41.1% of the patients were male. Among the study cohort, 66.1% were myelopathic and 33.9% had preoperative weakness. Mean blood loss was 1565.0 ml, and length of surgery was 315.9 minutes. Preoperative and postoperative measures assessed were cervical sagittal vertical axis (6.5 and 3.8 cm, respectively; p < 0.001), cervical lordosis (2.3° and -6.7°, p = 0.042), and T1 slope (48.6° and 35.8°, p < 0.001). The complication rate was 49.0%, and the new neurological deficit rate was 17.9%. When stratifying by osteotomy level, there were significantly higher rates of neurological deficits at C7 and T1: C7 (37.5%), T1 (44.4%), T2 (16.7%), T3 (14.3%), and T4 (0.0%; p = 0.042). Most new neurological weakness was the nerve root pattern rather than the spinal cord pattern. Overall, there were 16 IONM changes at any threshold: 14 at 50%, 8 at 75%, and 13 if only counting patients who did not return to baseline (RTB). Performance measures for the various thresholds were accuracy (73.2% to 77.8%), positive predictive value (25.0% to 46.2%), negative predictive value (81.3% to 88.1%), sensitivity (18.2% to 54.5%), and specificity (77.8% to 86.7%). Sensitivity to detect a spinal cord pattern of weakness was 100% and 28.6% for a nerve root pattern of weakness. In patients with a new postoperative deficit, 22.2% were unchanged, 44.4% improved, and 33.3% had a RTB at the 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Complication rates are high following posterior 3CO for cervical deformity. 3CO at C7 and T1 has the highest rates of neurological deficit. Current IONM modalities have modest performance in predicting postoperative deficits, especially for nerve root neuropraxia. A large prospective multicenter study is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darryl Lau
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, New York University, New York, New York
| | - Lanjun Guo
- 2Department of Neurophysiology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Vedat Deviren
- 3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco; and
| | - Christopher P Ames
- 4Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lau D, Haddad AF, Fury MT, Deviren V, Ames CP. Multilevel Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy for Correction of Severe Rigid Adult Spinal Deformities: A Case Series, Indications, Considerations, and Literature Review. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2021; 20:343-354. [PMID: 33377144 DOI: 10.1093/ons/opaa419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rigid and ankylosed thoracolumbar spinal deformities require three-column osteotomy (3CO) to achieve adequate correction. For severe and multiregional deformities, multilevel 3CO is required but its use and outcomes are rarely reported. OBJECTIVE To describe the use of multilevel pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients with severe, rigid, and ankylosed multiregional deformity. METHODS Retrospective review of 5 ASD patients who underwent multilevel PSO for the correction of severe fixed deformity and review the literature regarding the use of multilevel PSO. RESULTS Five patients presented with spinal imbalance secondary to regional and multiregional spinal deformities involving the thoracolumbar spine. All patients underwent a single-stage two-level noncontiguous PSO, and 2 of the patients underwent a staged third PSO to treat deformity involving a separate spinal region. Significant radiographic correction was achieved with normalization of spinal alignment and parameters. Two-level PSO was able to provide greater than 80 degrees of sagittal plane correction in both the lumbar and thoracic spine. Two patients experienced new postoperative weakness which recovered to preoperative baseline at 3 to 6 mo follow-up. At most recent follow-up, 4 of the 5 patients gained significant pain relief and had improved functionality. CONCLUSION Noncontiguous multilevel PSO is a formidable surgical technique. Additional risk (compared to single-level 3CO) comes in the form of greater blood loss and higher risk for postoperative weakness. Nonetheless, multilevel PSO is feasible and effective for correcting severe multiplanar and multiregional ASD, and patients gain significant benefits in increased functionality and pain relief.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darryl Lau
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Alexander F Haddad
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Marissa T Fury
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Vedat Deviren
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Christopher P Ames
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chryssikos T, Wessell A, Pratt N, Cannarsa G, Sharma A, Olexa J, Han N, Schwartzbauer G, Sansur C, Crandall K. Enhanced Safety of Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy Using Intraoperative Ultrasound. World Neurosurg 2021; 152:e523-e531. [PMID: 34098140 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.05.120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Revised: 05/27/2021] [Accepted: 05/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) can improve sagittal alignment but carries risks, including iatrogenic spinal cord and nerve root injury. Critically, during the reduction phase of the technique, medullary kinking or neural element compression can lead to neurologic deficits. METHODS We describe 3 cases of thoracic PSO and evaluate the feasibility, findings, and utility of intraoperative ultrasound in this setting. RESULTS Intraoperative ultrasound can provide a visual assessment of spinal cord morphology before and after PSO reduction and influences surgical decision making with regard to the final amount of sagittal plane correction. This modality is particularly useful for confirming ventral decompression of disc-osteophyte complex before reduction and also after reduction maneuvers when there is kinking of the thecal sac but uncertainty about the underlying status of the spinal cord. Intraoperative ultrasound is a reliable modality that fits well into the technical sequence of PSO, adds a minimal amount of operative time, and has few limitations. CONCLUSIONS We propose that intraoperative ultrasound is a useful supplement to standard neuromonitoring modalities for ensuring safe PSO reduction and decompression of neural elements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy Chryssikos
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
| | - Aaron Wessell
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Nathan Pratt
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Gregory Cannarsa
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Ashish Sharma
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Joshua Olexa
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Nathan Han
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Gary Schwartzbauer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Charles Sansur
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Kenneth Crandall
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mao G, Elhamdani S, Gigliotti MJ, Mace Z, Sclabassi R, Oh M, Whiting D. Neurologic Complications in Monitored versus Unmonitored Image-Guidance Assisted Posterior Lumbar Instrumentation. World Neurosurg 2021; 152:e155-e160. [PMID: 34052456 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.05.074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2021] [Revised: 05/16/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IOM) has been used clinically since the 1970s and is a reliable tool for detecting impending neurologic compromise. However, there are mixed data as to whether long-term neurologic outcomes are improved with its use. We investigated whether IOM used in conjunction with image guidance produces different patient outcomes than with image guidance alone. METHODS We reviewed 163 consecutive cases between January 2015 and December 2018 and compared patients undergoing posterior lumbar instrumentation with image guidance using and not using multimodal IOM. Monitored and unmonitored surgeries were performed by the same surgeons, ruling out variability in intersurgeon technique. Surgical and neurologic complication rates were compared between these 2 cohorts. RESULTS A total of 163 patients were selected (110 in the nonmonitored cohort vs. 53 in the IOM cohort). Nineteen signal changes were noted. Only 3 of the 19 patients with signal changes had associated neurologic deficits postoperatively (positive predictive value 15.7%). There were 5 neurologic deficits that were observed in the nonmonitored cohort and 8 deficits observed in the monitored cohort. Transient neurologic deficit was significantly higher in the monitored cohort per case (P < 0.0198) and per screw (P < 0.0238); however, there was no difference observed between the 2 cohorts when considering permanent neurologic morbidity per case (P < 0.441) and per screw (P < 0.459). CONCLUSIONS The addition of IOM to cases using image guidance does not appear to decrease long-term postoperative neurologic morbidity and may have a reduced diagnostic role given availability of intraoperative image-guidance systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gordon Mao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Shahed Elhamdani
- Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Michael J Gigliotti
- Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.
| | - Zachary Mace
- Computational Diagnostics, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Robert Sclabassi
- Neuroscience Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Michael Oh
- Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Donald Whiting
- Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Girod PP, Kögl N, Molliqaj G, Lener S, Hartmann S, Thomé C. Flexing a standard hinge-powered operating table for lumbosacral three-column osteotomy (3-CO) site closure in 84 consecutive patients. Neurosurg Rev 2021; 45:517-524. [PMID: 33963469 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-021-01559-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Revised: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Three-column osteotomy (3-CO) is a powerful technique in adult deformity surgery, and pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) is the workhorse to correct severe kyphotic spinal deformities. Aging of the population, increasing cases of iatrogenic flat back deformities and understanding the importance of sagittal balance have led to a dramatic increase of this surgical technique. Surgery, however, is demanding and associated with high complication rates so that every step of the procedure requires meticulous technique. Particularly, osteotomy closure is associated with risks like secondary fracture, translation, or iatrogenic stenosis. This step is traditionally performed by compression or a cantilever maneuver with sometimes excessive forces on the screws or instrumentation. Implant loosening or abrupt subluxation resulting in construct failure and/or neurological deficits can result. The aim of this prospective registry study was to assess the efficacy and safety of our surgical PSO technique as well as the osteotomy closure by flexing a hinge-powered OR table. In a series of 84 consecutive lumbosacral 3-CO, a standardized surgical technique with special focus on closure of the osteotomy was prospectively evaluated. The surgical steps with the patients positioned prone on a soft frame are detailed. Osteotomy closure was achieved by remote controlled bending of a standard OR table without compressive or cantilever forces in all 84 cases. This technique carries a number of advantages, particularly the reversibility and the slow speed of closure with minimum force. There was not a single mechanical intraoperative complication such as vertebral body fracture, subluxation, or adjacent implant loosening during osteotomy closure, compared to external cohorts using the cantilever technique (p = 0.130). The feasibility of controlled 3-CO closure by flexing a standard OR table is demonstrated. This technique enables a safe, gentle closure of the osteotomy site with minimal risk of implant failure or accidental neurological injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre-Pascal Girod
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, MZA 3rd floor, Tyrol, 6020, Austria.
| | - Nikolaus Kögl
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, MZA 3rd floor, Tyrol, 6020, Austria
| | - Granit Molliqaj
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Sara Lener
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, MZA 3rd floor, Tyrol, 6020, Austria
| | - Sebastian Hartmann
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, MZA 3rd floor, Tyrol, 6020, Austria
| | - Claudius Thomé
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, MZA 3rd floor, Tyrol, 6020, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wilent WB, Trott JM, Sestokas AK. Roadmap for Motor Evoked Potential (MEP) Monitoring for Patients Undergoing Lumbar and Lumbosacral Spinal Fusion Procedures. Neurodiagn J 2021; 61:27-36. [PMID: 33945448 DOI: 10.1080/21646821.2021.1866934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
MEPs are recommended for patients undergoing lumbar and lumbosacral procedures in which intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) is being utilized. While electromyography (EMG) provides critical nerve root proximity information, spontaneous EMG discharges are relatively poor at reliably diagnosing spinal nerve root dysfunction. In contrast, research indicates that MEPs are both sensitive and specific in diagnosing evolving spinal nerve root dysfunction. There is conflicting evidence, however, and it must be emphasized that the value of adding MEPs is only realized when practices and techniques are optimized. The ideal anesthetic plan is an optimized total intravenous anesthetic (TIVA) regimen. Selection of appropriate anesthetics and dosing is important for optimizing baseline response amplitudes and promoting diagnostic confidence in analyzing signal changes. An adaptive set of alert criteria that account for baseline amplitude and morphology fluctuations should guide the determination of significant signal change. The therapeutic impact of accurate diagnostic information depends on the timeliness of diagnosis and intervention. Prior to the start of surgery, a plan to obtain MEPs at least once every 10 minutes during the active part of the procedure and after every significant surgical maneuver should be agreed upon, and the intervention plan should include but not be limited to possible removal of hardware and release of retraction or distractive forces. In summary, MEPs can improve monitoring of at-risk nerve root function, but the accuracy and therapeutic impact of such monitoring depend on perioperative planning and communication that optimize use of this modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Julie M Trott
- Medical Department, SpecialtyCare, Brentwood, Tennessee
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hatef J, Katzir M, Toop N, Islam M, Clark T, Roscoe C, Khan S, Mendel E. Damned if you monitor, damned if you don't: medical malpractice and intraoperative neuromonitoring for spinal surgery. Neurosurg Focus 2020; 49:E19. [PMID: 33130617 DOI: 10.3171/2020.8.focus20580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Accepted: 08/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to identify trends in medical malpractice litigation related to intraoperative neuromonitoring. METHODS The Westlaw Edge legal research service was queried for malpractice litigation related to neuromonitoring in spine surgery. Cases were reviewed to determine if the plaintiff's assertion of negligence was due to either failure to use neuromonitoring or negligent monitoring. Comparative statistics and a detailed qualitative analysis of the resulting cases were performed. RESULTS Twenty-six cases related to neuromonitoring were identified. Spinal fusion was the procedure in question in all cases, and defendants were nearly evenly divided between orthopedic surgeons and neurosurgeons. Defense verdicts were most common (54%), followed by settlements (27%) and plaintiff verdicts (19%). Settlements resulted in a mean $7,575,000 damage award, while plaintiff verdicts resulted in a mean $4,180,213 damage award. The basis for litigation was failure to monitor in 54% of the cases and negligent monitoring in 46%. There were no significant differences in case outcomes between the two allegations of negligence. CONCLUSIONS The use and interpretation of intraoperative neuromonitoring findings can be the basis for a medical malpractice litigation. Spine surgeons can face malpractice risks by not monitoring when required by the standard of care and by interpreting or reacting to neuromonitoring findings inappropriately.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Hatef
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
| | - Miki Katzir
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center.,5Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Nathaniel Toop
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
| | - Monica Islam
- 2Section of Child Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children's Hospital and The Ohio State University
| | - Trevor Clark
- 3Associate General Counsel, Office of Legal Affairs and Risk Management, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
| | - Catherine Roscoe
- 3Associate General Counsel, Office of Legal Affairs and Risk Management, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
| | - Safdar Khan
- 4Division of Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center; and
| | - Ehud Mendel
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center.,5Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lau D, Haddad AF, Deviren V, Ames CP. Asymmetrical pedicle subtraction osteotomy for correction of concurrent sagittal-coronal imbalance in adult spinal deformity: a comparative analysis. J Neurosurg Spine 2020; 33:822-829. [PMID: 32764181 DOI: 10.3171/2020.5.spine20445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Rigid multiplanar thoracolumbar adult spinal deformity (ASD) cases are challenging and many require a 3-column osteotomy (3CO), specifically asymmetrical pedicle subtraction osteotomy (APSO). The outcomes and additional risks of performing APSO for the correction of concurrent sagittal-coronal deformity have yet to be adequately studied. METHODS The authors performed a retrospective review of all ASD patients who underwent 3CO during the period from 2006 to 2019. All cases involved either isolated sagittal deformity (patients underwent standard PSO) or concurrent sagittal-coronal deformity (coronal vertical axis [CVA] ≥ 4.0 cm; patients underwent APSO). Perioperative and 2-year follow-up outcomes were compared between patients with isolated sagittal imbalance who underwent PSO and those with concurrent sagittal-coronal imbalance who underwent APSO. RESULTS A total of 390 patients were included: 338 who underwent PSO and 52 who underwent APSO. The mean patient age was 64.6 years, and 65.1% of patients were female. APSO patients required significantly more fusions with upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV) in the upper thoracic spine (63.5% vs 43.3%, p = 0.007). Radiographically, APSO patients had greater deformity with more severe preoperative sagittal and coronal imbalance: sagittal vertical axis (SVA) 13.0 versus 10.7 cm (p = 0.042) and CVA 6.1 versus 1.2 cm (p < 0.001). In APSO cases, significant correction and normalization were achieved (SVA 13.0-3.1 cm, CVA 6.1-2.0 cm, lumbar lordosis [LL] 26.3°-49.4°, pelvic tilt [PT] 38.0°-20.4°, and scoliosis 25.0°-10.4°, p < 0.001). The overall perioperative complication rate was 34.9%. There were no significant differences between PSO and APSO patients in rates of complications (overall 33.7% vs 42.3%, p = 0.227; neurological 5.9% vs 3.9%, p = 0.547; medical 20.7% vs 25.0%, p = 0.482; and surgical 6.5% vs 11.5%, p = 0.191, respectively). However, the APSO group required significantly longer stays in the ICU (3.1 vs 2.3 days, p = 0.047) and hospital (10.8 vs 8.3 days, p = 0.002). At the 2-year follow-up, there were no significant differences in mechanical complications, including proximal junctional kyphosis (p = 0.352), pseudarthrosis (p = 0.980), rod fracture (p = 0.852), and reoperation (p = 0.600). CONCLUSIONS ASD patients with significant coronal imbalance often have severe concurrent sagittal deformity. APSO is a powerful and effective technique to achieve multiplanar correction without higher risk of morbidity and complications compared with PSO for sagittal imbalance. However, APSO is associated with slightly longer ICU and hospital stays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Vedat Deviren
- 2Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lau D, Deviren V, Ames CP. The impact of surgeon experience on perioperative complications and operative measures following thoracolumbar 3-column osteotomy for adult spinal deformity: overcoming the learning curve. J Neurosurg Spine 2020; 32:207-220. [PMID: 31653817 DOI: 10.3171/2019.7.spine19656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2019] [Accepted: 07/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Posterior-based thoracolumbar 3-column osteotomy (3CO) is a formidable surgical procedure. Surgeon experience and case volume are known factors that influence surgical complication rates, but these factors have not been studied well in cases of adult spinal deformity (ASD). This study examines how surgeon experience affects perioperative complications and operative measures following thoracolumbar 3CO in ASD. METHODS A retrospective study was performed of a consecutive cohort of thoracolumbar ASD patients who underwent 3CO performed by the senior authors from 2006 to 2018. Multivariate analysis was used to assess whether experience (years of experience and/or number of procedures) is associated with perioperative complications, operative duration, and blood loss. RESULTS A total of 362 patients underwent 66 vertebral column resections (VCRs) and 296 pedicle subtraction osteotomies (PSOs). The overall complication rate was 29.4%, and the surgical complication rate was 8.0%. The rate of postoperative neurological deficits was 6.2%. There was a trend toward lower overall complication rates with greater operative years of experience (from 44.4% to 28.0%) (p = 0.115). Years of operative experience was associated with a significantly lower rate of neurological deficits (p = 0.027); the incidence dropped from 22.2% to 4.0%. The mean operative time was 310.7 minutes overall. Both increased years of experience and higher case numbers were significantly associated with shorter operative times (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). Only operative years of experience was independently associated with operative times (p < 0.001): 358.3 minutes from 2006 to 2008 to 275.5 minutes in 2018 (82.8 minutes shorter). Over time, there was less deviation and more consistency in operative times, despite the implementation of various interventions to promote fusion and prevent construct failure: utilization of multiple-rod constructs (standard, satellite, and nested rods), bone morphogenetic protein, vertebroplasty, and ligament augmentation. Of note, the use of tranexamic acid did not significantly lower blood loss. CONCLUSIONS Surgeon years of experience, rather than number of 3COs performed, was a significant factor in mitigating neurological complications and improving quality measures following thoracolumbar 3CO for ASD. The 3- to 5-year experience mark was when the senior surgeon overcame a learning curve and was able to minimize neurological complication rates. There was a continuous decrease in operative time as the surgeon's experience increased; this was in concurrence with the implementation of additional preventative surgical interventions. Ongoing practice changes should be implemented and can be done safely, but it is imperative to self-assess the risks and benefits of those practice changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vedat Deviren
- 2Orthopedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lau D, Haddad AF, Deviren V, Ames CP. Complication profile associated with S1 pedicle subtraction osteotomy compared with 3-column osteotomies at other thoracolumbar levels for adult spinal deformity: series of 405 patients with 9 S1 osteotomies. J Neurosurg Spine 2020; 33:577-587. [PMID: 32559748 DOI: 10.3171/2020.4.spine20239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2020] [Accepted: 04/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There is an increased recognition of disproportional lumbar lordosis (LL) and artificially high pelvic incidence (PI) as a cause for positive sagittal imbalance and spinal pelvic mismatch. For such cases, a sacral pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) may be indicated, although its morbidity is not well described. In this study, the authors evaluate the specific complication risks associated with S1 PSO. METHODS A retrospective review of all adult spinal deformity patients who underwent a 3-column osteotomy (3CO) for thoracolumbar deformity from 2006 to 2019 was performed. Demographic, clinical baseline, and radiographic parameters were recorded. The primary outcome of interest was perioperative complications (surgical, neurological, and medical). Secondary outcomes of interest included case length, blood loss, and length of stay. Multivariate analysis was used to assess the risk of S1 PSO compared with 3CO at other levels. RESULTS A total of 405 patients underwent 3CO in the following locations: thoracic (n = 55), L1 (n = 25), L2 (n = 29), L3 (n = 141), L4 (n = 129), L5 (n = 17), and S1 (n = 9). After S1 PSO, there were significant improvements in the sagittal vertical axis (14.8 cm vs 6.7 cm, p = 0.004) and PI-LL mismatch (31.7° vs 9.6°, p = 0.025) due to decreased PI (80.3° vs 65.9°, p = 0.006). LL remained unchanged (48.7° vs 57.8°, p = 0.360). The overall complication rate was 27.4%; the surgical, neurological, and medical complication rates were 7.7%, 6.2%, and 20.0%, respectively. S1 PSO was associated with significantly higher rates of overall complications: thoracic (29.1%), L1 (32.0%), L2 (31.0%), L3 (19.9%), L4 (32.6%), L5 (11.8%), and S1 (66.7%) (p = 0.018). Similarly, an S1 PSO was associated with significantly higher rates of surgical (thoracic [9.1%], L1 [4.0%], L2 [6.9%], L3 [5.7%], L4 [10.9%], L5 [5.9%], and S1 [44.4%], p = 0.006) and neurological (thoracic [9.1%], L1 [0.0%], L2 [6.9%], L3 [2.8%], L4 [7.0%], L5 [5.9%], and S1 [44.4%], p < 0.001) complications. On multivariate analysis, S1 PSO was independently associated with higher odds of overall (OR 7.93, p = 0.013), surgical (OR 20.66, p = 0.010), and neurological (OR 14.75, p = 0.007) complications. CONCLUSIONS S1 PSO is a powerful technique for correction of rigid sagittal imbalance due to an artificially elevated PI in patients with rigid high-grade spondylolisthesis and chronic sacral fractures. However, the technique and intraoperative corrective maneuvers are challenging and associated with high surgical and neurological complications. Additional investigations into the learning curve associated with S1 PSO and complication prevention are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Vedat Deviren
- 2Orthopedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Fournier S, Clark JP, Lieberman JA. Letter to the Editor. Incorrect analysis of motor evoked potential efficacy for pedicle subtraction osteotomy. J Neurosurg Spine 2020; 32:779-780. [PMID: 31923891 DOI: 10.3171/2019.8.spine19909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|