Posterior revision surgery using an intraarticular distraction technique with cage grafting to treat atlantoaxial dislocation associated with basilar invagination

Analysis of Failed Atlantoaxial Reduction: Causes of Failure and Strategies for Revision

OBJECTIVE

The craniovertebral junction (CVJ) presents intricate anatomical challenges. In severe or irreducible malformations, complications such as reduction loss and fixation failure may occur, necessitating revision surgery. The posterior facet joint distraction and fusion (PFDF) technique, offers a solely posterior approach for revisions. Hence, we delineate varied revision scenarios, proposing surgical strategies and technical details to enhance outcomes and mitigate risks, thereby enriching the neurosurgical community's repertoire.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study, analyzed patient data from Xuanwu Hospital, between 2017 to 2023. All patients had a history of surgical treatment for CVJ malformations, and experienced failure or loss of reduction. The distance from the odontoid process tip to the Chamberlain's line (DCL), the atlantodental interval (ADI), clivus-canal angle, cervicomedullary angle, width of subarachnoid space, CVJ area, and width of syrinx were used for radiographic assessment. Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores and SF-12 scores were used for clinical assessment. Independent sample t-tests were employed. A significance level of p < 0.05 indicates statistically significant differences.

RESULTS

We analyzed data from 35 patients. For patients who underwent PFDF, the postoperative DCL, ADI, and clivus-canal angle significantly improved. For all patients, the postoperative cervicomedullary angle, width of subarachnoid space, CVJ area, and width of syrinx all demonstrated significant improvement, indicating the relief of neural compression. All patients showed significant improvement in both symptoms and clinical assessments.

CONCLUSION

Severe atlantoaxial joint locking or ligament contracting are the fundamental cause of reduction and fixation failure. Anterior odontoidectomy is indicated for patients with robust bony fusion of the atlantoaxial joint in an unreduced position. The PFDF technique is safe and effective for patients with incomplete atlantoaxial bony fusion. Preoperative assessment of surgical feasibility and vertebral artery status ensures surgical safety and efficacy.

Modified interfacet technique using shaped autologous occipital bone mass for basilar invagination

PURPOSE

In economically undeveloped areas, surgery for basilar invagination (BI) is still a serious economic burden for people. This study introduces a modified interfacet technique for the treatment of BI using shaped autologous occipital bone mass to reduce BI and to save economical expenditure.

METHODS

The data of 6 patients with BI who underwent modified interfacet technique using shaped autologous occipital bone mass in our hospital from April 2020 to February 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. During the operation, osteotomy at the external occipital protuberance was performed using ultrasonic osteotome, followed by interfacet release and implantation of shaped autologous occipital bone mass to complete vertical reduction. The atlantodental interval (ADI), Chamberlain's line violation (CLV), clivo-axial angle (CXA) and cervico-medullary angle (CMA) were compared before and after surgery. Additionally, we observed implant stability during the follow-up period to assess the long-term success of the modified interfacet technique.

RESULTS

The surgical procedure was successful in all six patients, with no reported incidents of vascular injury, spinal cord injury, or dural tear. Following the operation, improvements were observed in the ADI, CLV, CXA, and CMA. Throughout the follow-up period, the implants remained stable, demonstrating no complications such as bone resorption of the autologous occipital bone mass, implant fracture, or displacement.

CONCLUSION

The utilization of shaped autologous occipital bone mass in atlantoaxial interfacet bone grafting has demonstrated effectiveness and feasibility. This technique offers simplicity, ease of preparation, and cost-effectiveness, making it a viable option for treating BI.

Intra-articular Distraction Versus Decompression to Treat Basilar Invagination Without Atlantoaxial Dislocation: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 54 Patients

OBJECTIVE

The surgical management of basilar invagination without atlantoaxial dislocation (type B basilar invagination) remains controversial. Hence, we have reported the use of posterior intra-articular C1-2 facet distraction, fixation, and cantilever technique versus foramen magnum decompression in treating type B basilar invagination as well as the results and surgical indications for this procedure.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective cohort study. Fifty-four patients who underwent intra-articular distraction, fixation, and cantilever reduction (experimental group) and foramen magnum decompression (control group) were enrolled in this study. Distance from odontoid tip to Chamberlain's line, clivus-canal angle, cervicomedullary angle, craniovertebral junction (CVJ) triangle area, width of subarachnoid space and syrinx were used for radiographic assessment. Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores and 12-item Short Form health survey (SF-12) scores were used for clinical assessment.

RESULTS

All patients in the experimental group had a better reduction of basilar invagination and better relief of pressure on nerves. JOA scores and SF-12 scores also had better improvements in the experimental group postoperation. SF-12 score improvement was associated with preoperative CVJ triangle area (Pearson index, 0.515; p = 0.004), cutoff value of 2.00 cm2 indicating the surgical indication of our technique. No severe complications or infections occurred.

CONCLUSION

Posterior intra-articular C1-2 facet distraction, fixation, and cantilever reduction technique is an effective treatment for type B basilar invagination. As various factors involved, other treatment strategies should also be investigated.

Exploring the Pathogenesis of Atlanto-Occipital Instability in Chiari Malformation With Type II Basilar Invagination: A Systematic Morphological Study

BACKGROUND

Our previous study suggested that atlanto-occipital instability (AOI) is common in patients with type II basilar invagination (II-BI).

OBJECTIVE

To further understand the pathogenesis of AOI in Chiari malformations (CM) and CM + II-BI through systematic measurements of the bone structure surrounding the craniocervical junction.

METHODS

Computed tomography data from 185 adults (80 controls, 63 CM, and 42 CM + II-BI) were collected, and geometric models were established for parameter measurement. Canonical correlation analysis was used to evaluate the morphological and positional relationships of the atlanto-occipital joint (AOJ).

RESULTS

Among the 3 groups, the length and height of the condyle and superior portion of the lateral masses of the atlas (C1-LM) were smallest in CM + II-BI cases; the AOJ had the shallowest depth and the lowest curvature in the same group. AOJs were divided into 3 morphological types: type I, the typical ball-and-socket joint, mainly in the control group (100%); type II, the shallower joint, mainly in the CM group (92.9%); and type III, the abnormal flat-tilt joint, mainly in the CM + II-BI group (89.3%). Kinematic computed tomography revealed AOI in all III-AOJs (100%) and some II-AOJs (1.5%) but not in type I-AOJs (0%). Morphological parameters of the superior portion of C1-LM positively correlated with those of C0 and the clivus and significantly correlated with AOI.

CONCLUSION

Dysplasia of the condyle and superior portion of C1-LM exists in both CM and II-BI cases yet is more obvious in type II-BI. Unstable movement caused by AOJ deformation is another pathogenic factor in patients with CM + II-BI.

Evaluating craniovertebral stability in Chiari malformation coexisting with Type II basilar invagination: an observational study based on kinematic computed tomography and its clinical application

BACKGROUND

Treatment of Chiari malformation (CM) is controversial, especially when it coexists with "stable" or Type II basilar invagination (CM+II-BI). Precise evaluation of craniovertebral junction (CVJ) stability is crucial in such patients; however, this has never been validated. This study aimed to dynamically evaluate atlanto-condyle and atlantoaxial stability by kinematic computed tomography (CT) and report its surgical treatment.

METHODS

The study recruited 101 patients (control, CM, and CM+II-BI groups: 48, 34, and 19 patients, respectively). During kinematic CT, the CVJ stability-related parameters were measured and compared between the three groups. The surgical strategy for treating CM+II-BI was based on these results. Pre- and postoperative images were acquired, and functional scores were used to assess the outcome.

RESULTS

Among the three groups, the length of the clivus and the height of the condyle were the shortest in the CM+II-BI group, which was accompanied by the greatest rotation of the atlas and atlanto-condyle facet movement on cervical flexion and extension. Moreover, in such patients, increased Chamberlain's baseline violation indicated the aggregate invagination of the odontoid in the flexed position, and asymmetric displacement of atlantoaxial facets was observed. Seventeen CM+II-BI patients underwent surgical treatment with atlantoaxial distraction and occipitocervical fusion. The syringomyelia width and tonsillar herniation decreased significantly, and functional scores indicated symptom relief and good outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

CVJ instability, especially the ultra-movement of atlanto-condyle facets, commonly exists in II-BI as evaluated using kinematic CT. The surgical strategy of atlantoaxial distraction and occipitocervical fusion should be considered to treat such patients.

Atlantoaxial Dislocation with Bony Fusion of C1/2 Facet Joints Treated with Posterior Joint Release, Distraction and Reduction

Introduction

Atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) is a complicated and challenging deformity with severe morbidities. Irreducible AAD with C1/2 bony fusion requires anterior (transoral or transnasal) odontoidectomy to decompress spinal cord or medulla, which is highly demanding technique that is risky for comorbidities. Here, we report our application of modified Goel's technique to reduce AAD with bony fusion through single-stage posterior approach surgery.

Technical Note

Our technique that can reduce AAD with bony fusion through single-stage posterior approach surgery is reported. Joint release, distraction, cage implantation, and atlantoaxial or occipitocervical fixation can successfully manage AAD with C1/2 bony fusion. Key points for the technique include pinpointing original joint space, thorough release of bony fusion, stepwise distraction, and cage implantation with autograft.

Conclusions

Joint release, distraction, cage implantation, and atlantoaxial or occipitocervical fixation can successfully manage bony irreducible AAD. This technique provided an option for bony fused AAD and improved safety and efficacy of its management.

Transoral release to realign postoperative loss of reduction following occipitocervical fixation for congenital basilar invagination

PURPOSE

Revision surgery in an irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation (IAAD) previously operated with a posterior approach is challenging. Multiple modalities using anterior, posterior, and dual approaches have been described. We report a so far unreported technique of revision surgery by posterior implant removal and decompression with anterior transoral release followed by posterior instrumentation.

METHODS

14-year male with basilar invagination (BI) with IAAD, previously operated with posterior decompression and instrumented occipitocervical fusion presented three months later with post-traumatic recurrence of myelopathy with quadriparesis with Di Lorenzo grade 4 and loss of reduction. He was operated with a posterior implant and early fusion mass removal with extended foramen magnum decompression (FMD), followed by anterior transoral release with a satisfactory reduction on traction, and finally, a posterior revision instrumented occipitocervical fusion.

RESULTS

At 2-year follow-up, the patient was symptom-free with Di Lorenzo grade 1 and cervicomedullary angle improvement from 97.4° to 141.2°; achieving bony fusion.

CONCLUSION

Single-stage posterior-anterior transoral-posterior approach can be used to achieve satisfactory reduction for a revision BI with IAAD with prior posterior instrumentation.

A Safe and Effective Posterior Intra-Articular Distraction Technique to Treat Congenital Atlantoaxial Dislocation Associated With Basilar Invagination: Case Series and Technical Nuances

BACKGROUND

The management of atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) associated with basilar invagination (BI) is challenging, and traditional posterior-only approaches lack the ability to release the anterior soft tissue resulting in unsatisfactory reduction. Furthermore, vertebral artery anomalies and deformed anatomy increase surgical risks.

OBJECTIVE

To introduce a safe and efficient technique to reduce congenital AAD and BI through a single-stage posterior-only approach.

METHODS

A total of 65 patients with AAD and concomitant BI who had congenital osseous abnormalities were retrospectively analyzed. All patients had anterior soft tissue released through a posterior-only approach, followed by intra-facet cages implantation, cantilever correction, and instrumentation. Clinical results were measured using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scale, and radiographic measurements included the atlanto-dental interval, the distance of odontoid tip above Chamberlain's line, clivus-canal angle (CCA), and syrinx length. Paired t-tests were used to compare preoperative and postoperative measurements.

RESULTS

The mean JOA score increased from 10.98 to 14.40 at 1-yr follow-up. Complete reduction of AAD and BI was achieved in 48 patients (73.8%). The mean CCA improved from 115° preoperatively to 129° postoperatively. Reduction of syrinx size was observed in 14 patients at 1 wk and in 35 patients 1 yr after surgery. All patients achieved bony fusion.

CONCLUSION

Posterior intra-articular distraction followed by cage implantation and cantilever correction can achieve complete reduction in most cases of congenitally anomalous AAD associated with BI.

Transoral intraarticular cage distraction and C-JAWS fixation for revision of basilar invagination with irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation

Background

The revision surgery of basilar invagination (BI) with irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation (IAAD) after a previous occipitocervical fusion (OCF) is challenging. Transoral revision surgery has more advantages than a combined anterior and posterior approach in addressing this pathology. The C-JAWS is a cervical compressive staple that has been used in the lower cervical spine with many advantages. Up to now, there is no report on the application of C-JAWS in the atlantoaxial joint. We therefore present this report to investigate the clinical outcomes of transoral intraarticular cage distraction and C-JAWS fixation for revision of BI with IAAD.

Methods

From June 2011 to June 2015, 9 patients with BI and IAAD were revised by this technique after previous posterior OCF in our department. Plain cervical radiographs, computed tomographic scans and magnetic resonance imaging were obtained pre- and postoperatively to assess the degree of atlantoaxial dislocation and compression of the cervical cord. The Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score was used to evaluate the neurological function.

Results

The revision surgeries were successfully performed in all patients. The average follow-up duration was 18.9 ± 7.3 months (range 9–30 months). The postoperative atlas-dens interval (ADI), cervicomedullary angle (CMA), distance between the top of the odontoid process and the Chamberlain line (CL) and JOA score were significantly improved in all patients (P < 0.05). Bony fusion was achieved after 3–9 months in all cases. No patients developed recurrent atlantoaxial instability.

Conclusions

Transoral revision surgery by intraarticular cage distraction and C-JAWS fixation could provide a satisfactory outcome for BI with IAAD after a previous unsuccessful posterior operation.

Posterior intra-articular distraction with cage placement to treat congenital atlantoaxial dislocation associated with basilar invagination

Congenital atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) associated with basilar invagination (BI) is a complex congenital malalignment at the craniovertebral junction. The olisthesis, atlantoaxial facet joint arthropathy, and the contraction of the anterior soft tissue make the treatment challenging. Our video demonstrates the surgical technique for posterior intra-articular distraction with cage placement to treat congenital atlantoaxial dislocation associated with basilar invagination. The video can be found here: https://youtu.be/7EQqW96HhN8.

Navigated transoral odontoidectomy to treat congenital basilar invagination after failed posterior reduction and fusion

Transoral odontoidectomy is a traditional technique to treat congenital basilar invagination (BI) associated with atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD). Although posterior surgery has been a trend to treat most cases, there are still cases that need to be treated through a transoral approach. In addition, intraoperative modern image-guided navigation systems help identify any remnants of the dens and decrease the risk of vertebral artery injury. For symptomatic cases with a history of previous posterior fusion and severe osteoporosis, transoral odontoidectomy is preferred over a posterior-only approach. Our video demonstrates the surgical technique for transoral revision odontoidectomy to treat congenital basilar invagination associated with atlantoaxial dislocation after previous posterior craniovertebral junction surgery.

The video can be found here: https://youtu.be/vzcAW8oLcZY