Maternal and obstetric complications in fetal surgery for prenatal myelomeningocele repair: a systematic review

Fetal bradycardia in open versus fetoscopic prenatal repair of spina bifida

OBJECTIVE

To compare the occurrence of fetal bradycardia in open versus fetoscopic fetal spina bifida surgery.

METHODS

This is a single-institution retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing open (n = 25) or fetoscopic (n = 26) spina bifida repair between 2017 and 2022. From October 2017 to June 2020, spina bifida repairs were performed via an open classical hysterotomy, and from November 2020 to June 2022 fetoscopic repairs were performed following transition to this technique. Fetal heart rate (FHR) in beats per minute (bpm) was recorded via echocardiography every 15 min during the procedure. Cohort characteristics, fetal bradycardia and maternal physiologic parameters were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Fetuses undergoing an open repair more frequently developed bradycardia defined as <110 bpm (32% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.008), and a trend was observed for FHR decreases more than 25 bpm from baseline (20% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.073). Profound bradycardia less than 80 bpm was rare, occurring in only three operations (two in open, one in fetoscopic repair) with two fetuses (one in each group) requiring emergency cesarean delivery.

CONCLUSION

When compared to open fetal surgery, fetal bradycardia occurred less frequently in fetoscopic surgery despite a significantly greater anesthetic exposure and the use of the intraamniotic carbon dioxide insufflation.

Chorioamniotic Membrane Separation after Fetal Spina Bifida Repair: Impact of CMS Size and Patient Management

INTRODUCTION

Chorioamniotic membrane separation (CMS) is a known complication after fetal spina bifida (fSB) repair. This study's goal was to analyze women's outcomes with open fSB repair and CMS (group A) compared to the ones without (group B) and to assess the influence of CMS size and patient management.

METHODS

A total of 194 women with open fSB repair at our center were included in this retrospective study. Outcomes of group A were compared to the ones of group B. Regression analysis was performed to assess risk factors for CMS. Two subgroup analyses assessed the impact of CMS size (small [A-small] vs. large [A-large]) as well as patient management (A1 = hospitalization vs. A2 = no hospitalization) on pregnancy outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 194 women, 23 (11.9%) were in group A and 171 (88.1%) in group B. Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROMs) (69.6% vs. 24.1%, p = <0.001), amniotic infection syndrome (AIS) (22.7% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.03), histologically confirmed chorioamnionitis (hCA) (40.0% vs. 14.7%, p = 0.03), length of hospital stay (LOS) after fSB repair (35 [19-65] vs. 17 [14-27] days), and overall LOS (43 [33-71] vs. 35 [27-46] days, p = 0.004) were significantly more often/longer in group A. Gestational age (GA) at delivery was significantly lower in group A compared to group B (35.3 [32.3-36.3] vs. 36.7 [34.9-37.0] weeks, p = 0.006). Regression analysis did not identify risk factors for CMS. Subgroup analysis comparing CMS sized in group A-small versus A-large showed higher AIS rate (42% vs. 0%, p = 0.04), lower LOS (22.0 [15.5-42.5] vs. 59.6 ± 24.1, p = 0.003). Comparison of group A1 versus A2 showed longer LOS (49.3 ± 22.8 vs. 15 [15-17.5] days, p < 0.001), lower planned readmission rate (5.6% vs. 80%, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

CMS significantly increased the risk of PPROM, AIS, hCA, caused longer LOS, and caused lower GA at delivery. Women with small CMS had higher AIS rates but shorter LOS compared to women with large CMS, while apart from LOS pregnancy outcomes did not differ regarding patient management (hospitalization after CMS yes vs. no).

Systematic classification and comparison of maternal and obstetrical complications following 2 different methods of fetal surgery for the repair of open neural tube defects

BACKGROUND

In utero repair of open neural tube defects using an open hysterotomy approach (hereafter referred to as "open") has been shown to reduce the need for ventriculoperitoneal shunting and to improve motor outcomes for affected infants. Laparotomy-assisted fetoscopic repair (hereafter referred to as "hybrid") is an alternative approach that may confer similar neurologic benefits while reducing the incidence of hysterotomy-related complications.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to analyze procedure-related maternal and fetal complications of in utero repair using the Clavien-Dindo classification, and to compare the outcomes of the hybrid and open approaches.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in a single center between September 2011 and July 2021. All patients who met the Management of Myelomeningocele Study criteria and who underwent either hybrid or open fetal surgery were included. Maternal complications were classified using a unique adaptation of the Clavien-Dindo scoring system, allowing the development of a comprehensive complication index score specific to fetal surgery. Primary fetal outcome was defined as gestational age at delivery and summarized according to the World Health Organization definitions of preterm delivery.

RESULTS

There were 146 fetuses with open neural tube defects who were eligible for, and underwent, in utero repair during the study period. Of these, 102 underwent hybrid fetoscopic repair and 44 underwent open hysterotomy repair. Gestational age at the time of surgery was higher in the hybrid group than in the open group (25.1 vs 24.8 weeks; P=.004). Maternal body mass index was lower in the hybrid than in the open group (25.4 vs 27.1 kg/m2; P=.02). The duration of hybrid fetoscopic surgery was significantly longer in the hybrid than in the open group (250 vs 164 minutes; P<.001). There was a significantly lower Clavien-Dindo Grade III complication rate (4.9% vs 43.2%; P<.001) and a significantly lower overall comprehensive maternal complication index (8.7 vs 22.6; P=.021) in the hybrid group than in the open group. Gestational age at delivery was significantly higher in the hybrid group than in the open group (38.1 vs 35.8 weeks; P<.001), and this finding persisted when gestational age at delivery was analyzed using the World Health Organization definitions of preterm delivery.

CONCLUSION

Use of our adaptation of the standardized Clavien-Dindo classification to assess the maternal complications associated with in utero open neural tube defect repair provides a new method for objectively assessing different fetal surgical approaches. It also provides a much-needed standardized tool to allow objective comparisons between methods, which can be used when counseling patients. The hybrid open neural tube defect repair was associated with lower rates of maternal adverse events , and later gestational age at delivery compared with the open approach.

Open and endoscopic fetal myelomeningocele surgeries display similar in-hospital safety profiles in a large, multi-institutional database

BACKGROUND

Open intrauterine fetal myelomeningocele repair has demonstrated decreased ventriculoperitoneal shunting and improved motor outcomes despite maternal and fetal risks. Few data directly compare the safety of open vs endoscopic approaches.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to analyze in-hospital maternal and fetal outcomes of pregnant patients undergoing open vs endoscopic fetal myelomeningocele repair using a large, multi-center database.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a review of the Pediatric Health Information System database from October 1, 2015, to December 31, 2021. All patients who underwent open or endoscopic fetal myelomeningocele repair according to the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, were identified. Demographics, gestational age, and outcomes were analyzed. Descriptive and univariate statistics were used.

RESULTS

A total of 378 pregnant patients underwent fetal myelomeningocele repair. The approach was endoscopic in 143 cases (37.8%) and open in 235 cases (62.2%). Overall postprocedural outcomes included no maternal in-hospital mortalities or intensive care unit admissions, a median length of stay of 4 days (interquartile range, 4-5), 14 cases (3.7%) of surgical and postoperative complications, 6 cases (1.6%) of intrauterine infections, 12 cases (3.2%) of obstetrical complications (including preterm premature rupture of membranes), 3 cases (0.8%) of intrauterine fetal demise, and 16 cases (4.2%) of preterm delivery. Compared with an open approach, the endoscopic approach occurred at a later gestational age (25 weeks [interquartile range, 24-25] vs 24 weeks [interquartile range, 24-25]; P<.001) and had an increased rate of intrauterine infection (6 [4.2%] cases vs 0 [0%] case; P=.002). There was no difference between approaches in the rates of surgical complications, obstetrical complications, intrauterine fetal demise, or preterm deliveries.

CONCLUSION

Compared with an open approach, endoscopic fetal myelomeningocele repair displays a comparable rate of fetal complications, including intrauterine fetal demise and preterm delivery, and a similar in-hospital maternal safety profile despite an association with increased intrauterine infection.

Long-term neurological cognitive, behavioral, functional, and quality of life outcomes after fetal myelomeningocele closure: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Myelomeningocele is a lifelong condition that features several comorbidities, such as hydrocephalus, scoliosis, club foot, and lower limb sensory and motor disabilities. Its management has progressed over time, ranging from supportive care to early postnatal closure to prenatal closure of the defect. Recent research discovered that fetal myelomeningocele closure (fMMC) provided superior neurological outcomes to those of postnatal closure. When performed at 12 months of age, fMMC can avert or delay the need for a ventriculoperitoneal shunt and reversed the hindbrain herniation. Moreover, fMMC reportedly enhanced motor function and mental development at 30 months of age. However, its long-term outcomes remain dubious.

PURPOSE

This systematic review aimed to determine the long-term neurological cognitive, behavioral, functional, and quality of life (QoL) outcomes after fMMC.

METHODS

The PubMed, Directory of Open Access Journals, EBSCO, and Cochrane databases were extensively searched for articles published in 2007-2022. Meta-analyses, clinical trials, and randomized controlled trials with at least 5 years of follow-up were given priority.

RESULTS

A total of 11 studies were included. Most studies revealed enhanced long-term cognitive, behavioral, functional, and QoL outcomes after fMMC.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that fMMC substantially enhanced patients' long-term neurological cognitive, behavioral, functional, and QoL outcomes.

Fetal Repair of Neural Tube Defects

Myelomeningocele is the most common congenital neurologic defect, and the only nonlethal disease addressed by fetal surgery. A randomized control trial has established amelioration of the Arnold-Chiari II malformation, reduced ventriculoperitoneal shunt rate, and improvement in distal neurologic function in patients that receive in utero repair. Long-term follow-up of these school-age children demonstrates the persistence of these effects. The use of stem cells in fetal repair is being investigated to further improve distal motor function.

Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Perinatal Outcomes of Placental Abruption-Detailed Annual Data and Clinical Perspectives from Polish Tertiary Center

Placental abruption (PA) is a separation of the placenta from the uterine wall occurring with the fetus still present in the uterine cavity. It contributes to numerous neonatal and maternal complications, increasing morbidity and mortality. We conducted a retrospective study at a tertiary perinatal care center, which included 2210 cases of labor that took place in 2015 with a PA occurrence of 0.7%. No maternal or fetal death during delivery was reported in this period. The identified PA risk factors were uterine malformations, pPROM, placenta previa spectrum, and oligohydramnios. The significant maternal PA complications identified were maternal anemia, uterine rupture, and HELLP syndrome. Preterm delivery occurred significantly more often in the PA group, and the number of weeks of pregnancy and the birth weight at delivery were both significantly lower in the PA group. PA is a relatively rare perinatal complication with very serious consequences, and it still lacks effective prophylaxis and treatment. Despite its rare occurrence, each center should develop a certain strategy for dealing with this pathology or predicting which patients are at risk. Much work is still needed to ensure the proper care of the mother and the baby in this life-threatening condition.

Controversies in Fetal Surgery: Prenatal Repair of Myelomeningocele in the Modern Era

Fetal surgery is a constantly evolving field that showed noticeable progress with the treatment of myelomeningocele (MMC) using prenatal repair. Despite this success, there are ongoing questions regarding the optimal approach for fetal myelomeningocele repair, as well as which patients are eligible. Expansion of the inclusion and exclusion criteria is an important ongoing area of study for myelomeningocele including the recent Management of Myelomeningocele Plus trial. The significant personal and financial burden required of families seeking treatment has likely limited its accessibility to the general population.

Intrauterine fetoscopic closure of myelomeningocele: Clinical case and literature review

OBJECTIVE

Spina bifida (SB) is a congenital birth defect defined as a failure of the neural tube formation during the embryonic development phase. Fetoscopic repair of SB is a novel treatment technique that allows to close spinal defect early and prevent potential neurological and psychomotor complications.

CASE REPORT

We present a case report of a 32-year-old-multigravida whose fetus was diagnosed with lumbosacral myelomeningocele at 23rd week. Fetoscopic closure of MMC was performed at 26 weeks. At 32 weeks, due to premature amniorrhexis and placental abruption, an emergency C-section was performed. Newborn's psychomotor development was within normal limits.

CONCLUSION

Although intrauterine treatment has an increased risk of premature labor, placental abruption, prenatal closure is associated with improved postnatal psychomotor development. Prenatal surgery decreases the risk of Arnold-Chiari II malformation development and walking disability. Fetoscopic closure of SB is becoming a choice for treatment with beneficial outcomes for mother and fetus.

Role of Imaging in Obstetric Interventions: Criteria, Considerations, and Complications

US has an established role in the prenatal detection of congenital and developmental disorders. Many pregnant women undergo US at 18-20 weeks of gestation for assessment of fetal anatomy and detection of structural anomalies. With advances in fetoscopy and minimally invasive procedures, in utero fetal interventions can be offered to address some of the detected structural and physiologic fetal abnormalities. Most interventions are reserved for conditions that, if left untreated, often cause in utero death or a substantially compromised neonatal outcome. US is crucial for preprocedural evaluation and planning, real-time procedural guidance, and monitoring and assessment of postprocedural complications. Percutaneous needle-based interventions include in utero transfusion, thoracentesis and placement of a thoracoamniotic shunt, vesicocentesis and placement of a vesicoamniotic shunt, and aortic valvuloplasty. Fetoscopic interventions include myelomeningocele repair and tracheal balloon occlusion for congenital diaphragmatic hernia. In rare cases, open hysterotomy may be required for repair of a myelomeningocele or resection of a sacrococcygeal teratoma. Monochorionic twin pregnancies involve specific complications such as twin-twin transfusion syndrome, which is treated with fetoscopic laser ablation of vascular connections, and twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence, which is treated with radiofrequency ablation. Finally, when extended placental support is necessary at delivery for repair of congenital high airway obstruction or resection of lung masses, ex utero intrapartum treatment can be planned. Radiologists should be aware of the congenital anomalies that are amenable to in utero interventions and, when necessary, consider referral to centers where such treatments are offered. Online supplemental material and the slide presentation from the RSNA Annual Meeting are available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2021.

[Prenatal ultrasound prognostic of myelomeningocele at the era of fetal surgery]

Myelomeningocele (MMC) is a severe congenital condition responsible for motor and sensory impairments of the lower limbs, incontinence and cognitive impairment. Its screening, sometimes as early as the first trimester, is one of the major goals of modern prenatal care, supported by the emergence of prenatal surgery that results in a significant improvement in motor function, ambulation and ventriculoperitoneal shunt rate in patients undergoing in-utero surgery. From screening to pre- and post-operative prognostic evaluation, prenatal ultrasound is now an essential tool in the antenatal management of this condition. Using the multi planar and three-dimensional modes, it can be used to assess the vertebral level of MMC, which remains the key antenatal prognostic marker for motor function and ambulation, incontinence and the need for a ventriculo-peritoneal shunt. A careful and systematic ultrasound examination also makes it possible to assess the severity and progression of ventriculomegaly, to search for associated cerebral, spinal cord or vertebral anomalies, or to rule out exclusion criteria for in-utero surgery such as severe kyphosis or serious cortical anomalies. New tools from post-natal evaluation, such as the "metameric" ultrasound assessment of lower limb mobility, appear to be promising either for the initial examination or after in-utero surgery. Ultrasonography, associated with fetal MRI, cytogenetic and next generation sequencing, now allows a highly customized prognostic evaluation of these fetuses affected by MMC and provides the parents with the best possible information on the expected benefits and limitations of fetal surgery.

Uterine Dehiscence and Subsequent Pregnancy Management: A Review of the Literature

Importance

Uterine dehiscence is a separation of the uterine musculature with intact uterine serosa. Uterine dehiscence can be encountered at the time of cesarean delivery, be suspected on obstetric ultrasound, or be diagnosed in between pregnancies. Management is a conundrum for obstetricians, regardless of timing of onset.

Evidence Acquisition

A literature search was undertaken by our research librarian using the search engines PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science. The search term used was "uterine dehiscence." The search was limited to the English language, and there was no limit on the years searched.

Results

The search identified 152 articles, 32 of which are the basis for this review. Risk factors, treatment, and management in subsequent pregnancies are discussed. The number of prior cesarean deliveries is the greatest risk factor for uterine dehiscence. Unrepaired uterine dehiscence can cause symptoms outside of pregnancies and may require repair for alleviation of these symptoms. Dehiscence should also be repaired prior to subsequent pregnancies.

Conclusion and Relevance

Planned delivery prior to the onset of labor with careful monitoring of maternal symptoms is the preferred management strategy of women with prior uterine dehiscence. Careful attention should be paid to the lower uterine segment thickness when ultrasonography is performed in women with prior cesarean delivery.

Relevance Statement

An evidence-based review of uterine dehiscence in pregnancy and how to manage subsequent pregnancies following uterine dehiscence.

Guideline No. 410: Prevention, Screening, Diagnosis, and Pregnancy Management for Fetal Neural Tube Defects

OBJECTIVE

This revised guideline is intended to provide an update on the genetic aspects, prevention, screening, diagnosis, and management of fetal neural tube defects.

TARGET POPULATION

Women who are pregnant or may become pregnant. Neural tube defect screening should be offered to all pregnant women.

OPTIONS

For prevention: a folate-rich diet, and folic acid and vitamin B₁₂ supplementation, with dosage depending on risk level. For screening: second-trimester anatomical sonography; first-trimester sonographic screening; maternal serum alpha fetoprotein; prenatal magnetic resonance imaging. For genetic testing: diagnostic amniocentesis with chromosomal microarray and amniotic fluid alpha fetoprotein and acetylcholinesterase; fetal exome sequencing. For pregnancy management: prenatal surgical repair; postnatal surgical repair; pregnancy termination with autopsy. For subsequent pregnancies: prevention and screening options and counselling.

OUTCOMES

The research on and implementation of fetal surgery for prenatally diagnosed myelomeningocele has added a significant treatment option to the previous options (postnatal repair or pregnancy termination), but this new option carries an increased risk of maternal morbidity. Significant improvements in health and quality of life, both for the mother and the infant, have been shown to result from the prevention, screening, diagnosis, and treatment of fetal neural tube defects.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS

The benefits for patient autonomy and decision-making are provided in the guideline. Harms include an unexpected fetal diagnosis and the subsequent management decisions. Harm can also result if the patient declines routine sonographic scans or if counselling and access to care for neural tube defects are delayed. Cost analysis (personal, family, health care) is not within the scope of this clinical practice guideline.

EVIDENCE

A directed and focused literature review was conducted using the search terms spina bifida, neural tube defect, myelomeningocele, prenatal diagnosis, fetal surgery, neural tube defect prevention, neural tube defect screening, neural tube defect diagnosis, and neural tube defect management in order to update and revise this guideline. A peer review process was used for content validation and clarity, with appropriate ethical considerations.

VALIDATION METHODS

The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and weak recommendations).

INTENDED AUDIENCE

Maternity care professionals who provide any part of pre-conception, antenatal, delivery, and neonatal care. This guideline is also appropriate for patient education. RECOMMENDATIONS (GRADE RATINGS IN PARENTHESES).

Directive clinique no 410 : Anomalies du tube neural : Prévention, dépistage, diagnostic et prise en charge de la grossesse

OBJECTIF

La présente directive clinique révisée vise à fournir une mise à jour sur les aspects génétiques, la prévention, le dépistage, le diagnostic et la prise en charge des anomalies du tube neural.

POPULATION CIBLE

Les femmes enceintes ou qui pourraient le devenir. Il convient d'offrir le dépistage des anomalies du tube neural à toutes les femmes enceintes.

OPTIONS

Pour la prévention : un régime alimentaire riche en acide folique et des suppléments d'acide folique et de vitamine B₁₂ selon une posologie d'après le niveau de risque. Pour le dépistage : l'échographie obstétricale du deuxième trimestre, le dépistage échographique du premier trimestre, le dosage de l'alphafœtoprotéine sérique maternelle et l'imagerie par résonance magnétique prénatale. Pour les tests génétiques : l'amniocentèse diagnostique avec analyse chromosomique sur micropuce et le dosage de l'alphafœtoprotéine et de l'acétylcholinestérase dans le liquide amniotique et le séquençage de l'exome fœtal. Pour la prise en charge de la grossesse : la réparation chirurgicale prénatale, la réparation chirurgicale postnatale et l'interruption de grossesse avec autopsie. Pour les grossesses subséquentes : les options de prévention et de dépistage et les conseils. RéSULTATS: La recherche et la mise en œuvre du traitement chirurgical fœtal en cas de diagnostic prénatal de myéloméningocèle ont ajouté une option thérapeutique fœtale importante aux options précédentes (réparation postnatale ou interruption de grossesse), mais cette nouvelle option comporte un risque accru de morbidité maternelle. La prévention, le dépistage, le diagnostic et le traitement des anomalies du tube neural se révèlent entraîner des améliorations importantes à la mère et au nourrisson en matière de santé et de qualité de vie. BéNéFICES, RISQUES ET COûTS: Le type et l'ampleur des bénéfices, risques et coûts attendus pour les patientes grâce à la mise en œuvre de la présente directive clinique par un établissement de soins de santé intègrent un canal maternel préconception et prénatal adéquat comprenant l'accès des patientes aux soins, les conseils, les analyses et examens, l'imagerie, le diagnostic et l'interprétation. Les bénéfices relatifs à l'autonomie de la patiente et au processus décisionnel sont énoncés dans la présente directive clinique. Les risques comprennent un diagnostic fœtal inattendu et les décisions de prise en charge subséquentes. Le fait que la patiente refuse les échographies habituelles et le retard du conseil ou d'accès aux soins en cas d'anomalie du tube neural comportent également des risques. L'analyse des coûts (personnels, familiaux, santé publique) ne fait pas partie de la portée de la présente directive clinique. DONNéES PROBANTES: Afin de mettre à jour et réviser la présente directive, une revue de la littérature ciblée et dirigée a été effectuée à l'aide des termes de recherche suivants : spina bifida, neural tube defect, myelomeningocele, prenatal diagnosis, fetal surgery, neural tube defect prevention, neural tube defect screening, neural tube defect diagnosis et neural tube defect management. Un processus d'examen par les pairs a été utilisé pour la validation et la clarté du contenu, avec des considérations appropriées d'ordre éthique. MéTHODES DE VALIDATION: Les auteurs ont évalué la qualité des données probantes et la force des recommandations en utilisant l'approche d'évaluation, de développement et d'évaluation (GRADE). Consulter l'annexe A en ligne (le tableau A1 pour les définitions et le tableau A2 pour les interprétations des recommandations fortes et faibles). PROFESSIONNELS CONCERNéS: Professionnels des soins de maternité qui offrent des soins préconception, prénataux, obstétricaux ou néonataux. La présente directive clinique convient également aux fins d'éducation des patientes. RECOMMANDATIONS (CLASSEMENT GRADE ENTRE PARENTHèSES).