Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using a novel minimally invasive expandable interbody cage: patient-reported outcomes and radiographic parameters

Predicting and analysing of the unfavourable outcomes of early applicated percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: development and validation based nomogram

OBJECTIVE

To predict and analyse the unfavourable outcomes of early applicated percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy for lumbar disc herniation.

METHODS

Information of 426 patients treated by early applicated percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID) for lumbar disc herniation (LDH) at our hospital from June 2017 to October 2021 in addition to 17 other features was collected. The risk factors were selected by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method (LASSO) regression. Then, a prediction model (nomogram) was established to predict the unfavourable outcomes of using the risk factors selected from LASSO regression. Bootstrap (n = 1000) was used to perform the internal validation, and the performance of the model was assessed by the concordance index (C-index), receiver operating characteristic curve, and calibration curve. The decision curve analysis (DCA) and clinical impact curve (CIC) were used to assess the clinical utility of the model, respectively.

RESULTS

Finally, 53 of 426 patients showed unfavourable outcomes. Five potential factors, Modic change, Calcification, Lumbar epidural steroid injection preoperative, Articular process hyperplasia and cohesion, and Laminoplasty technique, were selected according to the LASSO regression, that identified the predictors to establish nomogram model. Meanwhile, the C-index of the prediction nomogram was 0.847, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value was 0.847, and the interval bootstrapping (n = 1000) validation C-index was 0.809. The model has good practicability for clinics according to the DCA and CIC.

CONCLUSION

This nomogram model has good predictive performance and clinical practicability, which could provide a certain basis for predicting unfavourable outcomes of early applicated PEID for LDH.

Simultaneous Single-Position Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery and Unilateral Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation for Spondylolisthesis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical and radiological efficacy of a combine of lateral single screw-rod and unilateral percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (LSUP) for lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) in the treatment of spondylolisthesis.

METHODS

Sixty-two consecutive patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis who underwent minimally invasive (MIS)-TLIF with bilateral pedicle screw (BPS) or LLIF-LSUP were retrospectively studied. Segmental lordosis angle (SLA), lumbar lordosis angle (LLA), disc height (DH), slipping percentage, the cross-sectional areas (CSA) of the thecal sac, screw placement accuracy, fusion rate and foraminal height (FH) were used to evaluate radiographic changes postoperatively. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were used to evaluate the clinical efficacy.

RESULTS

Patients who underwent LLIF-LSUP showed shorter operating time, less length of hospital stay and lower blood loss than MIS-TLIF. No statistical difference was found between the 2 groups in screw placement accuracy, overall complications, VAS, and ODI. Compared with MIS-TLIF-BPS, LLIF-LSUP had a significant improvement in sagittal parameters including DH, FH, LLA, and SLA. The CSA of MIS-TLIF-BPS was significantly increased than that of LLIF-LSUP. The fusion rate of LLIF-LSUP was significantly higher than that of MIS-TLIF-BPS at the follow-up of 3 months postoperatively, but there was no statistical difference between the 2 groups at the follow-up of 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months.

CONCLUSION

The overall clinical outcomes and complications of LLIF-LSUP were comparable to that of MIS-TLIF-BPS in this series. Compared with MIS-TLIF-BPS, LLIF-LSUP for lumbar spondylolisthesis represents a significantly shorter operating time, hospital stay and lower blood loss, and demonstrates better radiological outcomes to maintain lumbar lordosis, and reveal an overwhelming superiority in the early fusion rate.

Device profile of the FlareHawk interbody fusion system, an endplate-conforming multi-planar expandable lumbar interbody fusion cage

INTRODUCTION

The FlareHawk Interbody Fusion System is a family of lumbar interbody fusion devices (IBFDs) that include FlareHawk7, FlareHawk9, FlareHawk11, TiHawk7, TiHawk9, and TiHawk11. These IBFDs offer a new line of multi-planar expandable interbody devices designed to provide mechanical stability, promote arthrodesis, and allow for restoration of disc height and lordosis through a minimal insertion profile during standard open and minimally invasive posterior lumbar fusion procedures. The two-piece interbody cage design consists of a PEEK outer shell that expands in width, height, and lordosis with the insertion of a titanium shim. Once expanded, the open architecture design allows for ample graft delivery into the disc space.

AREAS COVERED

The design and unique features of the FlareHawk family of expandable fusion cages are described. The indications for their use are discussed. Early clinical and radiographic outcome studies using the FlareHawk Interbody Fusion System are reviewed, and properties of competitor products are outlined.

EXPERT OPINION

The FlareHawk multi-planar expandable interbody fusion cage is unique amongst the many lumbar fusion cages currently on the market. The multi-planar expansion, open architecture, and adaptive geometry set it apart from its competitors.

Comparison of the efficacy of expandable interbody fusion cage (EXP-IFC) and non-expandable interbody fusion cage (NE-IFC) in MIS-TLIF for lumbar degenerative diseases: A systematic retrospective study on 62 patients

Objectives

To investigate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of EXP-IFC in single-level MIS-TLIF.

Methods

This study included patients aged ≥18 years who received a single-level MIS-TLIF procedure with at least 1 year of follow-up. Outcome measures: clinical features, preoperative and neurological complications. Imaging analysis included disc height (DH) restoration, surgical and contralateral side foraminal height (FH), lumbar lordosis angle (LL), segmental lordosis (SL). Visual analog scale (VAS) score for low back pain (VAS-LBP) and leg pain (VAS-LP), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score were used to evaluate clinical outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed using independent sample t-test and sample t-test. The significance was set to p < 0.05 in univariate analysis.

Results

A total of 62 patients undergoing single level MIS-TLIFs between January 2017 and January 2019 were included, with 32 NE-IFC 46.9% female, mean age 54.86 ± 11.65, mean body mass index (BMI) 24.59 ± 3.63) and 30 EXP (40% female, mean age 58.32 ± 12.99, mean BMI 24.45 ± 2.76) with no significant differences in demographics. There were no significant differences between two groups in Operative time (OT), Estimated blood loss (EBL) and Length of stay (LOS). No significant differences were found in VAS-LBP, VAS-LP, JOA and ODI in post-operation and the last follow-up between the two groups. The imaging outcome demonstrated that the mean increase in DH was significantly greater for the patients with EXP-IFC than those with NE-IFC group at 1 year follow-up (8.92 ± 0.51 mm EXP-IFC vs. 7.96 ± 0.96 mm NE-IFC, p < 0.001). The mean change in FH of operative and contralateral sides were observed to be significantly higher for the patients with EXP-IFC at 1 year follow-up (operative side:17.67 ± 2.29 mm EXP-IFC vs. 16.01 ± 2.73 mm NE-IFC, p = 0.042; contralateral side:17.32 ± 2.26 mm EXP-IFC vs. 16.10 ± 2.32 mm NE-IFC, p < 0.001), but changes in LL and SL were not significantly different. At the last follow-up, we did not find any significant difference in the fusion rate between the two groups.

Conclusion

Our results indicated that there may be no significant difference in short-term clinical outcomes between EXP-IFC and NE-IFC, but the use of EXP-IFC in MIS-TLIF can provide a significant restoration of disc height, and neural foraminal height compared to NE-IFC.

Expandable vs. Static Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cages: 1-year Radiographic Parameters and Patient Reported Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Expandable transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) cages capable of multidirectional in situ expansion have gained popularity as they increase axial surface area for fusion and may enhance lordotic correction through a traditional MIS surgical corridor.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes between a novel expandable vs. static MIS TLIF cage for the treatment of degenerative disc disease.

STUDY DESIGN

A single center retrospective review of 120 consecutive adult patients undergoing 1 or 2-level MIS TLIF with an expandable (n=60) or static cage was performed between 2015-2019. Preoperative and 1-year postoperative radiographic and clinical outcomes were assessed by upright flexion/extension radiographs and serial confidential surveys.

RESULTS

120 patients (mean age 63.5 years, 60.0 % female) undergoing 1 and 2-level MIS TLIF met inclusion criteria. A statistically significant reduction of spondylolisthesis, restoration of foraminal, anterior and posterior disc height was achieved in both cohorts, but greater in the ECC (all p<0.05). Comparable rates of fusion, 93% and 91% were observed in the ECC and SCC. A significant reduction in NRS back and ODI scores were observed in both cohorts but more pronounced in the ECC (5.9±2.4 to 2.2±1.9 and 37.3±16.2 to 17.1±15.2) vs. SCC (6.2±2.8 to 3.2±2.5 and 41.8±16.1 to 24.3±17.5) (p<0.05). One instance of cage migration requiring reoperation occurred in the ECC.

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together, these radiographic and clinical findings suggest an expandable cage placed through an MIS corridor represents a safe, equitable and efficacious alternative to a static TLIF in adults with degenerative lumbar pathology.