Clinical dose profile of Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery for extensive brain metastases

Stereotactic Radiosurgery as Treatment for Brain Metastases: An Update

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a mainstay treatment option for brain metastasis (BM). While guidelines for SRS use have been outlined by professional societies, consideration of these guidelines should be weighed in the context of emerging literature, novel technology platforms, and contemporary treatment paradigms. Here, we review recent advances in prognostic scale development for SRS-treated BM patients and survival outcomes as a function of the number of BM and cumulative intracranial tumor volume. Focus is placed on the role of stereotactic laser thermal ablation in the management of BM that recur after SRS and the management of radiation necrosis. Neoadjuvant SRS prior to surgical resection as a means of minimizing leptomeningeal spread is also discussed.

A volume matched comparison of survival after radiosurgery in non-small cell lung cancer patients with one versus more than twenty brain metastases

BACKGROUND

Treatment of patients with a large number of brain metastases using radiosurgery remains controversial. In this study we sought to conduct a volume matched comparison to evaluate the clinical outcome of patients with > 20 brain metastases and compared it with patents with solitary brain tumor form non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Between 2014 and 2020, 26 NSCLC patients (925 tumors) underwent stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for > 20 metastases in a single procedure (median margin dose = 16 Gy, median cumulative tumor volume = 4.52 cc); 56 patients underwent SRS for a single metastasis (median margin dose = 18 Gy, median volume = 4.74 cc). The overall survival (OS), local tumor control (LC), adverse radiation effect (ARE) risk, and incidence of new tumor development were compared.

RESULTS

No difference in OS was found between patients with > 20 brain metastases (median OS = 15 months) and patients with solitary metastasis (median OS = 12 months; p = 0.3). In the solitary tumor cohort, two of 56 (3.5%) tumors progressed whereas in the > 20 cohort only 3 of 925 (0.3%) tumors showed progression (*p = 0.0013). The rate of new tumor development was significantly higher in patients with > 20 tumors (***p = 0.0001). No significant difference of ARE rate was found (7.5% for > 20 tumors vs. 8.7% for single metastasis).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with > 20 tumors showed significantly better LC with similar OS compared to patients with solitary tumors. Current guidelines that restrict the role of SRS to patients with 1-4 tumors should be revised.

Hippocampal sparing in patients receiving radiosurgery for ≥25 brain metastases

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

To report our dosimetric analysis of the hippocampi (HC) and the incidence of perihippocampal tumor location in patients with ≥25 brain metastases who received stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in single or multiple sessions.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Analysis of our prospective registry identified 89 patients treated with SRS for ≥25 brain metastases. HC avoidance regions (HA-region) were created on treatment planning MRIs by 5 mm expansion of HC. Doses from each session were summed to calculate HC dose. The distribution of metastases relative to the HA-region and the HC was analyzed.

RESULTS

Median number of tumors irradiated per patient was 33 (range 25-116) in a median of 3 (range1-12) sessions. Median bilateral HC D_min (D₁₀₀), D₄₀, D₅₀, D_max, and D_mean (Gy) was 1.88, 3.94, 3.62, 16.6, and 3.97 for all patients, and 1.43, 2.99, 2.88, 5.64, and 3.07 for patients with tumors outside the HA-region. Multivariate linear regression showed that the median HC D₄₀, D₅₀, and D_min were significantly correlated with the tumor number and tumor volume (p < 0.001). Of the total 3059 treated tumors, 83 (2.7%) were located in the HA-region in 57% evaluable patients; 38 tumors (1.2%) abutted or involved the HC itself.

CONCLUSIONS

Hippocampal dose is higher in patients with tumors in the HA-region; however, even for patients with a high burden of intracranial disease and tumors located in the HA-regions, SRS affords hippocampal sparing. This is particularly relevant in light of our finding of eventual perihippocampal metastases in more than half of our patients.