The utility of brain biopsy in pediatric cryptogenic neurological disease

Indications for a brain biopsy in neurological diseases of unknown etiology: The role of magnetic resonance imaging findings and liquid biopsy in yielding definitive pathological diagnoses

Brain biopsies are often considered for patients who cannot be diagnosed with various laboratory test results. However, physicians tend to be hesitant regarding their application in possibly non-neoplastic brain diseases, due to the invasiveness and risks. The aim was to determine the indications for brain biopsies in cases of neurological diseases of unknown etiology. We retrospectively evaluated diagnostic accuracy, laboratory findings (including a liquid biopsy for malignant lymphoma), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics and the post-treatment outcomes of patients undergoing brain biopsies for neurological diseases of unknown etiology. The data of patients who had undergone a brain biopsy during their admission to Niigata University Hospital, between 2011 and 2024, were reviewed. Moreover, the laboratory data and MRI findings between patients with definitive and nonspecific biopsy diagnoses were compared. Twenty-six patients underwent a brain biopsy, and a definitive diagnosis was obtained in 14 patients (53.8%). Even in cases where a nonspecific diagnosis was made, biopsy findings helped rule out malignancy and guide clinical diagnosis and treatment decisions. The liquid biopsy for malignant lymphoma was performed in eight patients, with one yielding a positive result, consistent with primary central nervous system lymphoma. The sensitivity and specificity of liquid biopsy were 0.5 and 1, respectively. Diffusely contrasted cortical lesions and the presence of mass effects on MRI, were significantly associated with a definitive diagnosis, compared to a nonspecific diagnosis. In conclusion, brain MRI and liquid biopsies can assist in determining the appropriate indications for brain biopsies in neurological diseases of unknown etiology.

Safety and efficacy of brain biopsy: Results from a single institution retrospective cohort study

Introduction

Brain biopsy provides important histopathological diagnostic information for patients with new intracranial lesions. Although a minimally invasive technique, previous studies report an associated morbidity and mortality between 0.6% and 6.8%. We sought to characterise the risk linked to this procedure, and to establish the feasibility of instigating a day-case brain biopsy pathway at our institution.

Materials and methods

This single-centre retrospective case series study included neuronavigation guided mini craniotomy and frameless stereotactic brain biopsies carried out between April 2019 and December 2021. Exclusion criteria were interventions performed for non-neoplastic lesions. Demographic data, clinical and radiological presentation, type of biopsy, histology and complications in the post-operative period were recorded.

Results

Data from 196 patients with a mean age of 58.7 years (SD+/-14.4 years) was analysed. 79% (n=155) were frameless stereotactic biopsies and 21% (n=41) neuronavigation guided mini craniotomy biopsies. Complications resulting in acute intracerebral haemorrhage and death, or new persistent neurological deficits were observed in 2% of patients (n=4; 2 frameless stereotactic; 2 open). Less severe complications or transient symptoms were noted in 2.5% of cases (n=5). 8 patients had minor haemorrhages in the biopsy tract with no clinical ramifications. Biopsy was non-diagnostic in 2.5% (n=5) of cases. Two cases were subsequently identified as lymphoma. Other reasons included insufficient sampling, necrotic tissue, and target error.

Discussion and conclusion

This study demonstrates that brain biopsy is a procedure with an acceptably low rate of severe complications and mortality, in line with previously published literature. This supports the development of day-case pathway allowing improved patient flow, reducing the risk of iatrogenic complications associated with hospital stay, such as infection and thrombosis.

Diagnosing viral encephalitis and emerging concepts

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review offers a contemporary clinical approach to the diagnosis of viral encephalitis and discusses recent advances in the field. The neurologic effects of coronaviruses, including COVID-19, as well as management of encephalitis are not covered in this review.

RECENT FINDINGS

The diagnostic tools for evaluating patients with viral encephalitis are evolving quickly. Multiplex PCR panels are now in widespread use and allow for rapid pathogen detection and potentially reduce empiric antimicrobial exposure in certain patients, while metagenomic next-generation sequencing holds great promise in diagnosing challenging and rarer causes of viral encephalitis. We also review topical and emerging infections pertinent to neuroinfectious disease practice, including emerging arboviruses, monkeypox virus (mpox), and measles.

SUMMARY

Although etiological diagnosis remains challenging in viral encephalitis, recent advances may soon provide the clinician with additional tools. Environmental changes, host factors (such as ubiquitous use of immunosuppression), and societal trends (re-emergence of vaccine preventable diseases) are likely to change the landscape of neurologic infections that are considered and treated in clinical practice.

Brain Biopsy for Neurological Diseases of Unknown Etiology in Critically Ill Patients: Feasibility, Safety, and Diagnostic Yield

OBJECTIVES

Brain biopsy is a useful surgical procedure in the management of patients with suspected neoplastic lesions. Its role in neurologic diseases of unknown etiology remains controversial, especially in ICU patients. This study was undertaken to determine the feasibility, safety, and the diagnostic yield of brain biopsy in critically ill patients with neurologic diseases of unknown etiology. We also aimed to compare these endpoints to those of non-ICU patients who underwent a brain biopsy in the same clinical context.

DESIGN

Monocenter, retrospective, observational cohort study.

SETTING

A French tertiary center.

PATIENTS

All adult patients with neurologic diseases of unknown etiology under mechanical ventilation undergoing in-ICU brain biopsy between January 2008 and October 2020 were compared with a cohort of non-ICU patients.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Among the 2,207 brain-biopsied patients during the study period, 234 biopsies were performed for neurologic diseases of unknown etiology, including 29 who were mechanically ventilated and 205 who were not ICU patients. Specific histological diagnosis and final diagnosis rates were 62.1% and 75.9%, respectively, leading to therapeutic management modification in 62.1% of cases. Meningitis on prebiopsy cerebrospinal fluid analysis was the sole predictor of obtaining a final diagnosis (2.3 [1.4-3.8]; p = 0.02). ICU patients who experienced therapeutic management modification after the biopsy had longer survival (p = 0.03). The grade 1 to 4 (mild to severe) complication rates were: 24.1%, 3.5%, 0%, and 6.9%, respectively. Biopsy-related mortality was significantly higher in ICU patients compared with non-ICU patients (6.9% vs 0%; p = 0.02). Hematological malignancy was associated with biopsy-related mortality (1.5 [1.01-2.6]; p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Brain biopsy in critically ill patients with neurologic disease of unknown etiology is associated with high diagnostic yield, therapeutic modifications and postbiopsy survival advantage. Safety profile seems acceptable in most patients. The benefit/risk ratio of brain biopsy in this population should be carefully weighted.

When Brain Biopsy Solves the Dilemma of Diagnosing Atypical Cerebral Amyoild Angiopathy: A Case Report

Patient: Female, 67-year-old

Final Diagnosis: Cerebral amyloid angiopathy related inflammation

Symptoms: Headache, Behavioral Changes • Seizures

Medication: —

Clinical Procedure: —

Specialty: Neurology • Neurosurgery

Evaluation of 311 contemporary cases of stereotactic biopsies in patients with neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions-diagnostic yield and management of non-diagnostic cases

Stereotactic biopsies are an established tool for obtaining diagnosis of unclear brain lesions. However, non-diagnostic biopsies still occur. We aimed to analyze the contemporary diagnostic yield of stereotactic biopsies, predictors for non-diagnostic biopsies, outcome, and follow-up strategy after non-diagnostic biopsy. We conducted a single-center retrospective study of 311 adult patients undergoing stereotactic biopsies due to a newly diagnosed lesion at our department between 2012 and 2018. Patient data regarding comorbidities, presenting symptoms, imaging features, and non-invasive diagnostic procedures were obtained. The overall diagnostic yield was 86.2% and differed significantly between the various suspected diagnosis groups and was the highest when suspecting primary brain tumor compared with non-neoplastic lesions (91.2% vs. 73.3%, p > 0.001). Predicators for non-diagnostic biopsies were small lesion size, lack of contrast-enhancement, presence of sepsis, or underlying hemato-oncological disease. In case of non-diagnostic biopsy, a re-biopsy was performed in 12 cases, revealing a final diagnosis in 75%. In 16 cases, empiric therapy was started based on the suspected underlying disease. Close follow-up was performed in the remaining 15 cases. We showed that stereotactic biopsy is a safe procedure with reasonable diagnostic yield even for non-neoplastic lesions, when non-invasive diagnostic was inconclusive. In addition, we developed treatment recommendations for cases of non-diagnostic biopsies.