Comparison of autograft versus allograft in the surgical repair of pediatric obstetrical brachial plexus injuries

Techniques and graft materials for repairing peripheral nerve defects

Peripheral nerve defects refer to damage or destruction occurring in the peripheral nervous system, typically affecting the limbs and face. The current primary approaches to address peripheral nerve defects involve the utilization of autologous nerve transplants or the transplantation of artificial material. Nevertheless, these methods possess certain limitations, such as inadequate availability of donor nerve or unsatisfactory regenerative outcomes post-transplantation. Biomaterials have been extensively studied as an alternative approach to promote the repair of peripheral neve defects. These biomaterials include both natural and synthetic materials. Natural materials consist of collagen, chitosan, and silk, while synthetic materials consist of polyurethane, polylactic acid, and polycaprolactone. Recently, several new neural repair technologies have also been developed, such as nerve regeneration bridging technology, electrical stimulation technology, and stem cell therapy technology. Overall, biomaterials and new neural repair technologies provide new methods and opportunities for repairing peripheral nerve defects. However, these methods still require further research and development to enhance their effectiveness and feasibility.

A Retrospective Case Series of Peripheral Mixed Nerve Reconstruction Failures Using Processed Nerve Allografts

BACKGROUND

Favorable rates of meaningful recovery (≥M3/S3) of processed nerve allografts (PNAs) for mixed and motor nerve injuries have been reported, but there are few reports of patients having complete PNA failure (M0/S0). The purpose of this study was to describe the outcomes, including rate of complete failures, in a case series of patients who underwent PNA for peripheral mixed nerve reconstructions.

METHODS

A retrospective review of outcomes between May 2018 to September 2020 was performed. Consecutive patients who underwent nerve reconstruction (>15 mm) with PNA for a peripheral mixed nerve injury of the upper or lower extremity were eligible. Those who returned to clinic for a 10-month postoperative visit were included in this study. The primary outcome was whether the patient was defined as having a complete failure (M0/S0).

RESULTS

A total of 22 patients underwent a PNA during the time period; 14 patients participated in follow-up and were included (average age: 34.7 years) with a mean follow-up of 11.9 months. The average gap length was 46.4 mm (range 15-110 mm). At their 10-month postoperative visit, no patients had any motor or sensory improvement; all patients were deemed as having complete failure. Four patients underwent or were planned for subsequent revision surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we demonstrated a high number of complete failures, with all 14 included patients sustaining a complete failure (100% failure rate) at a minimum 10-month follow-up visit. Failure in this case series was not observed to affect one nerve type, location, or be related to preoperative injury size.