Outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery for hemorrhagic arteriovenous malformations with or without prior resection or embolization

Radiosurgery With Prior Embolization Versus Radiosurgery Alone for Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The addition of adjuvant embolization to radiosurgery has been proposed as a means of improving treatment outcomes of intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). However, the relative efficacy and safety of radiosurgery with adjuvant embolization vs radiosurgery alone remain uncertain. Moreover, previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses have included a limited number of studies and did not consider the effects of baseline characteristics, including AVM volume, on the outcomes. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of preradiosurgery embolization for intracranial AVMs with consideration to matching status between participants in each treatment group.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by searching electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library, up to January 2023. All studies evaluating the utilization of preradiosurgery embolization were included.

RESULTS

A total of 70 studies (9 matched and 71 unmatched) with a total of 12 088 patients were included. The mean age of the included patients was 32.41 years, and 48.91% of the patients were female. Preradiosurgery embolization was used for larger AVMs and patients with previous hemorrhage ( P < .01, P = .02, respectively). The obliteration rate for preradiosurgery embolization (49.44%) was lower compared with radiosurgery alone (61.42%, odds ratio = 0.56, P < .01), regardless of the matching status of the analyzed studies. Although prior embolization was associated higher rate of cyst formation ( P = .04), it lowered the odds of radiation-induced changes ( P = .04). The risks of minor and major neurological deficits, postradiosurgery hemorrhage, and mortality were comparable between groups.

CONCLUSION

This study provides evidence that although preradiosurgery embolization is a suitable option to reduce the AVM size for future radiosurgical interventions, it may not be useful for same-sized AVMs eligible for radiosurgery. Utilization of preradiosurgery embolization in suitable lesions for radiosurgery may result in the added cost and burden of an endovascular procedure.

The impact of embolization on radiosurgery obliteration rates for brain arteriovenous malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

There exists no consensus in the literature regarding the impact of pre-stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) embolization on obliteration rates and clinical outcome after radiosurgery treatment of intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVM). We performed a systematic review of four databases and included studies with at least 10 patients evaluating obliteration rates of intracranial AVMs treated with SRS alone (SRS cohort) and combined pre-SRS embolization followed by SRS (E + SRS cohort). Meta-analytic results were pooled together via random-effects models. A total of 43 studies, with 7103 patients, were included in our analysis. Among our included patients, complete obliteration was achieved in 51.5% (964/1871) of patients in the E + SRS cohort as compared to 61.5% (3217/5231) of patients in the SRS cohort. Meta-analysis of the pooled data revealed that obliteration was significantly lower in the E + SRS cohort (pooled OR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.54-0.75, p < 0.0001). The use of pre-SRS embolization was significantly associated with lower AVM obliteration rates when compared to treatment with SRS alone. Our analysis seeks to provide a macroscopic insight into the complex interaction between pre-SRS embolization and brain AVM obliteration rates and prognosis. Pre-SRS embolization may still be beneficial in select patients, and further studies are needed to identify patients who benefit from neoadjuvant AVM embolization.

Effect of embolization before stereotactic radiosurgery for brain arteriovenous malformations: a case-control study with propensity score matching

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether endovascular embolization prior to stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has a negative impact on nidus obliteration for patients with arteriovenous malformations (AVMs).

METHODS

A total of 704 eligible patients with AVM who did not undergo prior surgery or radiotherapy were evaluated. Of these patients, 593 were treated with SRS only, and 111 were treated with embolization followed by SRS (E+SRS). Most patients in the E+SRS group (88%) underwent embolization with n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate. In the comparison of radiosurgical outcomes between patients treated with SRS only and E+SRS, these groups were matched in a 1:1 ratio using propensity score matching to eliminate differences in basic characteristics. The primary outcome was to compare the nidus obliteration rates between the SRS-only and E+SRS groups. The secondary outcomes were the comparison of cumulative hemorrhage rates and the incidence of cyst formation or chronic encapsulated hematoma after SRS between these groups.

RESULTS

In the unmatched cohorts, the actuarial 3-, 5-, and 8-year nidus obliteration rates after a single SRS session were 49.6%, 69.4%, and 74.1% in the SRS-only group, respectively, and 30.7%, 50.9%, and 68.6% in the E+SRS group, respectively (p = 0.001). In the matched cohort of 98 patients in each group, the rates were 47.1%, 62.0%, and 69.6% in the SRS-only group and 32.5%, 55.3%, and 75.0% in the E+SRS group, respectively (p = 0.24). There was no significant difference in either cumulative hemorrhage or the incidence of cyst formation or chronic encapsulated hematoma between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-SRS embolization did not affect nidus obliteration rates, cumulative hemorrhage rates, or the incidence of cyst formation or chronic encapsulated hematoma as late adverse radiation effects in patients with AVM treated with SRS.

Efficacy and safety of embolization for arteriovenous malformations of the basal ganglia and thalamus via the transarterial approach

Background

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety profile of transarterial embolization in the treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs) within the basal ganglia and thalamus.

Methods

A retrospective clinical study was performed on 22 patients with bAVMs localized within the basal ganglia and thalamus who were treated with transarterial embolization (December 2012 and January 2019) in our center. The bAVMs were embolized via the transarterial approach with Onyx or Glubran according to the anatomical structure. A detachable or undetachable microcatheter was used in the procedure according to the length of the feeding artery. The data of these patients were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

Among the 22 patients, 9 bAVMs were located in the basal ganglia and 13 were located in the thalamus. Twenty patients presented with hemorrhage (90.9%), leaving 2 patients (9.1%) who had no symptoms. According to the Spetzler-Martin grading classification, 13 bAVMs (59.1%) were grade 3, 7 (31.8%) were grade 4, and 2 (9.1%) were grade 5. Procedure-related complications occurred in only 1 patient (4.5%). No deaths related to the operation occurred. All patients achieved anatomic stabilization and no bleeding was observed in the follow-up.

Conclusions

Selective embolization via the transarterial approach is safe and effective for bAVMs originating within the basal ganglia and thalamus. Our results demonstrate a low rate of complications and an elevated degree of anatomical disruption in the endovascular treatment of bAVMs stemming from the basal ganglia and thalamus.

Awake surgery for right frontal lobe glioma can preserve visuospatial cognition and spatial working memory

PURPOSE

Awake surgery is the standard treatment to preserve motor and language functions. This longitudinal study aimed to evaluate the resection rate and preservation of neurocognitive functions in patients with right frontal lobe glioma who underwent awake surgery.

METHODS

Thirty-three patients (mean age, 48.0 years) with right frontal lobe glioma who underwent awake surgery at our hospital between 2013 and 2019 were included. Fourteen, thirteen, and six cases had WHO classification grades of II, III, and IV, respectively. We evaluated visuospatial cognition (VSC) and spatial working memory (SWM) before and three months after surgery. Relevant brain areas for VSC and SWM were intraoperatively mapped, whenever the task was successfully accomplished. Therefore, patients were divided into an intraoperative evaluation group and a non-evaluation group for each function, and the resection rate and functional outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

The removal rate in the evaluation group for VSC and SWM were similar to that in the non-evaluation group. Chronic impairment rate of VSC was significantly lower in the evaluation than in the non-evaluation group (5.6% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.034). No patient showed postoperative SWM impairment in the evaluation group as opposed to the non-evaluation group (16.7%, p = 0.049). The probability of resection of the deeper posterior part of the middle frontal gyrus, the relevant area of VSC, was higher in the non-evaluation group than in the evaluation group.

CONCLUSIONS

We statistically verified that awake surgery for right frontal lobe glioma results in successful preservation of VSC and SWM with satisfying resection rates.