Multicenter assessment of surgical outcomes in adult spinal deformity patients with severe global coronal malalignment: determination of target coronal realignment threshold

The kickstand rod technique for correction of coronal malalignment in patients with adult spinal deformity: a systematic review and pooled analysis of 97 cases

Coronal malalignment (CM) has recently gained focus as a key predictor of functional outcomes in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). The kickstand rod technique has been described as a novel technique for CM correction using an accessory rod on the convex side of the deformity. This review aimed to evaluate the surgical technique and outcomes of corrective surgery using this technique. The literature search was conducted on three databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus). After reviewing the search results, six studies were shortlisted for data extraction and pooled analysis. Weighted means for surgical duration, length of stay, amount of coronal correction, and sagittal parameters were calculated. The studies included in the review were published between 2018 and 2023, with a total sample size of 97 patients. The mean age of the study cohort was 61.1 years, with female preponderance. The mean operative time was 333.6 minutes. The mean correction of CM was 5.1 cm (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.6-6.6), the mean sagittal correction was 5.6 cm (95% CI, 4.1-7.1), and the mean change in lumbar lordosis was 17° (95% CI, 10.4-24.1). Preoperative coronal imbalance and mean correction achieved postoperatively were directly related with age. The reoperation rate was 13.2%. The kickstand rod technique compares favorably with conventional techniques such as asymmetric osteotomies in CM management. This technique provides an additional accessory rod that helps increase construct stiffness. Because of limited data, definitive conclusions cannot be drawn from this review; however, this technique is a valuable tool for a surgeon dealing with ASD.

Coronal Alignment in Adult Spine Surgery

Coronal realignment is an important goal in adult spine surgery that has been overshadowed by emphasis on the sagittal plane. As coronal malalignment drives considerable functional disability, a fundamental understanding of its clinical and radiographic evaluation and surgical techniques to prevent its development is of utmost importance. In this study, we review etiologies of coronal malalignment and their radiographic and clinical assessments, risk factors for and functional implications of postoperative coronal malalignment, and surgical strategies to optimize appropriate coronal realignment in adult spine surgery.

How coronal malalignment affects the surgical outcome in corrective spine surgery for adult symptomatic lumbar deformity

PURPOSE

The importance of coronal alignment is unclear, while the importance of sagittal alignment in the treatment of adult patients with spinal deformities is well described. This study sought to elucidate the impact of global coronal malalignment (GCMA) in surgically treated adult symptomatic lumbar deformity (ASLD) patients.

METHODS

A multicentre retrospective analysis of a prospective ASD database. GCMA was defined as GCA (C7PL-CSVL) ≥ 3 cm. GCMA is categorized based on the Obeid-Coronal Malalignment Classification (O-CM). Demographic, surgical, radiographic, HRQOL, and complication data were analysed. The risk for postoperative GCMA was analysed by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Of 230 surgically treated ASLD patients, 96 patients showed GCMA preoperatively and baseline GCA was correlated with the baseline SRS-22 pain domain score (r = - 30). Postoperatively, 62 patients (27%, O-CM type 1: 41[18%], type 2: 21[9%]) developed GCMA. The multivariate risk analysis indicated dementia (OR 20.1[1.2-304.4]), diabetes (OR 5.9[1.3-27.3]), and baseline O-CM type 2 (OR 2.1[1.3-3.4]) as independent risk factors for postoperative GCMA. The 2-year SRS-22 score was not different between the 2 groups, while 4 GCMA patients required revision surgery within 1 year after surgery due to coronal decompensation (GCMA+ vs. GCMA- function: 3.6 ± 0.6 vs. 3.7 ± 0.7, pain: 3.7 ± 0.8 vs. 3.8 ± 0.8, self-image: 3.6 ± 0.8 vs. 3.6 ± 0.8, mental health: 3.7 ± 0.8 vs. 3.8 ± 0.9, satisfaction: 3.9 ± 0.9 vs. 3.9 ± 0.8, total: 3.7 ± 0.7 vs. 3.7 ± 0.7). Additionally, the comparisons of 2-yr SRS-22 between GCMA ± showed no difference in any UIV and LIV level or O-CM type.

CONCLUSIONS

In ASLD patients with corrective spine surgery, GCMA at 2 years did not affect HRQOL or major complications at any spinal fusion extent or O-CM type of malalignment, whereas GCA correlated with pain intensity before surgery. These findings may warrant further study of the impact of GCMA on HRQOL in the surgical treatment of ASLD patients.

Risk Factors of Postoperative Coronal Balance Transition in Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective radiographic study.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the potential risk factors influencing the transition of postoperative coronal balance in degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) patients.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

As time passes after surgery, the spinal sequence of DLS patients may dynamically shift from coronal balance to imbalance, causing clinical symptoms. However, the transition of postoperative coronal balance and its risk factors have not been effectively investigated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included 156 DLS patients. The cohort was divided into immediate postoperative coronal balance with follow-up balance (N=73) and follow-up imbalance (N=21), immediate postoperative coronal imbalance (CIB) with follow-up balance (N=23), and follow-up imbalance (N=39). Parameters included age, sex, classification of coronal balance, coronal balance distance, fusion of L5 or S1, location of apical vertebra, apical vertebral translation (AVT), Cobb angle of the main curve and lumbar-sacral curve, tilt and direction of L4/5, tilt and direction of upper instrumented vertebra (UIV), and Cobb angle of T1-UIV. Statistical testing was performed using chi-square/Fisher exact test, t tests or nonparametric tests, correlation testing, and stepwise logistic regression.

RESULTS

We identified a significant difference in preoperative AVT, preoperative Cobb angle, and immediate postoperative UIV tilt between patients with and without follow-up balance. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated factors associated with follow-up CIB included preoperative AVT ( P =0.015), preoperative Cobb angle ( P =0.002), and tilt of immediate postoperative UIV ( P =0.018). Factors associated with immediate postoperative CIB in patients with follow-up coronal balance were sex, correction ratio of the main curve, and direction of L4. Logistic regression analysis further identified a correction ratio of main curve ≤0.7 ( P =0.009) as an important predictive factor.

CONCLUSION

Patients with immediate postoperative coronal balance and higher preoperative AVT, preoperative Cobb angle, and tilt of immediate postoperative UIV were more likely to experience follow-up CIB. A correction ratio of the main curve ≤0.7 was an independent predictor of follow-up CIB.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Adherence to the Obeid coronal malalignment classification and a residual malalignment below 20 mm can improve surgical outcomes in adult spine deformity surgery

PURPOSE

Coronal balance is a major factor impacting the surgical outcomes in adult spinal deformity (ASD). The Obeid coronal malalignment (O-CM) classification has been proposed to improve the coronal alignment in ASD surgery. Aim of this study was to investigate whether a postoperative CM < 20 mm and adherence to the O-CM classification could improve surgical outcomes and decrease the rate of mechanical failure in a cohort of ASD patients.

METHODS

Multicenter retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on all ASD patients who underwent surgical management and had a preoperative CM > 20 mm and a 2-year follow-up. Patients were divided in two groups according to whether or not surgery had been performed in adherence to the guidelines of the O-CM classification and according to whether or not the residual CM was < 20 mm. The outcomes of interest were radiographic data, rate of mechanical complications and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.

RESULTS

At 2 years, adherence to the O-CM classification led to a lower rate of mechanical complications (40 vs. 60%). A coronal correction of the CM < 20 mm allowed for a significant improvement in SRS-22 and SF-36 scores and was associated with a 3.5 times greater odd of achieving the minimal clinical important difference for the SRS-22.

CONCLUSION

Adherence to the O-CM classification could reduce the risk of mechanic complications 2 years after ASD surgery. Patients with a residual CM < 20 mm showed better functional outcomes and a 3.5 times greater odd of achieving the MCID for the SRS-22 score.

Three-Column Osteotomy for Frail Versus Nonfrail Patients with Adult Spinal Deformity: Assessment of Medical and Surgical Complications, Revision Surgery Rates, and Cost

BACKGROUND

Three-column osteotomy (3-CO) is a powerful tool for spinal deformity correction but has been associated with substantial risk and surgical invasiveness. It is incompletely understood how frailty might affect patients undergoing 3-CO.

METHODS

The PearlDiver database was used to examine spinal deformity patients with a diagnosis of frailty who had undergone 3-CO. Frail and nonfrail patients were matched, and the revision surgery rates, complications, and hospitalization costs were calculated. Logistic regression was used to account for possible confounding variables. Of the 2871 included patients, 1460 had had frailty and 1411 had had no frailty.

RESULTS

The frail patients were older, had had more comorbidities (P < 0.001), and were more likely to have undergone posterior interbody fusion (P < 0.05), without differences in the anterior interbody fusion rates. No differences were found in the reoperation rates for ≤5 years. At 30 days, the frail patients were more likely to have experienced acute kidney injury (P = 0.018), bowel/bladder dysfunction (P = 0.014), cardiac complications (P = 0.006), and pneumonia (P = 0.039). At 2 years, the frail patients were also more likely to have experienced bowel/bladder dysfunction (P = 0.028), cardiac complications (P < 0.001), deep vein thrombosis (P = 0.027), and sepsis (P = 0.033). The cost for the procedures was also higher for the frail patients than for the nonfrail patients ($24,544.79 vs. $21,565.63; P = 0.043).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that frail patients undergoing 3-CO were more likely to experience certain medical complications and had had higher associated costs but similar reoperation rates compared with nonfrail patients. Careful patient selection and surgical strategy modification might alter the risks of medical and surgical complications after 3-CO for frail patients.

Incidence, mechanism, and protective strategies for 2-year pelvic fixation failure after adult spinal deformity surgery with a minimum six-level fusion

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence, mechanism, and potential protective strategies for pelvic fixation failure (PFF) within 2 years after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery.

METHODS

Data for ASD patients (age ≥ 18 years, minimum of six instrumented levels) with pelvic fixation (S2-alar-iliac [S2AI] and/or iliac screws) with a minimum 2-year follow-up were consecutively collected (2015-2019). Patients with prior pelvic fixation were excluded. PFF was defined as any revision to pelvic screws, which may include broken rods across the lumbosacral junction requiring revision to pelvic screws, pseudarthrosis across the lumbosacral junction requiring revision to pelvic screws, a broken or loose pelvic screw, or sacral/iliac fracture. Patient information including demographic data and health history (age, sex, BMI, smoking status, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, osteoporosis), operative (total instrumented levels [TIL], three-column osteotomy [3CO], interbody fusion), screw (iliac, S2AI, length, diameter), rod (diameter, kickstand), rod pattern (number crossing lumbopelvic junction, lowest instrumented vertebra [LIV] of accessory rod[s], lateral connectors, dual-headed screws), and pre- and postradiographic (lumbar lordosis, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, major Cobb angle, lumbosacral fractional curve, C7 coronal vertical axis [CVA], T1 pelvic angle, C7 sagittal vertical axis) parameters was collected. All rods across the lumbosacral junction were cobalt-chrome. All iliac and S2AI screws were closed-headed tulips. Both univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine risk factors for PFF.

RESULTS

Of 253 patients (mean age 58.9 years, mean TIL 13.6, 3CO 15.8%, L5-S1 interbody 74.7%, mean pelvic screw diameter/length 8.6/87 mm), the 2-year failure rate was 4.3% (n = 11). The mechanisms of failure included broken rods across the lumbosacral junction (n = 4), pseudarthrosis across the lumbosacral junction requiring revision to pelvic screws (n = 3), broken pelvic screw (n = 1), loose pelvic screw (n = 1), sacral/iliac fracture (n = 1), and painful/prominent pelvic screw (n = 1). A higher number of rods crossing the lumbopelvic junction (mean 3.8 no failure vs 2.9 failure, p = 0.009) and accessory rod LIV to S2/ilium (no failure 54.2% vs failure 18.2%, p = 0.003) were protective for failure. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that accessory rod LIV to S2/ilium versus S1 (OR 0.2, p = 0.004) and number of rods crossing the lumbar to pelvis (OR 0.15, p = 0.002) were protective, while worse postoperative CVA (OR 1.5, p = 0.028) was an independent risk factor for failure.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2-year PFF rate was low relative to what is reported in the literature, despite patients undergoing long fusion constructs for ASD. The number of rods crossing the lumbopelvic junction and accessory rod LIV to S2/ilium relative to S1 alone likely increase construct stiffness. Residual postoperative coronal malalignment should be avoided to reduce PFF.

How common is acute pelvic fixation failure after adult spine surgery? A single-center study of 358 patients

OBJECTIVE

There is a paucity of literature on pelvic fixation failure after adult spine surgery in the early postoperative period. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of acute pelvic fixation failure in a large single-center study and to describe the lessons learned.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective review of adult (≥ 18 years old) patients who underwent spinal fusion with pelvic fixation (iliac, S2-alar-iliac [S2AI] screws) at a single academic medical center between 2015 and 2020. All patients had a minimum of 3 instrumented levels. The minimum follow-up was 6 months after the index spine surgery. Patients with prior pelvic fixation were excluded. Acute pelvic fixation failure was defined as revision of the pelvic screws within 6 months of the primary surgery. Patient demographics and operative, radiographic, and rod/screw parameters were collected. All rods were cobalt-chrome. All iliac and S2AI screws were closed-headed screws.

RESULTS

In 358 patients, the mean age was 59.5 ± 13.6 years, and 64.0% (n = 229) were female. The mean number of instrumented levels was 11.5 ± 5.5, and 79.1% (n = 283) had ≥ 6 levels fused. Three-column osteotomies were performed in 14.2% (n = 51) of patients, and 74.6% (n = 267) had an L5-S1 interbody fusion. The mean diameter/length of pelvic screws was 8.5/86.6 mm. The mean number of pelvic screws was 2.2 ± 0.5, the mean rod diameter was 6.0 ± 0 mm, and 78.5% (n = 281) had > 2 rods crossing the lumbopelvic junction. Accessory rods extended to S1 (32.7%, n = 117) or S2/ilium (45.8%, n = 164). Acute pelvic fixation failure occurred in 1 patient (0.3%); this individual had a broken S2AI screw near the head-neck junction. This 76-year-old woman with degenerative lumbar scoliosis and chronic lumbosacral zone 1 fracture nonunion had undergone posterior instrumented fusion from T10 to pelvis with bilateral S2AI screws (8.5 × 90 mm); i.e., transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion L4-S1. The patient had persistent left buttock pain postoperatively, with radiographically confirmed breakage of the left S2AI screw 68 days after surgery. Revision included instrumentation removal at L2-pelvis and a total of 4 pelvic screws.

CONCLUSIONS

The acute pelvic fixation failure rate was exceedingly low in adult spine surgery. This rate may be the result of multiple factors including the preference for multirod (> 2), closed-headed pelvic screw constructs in which large-diameter long screws are used. Increasing the number of rods and screws at the lumbopelvic junction may be important factors to consider, especially for patients with high risk for nonunion.

What Are the Benefits of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion on the Treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Deformity

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) combined with posterior spinal fusion (PSF) with that of conventional PSF in the treatment of adult spinal deformity (ASD).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed for relevant studies in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Spinopelvic parameters, surgical data, complications, and clinical outcomes at the last follow-up were compared between patients with ASD who underwent LLIF combined with PSF (LLIF+PSF group) and those who underwent conventional PSF (only-PSF group).

RESULTS

Ten studies, comprising 621 patients with ASD (313 in the LLIF+PSF group and 308 in the only-PSF group), were included. The level of evidence was III for 7 studies and IV for 3 studies. There was no significant difference in the improvement in the visual analog scale score, systemic complication rate, and revision rate between groups. In the LLIF+PSF group, we noted a superior restoration of lumbar lordosis (weighted mean difference [WMD], 9.77; 95% confidence interval [CI] 7.10 to 12.44, P < .001), pelvic tilt (WMD, -2.50; 95% CI -4.25 to -.75, P = .005), sagittal vertical axis (WMD, -21.92; 95% CI -30.73 to -13.11, P < .001), and C7 plumb line-center sacral vertical line (WMD, -4.03; 95% CI -7.52 to -.54, P = .024); a lower estimated blood loss (WMD, -719.99; 95% CI -1105.02 to -334.96, P < .001) while a prolonged operating time (WMD, 104.89; 95% CI 49.36 to 160.43, P < .001); lower incidence of pseudarthrosis (risk ratio [RR], .26; 95% CI .08 to .79, P = .017) while higher incidence of neurologic deficits (RR, 2.04; 95% CI 1.27 to 3.25, P = .003); and a better improvement in Oswestry Disability Index score (WMD, -7.04; 95% CI -10.155 to -3.93, P < .001) and Scoliosis Research Society-22 total score (WMD, .27; 95% CI .11 to .42, P = .001). The level of evidence in this systematic review and meta-analysis was II.

CONCLUSION

Compared with conventional PSF, LLIF combined with PSF was associated with superior restoration of sagittal and coronal alignment, lower incidence of pseudarthrosis, better improvement in quality of life, and less surgical invasiveness in the treatment of ASD, albeit at the cost of prolonged surgical times and substantially high incidence of lower extremity symptoms. Surgeons should weigh the advantages and disadvantages of this procedure, and inform patients about its side effects.

Postoperative coronal malalignment after adult spinal deformity surgery: incidence, risk factors, and impact on 2-year outcomes

PURPOSE

To evaluate the incidence, risk factors, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients with postoperative coronal malalignment.

METHODS

A single-institution, retrospective cohort study of ASD patients undergoing ≥ 6 level fusions from 2015 to 2019 was undertaken. The primary outcome was postoperative coronal malalignment, defined as C7-coronal vertical axis (CVA) > 3 cm. Secondary outcomes included: complications, readmissions, reoperations, and 2-year PROs.

RESULTS

A total of 243 ASD patients undergoing spinal surgery had preoperative and immediate postoperative measurements, and 174 patients (72%) had 2-year follow-up. Mean age was 49.3 ± 18.3yrs and mean instrumented levels was 13.5 ± 3.9. Mean preoperative CVA was 2.9 ± 2.7 cm, and 90 (37%) had preoperative coronal malalignment. Postoperative coronal malalignment occurred in 43 (18%) patients. Significant risk factors for postoperative coronal malalignment were: preoperative CVA (OR 1.21, p = 0.001), preoperative SVA (OR 1.05, p = 0.046), pelvic obliquity (OR 1.21; p = 0.008), Qiu B vs. A (OR 4.17; p = 0.003), Qiu C vs. A (OR 7.39; p < 0.001), lumbosacral fractional (LSF) curve (OR 2.31; p = 0.021), max Cobb angle concavity opposite the CVA (OR 2.10; p = 0.033), and operative time (OR 1.16; p = 0.045). Postoperative coronal malalignment patients were more likely to sustain a major complication (31% vs. 14%; p = 0.01), yet no differences were seen in readmissions (p = 0.72) or reoperations (p = 0.98). No significant differences were seen in 2-year PROs (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative coronal malalignment occurred in 18% of ASD patients and was most associated with preoperative CVA/SVA, pelvic obliquity, Qiu B/C curves, LSF curve concavity to the same side as the CVA, and maximum Cobb angle concavity opposite side of the CVA. Postoperative coronal malalignment was significantly associated with increased complications but not readmission, reoperation, or 2-year PROs.

Evaluation of coronal alignment from the skull using the novel orbital-coronal vertical axis line

OBJECTIVE

When treating patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD), radiographic measurements evaluating coronal alignment above C7 are lacking. The current objectives were to: 1) describe the new orbital-coronal vertical axis (ORB-CVA) line that evaluates coronal alignment from cranium to sacrum, 2) assess correlation with other radiographic variables, 3) evaluate correlations with patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and 4) compare the ORB-CVA with the standard C7-CVA.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of patients with ASD from a single institution was undertaken. Traditional C7-CVA measurements were obtained. The ORB-CVA was defined as the distance between the central sacral vertical line and the vertical line from the midpoint between the medial orbital walls. The ORB-CVA was correlated using traditional coronal measurements, including C7-CVA, maximum coronal Cobb angle, pelvic obliquity, leg length discrepancy (LLD), and coronal malalignment (CM), defined as a C7-CVA > 3 cm. Clinical improvement was analyzed as: 1) group means, 2) minimal clinically important difference (MCID), and 3) minimal symptom scale (MSS) (Oswestry Disability Index < 20 or Scoliosis Research Society-22r Instrument [SRS-22r] pain + function domains > 8).

RESULTS

A total of 243 patients underwent ASD surgery, and 175 had a 2-year follow-up. Of the 243 patients, 90 (37%) had preoperative CM. The mean (range) ORB-CVA at each time point was as follows: preoperatively, 2.9 ± 3.1 cm (-14.2 to 25.6 cm); 1 year postoperatively, 2.0 ± 1.6 cm (-12.4 to 6.7 cm); and 2 years postoperatively, 1.8 ± 1.7 cm (-6.0 to 11.1 cm) (p < 0.001 from preoperatively to 1 and 2 years). Preoperative ORB-CVA correlated best with C7-CVA (r = 0.842, p < 0.001), maximum coronal Cobb angle (r = 0.166, p = 0.010), pelvic obliquity (r = 0.293, p < 0.001), and LLD (r = 0.158, p = 0.006). Postoperatively, the ORB-CVA correlated only with C7-CVA (r = 0.629, p < 0.001) and LLD (r = 0.153, p = 0.017). Overall, 155 patients (63.8%) had an ORB-CVA that was ≥ 5 mm different from C7-CVA. The ORB-CVA correlated as well and sometimes better than C7-CVA with SRS-22r subdomains. After multivariate logistic regression, a greater ORB-CVA was associated with increased odds of complication, whereas C7-CVA was not associated with any of the three clinical outcomes (complication, readmission, reoperation). A larger difference between the ORB-CVA and C7-CVA was significantly associated with readmission and reoperation after univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. A threshold of ≥ 1.5-cm difference between the preoperative ORB-CVA and C7-CVA was found to be predictive of poorer outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The ORB-CVA correlated well with known coronal measurements and PROs. ORB-CVA was independently associated with increased odds of complication, whereas C7-CVA was not associated with any outcomes. A ≥ 1.5-cm difference between the preoperative ORB-CVA and C7-CVA was found to be predictive of poorer outcomes.

Which frailty scales for patients with adult spinal deformity are feasible and adequate? A systematic review

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Frailty as a concept is not yet fully understood, and is not the same as comorbidity. It is associated with an increased risk of adverse events and mortality after surgery, which makes its preoperative assessment significant. Despite its relevance, it still remains unclear which scales are appropriate for use in patients with spinal pathology.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility and measurement properties of frailty scales for spine patients, specifically with adult spinal deformity (ASD), and to propose adequate scales for primary triage to prevent surgery in too frail patients and for preoperative assessment to modify patients' condition and surgical plans.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Systematic review.

METHODS

Systematic search was performed between 2010 and 2021 including terms relating to spinal disorders, frailty scales, and methodological quality. Characteristics of the studies and frailty scales and data describing relation to treatment outcomes were extracted. The risk of bias was determined with the QAREL score.

RESULTS

Of the 1993 references found, 88 original studies were included and 23 scales were identified. No prospective interventional study was found where the preoperative frailty assessment was implemented. Predictive value of scales for surgical outcomes varied, dependent on spinal disorders, type of surgeries, patients' age and frailty at baseline, and outcomes. Seventeen studies reported measurement properties of eight scales but these studies were not free of bias. In 30 ASD studies, ASD-Frailty Index (ASD-FI, n=14) and 11-item modified Frailty Index (mFI-11, n=11) were most frequently used. These scales were mainly studied in registry studies including young adult population, and carry a risk of sample bias and make their validity in elderly population unclear. ASD-FI covers multidisciplinary concepts of frailty with 40 items but its feasibility in clinical practice is questionable due to its length. The Risk Analysis Index, another multidisciplinary scale with 14 items, has been implemented for preoperative assessment in other surgical domains and was proven to be feasible and effective in interventional prospective studies. The FRAIL is a simple questionnaire with five items and its predictive value was confirmed in prospective cohort studies in which only elderly patients were included.

CONCLUSIONS

No adequate scale was identified in terms of methodological quality and feasibility for daily practice. Careful attention should be paid when choosing an adequate scale, which depends on the setting of interest (eg triage or preoperative work-up). We recommend to further study a simple and predictive scale such as FRAIL for primary triage and a comprehensive and feasible scale such as Risk Analysis Index for preoperative assessment for patients undergoing spine surgery, as their adequacy has been shown in other medical domains.

Kickstand rods and correction of coronal malalignment in patients with adult spinal deformity

PURPOSE

Coronal malalignment (CM) is a challenging spinal deformity to treat. The kickstand rod (KR) technique is powerful for correcting truncal shift. This study tested the hypothesis that the KR technique provides superior coronal alignment correction in adult deformity compared with traditional rod techniques.

METHODS

A retrospective evaluation of a prospectively collected multicenter database was performed. A 2:1 matched cohort of non-KR accessory rod and KR patients was planned based on preoperative coronal balance distance (CBD) and a vector of global shift. Patients were subgrouped according to CM classification with a 30-mm CBD threshold defining CM, and comparisons of surgical and clinical outcomes among groups was performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients with preoperative CM treated with a KR were matched to 36 controls. KR-treated patients had improved CBD compared with controls (18 vs. 35 mm, P < 0.01). The postoperative CBD did not result in clinical differences between groups in patient-reported outcomes (P ≥ 0.09). Eight (38%) of 21 KR patients and 12 (33%) of 36 control patients with preoperative CM had persistent postoperative CM (P = 0.72). CM class did not significantly affect the likelihood of treatment failure (postoperative CBD > 30 mm) in the KR cohort (P = 0.70), the control cohort (P = 0.35), or the overall population (P = 0.31).

CONCLUSIONS

Application of the KR technique to coronal spinal deformity in adults allows for successful treatment of CM. Compared to traditional rod techniques, the use of KRs did not improve clinical outcome measures 1 year after spinal deformity surgery but was associated with better postoperative coronal alignment.

Two- and three-year outcomes of minimally invasive and hybrid correction of adult spinal deformity

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies have demonstrated the short-term radiographic and clinical benefits of circumferential minimally invasive surgery (cMIS) and hybrid (i.e., minimally invasive anterior or lateral interbody fusion with an open posterior approach) techniques to correct adult spinal deformity (ASD). However, it is not known if these benefits are maintained over longer periods of time. This study evaluated the 2- and 3-year outcomes of cMIS and hybrid correction of ASD.

METHODS

A multicenter database was retrospectively reviewed for patients undergoing cMIS or hybrid surgery for ASD. Patients were ≥ 18 years of age and had one of the following: maximum coronal Cobb angle (CC) ≥ 20°, sagittal vertical axis (SVA) > 5 cm, pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI-LL) ≥ 10°, or pelvic tilt (PT) > 20°. Radiographic parameters were evaluated at the latest follow-up. Clinical outcomes were compared at 2- and 3-year time points and adjusted for age, preoperative CC, levels operated, levels with interbody fusion, presence of L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion, and upper and lower instrumented vertebral level.

RESULTS

Overall, 197 (108 cMIS, 89 hybrid) patients were included with 187 (99 cMIS, 88 hybrid) and 111 (60 cMIS, 51 hybrid) patients evaluated at 2 and 3 years, respectively. The mean (± SD) follow-up duration for cMIS (39.0 ± 13.3 months, range 22-74 months) and hybrid correction (39.9 ± 16.8 months, range 22-94 months) were similar for both cohorts. Hybrid procedures corrected the CC greater than the cMIS technique (adjusted p = 0.022). There were no significant differences in postoperative SVA, PI-LL, PT, and sacral slope (SS). At 2 years, cMIS had lower Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores (adjusted p < 0.001), greater ODI change as a percentage of baseline (adjusted p = 0.006), less visual analog scale (VAS) back pain (adjusted p = 0.006), and greater VAS back pain change as a percentage of baseline (adjusted p = 0.001) compared to hybrid techniques. These differences were no longer significant at 3 years. At 3 years, but not 2 years, VAS leg pain was lower for cMIS compared to hybrid techniques (adjusted p = 0.032). Those undergoing cMIS had fewer overall complications compared to hybrid techniques (adjusted p = 0.006), but a higher odds of pseudarthrosis (adjusted p = 0.039).

CONCLUSIONS

In this review of a multicenter database for patients undergoing cMIS and hybrid surgery for ASD, hybrid procedures were associated with a greater CC improvement compared to cMIS techniques. cMIS was associated with superior ODI and back pain at 2 years, but this difference was no longer evident at 3 years. However, cMIS was associated with superior leg pain at 3 years. There were fewer complications following cMIS, with the exception of pseudarthrosis.

Obeid-Coronal Malalignment Classification Is Age Related and Independently Associated to Personal Reported Outcome Measurement Scores in the Nonfused Spine

Objective

To evaluate Obeid-coronal malalignment (O-CM) modifiers according to age, sagittal alignment, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), in the mobile spine.

Methods

Retrospective review of a prospective multicenter adult spinal deformity (ASD) database with 1,243 (402 nonoperative, 841 operative) patients with no prior fusion surgery. Patients were included if they were aged over 18 years and were affected by spinal deformity defined by one of: Cobb angle ≥ 20°, pelvic tilt ≥ 25°, sagittal vertical axis ≥ 5 cm, thoracic kyphosis ≥ 60°. Patients were classified according to the O-CM classification and compared to coronally aligned patients. Multivariate analysis was performed on the relationship between PROMs and age, global tilt (GT) and coronal malalignment (CM).

Results

Four hundred forty-three patients had CM of more than 2 cm compared to 800 who did not. The distribution of these modifiers was correlated to age. After multivariate analysis, using age and GT as confounding factors, we found that before the age of 50 years, 2A1 patients had worse sex life and greater satisfaction than patients without CM. After 50 years of age, patients with CM (1A1, 1A2) had worse self-image and those with 2A2, 2B had worse self-image, satisfaction, and 36-item Short Form Health Survey physical function. Self-image was the consistent determinant of patients opting for surgery for all ages.

Conclusion

CM distribution according to O-CM modifiers is age dependent. A clear correlation between the coronal malalignment and PROMs exists when using the O-CM classification and in the mobile spine, this typically affects self-image and satisfaction. Thus, CM classified according to O-CM modifiers is correlated to PROMs and should be considered in ASD.

Spine-Pelvis-Hip Alignments in Degenerative Spinal Deformity Patients and Associated Procedure of One-Stage Long-Fusion with Multiple-Level PLIF or Apical-Vertebra Three Column Osteotomy-a Clinical and Radiographic Analysis Study

OBJECTIVE

To explore the spine-pelvis-hip alignments in degenerative spinal deformity (DSD) patients, and compare the outcomes in the procedure of long-fusion with posterior lumbar inter-body fusion (PLIF) or single-level three-column osteotomy (STO) at lower lumbar level (LLL, L3 -S1 ) and thoracolumbar levels (TLL, T10 -L2 ) for those patients.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study. Following institutional ethics approval, a total of 83 patients (Female, 67; Male, 16) with DSD underwent long-fusion with PLIF or STO surgery between March 2015 and December 2017 were reviewed. All of those patients were assigned into LLL and TLL groups. The average age at surgery was 65.2 years (SD, 8.1). Demographic (age, gender, BMI, and comorbidities), radiographs (both coronal and sagittal parameters) and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) assessments were documented. The radiographic parameters and HRQOL-related measurements at pre- and post-operation were compared with paired-samples t test, and those variables in the two groups were analyzed using an independent-sample t test. The relationships between pelvic incidence (PI) and other sagittal parameters were investigated with Pearson correlation analysis. The Pearson χ2 or Fisher's exact was carried out for comparison of gender, incidence of comorbidities and post-operative complications.

RESULTS

There were 53 and 30 patients in the LLL and TLL groups respectively. Those spino-pelvic radiographic parameters had significant improvements after surgeries (P < 0.001). The patients in the two group with different pre-operative thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK, P = 0.003), PI (P = 0.02), and mismatch of PI minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL, P = 0.01) had comparable post-operative radiographic parameters except PI (P = 0.04) and pelvic-femur angle (PFA, P = 0.02). Comparing the changes of those spine-pelvic-hip data during surgeries, the corrections of TLK in TLL group were significant larger (P = 0.004). Pearson correlation analysis showed that there were negative relationship between PI and TLK (r = -0.302, P = 0.005), positive relationship between PI and LL (r = 0.261, P = 0.016) at pre-operation. Those patients underwent the surgical procedure that long-segment instrumentation and fusion with STO would have higher incidence of complications involving longer operative timing (P = 0.018), more blood loss (P < 0.001), revision surgery (P = 0.008), and cerebrospinal fluid leakage (P = 0.001). All the HRQOL scores significantly improved at final follow-up (P < 0.001), with no difference of intra-group.

CONCLUSION

Patients suffered de-novo scoliosis or hyper-kyphosis with low PI would be vulnerable to significant thoracolumbar degeneration, and have more changes of spine-pelvis-hip data after long-fusion surgery, however, those with high PI would be closed to significant lumbar degeneration. Although spine-pelvis-hip alignments in DSD patients can be restored effectively after long-fusion with PLIF or STO, the incidence of complications in patients underwent STO was significant higher than that in patients performed multi-level PLIF.