Simultaneous translation on two rods improves the correction and apex translocation in adolescent patients with hypokyphotic scoliosis

Low Radiation Protocol for Intraoperative Robotic C-Arm Can Enhance Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Deformity Correction Accuracy and Safety

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case-series study.

OBJECTIVES

To assess (1) low cone beam CT (CBCT) mediated intraoperative navigation to limit radiation exposure without compromising surgical accuracy, and (2) the potential of intraoperative C-arm CBCT navigation to augment pedicle screw (PS) placement accuracy in AIS surgery compared to pre-surgery CT-based planning.

METHODS

The first part involved a prospective phantom study, comparing radiation doses for conventional CT, and standard (6sDCT) and a low dose (5sDCT) Artis Zeego®-imaging. Next, 5sDCT- and 6sDCT-navigation were compared on PS accuracy and radiation exposure during AIS correction. The final part compared surgical AIS deformity correction through intraoperative 5sDCT navigation to a matched cohort treated using conventional pre-surgery CT-scans for navigation. Outcome parameters included operation time, skin dose (SD), dose area product (DAP), intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications, and PS deviation rates.

RESULTS

The phantom study demonstrated a reduction in radiation for the 5sDCT protocol. Moreover, 5sDCT-imaged patients (n = 15) showed a significantly lower SD (-27.41%) and DAP (-30.92%), without compromising PS accuracy compared with 6sDCT-settings (n = 15). Finally, AIS correction through intraoperative CBCT C-arm navigation (n = 27) significantly reduced screw deviation rates (6.83% versus 10.75%, P = .016) without increasing operation times, compared with conventional CT (n = 37).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative navigation using a CBCT C-arm system improved the accuracy of PS insertion and reduced surgery time. Moreover, it reduced radiation exposure compared with conventional CT, which was further curtailed by adapting the low-dose 5sDCT protocol. In short, our study highlights the benefits of intraoperative CBCT navigation for PS placement in AIS surgery.

Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliotic Deformity Correction Surgery Assisted by Smart Glasses Can Enhance Correction Outcomes and Accuracy and Also Improve Surgeon Fatigue

OBJECTIVE

Augmented reality (AR) is becoming more common and slowly being integrated into the surgical field. With the continuous progression of navigation and visualization techniques, AR has great potential to improve surgical quality and safety. Nevertheless, the effects of AR on surgical outcomes and surgeons' well-being remains poorly studied. The present prospective controlled study aims to assess the effect of surgery assisted with AR smart glasses on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) deformity correction outcomes and surgeon fatigue.

METHODS

AIS patients scheduled for surgical deformity correction were prospectively recruited and assigned to standard or AR-supported surgery, using lightweight AR smart glasses. The demographic and clinical features were recorded. The pre- and postoperative spinal features, operative time, and blood loss were recorded and compared. Finally, the participating surgeons were asked to complete a questionnaire (e.g., visual analog scale for fatigue) to compare the effects of AR on their well-being.

RESULTS

Our results have shown enhanced spinal deformity corrections with Cobb angle (-35.7° vs. -46.9°), thoracic kyphosis (8.1° vs. 11.6°), and vertebral rotation (-9.3° vs. -13.8°) changes favoring AR-supported surgery. Moreover, AR resulted in significantly lower violation rates per patient (7.5% vs. 6.6%; P = 0.023). Finally, the visual analog scale for fatigue scores consistently showed a significant reduction in fatigue (5.7 ± 1.7 vs. 3.3 ± 1.2; P < 0.001) and other fatigue classifiers for the surgeons after AR-supported surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Our controlled study has highlighted the enhanced spinal correction rates in AR-supported surgery and also improved surgeons' well-being and fatigue. These results endorse the adaptation of AR techniques to support AIS surgical correction.

Defining "successful" treatment outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a scoping review

PURPOSE

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is the most common type of scoliosis that affects children aged 10-18 years old, manifesting in a three-dimensional spinal deformity. This study aimed to explore outcome measures used in defining AIS treatment success. Particularly, analyzing the extent of qualitative and quantitative (radiographic and quality of life domains) measures to evaluate AIS and whether AIS treatment approaches (surgical, bracing and physiotherapy) influences outcomes used as proxies of treatment success.

METHODS

EMBASE and MEDLINE databases were used to conduct a systematic scoping review with 654 search queries. 158 papers met the inclusion criteria and were screened for data extraction. Extractable variables included: study characteristics, study participant characteristics, type of study, type of intervention approach and outcome measures.

RESULTS

All 158 studies measured quantitative outcomes. 61.38% of papers used radiographic outcomes whilst 38.62% of papers used quantitative quality of life outcomes to evaluate treatment success. Irrespective of treatment intervention utilized, the type of quantitative outcome measure recorded were similar in proportion. Moreover, of the radiographic outcome measures, the subcategory Cobb angle was predominantly used across all intervention approaches. For quantitative quality of life measures, questionnaires investigating multiple domains such as SRS were primarily used as proxies of AIS treatment success across all intervention approaches.

CONCLUSION

This study identified that no articles employed qualitative measures of describing the psychosocial implications of AIS in defining treatment success. Although quantitative measures have merit in clinical diagnoses and management, there is increasing value in using qualitative methods such as thematic analysis in guiding clinicians to develop a biopsychosocial approach for patient care.