Rediscovery of the transcerebellar approach: improving the risk-benefit ratio in robot-assisted brainstem biopsies

Frame-based stereotactic biopsies of brainstem lesions - Monocentric comparison of the transfrontal and the suboccipital-transcerebellar approach over a 16-year period

Both the transfrontal and the suboccipital-transcerebellar approach are frequently used trajectories for frame-based stereotactic biopsies of brainstem lesions. Nevertheless, it remains unclear which approach is more favorable in terms of complications, diagnostic success and outcome, especially considering the location of the lesion within the brainstem. This study compared the safety and diagnostic yield of these two approaches. Furthermore, a brainstem zone model was created to answer the question, whether there is a favorable approach depending on the location of the lesion in the brainstem. A retrospective analysis of 84 consecutive cases of frame-based stereotactic biopsies for brainstem lesions via either transfrontal or suboccipital-transcerebellar approaches over a 16-year period was performed. Clinical and surgical data regarding trajectories, histopathology, complications and outcome was collected. The brainstem was divided in anatomical zones to compare the use of the two approaches depending on the location of the lesions. A total of n = 84 cases of stereotactic biopsies for brainstem lesions were performed. In 36 cases the suboccipital-transcerebellar approach was used, while in 48 cases surgery was performed via the transfrontal approach. The patient's demographic data were comparable between the two approaches. Overall diagnostic yield was 90.5% (93.8% transfrontal vs. 86.1% suboccipital, p = 0.21, Risk Difference (RD) 0.077, CI [-0.0550, 0.2090]). Complications occurred in 11 cases (total complication rate: 13.1%; 12.5% transfrontal vs. 13.9% suboccipital, p = 0.55, RD 0.014, CI [-0.1607, 0.1327]). The brainstem model showed a more frequent use of the suboccipital approach in lesions of the dorsal pons. The transfrontal approach was used more frequently in mesencephalic targets. No significant differences in terms of complications and diagnostic yield were observed, even though complications in medullary lesions appeared higher using the transfrontal approach. This study showed, that if the approaches are used for their intended target locations there are no significant differences between the transfrontal and the suboccipital-transcerebellar approach for frame-based stereotactic biopsies of brainstem lesions in terms of diagnostic yield and safety. Therefore, our data suggests that both approaches should be considered for stereotactic biopsy of brainstem lesions.

Safety and Technical Efficacy of Pediatric Brainstem Biopsies: An Updated Meta-Analysis of 1000+ Children

BACKGROUND

Brainstem tumors represent ∼10% of pediatric brain tumors, ∼80% of these are diffuse midline glioma. Given invariably poor prognosis in diffuse midline glioma, there continues to be immense variation worldwide in performing biopsy of these lesions. Several contemporary studies in recent years have provided new data to elucidate the safety profile of biopsy and an updated meta-analysis is thus indicated.

METHODS

We found 29 studies of pediatric brainstem biopsy in the last 20 years (2003-2023, 1002 children). We applied meta-analysis of proportions using a random-effects model to generate point estimates, confidence intervals, and measures of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven percent of procedures were stereotactic needle biopsies (of these, 62% with a frame, 14% without frame, and 24% robotic.) Biopsy resulted in a histological diagnosis ("technical yield") in 96.8% of cases (95% CI 95.4-98.2). Temporary complications were seen in 6% (95 CI 4-8), with the most common neurological complications being 1) cranial nerve dysfunction, 2) worsening or new ataxia, and 3) limb weakness. Permanent complications (excluding death) were seen in 1% (95% CI 0.5-2), most commonly including cranial nerve dysfunction and limb weakness. Five deaths were reported in the entire pooled cohort of 1002 children (0.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

When counseling families on the merits of brainstem biopsy in children, it is reasonable to state that permanent morbidity is rare (<2%). If biopsy is performed specifically to facilitate enrollment in clinical trials requiring a molecular diagnosis, the risks of biopsy outlined here should be weighed against potential benefits of trial enrollment.

Stereotactic frame-based biopsy of infratentorial lesions via the suboccipital-transcerebellar approach with the Zamorano-Duchovny stereotactic system-a retrospective analysis of 79 consecutive cases

OBJECTIVE

Lesions of the posterior fossa (brainstem and cerebellum) are challenging in diagnosis and treatment due to the fact that they are often located eloquently and total resection is rarely possible. Therefore, frame-based stereotactic biopsies are commonly used to asservate tissue for neuropathological diagnosis and further treatment determination. The aim of our study was to assess the safety and diagnostic success rate of frame-based stereotactic biopsies for lesions in the posterior fossa via the suboccipital-transcerebellar approach.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective database analysis of all frame-based stereotactic biopsy cases at our institution since 2007. The aim was to identify all surgical cases for infratentorial lesion biopsies via the suboccipital-transcerebellar approach. We collected clinical data regarding outcomes, complications, diagnostic success, radiological appearances, and stereotactic trajectories.

RESULTS

A total of n = 79 cases of stereotactic biopsies for posterior fossa lesions via the suboccipital-transcerebellar approach (41 female and 38 male) utilizing the Zamorano-Duchovny stereotactic system were identified. The mean age at the time of surgery was 42.5 years (± 23.3; range, 1-87 years). All patients were operated with intraoperative stereotactic imaging (n = 62 MRI, n = 17 CT). The absolute diagnostic success rate was 87.3%. The most common diagnoses were glioma, lymphoma, and inflammatory disease. The overall complication rate was 8.7% (seven cases). All patients with complications showed new neurological deficits; of those, three were permanent. Hemorrhage was detected in five of the cases having complications. The 30-day mortality rate was 7.6%, and 1-year survival rate was 70%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggests that frame-based stereotactic biopsies with the Zamorano-Duchovny stereotactic system via the suboccipital-transcerebellar approach are safe and reliable for infratentorial lesions bearing a high diagnostic yield and an acceptable complication rate. Further research should focus on the planning of safe trajectories and a careful case selection with the goal of minimizing complications and maximizing diagnostic success.

Robot-assisted stereoencephalography vs subdural electrodes in the evaluation of temporal lobe epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

Invasive video-electroencephalography (iVEEG) is the gold standard for evaluation of refractory temporal lobe epilepsy before second stage resective surgery (SSRS). Traditionally, the presumed seizure onset zone (SOZ) has been covered with subdural electrodes (SDE), a very invasive procedure prone to complications. Temporal stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) with conventional frame-based stereotaxy is time-consuming and impeded by the geometry of the frame. The introduction of robotic assistance promised a simplification of temporal SEEG implantation. However, the efficacy of temporal SEEG in iVEEG remains unclear. The aim of this study was therefore to describe the efficiency and efficacy of SEEG in iVEEG of temporal lobe epilepsy.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 60 consecutive patients with medically intractable epilepsy who underwent iVEEG of a potential temporal SOZ by SDE (n = 40) or SEEG (n = 20). Surgical time efficiency was analyzed by the skin-to-skin time (STS) and the total procedure time (TPT) and compared between groups (SDE vs SEEG). Surgical risk was depicted by the 90-day complication rate. Temporal SOZ were treated by SSRS. Favorable outcome (Engel°1) was assessed after 1 year of follow-up.

RESULTS

Robot-assisted SEEG significantly reduced the duration of surgery (STS and TPT) compared to SDE implantations. There was no significant difference in complication rates. Notably, all surgical revisions in this study were attributed to SDE. Unilateral temporal SOZ was detected in 34/60 cases. Of the 34 patients, 30 underwent second stage SSRS. Both SDE and SEEG had a good predictive value for the outcome of temporal SSRS with no significant group difference.

SIGNIFICANCE

Robot-assisted SEEG improves the accessibility of the temporal lobe for iVEEG by increasing surgical time efficiency and by simplifying trajectory selection without losing its predictive value for SSRS.

A Comparison of the Safety, Efficacy, and Accuracy of Frame-Based versus Remebot Robot-Assisted Stereotactic Systems for Biopsy of Brainstem Tumors

BACKGROUND

Brainstem tumors are rare and extremely heterogeneous and present significant challenges in surgical treatment. Thus, biopsies often set the foundation for the diagnosis of brainstem tumors. Multimodal, image-guided, robot-assisted frameless stereotactic biopsies are increasingly popular in neurosurgery centers. This study aimed to compare the safety, efficacy, and duration of the Remebot robot-assisted (Remebot) frameless brainstem tumor biopsy versus those of frame-based stereotactic biopsy.

METHOD

A retrospective analysis of 33 patients with brainstem tumors who underwent stereotactic brainstem biopsies in the department of neurosurgery from January 2016 to January 2021 was conducted. The patients were divided into two groups: the Remebot group (n = 22) and the frame-based group (n = 11). The clinical characteristics, trajectory strategy, duration of procedure, diagnostic yielding, histopathological diagnosis, and postoperative complications were retrospectively analyzed and compared between the groups.

RESULTS

More pediatric patients performed Remebot frameless brainstem tumor biopsy than frame-based biopsy, with a mean age of 17.3 ± 18.7 vs. 32.8 ± 17.1 (p = 0.027). The diagnostic yield had no significant difference in the two groups, with the diagnostic yield of frame-based biopsy and Remebot frameless brain biopsy being 90.9% and 95.5%, respectively. The time of the total process was 124.5 min for the frame-based biopsy and 84.7 min for the Remebot frameless brain biopsy (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences with respect to the occurrence of complication or the duration of the operation between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Remebot frameless stereotactic brainstem biopsy is as safe and efficacious as frame-based stereotactic biopsy. However, Remebot frameless biopsy can reduce the total duration of the procedure and has better application in young pediatric patients. Remebot frameless stereotactic biopsies can be a better option towards the safe and efficient treatment of brainstem tumors.

Frameless Robotic-Assisted Biopsy of Pediatric Brainstem Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Safety

BACKGROUND

Pediatric brainstem lesions are diagnoses that require tissue sampling to advance our understanding of them and their management. Frameless, robot-assisted biopsy of these lesions has emerged as a novel, viable biopsy approach. Correspondingly, the aim of this study was to quantitively and qualitatively summarize the contemporary literature regarding the likelihood of achieving tumor diagnosis and experiencing any postoperative complications.

METHODS

Searches of 7 electronic databases from inception to September 2022 were conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Articles were screened against prespecified criteria. Outcomes were pooled by random-effects meta-analyses of proportions where possible.

RESULTS

A total of 8 cohort studies satisfied all criteria. They described 99 pediatric patients with brainstem lesions in whom frameless, robot-assisted biopsy was involved in their work-up. There were 62 (63%) male and 37 (37%) female patients with a median age of 9 years at time of biopsy. Overall, all patients had sufficient tissue obtained by initial biopsy for evaluation. Pooled estimate of achieving tumor diagnosis was 100% (95% confidence interval [CI] 97%-100%) across all studies with a high degree of certainty. Across all studies, there were no cases of procedure-related mortality. The pooled estimates of transient and permanent complications after biopsy were 10% (95% CI 4%-19%) and 0% (95% CI 0%-2%), respectively, of very low and low degrees of certainty each.

CONCLUSIONS

The contemporary metadata demonstrates the frameless, robot-assisted biopsy of pediatric brainstem lesions is both effective and safe when performed in an experienced setting. Further research is needed to augment robot and automated technologies into workup algorithms.

Frameless robot-assisted stereotactic biopsies for lesions of the brainstem-a series of 103 consecutive biopsies

PURPOSE

Targeted treatment for brainstem lesions requires above all a precise histopathological and molecular diagnosis. In the current technological era, robot-assisted stereotactic biopsies represent an accurate and safe procedure for tissue diagnosis. We present our center's experience in frameless robot-assisted biopsies for brainstem lesions.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients benefitting from a frameless robot-guided stereotactic biopsy at our University Hospital, from 2001 to 2017. Patients consented to the use of data and/or images. The NeuroMate® robot (Renishaw™, UK) was used. We report on lesion location, trajectory strategy, histopathological diagnosis and procedure safety.

RESULTS

Our series encompasses 96 patients (103 biopsies) treated during a 17 years period. Mean age at biopsy: 34.0 years (range 1-78). Most common location: pons (62.1%). Transcerebellar approach: 61 procedures (59.2%). Most common diagnoses: diffuse glioma (67.0%), metastases (7.8%) and lymphoma (6.8%). Non conclusive diagnosis: 10 cases (9.7%). After second biopsy this decreased to 4 cases (4.1%). Overall biopsy diagnostic yield: 95.8%. Permanent disability was recorded in 3 patients (2.9%, all adults), while transient complications in 17 patients (17.7%). Four cases of intra-tumoral hematoma were recorded (one case with rapid decline and fatal issue). Adjuvant targeted treatment was performed in 72.9% of patients. Mean follow-up (in the Neurosurgery Department): 2.2 years.

CONCLUSION

Frameless robot-assisted stereotactic biopsies can provide the initial platform towards a safe and accurate management for brainstem lesions, offering a high diagnostic yield with low permanent morbidity.