Transradial versus transfemoral access for embolization of intracranial aneurysms with the Woven EndoBridge device: a propensity score-matched study

Transradial access for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the Woven EndoBridge device: A systematic review and pooled analysis

BACKGROUND

The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device is a minimally invasive endovascular treatment option for patients with cerebral aneurysms. Transradial access (TRA) is a technique that involves accessing the arterial system through the radial artery in the wrist rather than the femoral artery in the groin. Several studies have investigated the use of TRA for WEB device deployment in treating intracranial aneurysms.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the TRA for WEB device deployment in treating intracranial aneurysms. The databases PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched. To reduce the risk of bias, this systematic review only included studies reporting on using TRA in WEB device deployment for intracranial aneurysm treatment with a minimum of four patients.

RESULTS

In this systematic review, 186 patients were included across five studies, with TRA used in 183 cases analyzed. The study population had a higher proportion of females (n = 118%-69%) than males, with a mean age of 62 years old. Among the aneurysms treated, 46 were ruptured, and 119 were located at bifurcation sites, with a mean maximum diameter/width of 6.6 mm and mean height of 5.9 mm. Adjunctive coiling was used in three cases, and adjunctive stenting was used in nine cases. In two cases, conversion to a femoral artery access was necessary.

CONCLUSION

The available results suggest TRA with the WEB device is a safe and effective alternative. However, using TRA versus TFA should be individualized based on patient factors and operator experience.

Dual Layer vs Single Layer Woven EndoBridge Device in the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) devices have been used for treating wide neck bifurcation aneurysms (WNBAs) with several generational enhancements to improve clinical outcomes. The original device dual-layer (WEB DL) was replaced by a single-layer (WEB SL) device in 2013. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of these devices in managing intracranial aneurysms.

METHODS

A multicenter cohort study was conducted, and data from 1,289 patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with either the WEB SL or WEB DL devices were retrospectively analyzed. Propensity score matching was utilized to balance the baseline characteristics between the two groups. Outcomes assessed included immediate occlusion rate, complete occlusion at last follow-up, retreatment rate, device compaction, and aneurysmal rupture.

RESULTS

Before propensity score matching, patients treated with the WEB SL had a significantly higher rate of complete occlusion at the last follow-up and a lower rate of retreatment. After matching, there was no significant difference in immediate occlusion rate, retreatment rate, or device compaction between the WEB SL and DL groups. However, the SL group maintained a higher rate of complete occlusion at the final follow-up. Regression analysis showed that SL was associated with higher rates of complete occlusion (OR: 0.19; CI: 0.04 to 0.8, p = 0.029) and lower rates of retreatment (OR: 0.12; CI: 0 to 4.12, p = 0.23).

CONCLUSION

The WEB SL and DL devices demonstrated similar performances in immediate occlusion rates and retreatment requirements for intracranial aneurysms. The SL device showed a higher rate of complete occlusion at the final follow-up.

Endovascular Treatment of Bifurcation Aneurysms with the Woven EndoBridge: Product Features and Selected Results of Off-Label Use

Treatment for wide-neck bifurcation cerebral aneurysms (WNBAs) is widely performed by endovascular treatment as well as open surgical clipping. However, due to factors such as the shape and size of the aneurysms, as well as the anatomical features of surrounding branch vessels, there are some cases in which simple coiling or conventional adjunctive techniques, such as balloon-assisted or neck bridge stent-assisted coiling, are not sufficient to achieve a satisfactory cure. Against this backdrop, the device known as the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) (MicroVention, Aliso Viejo, CA, USA) was developed and can be deployed directly into the aneurysm for treatment. Over a decade has passed since its development, and it is now used in many countries worldwide. This review provides insights into the evolution of the WEB device from its development to the date of this writing, highlighting the unique features of the device and its treatment indications. Additionally, it discusses the posttreatment course, perspectives on recurrence and retreatment, imaging assessments, and potential off-label use based on numerous studies primarily conducted in Europe and the USA.

Comparison of Transradial Access and Transfemoral Access for Diagnostic Cerebral Angiography in the Elderly Population

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction of transradial access (TRA) compared with conventional transfemoral access (TFA) for diagnostic cerebral angiography in elderly patients (≥65 years of age).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of patients receiving cerebral angiography via TRA or TFA between October 2020 and December 2021 at 3 institutions. Basic patient characteristics, angiographic data, postoperative complications, and patient satisfaction were collected for analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 357 enrolled elderly patients, 175 were performed through TRA and 182 were performed through TFA. There was no significant difference in mean fluoroscopy time (8.6 ± 3.8 minutes vs. 9.1 ± 3.1 minutes; P = 0.103) and radiation exposure (47.7 ± 10.8 Gy-cm2 vs. 49.8 ± 11.3 Gy-cm2; P = 0.068) between the TRA and TFA groups. However, the TRA group had a shorter procedural time (54.7 ± 6.2 minutes vs. 61.1 ± 5.6 minutes; P < 0.001) and less contrast agent (83.2 ± 28.1 mL vs. 100.1 ± 26.2 mL; P < 0.001) than the TFA group. In terms of safety, the incidence of minor vascular access complications in the TRA group was lower than that in the TFA group (1.7% vs. 8.8%; P = 0.003). The incidence of serious complications and neurologic complications in the TRA group was also lower, although the difference was not statistically significant. Overall patient satisfaction was higher in the TRA group than that in the TFA group.

CONCLUSIONS

TRA was an efficient and safe alternative to conventional TFA in elderly patients who underwent diagnostic cerebral angiography and who underwent TRA were more satisfied. Findings supported the radial-first strategy for cerebral angiography in elderly populations.

Transradial versus transfemoral access for endovascular therapy of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies

Endovascular treatment is widely used in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. However, neurosurgeons are sceptical about endovascular access via the radial artery. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness and safety of transradial and transfemoral artery access in patients with intracranial aneurysms. We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for studies comparing the two approaches. The primary outcome was total complications, and the secondary outcomes were access site complications, intracranial haemorrhage, stroke, thromboembolism, silent infarct, re-treatment rate, mortality, complete occlusion of intracranial aneurysms, procedure duration, and length of hospital stay. A random-effects model was used to assess the pooled data. Of the 100 identified studies, 6 were eligible (a total of 3764 participants). There were no significant differences in total complications(odds ratio [OR] = 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.33, 1.45], p = 0.32), complete occlusion of intracranial aneurysms (OR = 1.02, 95%CI [0.77,1.37], p = 0.87), procedure duration (mean difference [MD] =  - 6.24, 95%CI [- 14.75, - 1.54], p = 0.95), or length of hospital stay (MD = 2.204, 95%CI [- 0.05, 4.45], p = 0.95), access site complications (OR = 0.49, 95%CI [0.16, 1.52], p = 0.22), intracranial haemorrhage (OR = 1.07, 95%CI [0.49, 2.34], p = 0.86), stroke (OR = 0.59, 95%CI [0.20, 1.77], p = 0.35), thromboembolism (OR = 0.85, 95%CI [0.33, 2.17], p = 0.74), silent infarct (OR = 0.69, 95%CI [0.04, 11.80], p = 0.80), retreatment rate (OR = 1.32, 95%CI [0.70, 2.48], p = 0.39), mortality (OR = 1.41, 95%CI [0.06, 5.20], p = 0.61), immediate occlusion (OR = 0.99, 95%CI [0.64, 1.51], p = 0.95), and occlusion during follow-up (OR = 1.10, 95%CI [0.56, 2.16], p = 0.74) between the transradial and transfemoral groups. This study showed comparable safety and efficacy outcomes between transradial and transfemoral access in patients with intracranial aneurysms treated endovascularly. Future large randomised trials are warranted to confirm these findings.