Interhospital transfer status for spinal metastasis patients in the United States is associated with more severe clinical presentations and higher rates of inpatient complications

Pediatric TBI: Direct admissions vs. secondary referrals to a hospital: A single‑center, retrospective study

The present retrospective study was conducted in an aim to examine the differences between pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) cases referred to and those admitted directly to the hospital. For this purpose, pediatric patients who presented to a main trauma center with TBI between January, 2015 and December, 2019 were reviewed retrospectively, emphasizing whether they were admitted directly or referred from another center. Data collected included the demographic characteristics of the patients, as well as their presenting complaints and the cause of TBI. A total of 981 cases of pediatric TBI were admitted over the 5-year period. The average age of the patients was 58.1 months for the referred cases and almost 50 months for the patients directly admitted. The male sex accounted for 63.6% of all cases. The most common cause of injury was falling (63.5%). Nausea and vomiting were the most typical presenting symptoms, occurring more among the directly admitted cases (P-value ≤0.05). Mild TBI accounted for 85.3% of the cases, and the most common radiological diagnosis was skull fracture (37.4%) (P-value ≤0.004). The referred patients had a more extended hospital stay (P-value ≤0.001). On the whole, the present study identified 981 cases; the majority of these were direct admissions, and the majority of the severe cases were referred from other healthcare facilities. Further research is required on this topic as only a single hospital was covered herein, and patients were not followed-up after discharge. A multi-center analysis would cover a greater number of patients and would thus provide more substantial data on the topic.

Influence of Hospital Transfer Status on Surgical Outcomes for Traumatic Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures: Insights from a Multicenter Investigation

OBJECTIVE

Surgical intervention for unstable thoracolumbar spine fractures is common, but delayed management and complications can impact outcomes. This study compares perioperative outcomes between patients directly admitted and those transferred from another facility for thoracolumbar spine surgery, aiming to identify predictors of complications and mortality.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective cohort study used the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2011 to 2021 identified 61,626 patients undergoing fusion surgeries for thoracolumbar spine fractures, excluding spinal cord injury or pathological fractures. Patients were categorized as Direct (admitted from the emergency department) and Transfer (transferred from another facility). Perioperative outcomes, including operative time, length of stay (LOS), 30-day mortality, and complications, were compared.

RESULTS

Our patient population (54.3% female, mean age 62.4 ± 12.9 years) comprised 12.2% Transfer and 87.8% Direct patients. Following propensity score matching, Transfer patients had a longer hospital LOS (5.1 ± 5.7 days vs. 4.5 ± 4.6 days, P < 0.001). Transfer exhibited higher rates of superficial incisional surgical site infection (1.7% vs. 1.1%, P = 0.003), sepsis (1.7% vs. 1.3%, P = 0.038), pneumonia (1.7% vs. 1.2%, P = 0.019), postoperative reintubation (0.9% vs. 0.6%, P = 0.036), and failure to wean off ventilator >48 hours postsurgery (0.7% vs. 0.3%, P = 0.005) compared to Direct admissions. Direct group had a higher rate of perioperative transfusion (16.5% vs. 13.4%, P < 0.001). Transfer patients also had a higher 30-day mortality rate compared to Direct admissions (1.1% vs. 0.6%, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Interhospital transfers significantly affect hospital LOS, postoperative morbidity, and mortality in thoracolumbar spine surgery. Enhancing postoperative monitoring for transfer patients is crucial.

Baseline Frailty Measured by the Risk Analysis Index and 30-Day Mortality After Surgery for Spinal Malignancy: Analysis of a Prospective Registry (2011-2020)

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prognostic utility of baseline frailty, measured by the Risk Analysis Index (RAI), for prediction of postoperative mortality among patients with spinal malignancy (SM) undergoing resection.

METHODS

SM surgery cases were queried from the American College of Surgeons - National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2011-2020). The relationship between preoperative RAI frailty score and increasing rate of primary endpoint (mortality or discharge to hospice within 30 days, "mortality/hospice") were assessed. Discriminatory accuracy was assessed by computation of C-statistics (with 95% confidence interval [CI]) in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 2,235 cases were stratified by RAI score: 0-20, 22.7%; 21-30, 11.9%; 31-40, 54.7%; and ≥ 41, 10.7%. The rate of mortality/hospice was 6.5%, which increased linearly with increasing RAI score (p < 0.001). RAI was also associated with increasing rates of major complication, extended length of stay, and nonhome discharge (all p < 0.05). The RAI demonstrated acceptable discriminatory accuracy for prediction of primary endpoint (C-statistic, 0.717; 95% CI, 0.697-0.735). In pairwise ROC comparison, RAI demonstrated superiority versus modified frailty index-5 and chronological age (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative frailty, as measured by RAI, is a robust predictor of mortality/ hospice after SM surgery. The frailty score may be applied in clinical settings using a user-friendly calculator, deployed here: https://nsgyfrailtyoutcomeslab.shinyapps.io/spinalMalignancyRAI/.

Spinal intradural microsurgery in a nascent neurosurgical department: Lessons learned from the first 25 cases

BACKGROUND

Between 2017 and 2021, the newly established Department of Neurosurgery at Shaare Zedek Medical Center in Jerusalem, a high volume metropolitan hospital, operated on 25 intradural lesions in 24 patients (one patient had multiple tumors). In this retrospective study, we review results and lessons learned as experienced surgeons opened a new service line.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary team was assembled and led by experienced neurosurgeons with skills in both microneurosurgery and complex spine care. Standard operative techniques were used. A chart review was done to assess complications and outcome.

RESULTS

25 lesions were reviewed in 24 patients (14 female; 10 male) between the ages of 11-82 years of age. In 14 cases, gross total resection (GTR) was achieved; 11 cases underwent partial resection. Of the 11 non-GTR cases, 3 were initially planned as biopsies. In one case, there was a significant neurologic decline directly related to surgery. In a separate case, there was iatrogenic instability, necessitating further treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

We identify six lessons learned in a nascent neurosurgical department, noting that surgical excellence is of paramount importance, but that the surgeon must also expand his/her role from master technician to team leader. Both microsurgical expertise for neural anatomy and understanding of spinal biomechanics for osseous anatomy is mandatory for surgery of SIDT. This retrospective analysis of our case series demonstrates experienced neurosurgeons can successfully deploy a new service line for challenging cases to the benefit of the hospital and local community.

Patients with progression of spinal metastases who present to the clinic have better outcomes compared to those who present to the emergency department

BACKGROUND

As cancer therapies have improved, spinal metastases are increasingly common. Resulting complications have a significant impact on patient's quality of life. Optimal methods of surveillance and avoidance of neurologic deficits are understudied. This study compares the clinical course of patients who initially presented to the emergency department (ED) versus a multidisciplinary spine oncology clinic and who underwent stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) secondary to progression/presentation of metastatic spine disease.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of adult oncologic patients who underwent spinal SBRT at a single hospital from 2010 to 2021. Descriptive statistics and survival analyses were performed.

RESULTS

We identified 498 spinal radiographic treatment sites in 390 patients. Of these patients, 118 (30.3%) presented to the ED. Patients presenting to the ED compared to the clinic had significantly more severe spinal compression (52.5% vs. 11.7%; p < 0.0001), severe pain (28.8% vs. 10.3%; p < 0.0001), weakness (24.5% vs. 4.5%; p < 0.0001), and difficulty walking (24.5% vs. 4.5%; p < 0.0001). Patients who presented to the ED compared to the clinic were significantly more likely to have surgical intervention followed by SBRT (55.4% vs. 15.3%; p < 0.0001) compared to SBRT alone. Patients who presented to the ED compared to the clinic had a significantly quicker interval to distant spine progression (5.1 ± 6.5 vs. 9.1 ± 10.2 months; p = 0.004), systemic progression (5.1 ± 7.2 vs. 9.2 ± 10.7 months; p < 0.0001), and worse overall survival (9.3 ± 10.0 vs. 14.3 ± 13.7 months; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

The establishment of multidisciplinary spine oncology clinics is an opportunity to potentially allow for earlier, more data-driven treatment of their spinal metastatic disease.

Frailty predicts worse outcomes for spine surgery patients with interhospital transfer status: Analysis of 295,875 patients from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) 2015-2019

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of interhospital transfer (IHT) status, age, and frailty on postoperative outcomes in patients who underwent spine surgery.

METHODS

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried for patients who underwent spine surgeries from 2015 to 2019 (N = 295,875). Univariate and multivariable analyses were utilized to analyze the effect of IHT on postoperative outcomes and the contribution of baseline frailty status (mFI-5 score stratified into "pre-frail", "frail", and "severely frail") on outcomes in IHT patients. Effect sizes were summarized by odds ratio (OR) with associated 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

RESULTS

Of 295,875 patients in the study, 3.3% (N = 9666) were IHT status. On multivariable analysis, controlling for covariates, IHT status was significantly associated with greater likelihood of 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 9.3), major complications (OR=5.0), Clavien-Dindo (CD) grade IV complications (OR=7.0), unplanned readmission (OR=2.1), unplanned reoperation (OR=2.6), eLOS (OR=16.1), and discharge to non-home destination (OR=12.7) (all P < 0.001). Increasing frailty was significantly associated with poor outcomes in spine surgery patients with IHT status compared to chronological age.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence that IHT status is associated with poor outcomes in spine surgery patients. Furthermore, increasing frailty more than increasing age was a robust predictor of poor outcomes among IHT spine surgical patients. Baseline frailty status, as measured by the mFI-5, may be utilized for preoperative risk stratification of patients with IHT status with anticipated spine surgery.