Endoscopic approach for giant pituitary adenoma: clinical outcomes of 205 patients and comparison of two proposed classification systems for preoperative prediction of extent of resection

Comparison of Surgical Modalities for Giant Pituitary Adenoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 1413 Patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Giant pituitary adenomas (GPAs) are a challenging clinical entity, composing 5% to 15% of all pituitary adenomas. While the endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal (EET) approach has surpassed the microsurgical transsphenoidal (MT) and transcranial (TC) approaches as the first-line surgical modality in most institutions, a systematic review comparing the 3 approaches has not been undertaken since 2012. Given growing adoption of EET and development of novel operative techniques over the past decade, an updated comparison of GPA surgical modalities is warranted.

METHODS

We identified all studies related to the surgical management of GPAs in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from inception to December 31, 2021. End points assessed included gross total resection (GTR) rates, postoperative visual improvement, mortality, and perioperative complications.

RESULTS

After screening of 1701 studies, we identified 45 studies on the surgical management of GPAs for meta-analysis. Thirty-one used the EET approach (n = 1413), 11 studies used the MT approach (n = 601), and 10 used the TC approach (n = 416). The cumulative number of patients treated by EET did not exceed that of patients treated by the TC or MT approaches until 2014 and 2015, respectively. Despite patients undergoing EET having the highest average tumor diameter, pooled rates for GTR were significantly higher for EET (42%) than MT (33%, P < .001) and TC (8%, P < .001) and EET similarly exhibited superior rates of visual improvement (85%) than MT (73%, P < .001) and TC (56%, P < .001). Mortality rates were comparable between EET (0.6%) and MT (1.6%), but EET had significantly lower mortality than TC (2.7%, P < .001). Compared with MT, EET had lower rates of hypopituitarism (8.5% vs 14.9%, P = .012) but higher rates of diabetes insipidus (3.1% vs 0.5%, P = .001).

CONCLUSION

In an updated meta-analysis of 1413 patients with GPA, EET resection conferred significantly higher rates of visual improvement and GTR, when compared with the MT and TC approaches.

Management Approaches and Patient Outcomes for Giant Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors Classified as Knosp Grade 3 and 4

Background Treatment of patients with a giant pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (GPitNET) is challenging. Here, we present the methods used for the clinical management of patients who underwent GPitNET resection mainly via endoscopic endonasal surgery along with multimodal support to avoid surgical complications, which can affect the outcomes. Methodology The medical records of 25 patients with a GPitNET who underwent endonasal endoscopic surgery were retrospectively reviewed. Complications were analyzed and factors affecting the extent of resection were evaluated. Results Gross total resection was achieved in six (24%), near-total resection (>90%) in nine (36%), and partial resection in 10 (40%) patients. Multivariate analyses revealed that tumors invading the middle fossa had negative effects on the extent of resection (odds ratio = 0.092, p = 0.047). Postoperative vision improved or normalized in 16 (64%), remained stable in eight (32%), and worsened in one (4%), while a new hormonal deficit was noted in seven (28%) patients. Complications included permanent oculomotor nerve palsy in one (4%) and transient oculomotor palsy in one (4%), apoplexy of the residual tumor resulting in ischemic stroke in one (4%), postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage in one (4%), and permanent diabetes insipidus in six (24%) patients. Conclusions For GPitNETs that extend into the middle fossa, our study underscored the difficulties in surgical extraction and the necessity for tailored treatment approaches. To ensure the safest and most complete removal possible, the surgical strategy must be specifically adapted to each case. Additionally, employing a comprehensive support approach is essential to reduce the chance of complications in patients impacted by this condition.

Surgical Strategies in the Treatment of Giant Pituitary Adenomas

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The management of giant pituitary adenomas (GPAs) is challenging due to associated endocrinopathies and the close proximity of these tumors to critical structures, such as the optic nerves, structures of the cavernous sinus, and hypothalamus. The objective of this review article was to summarize the current management strategies for giant pituitary adenomas, including the role of open and endoscopic surgical approaches and the role of medical and radiation therapy in conjunction with surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of GPAs operated at our institute between January 2010 and March 2023. Surgical approaches, extent of resection, and associated complications were documented. Furthermore, we conducted a thorough literature review to identify relevant studies published in the past decade, which were incorporated along with insights gained from our institutional case series of GPAs to analyze and integrate both the existing knowledge base and our institution's firsthand experience in the management of GPAs.

RESULTS

A total of 46 giant pituitary adenomas (GPAs) were operated on, using various surgical approaches. Transsphenoidal approach was used in 25 cases and a staged approach using transsphenoidal and pterional was used in 15 cases. Other approaches included transcortical-transventricular, transcallosal, pterional/orbitozygomatic, and subfrontal approaches. Complications and technical nuances were reported.

CONCLUSION

The management of giant pituitary adenomas remains complex, often involving several modalities-open or endoscopic resection, radiosurgery, and medical management of both the tumor and associated endocrinopathies. Surgical resections are often challenging procedures that require careful consideration of several factors, including patient characteristics, tumor location, and size, and the experience and skill of the surgical team.

Morphological Classification of Pituitary Tumors With Suprasellar Extension

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to study the association among various morphological parameters and surgical outcomes in pituitary macroadenomas with suprasellar extension.

METHODS

MRI studies of 160 patients undergoing endoscopic transsphenoidal resection of pituitary macroadenomas with suprasellar extension were reviewed. In the coronal plane, tumors were classified into Type 1 (dome-shaped, no constriction at the level of diaphragma sellae) and Type 2 (dumbbell-shaped, with constriction at the level of diaphragma sellae). Based on the dome-to-neck ratio (D/Nr), Type 2 tumors were further classified as Type 2A (wide neck; D/Nr >1 and <1.3) and Type 2B (narrow neck; D/Nr ≥1.3). Surgical outcomes and complications were analyzed using a logistic regression model. Overall extent of resection (EOR) and presence of residual sellar-suprasellar tumor was separately assessed in all patients with available postoperative MRI (n = 149).

RESULTS

There were 108 Type 1 tumors and 26 patients each in the Type 2A and Type 2B subgroups. Tumor subtype was significantly associated with tumor size (P < .001), intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak (P < .001), EOR (P < .001), postoperative suprasellar residual tumor (P < .001), and postoperative complications, including diabetes insipidus (P = .005) and visual worsening (P = .003). On multivariate analysis, after adjusting for confounders, Type 2B tumors were negatively associated with EOR (odds ratio [OR] 0.22; 95% CI 0.07-0.68; P = .008) and associated with the presence of postoperative suprasellar residual tumor (OR 18.08; 95% CI 5.20-62.89; P < .001), intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak (OR 5.33; 95% CI 1.89-14.99; P = .002), and postoperative diabetes insipidus (OR 4.89; 95% CI 1.67-14.35; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative tumor classification based on D/Nr is clinically and surgically relevant, and Type 2B macroadenomas are significantly associated with lower rates of gross total resection and higher rates of postoperative complications after endoscopic transsphenoidal resection.

The incidence and risk factors of unplanned reoperation in endoscopic endonasal surgeries: a single center study

The incidence of unplanned reoperation after surgery during the same hospitalization is considered one of most important evaluation indicators for health care quality. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and risk factors related to unplanned reoperation after an endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA). All patients who underwent elective endoscopic endonasal surgery from January 2016 to December 2021 in the Department of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Military Medical University, were included. We identified the patients who underwent an unplanned reoperation and those who did not and divided them into two groups. The demographic data and risk factors were compared between the groups by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Of the 1783 patients undergoing EEA for various lesions of the skull base, the incidence of unplanned reoperation was 2.3%. The most common unplanned reoperations were repair of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage (39%), sellar hematoma evacuation (34.1%), hemostasis of epistaxis (14.6%) and external ventricular drainage for obstructive hydrocephalus (9.8%). The maximum diameter of tumor ≥ 3 cm (OR 2.654, CI 1.236-5.698; p = 0.012), meningioma (OR 4.198, CI 1.169-15.072; p = 0.028), craniopharyngioma (OR 5.020, CI 2.020-12.476; p = 0.001) and other sellar lesions (OR 4.336, CI 1.390-13.527; p = 0.012) and an operation time ≥ 240 min (OR 2.299, CI 1.170-4.518; p = 0.016) were the independent risk factors for unplanned reoperations in multivariate regression analysis. Of the 41 patients undergoing unplanned reoperation, 16 patients died, twenty-one patients had panhypopituitarism, 13 patients had transient and 6 had permanent diabetes insipidus, and 11 patients presented with intracranial infection and 6 of these patients were cured. By reviewing our department's data, we stated the incidence and risk factors for unplanned reoperation. It is important for the hospital administration and neurosurgeons to place more emphasis on these indicators. Furthermore, we suggest some effective quality improvement initiatives to reduce the incidence of unplanned reoperation.

A case of acute hydrocephalus due to a giant prolactinoma rescued by transventricular neuroendoscopic tumorectomy

Background

A giant prolactinoma extending to the suprasellar area and causing hydrocephalus may be life-threatening and should be treated promptly. A case of a giant prolactinoma with acute hydrocephalus that underwent transventricular neuroendoscopic tumor resection followed by cabergoline administration is presented.

Case Description

A 21-year-old man had a headache lasting for about a month. He gradually developed nausea and disturbance of consciousness. Magnetic resonance imaging showed a contrast-enhanced lesion that extended from the intrasellar space to the suprasellar space and into the third ventricle. The tumor obstructed the foramen of Monro and caused hydrocephalus. A blood test showed marked elevation of prolactin (16,790 ng/mL). The tumor was diagnosed as a prolactinoma. The tumor in the third ventricle had formed a cyst, and the cyst wall blocked the right foramen of Monro. The cystic component of the tumor was resected using an Olympus VEF-V flexible neuroendoscope. The histological diagnosis was pituitary adenoma. The hydrocephalus improved rapidly and his consciousness became clear. After the operation, he was started on cabergoline. The tumor size subsequently decreased.

Conclusion

Prompt partial resection of the giant prolactinoma by transventricular neuroendoscopy resulted in early improvement of hydrocephalus with less invasiveness, allowing subsequent treatment with cabergoline.

Microscopic Transsphenoidal Resection of Giant Pituitary Adenomas: Analysis of the Factors Limiting the Degree of Resection in 73 Cases

Purpose

To analyze the risk factors affecting the gross-total resection of giant pituitary adenomas using a transsphenoidal approach under a microscope to provide a reference basis for formulating an appropriate surgical strategy.

Methods

The clinical data of patients who underwent microscopic transsphenoidal resection of giant pituitary adenomas in a single center from January 2011 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Based on magnetic resonance imaging and surgical records, the predictive factors affecting the gross-total resection of giant pituitary adenomas under microscopy were determined through univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

A total of 73 patients with giant pituitary adenomas underwent transsphenoidal microsurgery. Gross-total resection was performed in 19 cases (26%), subtotal resection in 31 cases (42%), partial resection in 21 cases (29%), and the degree of resection was <50% in only two cases (3%). After binary logistic analysis, it was found that it was more difficult to completely remove giant pituitary adenomas with a Knosp grade 3–4 [odds ratio (OR) = 0.214, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.05–0.917; P = 0.038], greater proportion of tumor suprasellar volume (odds ratio = 0.937, 95% confidence interval: 0.898–0.978; P = 0.003), and intraoperative evidence of invasion of the cavernous sinus (odds ratio = 0.187, 95% CI: 0.039–0.898; P = 0.036).

Conclusion

It is difficult to remove a giant pituitary adenoma invading the cavernous sinus completely with a higher degree of invasion of the suprasellar region using microscopic transsphenoidal surgery. The combined application of multiple surgical methods can help to improve the degree of resection during a single operation.

Outcome of giant pituitary tumors requiring surgery

OBJECTIVE

The management of giant pituitary tumors is complex, with few publications and recommendations. Consequently, patient's care mainly relies on clinical experience. We report here a first large series of patients with giant pituitary tumors managed by a multidisciplinary expert team, focusing on treatments and outcome.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Giant pituitary tumors were defined by a main diameter > 40mm. Macroprolactinomas sensitive to dopamine agonists were excluded. All patients were operated by a single neurosurgical team. After surgery, multimodal management was proposed, including hormone replacement, radiotherapy and anti-tumor medical therapies. Outcome was modeled using Kaplan-Meyer representation. A logistic regression model was built to identify the risk factors associated with surgical complications.

RESULTS

63 consecutive patients presented a giant adenoma, most often with visual defects. Patients were operated once, twice or three times in 59%, 40% and 1% of cases respectively, mainly through endoscopic endonasal approach. Giant adenomas included gonadotroph, corticotroph, somatotroph, lactotroph and mixed GH-PRL subtypes in 67%, 14%, 11%, 6% and 2% of patients respectively. Vision improved in 89% of patients with prior visual defects. Severe surgical complications occurred in 11% of patients, mainly for tumors > 50 mm requiring microscopic transcranial approach. Additional radiotherapy was needed for 29% of patients, 3 to 56 months after first surgery. For 6% of patients, Temozolomide treatment was required, 19 to 66 months after first surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Giant pituitary tumors require multimodal management, with a central role of surgery. Most often, tumor control can be achieved by expert multidisciplinary teams.