1
|
Polly D, Mundis G, Eastlack R, Leveque JC, Elder BD, Martin C, Kent R, Snowden R, Kim HJ, Sembrano J, Herzog J, Lieberman I, Matheus V, Buchholz A, Franke J, Lee R, Shaffrey C. Randomized Trial of Augmented Pelvic Fixation in Patients Undergoing Thoracolumbar Fusion for Adult Spine Deformity: Initial Results from a Multicenter Randomized Trial. World Neurosurg 2024; 187:e15-e27. [PMID: 38310950 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.01.156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Revised: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 01/27/2024] [Indexed: 02/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal configuration for spinopelvic fixation during multilevel spine fusion surgery for adult spine deformity remains unclear. Postoperative sacroiliac (SI) joint pain, S2AI screw loosening and implant breakage could be related to continued motion of the SI joint with use of only a single point of fixation across the SI joint. METHODS Prospective, international, multicenter randomized controlled trial of 222 patients with adult spine deformity scheduled for multilevel (4 or more levels) spine fusion surgery with pelvic fixation. Subjects were randomized to sacroalar (S2) iliac (S2AI) screws alone for pelvic fixation or S2AI + triangular titanium implants placed cephalad to S2AI screws. Quad rod techniques were not allowed or used. Baseline spinal deformity measures were read by an independent radiologist. Site-reported perioperative adverse events were reviewed by a clinical events committee. Quality of life questionnaires and other clinical outcomes are in process with planned 2-year follow-up. RESULTS One hundred thirteen participants were assigned to S2AI and 109 to S2AI + titanium triangular implants (TTI). 35/222 (16%) of all subjects had a history of SI joint pain or were diagnosed with SI joint pain during preoperative workup. Three-month follow-up was available in all but 4 subjects. TTI placement was successful in 106 of 109 (98%) subjects assigned to TTI. In 2 cases, TTI could not be placed due to anatomical considerations. Three TTI ventral iliac breaches were observed, all of which were managed non-surgically. One TTI subject had a transverse sacral fracture and 1 TTI subject had malposition of the implant requiring removal. CONCLUSIONS SI joint pain is common in patients with adult spinal deformity who are candidates for multilevel spine fusion surgery. Concurrent placement of TTI parallel to S2AI screws during multilevel spine fusion surgery is feasible and safe. Further follow-up will help to determine the clinical value of this approach to augment pelvic fixation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Polly
- University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
| | - Greg Mundis
- San Diego Spine Foundation, San Diego, California, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Roland Kent
- Axis Spine Center, Coeur D'Alene, Idaho, USA
| | - Ryan Snowden
- Tennessee Orthopaedics Associates, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Han Jo Kim
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Robert Lee
- Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Odland K, Chanbour H, Zuckerman SL, Polly DW. Spinopelvic fixation failure in the adult spinal deformity population: systematic review and meta-analysis. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2024:10.1007/s00586-024-08241-6. [PMID: 38619634 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-024-08241-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2024] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite modern fixation techniques, spinopelvic fixation failure (SPFF) after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery ranges from 4.5 to 38.0%, with approximately 50% requiring reoperation. Compared to other well-studied complications after ASD surgery, less is known about the incidence and predictors of SPFF. AIMS/OBJECTIVES Given the high rates of SPFF and reoperation needed to treat it, the purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to report the incidence and failure mechanisms of SPF after ASD surgery. MATERIALS/METHODS The literature search was executed across four databases: Medline via PubMed and Ovid, SPORTDiscus via EBSCO, Cochrane Library via Wiley, and Scopus. Study inclusion criteria were patients undergoing ASD surgery with spinopelvic instrumentation, report rates of SPFF and type of failure mechanism, patients over 18 years of age, minimum 1-year follow-up, and cohort or case-control studies. From each study, we collected general demographic information (age, gender, and body mass index), primary/revision, type of ASD, and mode of failure (screw loosening, rod breakage, pseudarthrosis, screw failure, SI joint pain, screw protrusion, set plug dislodgment, and sacral fracture) and recorded the overall rate of SPF as well as failure rate for each type. For the assessment of failure rate, we required a minimum of 12 months follow-up with radiographic assessment. RESULTS Of 206 studies queried, 14 met inclusion criteria comprising 3570 ASD patients who underwent ASD surgery with pelvic instrumentation (mean age 65.5 ± 3.6 years). The mean SPFF rate was 22.1% (range 3-41%). Stratification for type of failure resulted in a mean SPFF rate of 23.3% for the pseudarthrosis group; 16.5% for the rod fracture group; 13.5% for the iliac screw loosening group; 7.3% for the SIJ pain group; 6.1% for the iliac screw group; 3.6% for the set plug dislodgement group; 1.1% for the sacral fracture group; and 1% for the iliac screw prominence group. CONCLUSION The aggregate rate of SPFF after ASD surgery is 22.1%. The most common mechanisms of failure were pseudarthrosis, rod fracture, and iliac screw loosening. Studies of SPFF remain heterogeneous, and a consistent definition of what constitutes SPFF is needed. This study may enable surgeons to provide patient specific constructs with pelvic fixation constructs to minimize this risk of failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kari Odland
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, 2450 Riverside Avenue South, Suite R200, Minneapolis, MN, 55454, USA.
| | - Hani Chanbour
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37204, USA
| | - Scott L Zuckerman
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37204, USA
| | - David W Polly
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, 2450 Riverside Avenue South, Suite R200, Minneapolis, MN, 55454, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Passias PG, Williamson TK, Kummer NA, Pellisé F, Lafage V, Lafage R, Serra-Burriel M, Smith JS, Line B, Vira S, Gum JL, Haddad S, Sánchez Pérez-Grueso FJ, Schoenfeld AJ, Daniels AH, Chou D, Klineberg EO, Gupta MC, Kebaish KM, Kelly MP, Hart RA, Burton DC, Kleinstück F, Obeid I, Shaffrey CI, Alanay A, Ames CP, Schwab FJ, Hostin RA, Bess S. Cost Benefit of Implementation of Risk Stratification Models for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery. Global Spine J 2023:21925682231212966. [PMID: 38081300 DOI: 10.1177/21925682231212966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE Assess the extent to which defined risk factors of adverse events are drivers of cost-utility in spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. METHODS ASD patients with 2-year (2Y) data were included. Tertiles were used to define high degrees of frailty, sagittal deformity, blood loss, and surgical time. Cost was calculated using the Pearl Diver registry and cost-utility at 2Y was compared between cohorts based on the number of risk factors present. Statistically significant differences in cost-utility by number of baseline risk factors were determined using ANOVA, followed by a generalized linear model, adjusting for clinical site and surgeon, to assess the effects of increasing risk score on overall cost-utility. RESULTS By 2 years, 31% experienced a major complication and 23% underwent reoperation. Patients with ≤2 risk factors had significantly less major complications. Patients with 2 risk factors improved the most from baseline to 2Y in ODI. Average cost increased by $8234 per risk factor (R2 = .981). Cost-per-QALY at 2Y increased by $122,650 per risk factor (R2 = .794). Adjusted generalized linear model demonstrated a significant trend between increasing risk score and increasing cost-utility (r2 = .408, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS The number of defined patient-specific and surgical risk factors, especially those with greater than two, were associated with increased index surgical costs and diminished cost-utility. Efforts to optimize patient physiology and minimize surgical risk would likely reduce healthcare expenditures and improve the overall cost-utility profile for ASD interventions.Level of evidence: III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter G Passias
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, NY, NY, USA
| | - Tyler K Williamson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Nicholas A Kummer
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, NY, NY, USA
| | - Ferran Pellisé
- Spine Surgery Unit, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Miguel Serra-Burriel
- Center for Research in Health and Economics, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Justin S Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Breton Line
- Denver International Spine Center, Presbyterian St. Luke's/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Shaleen Vira
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | - Sleiman Haddad
- Spine Surgery Unit, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alan H Daniels
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Dean Chou
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Eric O Klineberg
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Munish C Gupta
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Khaled M Kebaish
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michael P Kelly
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Robert A Hart
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Douglas C Burton
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Frank Kleinstück
- Spine Center Division, Department of Orthopedics and Neurosurgery, Schulthess Klinik, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Ibrahim Obeid
- Spine Surgery Unit, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Christopher I Shaffrey
- Spine Division, Departments of Neurosurgery and Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Ahmet Alanay
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Acıbadem University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Christopher P Ames
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Frank J Schwab
- Department of Orthopaedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Richard A Hostin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor Scoliosis Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Shay Bess
- Denver International Spine Center, Presbyterian St. Luke's/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
The efficacy of "TiRobot"orthopaedic robot-assisted VS conventional fluoroscopic percutaneous screw fixation of the sacroiliac joint. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS 2023; 47:351-358. [PMID: 36572784 PMCID: PMC9876857 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-022-05655-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 12/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study is to compare the precision and safety of the orthopaedic robot with conventional fluoroscopy for assisted percutaneous sacroiliac joint screw implantation. METHODS Retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 57 patients with unstable posterior pelvic ring injuries who were admitted and met the criteria between January 2017 and January 2022. All of these patients underwent percutaneous sacroiliac joint screw implantation, and their clinical data were split into two groups based on the surgical technique: a RA group (robot-assisted implantation, 30 patients, 54 screws) and a CF group (conventional fluoroscopic freehand implantation, 27 patients, 42 screws). There were 96 screws placed in total. The durations of the two groups' operations, fluoroscopy examinations, fluoroscopy doses, total number of fluoroscopies, and intra-operative guide pin applications were noted and compared. On post-operative CT scans, the placement of each screw was assessed using the Gertzbein-Robbins classification. Finally, imaging Matta criteria were used to assess the sacroiliac joint fracture reduction. The Majeed functional score was used to assess clinical function. RESULTS Both groups successfully completed 57 procedures in total. In both groups, there were no consequences from vascular injury, wound infection, or urinary tract infection. Additionally, there were no complications from robotic-induced nerve injury, operating time, fluoroscopic dose, and the frequency of fluoroscopic; the number of percutaneous punctures in the RA group was lower than that of the CF group.There were statistically significant differences between the aforementioned data (P < 0.05). The modified Matta evaluated the effectiveness of fracture reduction. In the RA group, there was no statistically significant difference between the CF group (P > 0.05). According to the modified Gertzbein-Robbins classification criteria, the 54 screws implanted in the RA group were classified as follows: class A (45), class B (5), class C (4), and class D (0); the accuracy rate of the implants was 92.59%. Forty-two screws implanted in the CF group, 30 screws were defined class A, class B (3), class C (7), and class D (2). The accuracy rate of the implants was 78.57%(χ2 = 3.967, P < 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups. The Majeed score 30 patients in RA group, one month post-operation, 16 considered exceptional, eight decent, six moderate, and zero bad. Post-operation more than six months,25 recorded exceptional, five decent. By the time,27 patients in CF group,12 exceptional grade, eight decent, six moderate, and one bad,one month post-operation. Post-operation more than six months,22 recorded exceptional, five decent.Both group (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION "TiRobot" robot-assisted screw implant treatment for unstable posterior pelvic ring injury has a greater success rate than traditional surgery as compared to conventional percutaneous screw implant. It is a precise, secure, and minimally invasive surgical technique that can also be applied to severe pelvic injuries even congenital sacral deformities.
Collapse
|
5
|
Ladd B, Jones K, Polly D. Rescue Pelvic Fixation in a Patient with Sacral-2-Alar-Iliac and Triangular Sacroiliac Joint Fusion (Bedrock) Instrumentation. World Neurosurg 2023; 169:10-11. [PMID: 36270593 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.10.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2022] [Revised: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this report is to demonstrate the creation of a 4-rod lumbosacral construct, when "stacked" sacral-2-alar-iliac (S2AI) screws are not possible due to a concurrent treatment of sacroiliitis with a posterior approach sacroiliac joint fusion device. This technique uses a combined S2AI and subcrestal iliac approach to achieve the 4-rod lumbosacral construct, while simultaneously biomechanically supporting the S2AI screws and treating the sacroiliitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan Ladd
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
| | - Kristen Jones
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - David Polly
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Youssef I, Saadeh YS, Strong MJ, Park P. Commentary: Robotic Sacroiliac Fixation Technique for Triangular Titanium Implant in Adult Degenerative Scoliosis Surgery: 2-Dimensional Operative Video. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2022; 22:e289-e290. [DOI: 10.1227/ons.0000000000000205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
|