1
|
Tang Y, Wei H, Zhang Z, Fu M, Feng J, Li Z, Liu X, Wu Y, Zhang J, You W, Xue R, Zhuo Y, Jiang Y, Li Y, Li R, Liu P. Transition of intracranial aneurysmal wall enhancement from high to low wall shear stress mediation with size increase: A hemodynamic study based on 7T magnetic resonance imaging. Heliyon 2024; 10:e30006. [PMID: 38694075 PMCID: PMC11061692 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Revised: 04/11/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Wall shear stress (WSS) has been proved to be related to the formation, development and rupture of intracranial aneurysms. Aneurysm wall enhancement (AWE) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be caused by inflammation and have confirmed its relationship with low WSS. High WSS can also result in inflammation but the research of its correlation with AWE is lack because of the focus on large aneurysms limited by 3T MRI in most previous studies.This study aimed to assess the potential association between high or low WSS and AWE in different aneuryms. Especially the relationship between high WSS and AWE in small aneurysm. Methods Forty-three unruptured intracranial aneurysms in 42 patients were prospectively included for analysis. 7.0 T MRI was used for imaging. Aneurysm size was measured on three-dimensional time-of-flight (TOF) images. Aneurysm-to-pituitary stalk contrast ratio (CRstalk) was calculated on post-contrast black-blood T1-weighted fast spin echo sequence images. Hemodynamics were assessed by four-dimensional flow MRI. Results The small aneurysms group had more positive WSS-CRstalk correlation coefficient distribution (dome: 78.6 %, p = 0.009; body: 50.0 %, p = 0.025), and large group had more negative coefficient distribution (dome: 44.8 %, p = 0.001; body: 69.0 %, p = 0.002). Aneurysm size was positively correlated with the significant OSI-CRstalk correlation coefficient at the dome (p = 0.012) and body (p = 0.010) but negatively correlated with the significant WSS-CRstalk correlation coefficient at the dome (p < 0.001) and body (p = 0.017). Conclusion AWE can be mediated by both high and low WSS, and translate from high WSS- to low WSS-mediated pathways as size increase. Additionally, AWE may serve as an indicator of the stage of aneurysm development via different correlations with hemodynamic factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yudi Tang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute and Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Haining Wei
- Center for Biomedical Imaging Research, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Medical School, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Zihao Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, Beijing MR Center for Brain Research, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- Institute of Artificial Intelligence, Hefei Comprehensive National Science Center, Hefei, China
| | - Mingzhu Fu
- Center for Biomedical Imaging Research, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Medical School, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Junqiang Feng
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute and Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhixin Li
- State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, Beijing MR Center for Brain Research, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Xinke Liu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute and Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Engineering Research Center, Beijing, China
| | - Yue Wu
- State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, Beijing MR Center for Brain Research, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Jinyuan Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, Beijing MR Center for Brain Research, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Wei You
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute and Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Rong Xue
- State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, Beijing MR Center for Brain Research, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Yan Zhuo
- State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, Beijing MR Center for Brain Research, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Yuhua Jiang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute and Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Engineering Research Center, Beijing, China
| | - Youxiang Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute and Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Engineering Research Center, Beijing, China
| | - Rui Li
- Center for Biomedical Imaging Research, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Medical School, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Peng Liu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute and Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Engineering Research Center, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yan Y, An X, Ren H, Luo B, Jin S, Liu L, Di Y, Li T, Huang Y. Nomogram-based geometric and hemodynamic parameters for predicting the growth of small untreated intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurg Rev 2024; 47:169. [PMID: 38635054 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-024-02408-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
Previous studies have shown that the growth status of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) predisposes to rupture. This study aimed to construct a nomogram for predicting the growth of small IAs based on geometric and hemodynamic parameters. We retrospectively collected the baseline and follow-up angiographic images (CTA/ MRA) of 96 small untreated saccular IAs, created patient-specific vascular models and performed computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. Geometric and hemodynamic parameters were calculated. A stepwise Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was employed to construct a nomogram. IAs were stratified into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups based on the total points from the nomogram. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, calibration curves, decision curve analysis (DCA) and Kaplan-Meier curves were evaluated for internal validation. In total, 30 untreated saccular IAs were grown (31.3%; 95%CI 21.8%-40.7%). The PHASES, ELAPSS, and UIATS performed poorly in distinguishing growth status. Hypertension (hazard ratio [HR] 4.26, 95%CI 1.61-11.28; P = 0.004), nonsphericity index (95%CI 4.10-25.26; P = 0.003), max relative residence time (HR 1.01, 95%CI 1.00-1.01; P = 0.032) were independently related to the growth status. A nomogram was constructed with the above predictors and achieved a satisfactory prediction in the validation cohort. The log-rank test showed significant discrimination among the Kaplan-Meier curves of different risk groups in the training and validation cohorts. A nomogram consisting of geometric and hemodynamic parameters presented an accurate prediction for the growth status of small IAs and achieved risk stratification. It showed higher predictive efficacy than the assessment tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yujia Yan
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Brain Science and Neuroengineering, Academy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
- Haihe Laboratory of Brain-Computer Interaction and Human-Machine Integration, Tianjin, China
- State Key Laboratory of Advanced Medical Materials and Devices, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tianjin Huanhu Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Xingwei An
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Brain Science and Neuroengineering, Academy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
- Haihe Laboratory of Brain-Computer Interaction and Human-Machine Integration, Tianjin, China
- State Key Laboratory of Advanced Medical Materials and Devices, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| | - Hecheng Ren
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tianjin Huanhu Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Bin Luo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tianjin Huanhu Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Song Jin
- Department of Radiology, Tianjin Huanhu Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Li Liu
- Department of Radiology, Tianjin Huanhu Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Yang Di
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Brain Science and Neuroengineering, Academy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
- Haihe Laboratory of Brain-Computer Interaction and Human-Machine Integration, Tianjin, China
- State Key Laboratory of Advanced Medical Materials and Devices, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| | - Tingting Li
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Brain Science and Neuroengineering, Academy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
- Haihe Laboratory of Brain-Computer Interaction and Human-Machine Integration, Tianjin, China
- State Key Laboratory of Advanced Medical Materials and Devices, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| | - Ying Huang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tianjin Huanhu Hospital, Tianjin, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ren X, Li H, Xu K, Li Z, Gao B, Lu W, Yang G, Wang Y, Yin Y, Chen T. Hemodynamic study on the therapeutic effects of varying diameter embolic coils in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING 2024; 40:e3807. [PMID: 38281812 DOI: 10.1002/cnm.3807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Revised: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/14/2024] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
Endovascular coiling is the predominant method for treating cerebral aneurysms. Extensive reports on selecting coil length, hardness, and material are available. However, the impact of coil diameter on postoperative outcomes remains unclear. This study enrolled six personalized geometric models of intracranial aneurysms: three bifurcation aneurysms and three sidewall aneurysms. Four coil models were constructed by changing the coil diameter. Coil embolization was simulated using the finite element method. Computational fluid dynamics was used to characterize hemodynamics in the aneurysms after embolization. Evaluation parameters included velocity reduction, wall shear stress (WSS), low WSS (LWSS), oscillatory shear index (OSI), relative residence time (RRT), and residual flow volume in the aneurysms. At the peak time (t = 0.17 s), the proportion of LWSS area in bifurcation aneurysms increase with the rise in coil diameter: 0.8D, 71.28 ± 12.62% versus 1D, 74.97 ± 19.17% versus 1.2D, 78.88 ± 18.56% versus 1.4D, 84.00 ± 11.53% (mean ± SD). The proportion of high OSI area decreases as the coil diameter increases: 0.8D, 4.41% ± 2.82% versus 1.0D, 3.78 ± 3.33% versus 1.2D, 2.28% ± 1.77% versus 1.4D, 1.58% ± 1.11% (mean ± SD). The proportion of high RRT area increases as the coil diameter rises: 0.8D, 3.40% ± 1.68% versus 1.0D, 7.67 ± 4.12% versus 1.2D, 9.84% ± 9.50% versus 1.4D, 22.29% ± 14.28% (mean ± SD). Side wall aneurysms do not exhibit the aforementioned trend. Bifurcation aneurysms plugged with a coil of 1.4 times the diameter have the largest RFVs (<10 mm/s) within the group. Aforementioned patterns are not found in sidewall aneurysms. In the treatment of aneurysms with coiling, varying coil diameters can result in different hemodynamic environments within the aneurysm. Larger coil diameters have improved hemodynamic performance for bifurcation aneurysms. However, coil diameter and embolization effectiveness have no significant relationship for sidewall aneurysms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoyu Ren
- Faculty of Environment and Life, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China
| | - Haoran Li
- Faculty of Environment and Life, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China
| | - Kaihang Xu
- Faculty of Environment and Life, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China
| | - Zhongkai Li
- Faculty of Environment and Life, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China
| | - Bin Gao
- Faculty of Environment and Life, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China
| | - Wangsheng Lu
- Union Strong (Beijing) Technology Co. Ltd., Beijing, China
| | - Guangming Yang
- Union Strong (Beijing) Technology Co. Ltd., Beijing, China
| | - Yunjie Wang
- Union Strong (Beijing) Technology Co. Ltd., Beijing, China
| | - Yin Yin
- Union Strong (Beijing) Technology Co. Ltd., Beijing, China
| | - Tao Chen
- Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|