1
|
González EO, Runge S, Mantziaris G, Ironside N, Sheehan JP. Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain arteriovenous malformations in patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2024; 166:21. [PMID: 38231447 PMCID: PMC10794397 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-024-05923-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) in patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) present different characteristics from sporadic AVMs, and they have lower initial bleeding rates. Conservative management is usually preferred for the treatment of these lesions. In this case study, we present the largest series of HHT patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery to date. METHODS We identified eight patients with HHT and 14 AVMs. We retrospectively collected clinical, radiographic, and treatment characteristics of the patients and each AVM. RESULTS Most patients in our sample presented with small AVMs. The median volume of these AVMs was 0.22 cm3 (IQR 0.08-0.59). Three out of eight patients presented with initial intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). The majority of lesions had low (12/14) Spetzler-Martin grades (I-II). Median maximum and margin doses used for treatment were 36.2 (IQR 35.25-44.4) and 20 (IQR 18-22.5) Gy, respectively. The overall obliteration rate after SRS was 11/14, and the median time to obliteration across all 11 obliterated AVMs was 35.83 months (IQR, 17-39.99). Neurological status was favorable with all patients having a mRS of 0 or 1 at the last follow-up. Symptomatic radiation-induced changes (RIC) after SRS were low (7.1%), and there were no permanent RIC. CONCLUSIONS Patients with HHT who present with multiple brain AVMs are generally well served by SRS. Obliteration can be achieved in the majority of HHT patients and with a low complication rate. In the current study, initial hemorrhage rates prior to SRS were noticeable which supports the decision to treat these AVMs. Future studies are needed to better address the role of SRS for HHT patients harboring ruptured and unruptured AVMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo Orrego González
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA
| | - Sean Runge
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA
| | - Georgios Mantziaris
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA
| | - Natasha Ironside
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA
| | - Jason P Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fang W, Yang Z, Liu Y, Yu J, Sun P, Zhao Z, He Y, Zhang T, Deng J. Peri-procedure efficacy and safety of one-stop hybrid surgery for the treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations: A single-center preliminary experience. Front Neurol 2022; 13:1052882. [PMID: 36408526 PMCID: PMC9671923 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1052882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Some deficiencies and shortcomings in treatment strategies of brain arteriovenous malformation (bAVM) remain. It is worth exploring whether the one-stop hybrid surgical platform can play a positive role in the treatment of bAVM. Objective This study investigated short clinical and angiographic results of one-stop hybrid surgery for the treatment of bAVM. Methods All patients with bAVM treated with one-stop hybrid surgery were reviewed from February 2017 to December 2021. Data including demographic information, clinical conditions, characteristics of AVM, procedure details, and clinical and angiographic results were collected. Result In total, 150 cerebral bAVM patients received one-stop hybrid surgery; among them, 122 received surgical resection assisted by intraoperative DSA, and 28 were treated with combination surgical resection and endovascular embolization. Complete angiographic obliteration of the AVM was achieved in 136 patients (90.7%), and procedure-related death and neurological deficit rates were 7.3%. Of all relevant variables, logistic regression analysis showed that the Spetzler & Martin (S&M) score was the only factor related to the cure rate (P < 0.001) and endpoint complication rate (P = 0.007). Conclusions In our preliminary experience, one-stop hybrid surgery for the treatment of brain AVMs achieves a high angiographic total occlusion rate, with acceptable peri-procedure morbidity and mortality. For S&M 4 and 5 lesions, more cases and further study are needed to investigate the effects and safety of hybrid surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Fang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Zijian Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Yufeng Liu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Jia Yu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Peng Sun
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Zhenwei Zhao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Yue He
- Tongji Medical College, Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Tao Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China
- Tao Zhang
| | - Jianping Deng
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China
- *Correspondence: Jianping Deng
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Darsaut TE, Magro E, Bojanowski MW, Chaalala C, Nico L, Bacchus E, Klink R, Iancu D, Weill A, Roy D, Sabatier JF, Cognard C, Januel AC, Pelissou-Guyotat I, Eker O, Roche PH, Graillon T, Brunel H, Proust F, Beaujeux R, Aldea S, Piotin M, Cornu P, Shotar E, Gaberel T, Barbier C, Corre ML, Costalat V, Jecko V, Barreau X, Morandi X, Gauvrit JY, Derrey S, Papagiannaki C, Nguyen TN, Abdalkader M, Tawk RG, Huynh T, Viard G, Gevry G, Gentric JC, Raymond J. Surgical treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations: clinical outcomes of patients included in the registry of a pragmatic randomized trial. J Neurosurg 2022; 138:891-899. [PMID: 36087316 DOI: 10.3171/2022.7.jns22813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The Treatment of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations Study (TOBAS) is a pragmatic study that includes 2 randomized trials and registries of treated or conservatively managed patients. The authors report the results of the surgical registry. METHODS TOBAS patients are managed according to an algorithm that combines clinical judgment and randomized allocation. For patients considered for curative treatment, clinicians selected from surgery, endovascular therapy, or radiation therapy as the primary curative method, and whether observation was a reasonable alternative. When surgery was selected and observation was deemed unreasonable, the patient was not included in the randomized controlled trial but placed in the surgical registry. The primary outcome of the trial was mRS score > 2 at 10 years (at last follow-up for the current report). Secondary outcomes include angiographic results, perioperative serious adverse events, and permanent treatment-related complications leading to mRS score > 2. RESULTS From June 2014 to May 2021, 1010 patients were recruited at 30 TOBAS centers. Surgery was selected for 229/512 patients (44%) considered for curative treatment; 77 (34%) were included in the surgery versus observation randomized trial and 152 (66%) were placed in the surgical registry. Surgical registry patients had 124/152 (82%) ruptured and 28/152 (18%) unruptured arteriovenous malformations (AVMs), with the majority categorized as low-grade Spetzler-Martin grade I-II AVM (118/152 [78%]). Thirteen patients were excluded, leaving 139 patients for analysis. Embolization was performed prior to surgery in 78/139 (56%) patients. Surgical angiographic cure was obtained in 123/139 all-grade (89%, 95% CI 82%-93%) and 105/110 low-grade (95%, 95% CI 90%-98%) AVM patients. At the mean follow-up of 18.1 months, 16 patients (12%, 95% CI 7%-18%) had reached the primary safety outcome of mRS score > 2, including 11/16 who had a baseline mRS score ≥ 3 due to previous AVM rupture. Serious adverse events occurred in 29 patients (21%, 95% CI 15%-28%). Permanent treatment-related complications leading to mRS score > 2 occurred in 6/139 patients (4%, 95% CI 2%-9%), 5 (83%) of whom had complications due to preoperative embolization. CONCLUSIONS The surgical treatment of brain AVMs in the TOBAS registry was curative in 88% of patients. The participation of more patients, surgeons, and centers in randomized trials is needed to definitively establish the role of surgery in the treatment of unruptured brain AVMs. Clinical trial registration no.: NCT02098252 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim E Darsaut
- 1Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta Hospital, Mackenzie Health Sciences Centre, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Elsa Magro
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, CHU Cavale Blanche, INSERM UMR 1101 LaTIM, Brest, France
| | - Michel W Bojanowski
- 3Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, University of Montreal Health Centre (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Chiraz Chaalala
- 3Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, University of Montreal Health Centre (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Lorena Nico
- 4Division of Interventional Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, CHU Saint-Etienne, North Hospital, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Emma Bacchus
- 1Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta Hospital, Mackenzie Health Sciences Centre, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Ruby Klink
- 5Research Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre, Interventional Neuroradiology Research Laboratory (NRI), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Daniela Iancu
- 6Department of Radiology, Service of Neuroradiology, Hospital Centre of the University of Montreal (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Alain Weill
- 6Department of Radiology, Service of Neuroradiology, Hospital Centre of the University of Montreal (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Daniel Roy
- 6Department of Radiology, Service of Neuroradiology, Hospital Centre of the University of Montreal (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jean-Francois Sabatier
- 7Department of Neurosurgery, Pierre-Paul Riquet Hospital, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Christophe Cognard
- 8Diagnostic and Therapeutic Neuroradiology Department, Pierre-Paul Riquet Hospital, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Anne-Christine Januel
- 8Diagnostic and Therapeutic Neuroradiology Department, Pierre-Paul Riquet Hospital, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Omer Eker
- 10Diagnostic and Interventional Neurological Imaging, Pierre Wertheimer Neurological Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | | | - Thomas Graillon
- 12Department of Neurosurgery, Aix Marseille University, INSERM, AP-HM, MMG, UMR1251, Marmara Institute, La Timone Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - Hervé Brunel
- 13Department of Neuroradiology, La Timone Hospital, AP-HM, Marseille, France
| | - Francois Proust
- 14Department of Neurosurgery, Strasbourg University Hospitals, Strasbourg, France
| | - Rémy Beaujeux
- 15Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | | | - Michel Piotin
- 17Interventional Radiology, Adolphe de Rothschild Foundation Hospital, Paris, France
| | | | - Eimad Shotar
- 19Neuroradiology, Mercy Salpetriere Hospital AP-HP, Paris, France
| | | | - Charlotte Barbier
- 21Vascular and Interventional Imaging, CHU Caen Normandie, Caen, France
| | | | | | - Vincent Jecko
- 24Neurosurgery Department A, Pellegrin Hospital Group, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Xavier Barreau
- 25Diagnostic and Therapeutic Neuroradiology Department, Pellegrin Hospital Group, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Jean-Yves Gauvrit
- 27Neuroradiology, Pontchaillou Hospital, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | | | | | - Thanh N Nguyen
- Departments of30Radiology.,31Neurology, and.,32Neurosurgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Thien Huynh
- 34Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Geraldine Viard
- 35Clinical Investigation Center, CHU Brest, Brest, France; and
| | - Guylaine Gevry
- 5Research Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre, Interventional Neuroradiology Research Laboratory (NRI), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jean-Christophe Gentric
- 36Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Cavale Blanche Hospital, Brest University Hospital, Brest, France
| | - Jean Raymond
- 5Research Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre, Interventional Neuroradiology Research Laboratory (NRI), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,6Department of Radiology, Service of Neuroradiology, Hospital Centre of the University of Montreal (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|