Feasibility of lateral mass screw insertion in patients with the risky triad of C1: evaluation of the over-the-arch technique

The postoperative course of mechanical complications in adult spinal deformity surgery

PURPOSE

(a) Describe the time course of each mechanical complication, and (b) compare radiographic measurements and preoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) among each mechanical complication type.

METHODS

A single-institution case-control study was undertaken of patients undergoing adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery from 2009-2017. Exposure variables included patient demographics, operative variables, radiographic measurements, and preoperative PROMs, including Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Numeric Rating Scale Back/Leg-pain scores (NRS-Back/Leg), and EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D). The primary outcomes were occurrence of a mechanical complication and time to complication. Due to overlapping occurrence, rod fracture and pseudarthrosis were grouped into one composite category.

RESULTS

145 patients underwent ASD surgery and were followed for at least 2 years. 30/47 (63.8%) patients with proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) required reoperation, whereas 27/31 (87.1%) patients with pseudarthrosis/rod fracture required reoperation (63.8% vs. 87.1%, Χ² = -0.23, 95% CI -0.41, -0.05, p = 0.023). Cox regression showed no significant difference in time to reoperation between PJK and rod fracture/pseudarthrosis (HR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.85-1.11, p = 0.686). Distal junctional kyphosis (DJK) (N = 3; 2 reoperation) and implant failures (N = 4; 0 reoperations) were rare. Patients with PJK had significantly lower Hounsfield Units preoperatively compared to those with pseudarthrosis/rod fracture (138.2 ± 43.8 vs. 160.3 ± 41.0, mean difference (MD) =  -22.1, 95% CI -41.8, -2.4, p = 0.028), more prior fusions (51.1% vs. 25.8%, Χ² = 0.253, 95% CI 0.41, 0.46, p = 0.026), fewer instrumented vertebrae (9.2 ± 2.6 vs. 10.7 ± 2.5, MD =  -1.5, 95% CI -2.7, -0.31, p = 0.013), and higher postoperative thoracic kyphosis (TK) (46.3 ± 12.7 vs. 34.9 ± 10.6, MD = 11.4, 95% CI 5.9, 16.9, p < 0.001). Higher postoperative C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) did not achieve a significant difference (80.7 ± 72.1 vs. 51.9 ± 57.3, MD = 28.8, 95% CI -1.9, 59.5, p = 0.066). No differences were seen in preoperative PROMs.

CONCLUSION

Patients with pseudarthrosis/rod fracture had a higher reoperation rate compared to those with PJK with similar time to reoperation. Moreover, patients with PJK had higher postoperative TK, lower Hounsfield Units, more prior fusions, and fewer instrumented levels compared to those with pseudarthrosis/rod fracture. The results of this single-institution study suggest that even though mechanical complications are often analyzed as a single group, important differences may exist between them.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Systematic review and meta-analysis for the impact of rod materials and sizes in the surgical treatment of adult spine deformity

PURPOSE

To assess clinical and safety outcomes associated with different rod materials and diameters in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery.

METHODS

A systematic literature review and meta-analysis evaluated ASD surgery using pedicle screw fixation systems with rods of different materials and sizes. Postoperative outcomes (i.e., Cobb, sagittal vertical axis, and pelvic tilt angle) and complications (i.e., pseudarthrosis and rod breakage) were assessed. Random effects models (REMs) pooled data for outcomes reported in ≥ 2 studies.

RESULTS

Among 50 studies evaluating ASD surgery using pedicle screw fixation systems, 17 described rod material/diameter. Postoperative outcomes did not statistically differ between cobalt-chromium (CoCr) vs. titanium (Ti) rods (n = 2 studies; mean [95% confidence interval (CI)] sagittal vertical axis angle: CoCr 37.00° [18.58°-55.42°] and Ti 32.58° [24.62°-40.54°]; mean [95% CI] pelvic tilt angle: CoCr 26.20° [22.87°-29.53°] and Ti 20.15° [18.0°-22.31°]). The pooled proportion (95% CI) of pseudarthrosis was 15% (7-22%) for CoCr and 12% (- 8-32%) for stainless steel (SS) (n = 2 studies each; Chi2 = 0.07, p = 0.79). The pooled proportion (95% CI) of broken rods was 12% (1-22%) for Ti (n = 3 studies) and 10% (2-19) for CoCr (n = 1 study). Among 6.0-6.35 mm rods, the pooled (95% CI) postoperative Cobb angle (n = 2) was 12.01° (9.75°-14.28°), sagittal vertical axis angle (n = 4) was 35.32° (30.02°-40.62°), and pelvic tilt angle was 21.11° (18.35°-23.86°).

CONCLUSIONS

For ASD patients undergoing posterior fixation and fusion, there are no statistically significant differences in postoperative outcomes or complications among rods of varying materials and diameters. Benchmark postsurgical outcomes and complication rates by rod material and diameter are provided.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Effect of gluteal muscle strengthening exercise on sagittal balance and muscle volume in adult spinal deformity following long-segment fixation surgery

This study aimed to investigate the changes in gluteal muscle volume and the effects of such changes in spinal alignment as a result of postoperative gluteal muscle strengthening exercise (GMSE) in patients following long-segment fixation for adult spinal deformity (ASD). Eighty-three consecutive patients (average age, 70.1 years) were analyzed. Three-dimensional CT scans were conducted to obtain serial axial gluteus muscle image slices. The size of each muscle area in every image slice was measured by Computer Aided Design and the sum of each muscle area was calculated. At the last follow-up, the sagittal vertical axis was significantly greater in the basic postoperative exercise group (1.49 mm vs. 17.94 mm), and the percentage of optimal sagittal alignment was significantly higher in the GMSE group (97.8% vs. 84.2%). At the last follow-up, the gluteus maximus volume was significantly higher in the GMSE group (900,107.1 cm³ vs. 825,714.2 cm³, p = 0.036). For the increase in muscle volume after 1 year, gluteus maximus and medius volumes showed a significant intergroup difference (+ 6.8% vs. + 2.4% and + 6.9% vs. + 3.6%). The GMSE protocol developed in this study could effectively increase gluteal muscle volume and maintain the optimal sagittal balance in patients with ASD.