Novel artificial intelligence algorithm: an accurate and independent measure of spinopelvic parameters

Artificial Intelligence Assistance for the Measurement of Full Alignment Parameters in Whole-Spine Lateral Radiographs

BACKGROUND

Measuring spinal alignment with radiological parameters is essential in patients with spinal conditions likely to be treated surgically. These evaluations are not usually included in the radiological report. As a result, spinal surgeons commonly perform the measurement, which is time-consuming and subject to errors. We aim to develop a fully automated artificial intelligence (AI) tool to assist in measuring alignment parameters in whole-spine lateral radiograph (WSL X-rays).

METHODS

We developed a tool called Vertebrai that automatically calculates the global spinal parameters (GSPs): Pelvic incidence, sacral slope, pelvic tilt, L1-L4 angle, L4-S1 lumbo-pelvic angle, T1 pelvic angle, sagittal vertical axis, cervical lordosis, C1-C2 lordosis, lumbar lordosis, mid-thoracic kyphosis, proximal thoracic kyphosis, global thoracic kyphosis, T1 slope, C2-C7 plummet, spino-sacral angle, C7 tilt, global tilt, spinopelvic tilt, and hip odontoid axis. We assessed human-AI interaction instead of AI performance alone. We compared the time to measure GSP and inter-rater agreement with and without AI assistance. Two institutional datasets were created with 2267 multilabel images for classification and 784 WSL X-rays with reference standard landmark labeled by spinal surgeons.

RESULTS

Vertebrai significantly reduced the measurement time comparing spine surgeons with AI assistance and the AI algorithm alone, without human intervention (3 minutes vs. 0.26 minutes; P < 0.05). Vertebrai achieved an average accuracy of 83% in detecting abnormal alignment values, with the sacral slope parameter exhibiting the lowest accuracy at 61.5% and spinopelvic tilt demonstrating the highest accuracy at 100%. Intraclass correlation analysis revealed a high level of correlation and consistency in the global alignment parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Vertebrai's measurements can accurately detect alignment parameters, making it a promising tool for measuring GSP automatically.

Novel AI-Based Algorithm for the Automated Computation of Coronal Parameters in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients: A Validation Study on 100 Preoperative Full Spine X-Rays

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective, mono-centric cohort research study.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study is to validate a novel artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithm against human-generated ground truth for radiographic parameters of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

METHODS

An AI-algorithm was developed that is capable of detecting anatomical structures of interest (clavicles, cervical, thoracic, lumbar spine and sacrum) and calculate essential radiographic parameters in AP spine X-rays fully automatically. The evaluated parameters included T1-tilt, clavicle angle (CA), coronal balance (CB), lumbar modifier, and Cobb angles in the proximal thoracic (C-PT), thoracic, and thoracolumbar regions. Measurements from 2 experienced physicians on 100 preoperative AP full spine X-rays of AIS patients were used as ground truth and to evaluate inter-rater and intra-rater reliability. The agreement between human raters and AI was compared by means of single measure Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (ICC; absolute agreement; >.75 rated as excellent), mean error and additional statistical metrics.

RESULTS

The comparison between human raters resulted in excellent ICC values for intra- (range: .97-1) and inter-rater (.85-.99) reliability. The algorithm was able to determine all parameters in 100% of images with excellent ICC values (.78-.98). Consistently with the human raters, ICC values were typically smallest for C-PT (eg, rater 1A vs AI: .78, mean error: 4.7°) and largest for CB (.96, -.5 mm) as well as CA (.98, .2°).

CONCLUSIONS

The AI-algorithm shows excellent reliability and agreement with human raters for coronal parameters in preoperative full spine images. The reliability and speed offered by the AI-algorithm could contribute to the efficient analysis of large datasets (eg, registry studies) and measurements in clinical practice.

Spine surgeon versus AI algorithm full-length radiographic measurements: a validation study of complex adult spinal deformity patients

INTRODUCTION

Spinal measurements play an integral role in surgical planning for a variety of spine procedures. Full-length imaging eliminates distortions that can occur with stitched images. However, these images take radiologists significantly longer to read than conventional radiographs. Artificial intelligence (AI) image analysis software that can make such measurements quickly and reliably would be advantageous to surgeons, radiologists, and the entire health system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for this study. Preoperative full-length standing anterior-posterior and lateral radiographs of patients that were previously measured by fellowship-trained spine surgeons at our institution were obtained. The measurements included lumbar lordosis (LL), greatest coronal Cobb angle (GCC), pelvic incidence (PI), coronal balance (CB), and T1-pelvic angle (T1PA). Inter-rater intra-class correlation (ICC) values were calculated based on an overlapping sample of 10 patients measured by surgeons. Full-length standing radiographs of an additional 100 patients were provided for AI software training. The AI algorithm then measured the radiographs and ICC values were calculated.

RESULTS

ICC values for inter-rater reliability between surgeons were excellent and calculated to 0.97 for LL (95% CI 0.88-0.99), 0.78 (0.33-0.94) for GCC, 0.86 (0.55-0.96) for PI, 0.99 for CB (0.93-0.99), and 0.95 for T1PA (0.82-0.99). The algorithm computed the five selected parameters with ICC values between 0.70 and 0.94, indicating excellent reliability. Exemplary for the comparison of AI and surgeons, the ICC for LL was 0.88 (95% CI 0.83-0.92) and 0.93 for CB (0.90-0.95). GCC, PI, and T1PA could be determined with ICC values of 0.81 (0.69-0.87), 0.70 (0.60-0.78), and 0.94 (0.91-0.96) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The AI algorithm presented here demonstrates excellent reliability for most of the parameters and good reliability for PI, with ICC values corresponding to measurements conducted by experienced surgeons. In future, it may facilitate the analysis of large data sets and aid physicians in diagnostics, pre-operative planning, and post-operative quality control.

Deep learning algorithm for fully automated measurement of sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity

AIM

Deep learning (DL) algorithms can be used for automated analysis of medical imaging. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of an innovative, fully automated DL algorithm for analysis of sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity (ASD).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Sagittal balance (sacral slope, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, lumbar lordosis and sagittal vertical axis) was evaluated in 141 preoperative and postoperative radiographs of patients with ASD. The DL, landmark-based measurements, were compared with the ground truth values from validated manual measurements.

RESULTS

The DL algorithm showed an excellent consistency with the ground truth measurements. The intra-class correlation coefficient between the DL and ground truth measurements was 0.71-0.99 for preoperative and 0.72-0.96 for postoperative measurements. The DL detection rate was 91.5% and 84% for preoperative and postoperative images, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study evaluating a complete automated DL algorithm for analysis of sagittal balance with high accuracy for all evaluated parameters. The excellent accuracy in the challenging pathology of ASD with long construct instrumentation demonstrates the eligibility and possibility for implementation in clinical routine.

AI-Driven Segmentation and Automated Analysis of the Whole Sagittal Spine from X-ray Images for Spinopelvic Parameter Evaluation

Spinal-pelvic parameters are utilized in orthopedics for assessing patients' curvature and body alignment in diagnosing, treating, and planning surgeries for spinal and pelvic disorders. Segmenting and autodetecting the whole spine from lateral radiographs is challenging. Recent efforts have employed deep learning techniques to automate the segmentation and analysis of whole-spine lateral radiographs. This study aims to develop an artificial intelligence (AI)-based deep learning approach for the automated segmentation, alignment, and measurement of spinal-pelvic parameters through whole-spine lateral radiographs. We conducted the study on 932 annotated images from various spinal pathologies. Using a deep learning (DL) model, anatomical landmarks of the cervical, thoracic, lumbar vertebrae, sacrum, and femoral head were automatically distinguished. The algorithm was designed to measure 13 radiographic alignment and spinal-pelvic parameters from the whole-spine lateral radiographs. Training data comprised 748 digital radiographic (DR) X-ray images, while 90 X-ray images were used for validation. Another set of 90 X-ray images served as the test set. Inter-rater reliability between orthopedic spine specialists, orthopedic residents, and the DL model was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The segmentation accuracy for anatomical landmarks was within an acceptable range (median error: 1.7-4.1 mm). The inter-rater reliability between the proposed DL model and individual experts was fair to good for measurements of spinal curvature characteristics (all ICC values > 0.62). The developed DL model in this study demonstrated good levels of inter-rater reliability for predicting anatomical landmark positions and measuring radiographic alignment and spinal-pelvic parameters. Automated segmentation and analysis of whole-spine lateral radiographs using deep learning offers a promising tool to enhance accuracy and efficiency in orthopedic diagnostics and treatments.

Analysis of sagittal parameters for easier and more accurate determination of cervical spine alignment

Cross-sectional comparative study. This study aimed to analyze the role of cervical parameters, in terms of the perception process, when evaluating cervical sagittal balance on an X-ray image. Reports on the role of cervical parameters in the perception of cervical sagittal balance have not been made. The study included 4 board-certified neurosurgeons and 6 residents of a neurosurgical department. They were instructed to answer a total of 40 questions. The parameter that was the most helpful in deriving the answer was checked. The correct answer rate, dependency on the parameter, and correct answer contribution of the parameter were analyzed. Among the various parameters, 5 parameters [C2-7 angle (C2-7A), T1 slope minus cervical lordosis (T1s-CL), C2 slope (C2s), C7 slope (C7s), and C2-7 sagittal vertical axis) were selected. The simple parameter (C2s, C7s) has a higher dependency and correct answer contribution than the complex parameter (C2-7A, T1s-CL). The angular (C2-7A, T1s-CL, C2s, C7s) parameters have a higher dependency; however, both the length and angular parameters correct answer contribution were similar. The cervical parameters that have simpler properties were highly preferred and had a lower perception error.

Automatic Calculation of Cervical Spine Parameters Using Deep Learning: Development and Validation on an External Dataset

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective data analysis.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to develop a deep learning model for the automatic calculation of some important spine parameters from lateral cervical radiographs.

METHODS

We collected two datasets from two different institutions. The first dataset of 1498 images was used to train and optimize the model to find the best hyperparameters while the second dataset of 79 images was used as an external validation set to evaluate the robustness and generalizability of our model. The performance of the model was assessed by calculating the median absolute errors between the model prediction and the ground truth for the following parameters: T1 slope, C7 slope, C2-C7 angle, C2-C6 angle, Sagittal Vertical Axis (SVA), C0-C2, Redlund-Johnell distance (RJD), the cranial tilting (CT) and the craniocervical angle (CCA).

RESULTS

Regarding the angles, we found median errors of 1.66° (SD 2.46°), 1.56° (1.95°), 2.46° (SD 2.55), 1.85° (SD 3.93°), 1.25° (SD 1.83°), .29° (SD .31°) and .67° (SD .77°) for T1 slope, C7 slope, C2-C7, C2-C6, C0-C2, CT, and CCA respectively. As concerns the distances, we found median errors of .55 mm (SD .47 mm) and .47 mm (.62 mm) for SVA and RJD respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this work, we developed a model that was able to accurately predict cervical spine parameters from lateral cervical radiographs. In particular, the performances on the external validation set demonstrate the robustness and the high degree of generalizability of our model on images acquired in a different institution.

PreOperative Planning for Adult Spinal Deformity Goals: Level Selection and Alignment Goals

Adult Spinal Deformity (ASD) is a complex pathologic condition with significant impact on quality of life, including pain, loss of function, and fatigue. Achieving realignment goals is crucial for long-term results. Reliable preoperative planning strategies, including nomograms, measurement tools, and level selection, are key to maximizing the likelihood of achieving a good outcome following ASD corrective surgery. This review covers recent literature on such strategies, including review of the different targets for realignment and their association with outcomes (both patients-reported outcomes and complications), selection of upper and lower instrumented vertebrae, and the latest innovation in preoperative planning for deformity surgery.

Proximal Junctional Failure in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: An In-depth Review

Adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery aims to correct abnormal spinal curvature in adults, leading to improved functionality and reduced pain. However, this surgery is associated with various complications, one of which is proximal junctional failure (PJF). PJF can have a significant impact on a patient's quality of life, necessitating a comprehensive understanding of its causes and the development of effective management strategies. This review aims to provide an in-depth understanding of PJF in ASD surgery. PJF is a complex complication resulting from a multitude of factors including patient characteristics, surgical techniques, and postoperative management. Age, osteoporosis, overcorrection of sagittal alignment, and poor bone quality are identified as significant risk factors. The clinical implications of PJF are substantial, often requiring revision surgery and causing a considerable decrease in patients' quality of life. Prevention strategies include careful preoperative planning, appropriate patient selection, and optimization of surgical techniques. Treatment often necessitates a multifaceted approach, including surgical intervention and the management of underlying risk factors. Predictive modeling is an emerging field that may offer a promising avenue for the risk stratification of patients and individualized preventive strategies. A thorough understanding of PJF's pathogenesis, risk factors, and clinical implications is essential for surgeons involved in ASD surgery. Current preventive measures and treatment strategies aim to mitigate the risk and manage the complications of PJF, but the complication cannot be entirely prevented. Future research should focus on the development of more effective preventive and treatment strategies, and predictive models could be valuable in this pursuit.

Performance of a deep convolutional neural network for MRI-based vertebral body measurements and insufficiency fracture detection

OBJECTIVES

The aim is to validate the performance of a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) for vertebral body measurements and insufficiency fracture detection on lumbar spine MRI.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included 1000 vertebral bodies in 200 patients (age 75.2 ± 9.8 years) who underwent lumbar spine MRI at multiple institutions. 160/200 patients had ≥ one vertebral body insufficiency fracture, 40/200 had no fracture. The performance of the DCNN and that of two fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologists in vertebral body measurements (anterior/posterior height, extent of endplate concavity, vertebral angle) and evaluation for insufficiency fractures were compared. Statistics included (a) interobserver reliability metrics using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), kappa statistics, and Bland-Altman analysis, and (b) diagnostic performance metrics (sensitivity, specificity, accuracy). A statistically significant difference was accepted if the 95% confidence intervals did not overlap.

RESULTS

The inter-reader agreement between radiologists and the DCNN was excellent for vertebral body measurements, with ICC values of > 0.94 for anterior and posterior vertebral height and vertebral angle, and good to excellent for superior and inferior endplate concavity with ICC values of 0.79-0.85. The performance of the DCNN in fracture detection yielded a sensitivity of 0.941 (0.903-0.968), specificity of 0.969 (0.954-0.980), and accuracy of 0.962 (0.948-0.973). The diagnostic performance of the DCNN was independent of the radiological institution (accuracy 0.964 vs. 0.960), type of MRI scanner (accuracy 0.957 vs. 0.964), and magnetic field strength (accuracy 0.966 vs. 0.957).

CONCLUSIONS

A DCNN can achieve high diagnostic performance in vertebral body measurements and insufficiency fracture detection on heterogeneous lumbar spine MRI.

KEY POINTS

• A DCNN has the potential for high diagnostic performance in measuring vertebral bodies and detecting insufficiency fractures of the lumbar spine.