Responsive neurostimulation for pediatric patients with drug-resistant epilepsy: a case series and review of the literature

Advancing thalamic neuromodulation in epilepsy: Bridging adult data to pediatric care

Thalamic neuromodulation has emerged as a treatment option for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) with widespread and/or undefined epileptogenic networks. While deep brain stimulation (DBS) and responsive neurostimulation (RNS) depth electrodes offer means for electrical stimulation of the thalamus in adult patients with DRE, the application of thalamic neuromodulation in pediatric epilepsy remains limited. To address this gap, the Neuromodulation Expert Collaborative was established within the Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium (PERC) Epilepsy Surgery Special Interest Group. In this expert review, existing evidence and recommendations for thalamic neuromodulation modalities using DBS and RNS are summarized, with a focus on the anterior (ANT), centromedian(CMN), and pulvinar nuclei of the thalamus. To-date, only DBS of the ANT is FDA approved for treatment of DRE in adult patients based on the results of the pivotal SANTE (Stimulation of the Anterior Nucleus of Thalamus for Epilepsy) study. Evidence for other thalamic neurmodulation indications and targets is less abundant. Despite the lack of evidence, positive responses to thalamic stimulation in adults with DRE have led to its off-label use in pediatric patients. Although caution is warranted due to differences between pediatric and adult epilepsy, the efficacy and safety of pediatric neuromodulation appear comparable to that in adults. Indeed, CMN stimulation is increasingly accepted for generalized and diffuse onset epilepsies, with recent completion of one randomized trial. There is also growing interest in using pulvinar stimulation for temporal plus and posterior quadrant epilepsies with one ongoing clinical trial in Europe. The future of thalamic neuromodulation holds promise for revolutionizing the treatment landscape of childhood epilepsy. Ongoing research, technological advancements, and collaborative efforts are poised to refine and improve thalamic neuromodulation strategies, ultimately enhancing the quality of life for children with DRE.

National 22-year epilepsy surgery landscape shows increasing open and minimally invasive pediatric epilepsy surgery

OBJECTIVES

A surgical "treatment gap" in pediatric epilepsy persists despite the demonstrated safety and effectiveness of surgery. For this reason, the national surgical landscape should be investigated such that an updated assessment may more appropriately guide health care efforts.

METHODS

In our retrospective cross-sectional observational study, the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was queried for individuals 0 to <18 years of age who had an International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). This cohort was then split into a medical group and a surgical group. The former was defined by ICD codes for -DRE without an accompanying surgical code, and the latter was defined by DRE and one of the following epilepsy surgeries: any open surgery; laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT); vagus nerve stimulation; or responsive neurostimulation (RNS) from 1998 to 2020. Demographic variables of age, gender, race, insurance type, hospital charge, and hospital characteristics were analyzed between surgical options. Continuous variables were analyzed with weight-adjusted quantile regression analysis, and categorical variables were analyzed by weight-adjusted counts with percentages and compared with weight-adjusted chi-square test results.

RESULTS

These data indicate an increase in epilepsy surgeries over a 22-year period, primarily due to a statistically significant increase in open surgery and a non-significant increase in minimally invasive techniques, such as LITT and RNS. There are significant differences in age, race, gender, insurance type, median household income, Elixhauser index, hospital setting, and size between the medical and surgical groups, as well as the procedure performed.

SIGNIFICANCE

An increase in open surgery and minimally invasive surgeries (LITT and RNS) account for the overall rise in pediatric epilepsy surgery over the last 22 years. A positive inflection point in open surgery is seen in 2005. Socioeconomic disparities exist between medical and surgical groups. Patient and hospital sociodemographics show significant differences between the procedure performed. Further efforts are required to close the surgical "treatment gap."

A pediatrician's guide to epilepsy surgery

Surgical intervention for epilepsy emerged in the second half of the 20th century as an important option for pediatric patients with medically refractory epilepsy. Both the number of patients undergoing epilepsy surgery and the available surgical procedures for epilepsy have expanded in the last 3 decades, and now range from surgical resection to neuromodulatory device placement1,2 Studies showing that many patients who would be excellent candidates for surgery are still not being offered appropriate interventions have prompted an interest in ensuring that all providers who see patients with epilepsy are aware of the options for epilepsy surgery to facilitate earlier referrals when medications have not been effective3 In this article, we will introduce the pediatrician to the process involved in determining epilepsy surgery candidacy and to surgical outcomes, with the goal of empowering pediatric providers to refer their medically refractory epilepsy patients to a pediatric epilepsy center.

Neurostimulation for childhood epilepsy

The experience with neurostimulation for childhood epilepsy is far less extensive than for adults. Nevertheless, the implementation of these techniques could be of great value, especially considering the detrimental effects of ongoing seizures on the developing brain. In this review, we discuss the available evidence for neurostimulation for childhood epilepsy. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is the most studied neurostimulation modality in children. Based on mostly retrospective, open-label studies, we can conclude that VNS has a similar safety and efficacy profile in children compared to adults. Although there is little available evidence for deep brain stimulation (DBS) and responsive neurostimulation (RNS) in children, both DBS and RNS show promise in reducing seizure frequency with few complications. The implementation of non-invasive techniques with a more appealing safety profile has gained interest. Small randomized control trials and open-label studies have investigated transcranial direct current simulation for childhood epilepsy, demonstrating promising but inconsistent findings.

Predictors of therapeutic response following thalamic neuromodulation for drug-resistant pediatric epilepsy: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis

We sought to perform a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis to identify predictors of treatment response following thalamic neuromodulation in pediatric patients with medically refractory epilepsy. Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Ovid, Embase, and Cochrane) were searched, with no language or data restriction, to identify studies reporting seizure outcomes in pediatric populations following deep brain stimulation (DBS) or responsive neurostimulation (RNS) implantation in thalamic nuclei. Studies featuring individual participant data of patients with primary or secondary generalized drug-resistant epilepsy were included. Response to therapy was defined as >50% reduction in seizure frequency from baseline. Of 417 citations, 21 articles reporting on 88 participants were eligible. Mean age at implantation was 13.07 ± 3.49 years. Fifty (57%) patients underwent DBS, and 38 (43%) RNS. Sixty (68%) patients were implanted in centromedian nucleus and 23 (26%) in anterior thalamic nucleus, and five (6%) had both targets implanted. Seventy-four (84%) patients were implanted bilaterally. The median time to last follow-up was 12 months (interquartile range = 6.75-26.25). Sixty-nine percent of patients achieved response to treatment. Age, target, modality, and laterality had no significant association with response in univariate logistic regression. Until thalamic neuromodulation gains widespread approval for use in pediatric patients, data on efficacy will continue to be limited to small retrospective cohorts and case series. The inherent bias of these studies can be overcome by using individual participant data. Thalamic neuromodulation appears to be a safe and effective treatment for epilepsy. Larger, prolonged prospective, multicenter studies are warranted to further evaluate the efficacy of DBS over RNS in this patient population where resection for curative intent is not a safe option.

Pediatric Neurostimulation and Practice Evolution

Since the late nineteenth century, the prevailing view of epilepsy surgery has been to identify a seizure focus in a medically refractory patient and eradicate it. Sadly, only a select number of the many who suffer from uncontrolled seizures benefit from this approach. With the development of safe, efficient stereotactic methods and targeted surgical therapies that can affect deep structures and modulate broad networks in diverse disorders, epilepsy surgery in children has undergone a paradigmatic evolutionary change. With modern diagnostic techniques such as stereo electroencephalography combined with closed loop neuromodulatory systems, pediatric epilepsy surgery can reach a much broader population of underserved patients.

Responsive neurostimulation for treatment of pediatric refractory epilepsy: A pooled analysis of the literature

BACKGROUND

Drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) is a complex medical condition often requiring resective surgery and/or some form of neurostimulation. In recent years responsive neurostimulation (RNS) has shown promising results in adult DRE, however there is a paucity of information regarding outcomes of RNS among pediatric patients treated with DRE. In this individual patient data meta-analysis (IPDMA) we seek to elucidate the effects RNS has on the pediatric population.

METHODS

Literature regarding management of pediatric DRE via RNS was reviewed in accordance with individual patient data meta-analysis guidelines. Four databases were searched with keywords ((Responsive neurostimulation) AND (epilepsy)) through December of 2022. From 1624 retrieved full text studies, 15 were ultimately included affording a pool of 98 individual participants.

RESULTS

The median age at implantation was 14 years (n = 95) with 42% of patients having undergone prior resective epilepsy surgery, 18% with prior vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), and 1% with prior RNS. At a median follow up time 12 months, median percent seizure reduction was 75% with 57% of patients achieving Engel Class < 2 outcome, 9.7% of which achieved seizure freedom. We report a postoperative complication rate of 8.4%, half of which were device-related infections. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-negative cases were negatively associated with magnitude of seizure reduction, and direct targeting techniques were associated with stronger treatment response when compared to other methods.

CONCLUSIONS

This review suggests RNS to be an effective treatment modality for pediatric patients with a postoperative complication rate comparable to that of RNS in adults. Investigation of prognostic clinical variables should be undertaken to augment patient selection. Last, multi-institutional prospective study of long-term effects of RNS on pediatric patients would stand to benefit clinicians in the management of pediatric DRE.

The Utility of Responsive Neurostimulation for the Treatment of Pediatric Drug-Resistant Epilepsy

Drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) has a strongly negative impact on quality of life, as well as the development of pediatric patients. Surgical treatments have evolved over time, including more invasive craniotomies for resection or disconnection. More recently, neuromodulation techniques have been employed as a less invasive option for patients. Responsive neurostimulation (RNS) is the first closed-loop technology that allows for both treatment and device data collection, which allows for an internal assessment of the efficacy of treatment. This novel technology has been approved in adults and has been used off label in pediatrics. This review seeks to describe this technology, its history, and future directions.