The evolution of endovascular treatment for intracranial arteriovenous malformations

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the cerebrovascular space: essential domains for readers

INTRODUCTION

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (SRMAs) in neurosurgery have significantly increased. With approximately 1 million patients affected by cerebrovascular disease annually, interpreting SRMAs necessitates a systematic approach. The objective of this review is to identify and describe four essential domains for SRMA interpretation.

METHODS

This review outlines the necessities of reviewing existing literature and methodological frameworks essential for interpreting cerebrovascular neurosurgery SRMAs. Each domain is to accurately assess study design variations, heterogeneity assessment methods, outcome comparability strategies, and the impact of technological advancements and time bias on study outcomes.

RESULTS

Study design evaluation distinguishes between randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies. RCTs provide high internal validity, but as seen in the ARUBA trial, can contain internal flaws that necessitate a deeper understanding before application to clinical practices. Non-randomized studies offer valuable real-world insights. A heterogeneity assessment involves readers and writers accurately using forest plots, Cochrane's Q test, Higgins I² statistics, subgroup analysis, and meta-regressions to understand a study's clinical findings. The expertise thresholds, as in the NASCET trial, significantly impact a study's external validity. Strategies such as the GRADE approach can assist in managing diverse outcome measures. Technological advancements, particularly in endovascular procedures and SRS, influence the accuracy of comparing studies across periods, and thus swiftly outdate older studies, lowering the applicability of SRMAs.

CONCLUSION

Effective interpretation of cerebrovascular neurosurgery SRMAs requires attention to study design, heterogeneity, outcome comparability, and technological advancements. These domains collectively enable evidence-based clinical decision-making and optimized patient care in a dynamic field.

History of Neurointervention

In this review article, we aim to provide a summary of the discoveries and developments that were instrumental in the evolution of the Neurointerventional field. We begin with developments in the advent of Diagnostic Cerebral Angiography and progress to cerebral aneurysm treatment, embolization in AVMs and ischemic stroke treatment. In the process we discuss many persons who were key in the development and maturation of the field. A pivotal aspect to rapid growth in the field has been the multidisciplinary involvement of the different neuroscience specialties and therefore we close out our discussion with excitement about ongoing and future developments in the field with a focus on treatments in the non-cerebrovascular disease realm.

Developmental outcomes for neonatal dural arteriovenous fistulas

Large dural arteriovenous malformations (DAVMs) accompanied by cardiac failure usually carry a poor prognosis with a high risk of morbidity and death. The authors report on the case of a male neonate with a massive DAVM who presented at birth with macrocephaly and high-output cardiac failure. The child initially underwent treatment with surgical clipping of the large main feeding artery. Hydrocephalus, thought to be due to venous hypertension, developed when the boy was 8 months old. The condition resolved after interventional embolization treatment. The patient did not require placement of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt. At 21 months of age, the child had near normal development without any focal neurological deficits.

Treatment of arteriovenous malformations with hydrocoils in a Swine model

SUMMARY

Arteriovenous malformations (AVM) of the brain are the most common symptomatic congenital vascular malformation of the central nervous system, with significant associated morbidity and mortality. This study compared the feasibility and efficacy of treating AVMs by embolization with hydrocoils with similar treatment with bare platinum coils, using the swine rete mirabile as a model. A right carotid-jugular fistula was created in ten swine.A microcatheter was positioned into the rete mirabile, which was unilaterally (contralateral to the fistula) embolized with hydrocoils in six and bare platinum coils in four swine. Angiograms were evaluated during and immediately after embolization. Embolization with complete cessation of bloodf low in the unilateral rete mirabile was achieved in all animals treated with hydrocoils. The number of coils needed varied from four to seven (diameter 2-4 mm; mean coil length 22.3 cm). Embolization with platinum coils of similar number (seven) and slightly longer length (mean 37.75 cm) had a minimal effect on blood flow, resulting in occlusion of only small compartments. No immediate complications were noted with either coil. Hydrocoils are more effective in achieving embolization than bare platinum coils. Expansion of the hydrocoil over only a few minutes allows precise placement and stabilization of the coil before detachment. Hydrocoilscan be safely placed into small vessels. This approach may be particularly useful to decrease the flow rate, as a first stage of AVM embolizationin high flow AVMs that contain arteriovenous fistulae.