Delayed posttraumatic falx granuloma in a child presenting with paraplegia

Bone Fragment Granuloma Mimicking a Brain Tumor Following Placement of an Intracranial Pressure Monitoring System

The placement of intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring system requires drilling an orifice in the skull. Bone fragments can accidentally be inserted into the brain parenchyma while introducing the ICP monitoring system during the procedure. An intracranial granuloma can be subsequently formed if a non-specific reaction is induced and maintained by the inserted bone fragment in the brain parenchyma. These intracranial granulomas may eventually be confused with brain masses on follow-up imaging studies. We present the case of a 65-year-old male who underwent cranial surgery secondary to a severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). An intracranial bolt was initially placed contralaterally to measure the ICP. Eleven years later, a granuloma from a retained bone fragment secondary to the intracranial bolt placement was suspected. The clinical course, radiological investigations, and differential diagnosis are presented.

[Granulomatous inflammation in the bed of resected cerebral cavernoma in a child, caused by a hemostatic agent]

OBJECTIVE

The study presents a clinical observation of foreign body granuloma, which is rare productive inflammation, developed on treatment with a hemostatic material upon removal of cerebral cavernoma.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A 4-year-old boy operated on for left parietal lobe cavernoma was diagnosed with a mass lesion during a follow-up MRI examination 4 months after surgery. The patient was re-operated in connection with suspected abscess formation. The pathological tissue was subjected to the histological and immunohistochemical examination.

RESULTS

Inflammation was accompanied by the formation of foreign body granulomas, and, in some areas, had immune nature with signs of focal destructive vasculitis, delayed maturation of the granulation tissue, and disturbance of the current organization and encapsulation processes. It is worth noting that granulomatous inflammation around a hemostatic material in the brain has no specific features during introscopy and mimics an abscess or tumor recurrence.

CONCLUSION

The use of hemostatic materials upon resection of cerebral cavernous malformations may cause formation of granuloma mimicking disease relapse or abscess in the long term period. To prevent granulomatous inflammation, removal of a hemostatic material, if possible, from the surgical field is recommended when reliable hemostasis is achieved.