Effect of naloxone on cerebral perfusion and cardiac performance during experimental cerebral ischemia

Randomized trial of Cervene, a kappa receptor-selective opioid antagonist, in acute ischemic stroke

The purpose of this randomized trial was to confirm drug safety and to obtain preliminary efficacy data on Cervene (nalmefene), an opioid antagonist with relative kappa receptor selectivity, for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Patients were treated for 24 hours with either intravenous Cervene (0.05 mg/kg as an initial infusion over 15 minutes and 0.01 mg/kg/h maintenance) or placebo within 6 hours of an ischemic stroke. Efficacy was assessed by comparing the change from baseline to day 7 in the National Institutes of Health stroke scale score (NIHSSS) and the Glasgow Outcome Scale and Barthel Index at 3 months. Forty-four evaluable patients were randomized (3:1) to Cervene (n = 34; treated at 5.0 +/- 0.9 hours after onset) and placebo (n = 10; treated at 4.6 +/- 1.5 hours). No deaths or serious adverse events reasonably attributable to Cervene have been reported. A "major improvement" (NHSSS > 4) was seen at day 7: placebo, 33% (three of nine patients) and Cervene, 66% (19 of 29 patients). Only patients with initial NIHSSS >/= 4 were considered evaluable for this primary endpoint. "Good recovery" at 3 months (Glasgow = 5) was as follows: placebo, 50% (5 of 10 patients) and Cervene, 73% (24 of 33 patients). The death rate at 3 months was placebo, 20% (2 of 10 patients) and Cervene, 9.1% (3 of 33 patients). One patient was lost to follow-up. In conclusion, results from this randomized trial suggest that Cervene is safe, tolerable, and may be beneficial in the treatment of acute stroke patients.

Clinical trials for cytoprotection in stroke

To date, many cytoprotective drugs have reached the stage of pivotal phase 3 efficacy trials in acute stroke patients. (Table 1) Unfortunately, throughout the neuroprotective literature, the phrase "failure to demonstrate efficacy" prevails as a common thread among the many neutral or negative trials, despite the largely encouraging results encountered in preclinical studies. The reasons for this discrepancy are multiple, and have been discussed by Dr. Zivin in his review. Many of the recent trials have addressed deficiencies of the previous ones with more rigorous trial design, including more specific patient selection criteria (ensure homogeneity of stroke location and severity), stratified randomization algorithms (time-to-treat), narrowed therapeutic time-window and pharmacokinetic monitoring. Current trials have also incorporated biologic surrogate markers of toxicity and outcome such as drug levels and neuroimaging. Lastly, multi-modal therapies and coupled cytoprotection/reperfusion strategies are being investigated to optimize tissue salvage. This review will focus on individual therapeutic strategies and we will emphasize what we have learned from these trials both in terms of trial design and the biologic effect (or lack thereof) of these agents.

Cervene (Nalmefene) in acute ischemic stroke : final results of a phase III efficacy study. The Cervene Stroke Study Investigators

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The goals of the present study were to assess the efficacy and safety of nalmefene (Cervene) in patients with acute (< or =6 hours) ischemic stroke and to investigate the safety of combined recombinant tissue plasminogen activator and nalmefene in a separate subset of patients. Nalmefene, an opioid antagonist with relative kappa receptor selectivity, has shown neuroprotective effects in multiple experimental central nervous system injury and ischemic models. Results from an earlier phase II study in patients with acute ischemic stroke suggested that nalmefene was safe and tolerable and may be effective for patients <70 years old.

METHODS

This investigation was a phase III, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized study of a 24-hour infusion of nalmefene. Patients with acute ischemic stroke who had an onset of symptoms within 6 hours and a baseline score of > or =4 on the NIH Stroke Scale were randomized to receive either 60 mg nalmefene administered as a 10-mg bolus over 15 minutes and then a 50-mg infusion over 23.75 hours or placebo. The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of patients achieving a score of > or =60 on the Barthel Index and a rating of "moderate disability" or better on the Glasgow Outcome Scale at 12 weeks. Assessments were performed at baseline (predose), hours 12 and 24, days 2 and 7, and week 12.

RESULTS

A total of 368 patients were randomized at 42 centers, including 32 patients treated with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator and study drug. Nalmefene was well tolerated. Overall, there was no significant difference in 3-month functional outcome for nalmefene treatment compared with placebo on any of the planned analyses. A prospective secondary analysis also failed to find a treatment effect in patients <70 years old.

CONCLUSIONS

Although nalmefene appears to be safe and well tolerated, this study failed to find any treatment benefit in stroke patients treated within 6 hours.

Cervene in acute ischemic stroke: Results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-comparison study

Cervene (nalmefene), an opioid antagonist with relative kappa receptor selectivity, has shown neuroprotective effects in multiple experimental central nervous system injury and ischemic models. The agent already has a well-established safety profile in various clinical indications. Results from an earlier pilot study in 44 acute stroke patients suggest that Cervene administered by 24-hour maintenance infusion was safe and tolerable. The primary and secondary objectives of the current study were to assess the dose-related safety and preliminary efficacy of Cervene in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

METHODS

The present investigation was a Phase II, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized, dose-comparison, parallel-group study of a 24-hour administration of Cervene injection. Patients with acute ischemic stroke, onset of symptoms within 6 hours, and baseline score > or =4 on the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) were randomized to 1 of 4 treatment groups: Cervene 6 mg, 20 mg, 60 mg or placebo. The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of patients achieving a score of > or =60 on the Barthel Index and a rating of "moderate disability" or better on the Glasgow Outcome Scale at 12 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 312 patients were randomized at 28 centers. All doses of Cervene were well tolerated. Overall, there was no significant difference in 3-month functional outcome for any dose of Cervene treatment compared with placebo. However, a prospective secondary analysis showed that both male and female patients less than age 70 years may have had an improved 3-month outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that the competitive kappa receptor opiate antagonist Cervene can be given safely to acute stroke patients at doses up to 60 mg/24 hr. Although overall there was no significant difference in the 3-month outcome, Cervene treatment may be associated with improved outcomes for patients younger than age 70.

High dose naloxone does not improve cerebral or myocardial blood flow during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in pigs

In a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial we tested the hypothesis that naloxone given during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) enhances cerebral and myocardial blood flow. Twenty-one anesthetized, normoventilated pigs were instrumented for measurements of right atrial and aortic pressures, and regional organ blood flow (radiolabeled microspheres). After 5 min of untreated fibrillatory arrest, CPR was commenced using a pneumatic chest compressor/ventilator. With onset of CPR, an i.v. bolus of 40 micrograms/kg b.w. of epinephrine was given, followed by an infusion of 0.4 micrograms/kg per min. After 5 min of CPR, either naloxone, 10 mg/kg b.w. (group N, n = 11) or normal saline (group S, n = 10) was given i.v. Prior to, and after 1, 15, and 30 min of CPR, hemodynamic and blood flow measurements were obtained. After 30 min of CPR, mean arterial pressure was significantly higher in group N (26 +/- 5 vs. 13 +/- 3 mmHg, P < 0.05). Groups did not differ with respect to myocardial perfusion pressure or arterial blood gases at any time during the observation period. Regional brain and heart blood flows were not different between N and S at any point of measurement. We conclude that high-dose naloxone does not augment cerebral or myocardial blood flow during prolonged closed-chest CPR.

The partial mu opiate agonist buprenorphine protects a sub-population of thalamic reticular neurons following cardiac arrest in rats

Extensive loss of neurons occurs from the middle region of the thalamic reticular nucleus (RT) in rats resuscitated after 10 min of cardiac arrest. Administration of the partial mu opiate agonist buprenorphine 45 min after resuscitation produces a small but significant increase in spared neurons along the medial and lateral margins of the middle RT, regions where mu receptors have been localized. Systemic administration of mu agonists may augment endogenous opiate mechanisms that contribute to the relative ischemic resistance of subpopulations of RT neurons.

Reversal of neurological deficit with naloxone: an additional report

We report the repeated improvement in neurological function following naloxone administration in a patient who developed acute hemiplegia after an intracranial neurological procedure. The mechanisms responsible for the neurological deficit and for its reversal by naloxone are discussed. A review of the literature suggests that the beneficial effect of naloxone can result from an improvement in haemodynamic status or from metabolic effects that could be favorable during cerebral ischaemia.

Alterations in Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase activity and beta-endorphin content in acute ischemic brain with and without naloxone treatment

The Na(+)-K(+)-adenosine triphosphatase (Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase) activity and beta-endorphin immunoreactivity were determined in rat brain at the acute stage of ischemia produced by unilateral occlusion of the middle cerebral artery (MCA). The effect of pretreatment with naloxone on these activities was also evaluated in the same model. After MCA occlusion, Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase activity was promptly reduced in the ischemic hemisphere and remained at a lower level than in the contralateral hemisphere during 90 minutes of ischemia. A single intraperitoneal 0.5-mg injection of naloxone prior to MCA occlusion attenuated the inactivation. On the other hand, beta-endorphin immunoreactivity was significantly increased following ischemia. The increase was marked in the ischemic hemisphere and was also observed in the contralateral hemisphere; this increase was not affected by the administration of naloxone. These results indicate the possibility that naloxone contributes to protecting the brain from ischemia through stabilizing the cellular membrane. The possible mechanism by which naloxone attenuates the inactivation of Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase in the ischemic brain is discussed in view of alterations of the central beta-endorphin system during ischemia.

The effects of naloxone on cerebral blood flow and cerebral function during relative cerebral ischemia

CBF and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) were measured in a model of moderate cerebral ischemia in anesthetized spontaneously hypertensive rats. The rats were bled to reduce SEP amplitudes to about 50% of prebleeding control. The consequent blood pressure fall reduced CBF to 77% of control as measured by the laser-Doppler technique. Naloxone (5 mg kg-1 i.v. plus 25 mg kg-1 h-1 i.v. for 30 min) caused a significant increase in SEP amplitudes, while CBF did not change significantly. In addition, the latency of the first SEP component decreased toward prebleeding values. Heart rate (HR) decreased, but MABP was held constant by a pressure-regulating reservoir. In unbled rats, naloxone (5 mg kg-1 i.v.) caused a transient small increase in MABP and SEP amplitudes and decrease in HR. These results indicate that sensory input is regulated by opioid systems. Increased opioid activity may inhibit ascending sensory pathways during relative cerebral ischemia and thereby depress SEP responses. Thus, naloxone can release this inhibition and enhances SEP independently of CBF during relative cerebral ischemia. Similar mechanisms might explain the apparently beneficial effects of naloxone in some stroke models.

Intravenously and iontophoretically administered naloxone reverses ischemic changes in rat hippocampus

Forty rats under urethane anesthesia were subjected to cerebral ischemia by ligation of the right carotid, the right plus the left carotid, or the right carotid plus two vertebral arteries. Ischemia caused three types of changes in the field potential of the right hippocampal CA1 region evoked by fimbrial stimulation: 1) completely reversible deterioration (57% and 16% of the rats with unilateral and bilateral carotid artery ligation, respectively), 2) moderate deterioration (37% and 24% of the rats with unilateral and bilateral carotid artery ligation) and 3) irreversible loss of the evoked activity (6% and 60% of the rats with unilateral and bilateral carotid artery ligation and all the rats subjected to three-vessel occlusion). Naloxone improved the moderate deterioration in 10 of 11 rats (1-3 mg/kg i.v.) and in 15 of 16 (50-150 nA) iontophoretic applications, but naloxone did not restore the lost evoked activity. Intravenous morphine (10 mg/kg) aggravated the ischemic changes, and this effect was reversed by naloxone, while iontophoretic administration of morphine caused only excitation. These findings suggest that naloxone has a favorable effect on cerebral ischemia not severe enough to cause transmission failure. The reversal of ischemic changes by iontophoretic naloxone indicates that its site of action is at the neuronal or microcirculatory level.

Effect of opiate antagonists on middle cerebral artery occlusion infarct in the rat

The authors examined the effect of the opiate antagonists naloxone and thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) on neurological outcome and the size of areas of cerebral infarction in a rat model of focal cerebral ischemia. The middle cerebral artery (MCA) was permanently occluded in 66 adult Sprague-Dawley rats. The rats were randomly divided into three groups. In 20 Group I rats, TRH in normal saline was administered initially as a 2-mg/kg bolus followed by continuous infusion of 2 mg/kg/hr for 4 hours. In 20 Group II rats, naloxone in normal saline was administered initially as a 2-mg/kg bolus followed by continuous infusion of 2-mg/kg/hr for 4 hours. In 26 Group III rats, physiological saline was administered as an initial 0.5-cc bolus followed by continuous infusion of 0.5 cc/hr for 4 hours. All solutions were given in volumes of 0.5 cc for the bolus and 0.5 cc/hr for continuous infusion, and all infusions were begun within 10 minutes of MCA occlusion. Twenty-four hours after treatment, the rats underwent a careful neurological examination and were then sacrificed immediately. The size of areas of cerebral infarction was evaluated using 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining techniques. The neurological grade of the rats correlated with the size of infarcted areas among all grades, irrespective of treatment (p less than 0.01). Neither naloxone nor TRH improved neurological function or reduced the size of infarction compared to saline-treated control rats. Treatment with TRH caused a significant increase in mean arterial blood pressure during infusion, but naloxone had no effect. These results suggest that neither TRH nor naloxone are effective in the treatment of acute focal cerebral ischemia.

Endogenous opiates: 1986

This is the ninth installment of our annual review of research involving the endogenous opiate peptides. It is restricted to the non-analgesic and behavioral studies of the opiate peptides published in 1986. The specific topics this year include stress; tolerance and dependence; eating; drinking; gastrointestinal, renal, and hepatic processes; mental illness; learning, memory, and reward; cardiovascular responses; respiration and thermoregulation; seizures and other neurological disorders; activity; sex, pregnancy, and development; and some other behaviors.