Stereotactic biopsy of nonpolar tumors in the dominant hemisphere: a prospective study of effects on language functions

Tumor-related neurocognitive dysfunction in patients with diffuse glioma: a systematic review of neurocognitive functioning prior to anti-tumor treatment

Deficits in neurocognitive functioning (NCF) frequently occur in glioma patients. Both treatment and the tumor itself contribute to these deficits. Data about the role of the tumor are scarce, because NCF has mostly been studied postoperatively. We aimed to summarize data on pre-treatment NCF in glioma patients and to determine the overall and domain-specific prevalence of neurocognitive dysfunction. We searched PubMed and Embase according to PRISMA-P protocol for studies that evaluated pre-treatment NCF in glioma patients (1995-November 2016) and extracted information about NCF. We performed analysis of data for two main outcome measures; mean cognitive functioning of the study sample (at group level) and the percentage of impaired patients (at individual level). We included 23 studies. Most studies were small observational prospective cohort studies. In 11 (47.5%) studies, patient selection was based on tumor location. NCF was analyzed at the group level in 14 studies, of which 13 (92.9%) found decreased NCF at group level, compared to normative data or matched controls. The proportion of individuals with decreased NCF was reported in 15 studies. NCF was impaired (in any domain) in 62.6% of the individuals (median; interquartile range 31.0–79.0). Cognitive impairments were more common in patients with high-grade glioma than with low-grade glioma (OR 2.50; 95% CI 1.71–3.66). Cognitive impairment occurs in the majority of treatment-naive glioma patients, suggesting that neurocognitive dysfunction is related to the tumor. However, the literature about pre-treatment NCF in glioma patients is characterized by small-scale studies and strong heterogeneity in patient selection, resulting in high risk of bias.

Glioma surgery in eloquent areas: can we preserve cognition?

BACKGROUND

Cognitive preservation is crucial in glioma surgery, as it is an important aspect of daily life functioning. Several studies claimed that surgery in eloquent areas is possible without causing severe cognitive damage. However, this conclusion was relatively ungrounded due to the lack of extensive neuropsychological testing in homogenous patient groups. In this study, we aimed to elucidate the short-term and long-term effects of glioma surgery on cognition by identifying all studies who conducted neuropsychological tests preoperatively and postoperatively in glioma patients.

METHODS

We systematically searched the electronical databases Embase, Medline OvidSP, Web of Science, PsychINFO OvidSP, PubMed, Cochrane, Google Scholar, Scirius and Proquest aimed at cognitive performance in glioma patients preoperatively and postoperatively.

RESULTS

We included 17 studies with tests assessing the cognitive domains: language, memory, attention, executive functions and/or visuospatial abilities. Language was the domain most frequently examined. Immediately postoperatively, all studies except one, found deterioration in one or more cognitive domains. In the longer term (3-6/6-12 months postoperatively), the following tests showed both recovery and deterioration compared with the preoperative level: naming and verbal fluency (language), verbal word learning (memory) and Trailmaking B (executive functions).

CONCLUSIONS

Cognitive recovery to the preoperative level after surgery is possible to a certain extent; however, the results are too arbitrary to draw definite conclusions and not all studies investigated all cognitive domains. More studies with longer postoperative follow-up with tests for cognitive change are necessary for a better understanding of the conclusive effects of glioma surgery on cognition.

Effects of resective surgery for left-sided intracranial tumours on language function: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

Although language disorders occur in about 50% of patients with a left hemispheric tumour and are a significant cause of morbidity, the effects of resective neurosurgery and their relation to tumour pathology are unclear. We report the immediate effects of resective surgery on language functions in a heterogeneous group of patients with left-sided intracranial tumours.

METHODS

40 patients were studied. The Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) and Boston Naming Test (BNT) were administered preoperatively and before discharge following resective neurosurgery. Dexamethasone dose at time of testing was recorded, as was time taken to complete the tests, and tumour neuropathology.

FINDINGS

15 patients with normal aphasia quotients and language quotients before resective surgery all had normal quotients postoperatively. 25 who were dysphasic (ie, aphasia quotient <93.8) preoperatively showed significant postoperative improvements in both their mean aphasia quotient (from 81.8 to 89.1, p=0.004) and their mean language quotient (from 73.4 to 85.4, p=0.001), though 13 remained dysphasic. Two of the 25 dysphasic patients had their WAB scores lowered by tumour resection. The findings and postoperative changes in BNT scores were almost identical to the pattern of those in WAB scores. At second assessment, dexamethasone therapy was significantly (p<0.01) lower than preoperative dose (reduction from mean 10.3 mg/day to 0.7 mg/day in the dysphasic group). Patients with glioblastoma were more likely to have lower aphasia quotients, language quotients, and BNT scores than patients with anaplastic glioma, metastasis, or meningioma. Although the glioblastoma group had the greatest improvements in WAB operative scores, 57% remained dysphasic after resective surgery. Two additional patients declined postoperative assessment.

INTERPRETATION

Resective surgery for left-sided intracranial tumours significantly improves language function in dysphasic patients, and is unlikely to impair language functions in non-dysphasic patients. Dysphasia and its response to resective surgery are related to the tumour neuropathology.