1
|
Gupta S, Agrawal D, Kedia S, Kale SS. Should post-operative stereotactic radiosurgery be the standard of care in Craniopharyngioma patients? World Neurosurg X 2024; 22:100327. [PMID: 38455244 PMCID: PMC10918274 DOI: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2024.100327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Saurabh Gupta
- Department of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Deepak Agrawal
- Department of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Shweta Kedia
- Department of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Shashank Sharad Kale
- Department of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kamogawa M, Shuto T, Matsunaga S. Effects of two different radiotherapies for craniopharyngiomas using stereotactic radiosurgery/ stereotactic radiotherapy or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. Surg Neurol Int 2022; 13:563. [PMID: 36600746 PMCID: PMC9805634 DOI: 10.25259/sni_802_2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Numerous studies have reported about good tumor control with both stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) for residual and recurrent craniopharyngiomas, but no studies have reported on the appropriate use of different types of radiation modalities. This study aimed to report the outcomes of SRS/stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) or FSRT and compare tumor control in a single center. Methods From 2014 when TrueBeamTM STx with Novalis was introduced in our hospital to 2021, 21 patients underwent SRS/SRT or FSRT with gamma knife surgery (GKS) and Novalis. We have selected the radiation modalities considering mainly the distance of the optic nerve and chiasm. Imaging and clinical follow-up data were sent and reviewed. Results The mean age was 52 years and there were 11 men. Of the 21 total patients, three experienced SRS (GKS, 50% isodose 12-15 Gy), five underwent SRT (GKS or Novalis, 19.5-24 Gy 3 fractions), and 13 patients underwent FSRT (Novalis, 54 Gy 30 fractions). The median follow-up was 32.6 (range 17-44) months after SRS/SRT and 34.0 (range 4-61) months after FSRT. In the SRS/SRT group, the mean tumor volume decreased from 1.103 to 0.131 cm3 (P < 0.01), and in the FSRT group, from 3.015 to 1.012 cm3 (P < 0.01). No radiation-induced optic neuropathy and other acute toxicity occurred. Conclusion Craniopharyngioma can be expected to have very good tumor control by selecting SRS/SRT or FSRT depending on the distance between the optic nerve and the tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Misaki Kamogawa
- Corresponding author: Misaki Kamogawa, Department of Neurosurgery, Yokohama Rosai Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hong CS, Omay SB. The Role of Surgical Approaches in the Multi-Modal Management of Adult Craniopharyngiomas. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:1408-1421. [PMID: 35323318 PMCID: PMC8947636 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29030118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2022] [Revised: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Craniopharyngiomas are rare, benign primary brain tumors that arise from remnants of the craniopharyngeal duct epithelium within the sellar and suprasellar region. Despite their benign biology, they may cause significant morbidity, secondary to involvement of nearby eloquent neural structures, such as the pituitary gland, hypothalamus, and optic apparatus. Historically, aggressive surgical resection was the treatment goal to minimize risk of tumor recurrence via open transcranial midline, anterolateral, and lateral approaches, but could lead to clinical sequela of visual, endocrine, and hypothalamic dysfunction. However, recent advances in the endoscopic endonasal approach over the last decade have mostly supplanted transcranial surgery as the optimal surgical approach for these tumors. With viable options for adjuvant radiation therapy, targeted medical treatment, and alternative minimally invasive surgical approaches, the management paradigm for craniopharyngiomas has shifted from aggressive open resection to more minimally invasive but maximally safe resection, emphasizing quality of life issues, particularly in regards to visual, endocrine, and hypothalamic function. This review provides an update on current multi-modal approaches for craniopharyngiomas, highlighting the modern surgical treatment paradigm for this disease entity.
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Craniopharyngiomas are difficult to treat because of their dense adherence to surrounding structures and the frequent presence of cysts which obscure the anatomy. The introduction of endonasal endoscopic approaches has enabled microsurgery to be performed without mortality. The high recurrence rate requires other forms of treatment of which GKNS has currently been shown to be perhaps the most effective. Difficulties include poorly visualized visual pathways despite which a high degree of tumor control is achievable with surprisingly little damage to vision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy C Ganz
- Department of Neurosurgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pikis S, Mantziaris G, Lavezzo K, Dabhi N, Sheehan J. Stereotactic radiosurgery for craniopharyngiomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2021; 163:3201-3207. [PMID: 34518903 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-021-04990-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The management of craniopharyngiomas is challenging, usually requiring multidisciplinary care. We evaluated the long-term clinical and radiologic outcomes of Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for craniopharyngiomas. METHODS This retrospective study involved patients managed with GKRS for a craniopharyngioma during the period of 1989 to 2019. Patient clinical and radiologic data, tumor characteristics, and procedural details were analyzed. RESULTS Thirty-eight consecutive patients (24 males; mean patient age at GKRS = 30.82 years [SD ± 20.45 years]) were treated with GKRS for craniopharyngioma. Overall survival rates at 5 and 10 years were 84.1% and 80.1%, respectively. Progression-free survival at 5 years was 48.1%, and, at 10 years, it was 29.8%. Risk factors for post-GKRS clinical deterioration were increasing number of isocenters used (p = 0.04 (HR1.32, CI 1-1.73)), increasing margin dose [p = 0.02 (HR1.52, CI 1.31-1.84)], and maximum dose > 35 Gy [p = 0.002 (HR1.35, CI 1.11-1.63)]. CONCLUSION Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) appears a safe and effective management option in selected craniopharyngioma patients. Increasing margin dose and maximum dose > 35 Gy are associated with an increased risk for post-SRS neurologic deficit. Further, well-designed studies are necessary to determine the optimal timing and SRS parameters and to identify which patients with craniopharyngioma will benefit the most from SRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stylianos Pikis
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Box 800212, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA
| | - Georgios Mantziaris
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Karen Lavezzo
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Nisha Dabhi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Jason Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Box 800212, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Albano L, Losa M, Barzaghi LR, Niranjan A, Siddiqui Z, Flickinger JC, Lunsford LD, Mortini P. Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Pituitary Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13194998. [PMID: 34638482 PMCID: PMC8508565 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13194998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Revised: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 10/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Pituitary tumors represent approximately 10–15% of all brain neoplasms. Gamma Knife, the most commonly used stereotactic radiosurgery technique worldwide, plays an important role in the treatment of several pituitary neoplasm. It is currently used in cases of residual or recurrent tumors after surgery or as primary treatment when surgery is contraindicated. Its goals are long-term tumor control, preservation of visual function, and, for secreting pituitary adenomas, endocrine remission. Several retrospective case-series (level of evidence IV) on Gamma Knife for pituitary tumors have been published describing encouraging outcomes; only one systematic review and meta-analysis on non-functioning pituitary adenoma has been recently reported. We provide a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis from the last two decades on Gamma Knife radiosurgery for several pituitary tumors with the aim of describing and confirming safety and effectiveness of this technique. Abstract To describe and evaluate outcomes of Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GK) for the treatment of pituitary tumors over the past twenty years, a systematic review and meta-analysis according to PRISMA statement was performed. Articles counting more than 30 patients were included. A weighted random effects models was used to calculate pooled outcome estimates. From 459 abstract reviews, 52 retrospective studies were included. Among them, 18 reported on non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPA), 13 on growth hormone (GH)-secreting adenomas, six on adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-secreting adenomas, four on prolactin hormone (PRL)-secreting adenomas, and 11 on craniopharyngiomas. Overall tumor control and five-year progression free survival (PFS) estimate after one GK procedure for NFPA was 93% (95% CI 89–97%) and 95% (95% CI 91–99%), respectively. In case of secreting pituitary adenomas, overall remission (cure without need for medication) estimates were 45% (95% CI 35–54%) for GH-secreting adenomas, 64% (95% CI 0.52–0.75%) for ACTH-secreting adenomas and 34% (95% CI: 19–48%) for PRL-secreting adenomas. The pooled analysis for overall tumor control and five-year PFS estimate after GK for craniopharyngioma was 74% (95% CI 67–81%) and 70% (95% CI: 64–76%), respectively. This meta-analysis confirms and quantifies safety and effectiveness of GK for pituitary tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Albano
- Departments of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy; (L.R.B.); (P.M.)
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy
- Correspondence: (L.A.); (M.L.); Tel.: +390226432396 (L.A. & M.L.)
| | - Marco Losa
- Departments of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy; (L.R.B.); (P.M.)
- Correspondence: (L.A.); (M.L.); Tel.: +390226432396 (L.A. & M.L.)
| | - Lina Raffaella Barzaghi
- Departments of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy; (L.R.B.); (P.M.)
| | - Ajay Niranjan
- Departments of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA; (A.N.); (L.D.L.)
- Center for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA; (Z.S.); (J.C.F.)
| | - Zaid Siddiqui
- Center for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA; (Z.S.); (J.C.F.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | - John C. Flickinger
- Center for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA; (Z.S.); (J.C.F.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | - Lawrence Dade Lunsford
- Departments of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA; (A.N.); (L.D.L.)
- Center for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA; (Z.S.); (J.C.F.)
| | - Pietro Mortini
- Departments of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy; (L.R.B.); (P.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hori T, Amano K, Kawamata T, Hayashi M, Ohhashi G, Miyazaki S, Ono M, Miki N. Outcome After Resection of Craniopharyngiomas and the Important Role of Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Their Management. ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA. SUPPLEMENT 2021; 128:15-27. [PMID: 34191058 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-69217-9_3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Experience with management of craniopharyngiomas (CPH) was evaluated retrospectively. METHODS Between 1981 and 2012, 100 patients underwent removal of a CPH (the main surgical group), and an original tumor grading system was applied to these cases. The mean length of follow-up was 121 months. Additionally, 17 patients underwent removal of a CPH between 2012 and 2017 (the supplementary surgical group), and in 6 of them, CyberKnife radiosurgery was performed on a residual tumor (in 5 cases) or at the time of recurrence (in 1 case). RESULTS In the main surgical group, the gross total resection (GTR) rate was 81%. The early and late disease-specific postoperative mortality rates were 0% and 2%, respectively. Tumor recurrence was never noted after GTR. There was a statistically significant increase in the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score after surgery. The tumor surgical grade was inversely associated with both the pre- and postoperative KPS scores, and was lower in cases operated on via the transnasal transsphenoidal approach, but was unrelated to the GTR rate. In the supplementary surgical group, the GTR rate was 65%. CyberKnife radiosurgery consistently resulted in tumor shrinkage. CONCLUSION GTR is the preferred management option for CPH. The original surgical grading system developed at Tokyo Women's Medical University may be helpful for clinical decision-making. CyberKnife radiosurgery for residual and recurrent CPH is associated with high tumor response rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomokatsu Hori
- Moriyama Neurological Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. .,Department of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Kosaku Amano
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takakazu Kawamata
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Motohiro Hayashi
- Faculty of Advanced Techno-Surgery and Department of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.,Saitama Gamma Knife Center, Sanai Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Genichiro Ohhashi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shin-Yurigaoka General Hospital, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Shinichiro Miyazaki
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shin-Yurigaoka General Hospital, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Masami Ono
- Department of Endocrinology, Tokyo Neurological Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nobuhiro Miki
- Department of Endocrinology, Tokyo Neurological Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Liu YM, Peng YL, Li QW, Shen G, Ma YR, Chen MN, Zhang J, Fu LR, Qiu B, Liu H, Deng XW. Computed Tomography-Based Evaluation of Volume and Position Changes of the Target Region and Organs at Risk During Radiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer: A Pilot Study. Front Oncol 2021; 11:702400. [PMID: 34395275 PMCID: PMC8355816 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.702400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To analyze changes in volume and position of target regions and organs at risk (OARs) during radiotherapy for esophageal cancer patients. Methods Overall, 16 esophageal cancer patients who underwent radiotherapy, including 10 cases of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and six of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), were enrolled. The prescription doses for the planning target volumes (PTVs) were as follows: PTV1, 64 Gy/32 fractions; and PTV2, 46 Gy/23 fractions. Repeat computed tomography (CT) was performed for patients after the 5th, 10th, 15th, 20th, and 25th fractions. Delineation of the gross tumor volume (GTV) and OAR volume was determined using five repeat CTs performed by the same physician. The target and OAR volumes and centroid positions were recorded and used to analyze volume change ratio (VCR), center displacement (ΔD), and changes in the distance from the OAR centroid positions to the planned radiotherapy isocenter (distance to isocenter, DTI) during treatment. Results No patient showed significant changes in target volume (TV) after the first week of radiotherapy (five fractions). However, TV gradually decreased over the following weeks, with the rate slowing after the fourth week (40 Gy). The comparison of TV from baseline to 40 Gy (20 fractions) showed that average GTVs decreased from 130.7 ± 63.1 cc to 92.1 ± 47.2 cc, with a VCR of −29.21 ± 13.96% (p<0.01), while the clinical target volume (CTV1) decreased from 276.7 ± 98.2 cc to 246.7 ± 87.2 cc, with a VCR of −10.34 ± 7.58% (p<0.01). As TVs decreased, ΔD increased and DTI decreased. After the fourth week of radiotherapy (40 Gy), centroids of GTV, CTV1, and prophylactic CTV (CTV2) showed average deviations in ΔD of 7.6 ± 4.0, 6.9 ± 3.4, and 6.0 ± 3.0 mm, respectively. The average DTI of the heart decreased by 4.53 mm (from 15.61 ± 2.96 cm to 15.16 ± 2.27 cm). Conclusion During radiotherapy for esophageal cancer, Targets and OARs change significantly in volume and position during the 2nd–4th weeks. Image-guidance and evaluation of dosimetric changes are recommended for these fractions of treatment to appropriate adjust treatment plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Mei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.,Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ying-Lin Peng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qi-Wen Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Guanzhu Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ya-Ru Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Mei-Ning Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jun Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Li-Rong Fu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Bo Qiu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hui Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiao-Wu Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wang EW, Zanation AM, Gardner PA, Schwartz TH, Eloy JA, Adappa ND, Bettag M, Bleier BS, Cappabianca P, Carrau RL, Casiano RR, Cavallo LM, Ebert CS, El-Sayed IH, Evans JJ, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Folbe AJ, Froelich S, Gentili F, Harvey RJ, Hwang PH, Jane JA, Kelly DF, Kennedy D, Knosp E, Lal D, Lee JYK, Liu JK, Lund VJ, Palmer JN, Prevedello DM, Schlosser RJ, Sindwani R, Solares CA, Tabaee A, Teo C, Thirumala PD, Thorp BD, de Arnaldo Silva Vellutini E, Witterick I, Woodworth BA, Wormald PJ, Snyderman CH. ICAR: endoscopic skull-base surgery. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2020; 9:S145-S365. [PMID: 31329374 DOI: 10.1002/alr.22326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2018] [Revised: 02/12/2019] [Accepted: 02/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic skull-base surgery (ESBS) is employed in the management of diverse skull-base pathologies. Paralleling the increased utilization of ESBS, the literature in this field has expanded rapidly. However, the rarity of these diseases, the inherent challenges of surgical studies, and the continued learning curve in ESBS have resulted in significant variability in the quality of the literature. To consolidate and critically appraise the available literature, experts in skull-base surgery have produced the International Consensus Statement on Endoscopic Skull-Base Surgery (ICAR:ESBS). METHODS Using previously described methodology, topics spanning the breadth of ESBS were identified and assigned a literature review, evidence-based review or evidence-based review with recommendations format. Subsequently, each topic was written and then reviewed by skull-base surgeons in both neurosurgery and otolaryngology. Following this iterative review process, the ICAR:ESBS document was synthesized and reviewed by all authors for consensus. RESULTS The ICAR:ESBS document addresses the role of ESBS in primary cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea, intradural tumors, benign skull-base and orbital pathology, sinonasal malignancies, and clival lesions. Additionally, specific challenges in ESBS including endoscopic reconstruction and complication management were evaluated. CONCLUSION A critical review of the literature in ESBS demonstrates at least the equivalency of ESBS with alternative approaches in pathologies such as CSF rhinorrhea and pituitary adenoma as well as improved reconstructive techniques in reducing CSF leaks. Evidence-based recommendations are limited in other pathologies and these significant knowledge gaps call upon the skull-base community to embrace these opportunities and collaboratively address these shortcomings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Adam J Folbe
- Michigan Sinus and Skull Base Institute, Royal Oak, MI
| | | | | | - Richard J Harvey
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Charles Teo
- Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Surgical management of craniopharyngiomas in adult patients: a systematic review and consensus statement on behalf of the EANS skull base section. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2020; 162:1159-1177. [PMID: 32112169 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-020-04265-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2019] [Accepted: 02/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Craniopharyngiomas are locally aggressive neuroepithelial tumors infiltrating nearby critical neurovascular structures. The majority of published surgical series deal with childhood-onset craniopharyngiomas, while the optimal surgical management for adult-onset tumors remains unclear. The aim of this paper is to summarize the main principles defining the surgical strategy for the management of craniopharyngiomas in adult patients through an extensive systematic literature review in order to formulate a series of recommendations. MATERIAL AND METHODS The MEDLINE database was systematically reviewed (January 1970-February 2019) to identify pertinent articles dealing with the surgical management of adult-onset craniopharyngiomas. A summary of literature evidence was proposed after discussion within the EANS skull base section. RESULTS The EANS task force formulated 13 recommendations and 4 suggestions. Treatment of these patients should be performed in tertiary referral centers. The endonasal approach is presently recommended for midline craniopharyngiomas because of the improved GTR and superior endocrinological and visual outcomes. The rate of CSF leak has strongly diminished with the use of the multilayer reconstruction technique. Transcranial approaches are recommended for tumors presenting lateral extensions or purely intraventricular. Independent of the technique, a maximal but hypothalamic-sparing resection should be performed to limit the occurrence of postoperative hypothalamic syndromes and metabolic complications. Similar principles should also be applied for tumor recurrences. Radiotherapy or intracystic agents are alternative treatments when no further surgery is possible. A multidisciplinary long-term follow-up is necessary.
Collapse
|
11
|
Albano L, Losa M, Flickinger J, Mortini P, Minniti G. Radiotherapy of Parasellar Tumours. Neuroendocrinology 2020; 110:848-858. [PMID: 32126559 DOI: 10.1159/000506902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2019] [Accepted: 03/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Parasellar tumours represent a wide group of intracranial lesions, both benign and malignant. They may arise from several structures located within the parasellar area or they may infiltrate or metastasize this region. The treatment of the tumours located in these areas is challenging because of their complex anatomical location and their heterogenous histology. It often requires a multimodal approach, including surgery, radiation therapy (RT), and medical therapy. Due to the proximity of critical structures and the risks of side effects related to the procedure, a successful surgical resection is often not achievable. Thus, RT plays a crucial role in the treatment of several parasellar tumours. Conventional fractionated RT and modern radiation techniques, like stereotactic radiosurgery and proton beam RT, have become a standard management option, in particular for cases with residual or recurrent tumours after surgery and for those cases where surgery is contraindicated. This review examines the role of RT in parasellar tumours analysing several techniques, outcomes and side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Albano
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, I.R.C.C.S. San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, Institute of Experimental Neurology, I.R.C.C.S. San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Losa
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, I.R.C.C.S. San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - John Flickinger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Pietro Mortini
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, I.R.C.C.S. San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy,
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center San Pietro Hospital, Rome, Italy,
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Benefits of image-guided stereotactic hypofractionated radiation therapy as adjuvant treatment of craniopharyngiomas. A review. Childs Nerv Syst 2019; 35:53-61. [PMID: 30151751 DOI: 10.1007/s00381-018-3954-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2018] [Accepted: 08/19/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Craniopharyngiomas account for 5.6-13% of intracranial tumors in children. Despite being histologically benign, these tumors remain a major neurosurgical challenge because of the typical tight adherence to adjacent critical structures. The optimal therapeutic approach for this disease is controversial. Large cystic size and adherence to neurovascular, neuroendocrine, and optic structures without a clear line of cleavage make complete resection problematic and often hazardous. For these reasons, partial resection and adjuvant treatment play an important role. Post-operative radiation therapy (RT) following either complete or incomplete tumor removal is associated with significantly decreased recurrence rates. The aim of this review is to analyze the potential advantage of the most modern technical advancements for RT of craniopharyngiomas. METHODS This narrative review on the topic of craniopharyngiomas was based on published data available on PUBMED/Medline. All data concerning adjuvant or upfront radiation therapy treatment of craniopharyngioma were reviewed and summarized. A more detailed analysis of fractionated frameless steretactic radiosurgery of these tumors is provided as well. RESULTS We reviewed the possible improvement provided by intensity modulated beams, arc therapy, image guidance, proton radiation, and fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery. Many published findings on outcome and toxicity after RT involve the use of relatively outdated RT techniques. Technologic improvements in imaging, radiation planning, and delivery have improved the distribution of radiation doses to desired target volumes and reduced the dose to nearby critical normal tissues. Currently available techniques, providing image guidance and improved radiation doses distribution profile, have shown to maintain the efficacy of conventional techniques while significantly reducing the toxicity. CONCLUSIONS Image-guided radiosurgery holds the dose distributions and precision of frame-based techniques with the remarkable advantage of multiple-session treatments that are better tolerated by sensitive peritumoral structures, such as the optic pathway and hypothalamus. This, together with the comfort of a frameless technique, candidates frameless image-guided radiosurgery to be the first option for the adjuvant post-operative treatment of craniopharyngiomas in children and young adults when total resection cannot be achieved, in particular those with hypothalamic involvement, and when the residual tumor is mostly solid.
Collapse
|
13
|
Losa M, Pieri V, Bailo M, Gagliardi F, Barzaghi LR, Gioia L, Del Vecchio A, Bolognesi A, Mortini P. Single fraction and multisession Gamma Knife radiosurgery for craniopharyngioma. Pituitary 2018; 21:499-506. [PMID: 30043097 DOI: 10.1007/s11102-018-0903-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The optimal management of residual or recurring craniopharyngioma is still a matter of debate even though adjuvant radiation therapy plays a crucial role. Aim of our study is to report the results of single fraction or multisession Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) in patients with craniopharyngioma. METHODS We included 50 consecutive patients treated from 1994 to 2016. All patients had at least one post GKRS magnetic resonance imaging reviewed at our center. Vital status of all patients was assessed at the end of 2016. RESULTS There were 29 males (58.0%) and 21 females (42.0%). Mean age was 41.5 ± 2.8 year. Single session GKRS was delivered in 29 patients (58.0%). The mean tumor volume was 2.15 ± 0.3 cm3 and the mean prescription dose to the tumor margin was 14.3 ± 0.3 Gy. During a mean follow-up of 74.6 ± 8.4 months, seven patients (14.0%) had recurrence of disease. The 5- and 10-year recurrence-free survivals were 90.3% (95% CI, 81.0-99.6%) and 78.4% (95% CI, 59.9-96.9%), respectively. Multisession GKRS was not less effective than single fraction GKRS. Eighteen of the 28 patients (64.3%) had a tumor volume decrease of at least 10%. No serious side effects occurred after GKRS treatment, except for one case of mild visual worsening. CONCLUSIONS GKRS was effective for controlling the growth of residual or recurrent craniopharyngioma. Serious side effects were uncommon. Multisession GKRS seems a very promising tool to allow performing GKRS even in patients with large residual or recurrent craniopharyngioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Losa
- Department of Neurosurgery, Istituto Scientifico San Raffaele, Vita-Salute University, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milano, Italy.
| | - Valentina Pieri
- Department of Neurosurgery, Istituto Scientifico San Raffaele, Vita-Salute University, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milano, Italy
| | - Michele Bailo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Istituto Scientifico San Raffaele, Vita-Salute University, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milano, Italy
| | - Filippo Gagliardi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Istituto Scientifico San Raffaele, Vita-Salute University, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milano, Italy
| | - Lina Raffaella Barzaghi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Istituto Scientifico San Raffaele, Vita-Salute University, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milano, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Gioia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Istituto Scientifico San Raffaele, Vita-Salute University, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milano, Italy
| | - Antonella Del Vecchio
- Department of Medical Physics Department, Istituto Scientifico San Raffaele, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Angelo Bolognesi
- Department of Radiotherapy, Istituto Scientifico San Raffaele, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Pietro Mortini
- Department of Neurosurgery, Istituto Scientifico San Raffaele, Vita-Salute University, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Optimal strategy of gamma knife radiosurgery for craniopharyngiomas. J Neurooncol 2018; 140:135-143. [DOI: 10.1007/s11060-018-2943-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2018] [Accepted: 07/01/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
15
|
Park HR, Kshettry VR, Farrell CJ, Lee JM, Kim YH, Won TB, Han DH, Do H, Nyguist G, Rosen M, Kim DG, Evans JJ, Paek SH. Clinical Outcome After Extended Endoscopic Endonasal Resection of Craniopharyngiomas: Two-Institution Experience. World Neurosurg 2017; 103:465-474. [PMID: 28433845 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.04.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2017] [Revised: 04/05/2017] [Accepted: 04/07/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The extended endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) to the anterior cranial base is used for the resection of craniopharyngiomas. OBJECTIVE We present clinical experience and outcomes of using EEA for craniopharyngiomas. METHODS A total of 116 patients in 2 remote institutions were enrolled in this retrospective study. Surgical, endocrinologic, and ophthalmologic outcomes were assessed. RESULTS The mean follow-up was 35 months (range, 1-115). Gross total resection (GTR), near total resection (NTR, >95%), and subtotal resection (STR) were achieved in 46%, 39%, and 15% of the patients, respectively. Surgery performed after 2010 was the only variable significantly associated with greater extent of resection, which might be explained by the learning curve. Overall tumor recurrence rate was 15.5%, with a median interval until recurrence of 14.5 months (range, 3-58). Extent of resection was significantly associated with recurrence-free survival (P = 0.0116). Those who underwent NTR/STR followed by adjuvant radiotherapy had a similar median recurrence-free survival rate compared with those who underwent GTR (26.5 vs. 20 months, P = 0.167). Endocrinologic examination revealed that 47.4% of patients experienced worsening of anterior pituitary function following surgery while 25.5% developed new-onset diabetes insipidus. Of the 89 patients with preoperative visual deficits, 68 (76.4%) experienced improvement in visual field assessment. CONCLUSION EEA is effective for the surgical resection of craniopharyngiomas, resulting in high rates of visual improvement and low complication rates. Adjuvant radiotherapy is a useful method for tumor control after incomplete resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hye Ran Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea; Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Varun R Kshettry
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Christopher J Farrell
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jae Meen Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yong Hwy Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae Bin Won
- Department of Otolaryngology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Doo Hee Han
- Department of Otolaryngology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyunwoo Do
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Gurston Nyguist
- Department of Otolaryngology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Marc Rosen
- Department of Otolaryngology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Dong Gyu Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - James J Evans
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
| | - Sun Ha Paek
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Astradsson A, Munck af Rosenschöld P, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Poulsgaard L, Wiencke AK, Ohlhues L, Engelholm SA, Broholm H, Hansen Møller E, Klose M, Roed H, Juhler M. Visual outcome, endocrine function and tumor control after fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy of craniopharyngiomas in adults: findings in a prospective cohort. Acta Oncol 2017; 56:415-421. [PMID: 28084862 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2016.1270466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to examine visual outcome, endocrine function and tumor control in a prospective cohort of craniopharyngioma patients, treated with fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (FSRT). MATERIAL AND METHODS Sixteen adult patients with craniopharyngiomas were eligible for analysis. They were treated with linear accelerator-based FSRT during 1999-2015. In all cases, diagnosis was confirmed by histological analysis. The prescription dose to the tumor was 54 Gy (median, range 48-54) in 1.8 or 2.0 Gy per fraction, and the maximum radiation dose to the optic nerves and chiasm was 54.2 Gy (median, range 48.6-60.0) for the cohort. Serial ophthalmological and endocrine evaluations and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were performed at regular intervals. Median follow-up was 3.3 years (range 1.1-14.1), 3.7 years (range 0.8-15.2), and 3.6 years (range 0.7-13.1) for visual outcome, endocrine function, and tumor control, respectively. RESULTS Visual acuity impairment was present in 10 patients (62.5%) and visual field defects were present in 12 patients (75%) before FSRT. One patient developed radiation-induced optic neuropathy at seven years after FSRT. Thirteen of 16 patients (81.3%) had pituitary deficiency before FSRT, and did not develop further pituitary deficiency after FSRT. Mean tumor volume pre-FSRT was 2.72 cm3 (range 0.20-9.90) and post-FSRT 1.2 cm3 (range 0.00-13.10). Tumor control rate was 81.3% at two, five, and 10 years after FSRT. CONCLUSIONS FSRT was relatively safe in this prospective cohort of craniopharyngiomas, with only one case of radiation-induced optic neuropathy and no case of new endocrinopathy. Tumor control rate was acceptable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnar Astradsson
- Department of Neurorehabilitation, Traumatic Brain Injury Unit, Rigshospitalet, Hvidovre, Denmark
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | - Lars Poulsgaard
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Lars Ohlhues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Finsen Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Svend Aage Engelholm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Finsen Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Helle Broholm
- Department of Neuropathology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Emil Hansen Møller
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Medical Endocrinology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Marianne Klose
- Department of Medical Endocrinology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Henrik Roed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Finsen Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Marianne Juhler
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Varlotto J, DiMaio C, Grassberger C, Tangel M, Mackley H, Pavelic M, Specht C, Sogge S, Nguyen D, Glantz M, Saw C, Upadhyay U, Moser R, Yunus S, Rava P, Fitzgerald T, Glanzman J, Sheehan J. Multi-modality management of craniopharyngioma: a review of various treatments and their outcomes. Neurooncol Pract 2015; 3:173-187. [PMID: 31386091 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npv029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2015] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Craniopharyngioma is a rare tumor that is expected to occur in ∼400 patients/year in the United States. While surgical resection is considered to be the primary treatment when a patient presents with a craniopharyngioma, only 30% of such tumors present in locations that permit complete resection. Radiotherapy has been used as both primary and adjuvant therapy in the treatment of craniopharyngiomas for over 50 years. Modern radiotherapeutic techniques, via the use of CT-based treatment planning and MRI fusion, have permitted tighter treatment volumes that allow for better tumor control while limiting complications. Modern radiotherapeutic series have shown high control rates with lower doses than traditionally used in the two-dimensional treatment era. Intracavitary radiotherapy with radio-isotopes and stereotactic radiosurgery may have a role in the treatment of recurrent cystic and solid recurrences, respectively. Recently, due to the exclusive expression of the Beta-catenin clonal mutations and the exclusive expression of BRAF V600E clonal mutations in the overwhelming majority of adamantinomatous and papillary tumors respectively, it is felt that inhibitors of each pathway may play a role in the future treatment of these rare tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Varlotto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (J.V., P.R., T.F., J.G.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.D.); Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts (C.G.); Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania (M.T., M.P., C.S., D.N., M.G., J.S.); Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.M.); Penn State Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.S., D.N.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N.); Penn State Neuroscience Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N., M.G., J.S.); Northeast Radiation Oncology, Scranton, Pennsylvania (C.S.); University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Division of Neurologic Surgery, Worcester, Massachusetts (U.U., R.M.); Department of Medical Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (S.Y.)
| | - Christopher DiMaio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (J.V., P.R., T.F., J.G.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.D.); Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts (C.G.); Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania (M.T., M.P., C.S., D.N., M.G., J.S.); Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.M.); Penn State Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.S., D.N.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N.); Penn State Neuroscience Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N., M.G., J.S.); Northeast Radiation Oncology, Scranton, Pennsylvania (C.S.); University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Division of Neurologic Surgery, Worcester, Massachusetts (U.U., R.M.); Department of Medical Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (S.Y.)
| | - Clemens Grassberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (J.V., P.R., T.F., J.G.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.D.); Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts (C.G.); Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania (M.T., M.P., C.S., D.N., M.G., J.S.); Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.M.); Penn State Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.S., D.N.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N.); Penn State Neuroscience Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N., M.G., J.S.); Northeast Radiation Oncology, Scranton, Pennsylvania (C.S.); University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Division of Neurologic Surgery, Worcester, Massachusetts (U.U., R.M.); Department of Medical Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (S.Y.)
| | - Matthew Tangel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (J.V., P.R., T.F., J.G.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.D.); Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts (C.G.); Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania (M.T., M.P., C.S., D.N., M.G., J.S.); Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.M.); Penn State Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.S., D.N.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N.); Penn State Neuroscience Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N., M.G., J.S.); Northeast Radiation Oncology, Scranton, Pennsylvania (C.S.); University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Division of Neurologic Surgery, Worcester, Massachusetts (U.U., R.M.); Department of Medical Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (S.Y.)
| | - Heath Mackley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (J.V., P.R., T.F., J.G.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.D.); Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts (C.G.); Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania (M.T., M.P., C.S., D.N., M.G., J.S.); Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.M.); Penn State Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.S., D.N.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N.); Penn State Neuroscience Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N., M.G., J.S.); Northeast Radiation Oncology, Scranton, Pennsylvania (C.S.); University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Division of Neurologic Surgery, Worcester, Massachusetts (U.U., R.M.); Department of Medical Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (S.Y.)
| | - Matt Pavelic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (J.V., P.R., T.F., J.G.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.D.); Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts (C.G.); Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania (M.T., M.P., C.S., D.N., M.G., J.S.); Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.M.); Penn State Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.S., D.N.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N.); Penn State Neuroscience Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N., M.G., J.S.); Northeast Radiation Oncology, Scranton, Pennsylvania (C.S.); University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Division of Neurologic Surgery, Worcester, Massachusetts (U.U., R.M.); Department of Medical Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (S.Y.)
| | - Charles Specht
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (J.V., P.R., T.F., J.G.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.D.); Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts (C.G.); Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania (M.T., M.P., C.S., D.N., M.G., J.S.); Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.M.); Penn State Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.S., D.N.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N.); Penn State Neuroscience Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N., M.G., J.S.); Northeast Radiation Oncology, Scranton, Pennsylvania (C.S.); University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Division of Neurologic Surgery, Worcester, Massachusetts (U.U., R.M.); Department of Medical Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (S.Y.)
| | - Steven Sogge
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (J.V., P.R., T.F., J.G.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.D.); Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts (C.G.); Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania (M.T., M.P., C.S., D.N., M.G., J.S.); Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.M.); Penn State Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.S., D.N.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N.); Penn State Neuroscience Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N., M.G., J.S.); Northeast Radiation Oncology, Scranton, Pennsylvania (C.S.); University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Division of Neurologic Surgery, Worcester, Massachusetts (U.U., R.M.); Department of Medical Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (S.Y.)
| | - Dan Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (J.V., P.R., T.F., J.G.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.D.); Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts (C.G.); Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania (M.T., M.P., C.S., D.N., M.G., J.S.); Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.M.); Penn State Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.S., D.N.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N.); Penn State Neuroscience Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N., M.G., J.S.); Northeast Radiation Oncology, Scranton, Pennsylvania (C.S.); University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Division of Neurologic Surgery, Worcester, Massachusetts (U.U., R.M.); Department of Medical Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (S.Y.)
| | - Michael Glantz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (J.V., P.R., T.F., J.G.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.D.); Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts (C.G.); Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania (M.T., M.P., C.S., D.N., M.G., J.S.); Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.M.); Penn State Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.S., D.N.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N.); Penn State Neuroscience Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N., M.G., J.S.); Northeast Radiation Oncology, Scranton, Pennsylvania (C.S.); University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Division of Neurologic Surgery, Worcester, Massachusetts (U.U., R.M.); Department of Medical Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (S.Y.)
| | - Cheng Saw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (J.V., P.R., T.F., J.G.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.D.); Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts (C.G.); Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania (M.T., M.P., C.S., D.N., M.G., J.S.); Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.M.); Penn State Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.S., D.N.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N.); Penn State Neuroscience Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N., M.G., J.S.); Northeast Radiation Oncology, Scranton, Pennsylvania (C.S.); University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Division of Neurologic Surgery, Worcester, Massachusetts (U.U., R.M.); Department of Medical Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (S.Y.)
| | - Urvashi Upadhyay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (J.V., P.R., T.F., J.G.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.D.); Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts (C.G.); Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania (M.T., M.P., C.S., D.N., M.G., J.S.); Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.M.); Penn State Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.S., D.N.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N.); Penn State Neuroscience Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N., M.G., J.S.); Northeast Radiation Oncology, Scranton, Pennsylvania (C.S.); University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Division of Neurologic Surgery, Worcester, Massachusetts (U.U., R.M.); Department of Medical Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (S.Y.)
| | - Richard Moser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (J.V., P.R., T.F., J.G.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.D.); Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts (C.G.); Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania (M.T., M.P., C.S., D.N., M.G., J.S.); Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.M.); Penn State Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.S., D.N.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N.); Penn State Neuroscience Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N., M.G., J.S.); Northeast Radiation Oncology, Scranton, Pennsylvania (C.S.); University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Division of Neurologic Surgery, Worcester, Massachusetts (U.U., R.M.); Department of Medical Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (S.Y.)
| | - Shakeeb Yunus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (J.V., P.R., T.F., J.G.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.D.); Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts (C.G.); Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania (M.T., M.P., C.S., D.N., M.G., J.S.); Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.M.); Penn State Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.S., D.N.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N.); Penn State Neuroscience Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N., M.G., J.S.); Northeast Radiation Oncology, Scranton, Pennsylvania (C.S.); University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Division of Neurologic Surgery, Worcester, Massachusetts (U.U., R.M.); Department of Medical Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (S.Y.)
| | - Paul Rava
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (J.V., P.R., T.F., J.G.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.D.); Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts (C.G.); Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania (M.T., M.P., C.S., D.N., M.G., J.S.); Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.M.); Penn State Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.S., D.N.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N.); Penn State Neuroscience Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N., M.G., J.S.); Northeast Radiation Oncology, Scranton, Pennsylvania (C.S.); University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Division of Neurologic Surgery, Worcester, Massachusetts (U.U., R.M.); Department of Medical Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (S.Y.)
| | - Thomas Fitzgerald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (J.V., P.R., T.F., J.G.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.D.); Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts (C.G.); Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania (M.T., M.P., C.S., D.N., M.G., J.S.); Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.M.); Penn State Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.S., D.N.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N.); Penn State Neuroscience Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N., M.G., J.S.); Northeast Radiation Oncology, Scranton, Pennsylvania (C.S.); University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Division of Neurologic Surgery, Worcester, Massachusetts (U.U., R.M.); Department of Medical Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (S.Y.)
| | - Jonathan Glanzman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (J.V., P.R., T.F., J.G.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.D.); Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts (C.G.); Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania (M.T., M.P., C.S., D.N., M.G., J.S.); Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.M.); Penn State Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.S., D.N.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N.); Penn State Neuroscience Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N., M.G., J.S.); Northeast Radiation Oncology, Scranton, Pennsylvania (C.S.); University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Division of Neurologic Surgery, Worcester, Massachusetts (U.U., R.M.); Department of Medical Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (S.Y.)
| | - Jonas Sheehan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (J.V., P.R., T.F., J.G.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.D.); Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts (C.G.); Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania (M.T., M.P., C.S., D.N., M.G., J.S.); Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.M.); Penn State Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (C.S., D.N.); Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N.); Penn State Neuroscience Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.N., M.G., J.S.); Northeast Radiation Oncology, Scranton, Pennsylvania (C.S.); University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Division of Neurologic Surgery, Worcester, Massachusetts (U.U., R.M.); Department of Medical Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts (S.Y.)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wang JZ, Li JB, Wang W, Qi HP, Ma ZF, Zhang YJ, Li FX, Fan TY, Shao Q, Xu M. Changes in tumour volume and motion during radiotherapy for thoracic oesophageal cancer. Radiother Oncol 2015; 114:201-5. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2014] [Revised: 12/02/2014] [Accepted: 12/22/2014] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
19
|
Lee CC, Yang HC, Chen CJ, Hung YC, Wu HM, Shiau CY, Guo WY, Pan DHC, Chung WY, Liu KD. Gamma Knife surgery for craniopharyngioma: report on a 20-year experience. J Neurosurg 2014; 121 Suppl:167-78. [DOI: 10.3171/2014.8.gks141411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
ObjectAlthough craniopharyngiomas are benign intracranial tumors, their high recurrence rates and intimate associations with surrounding neurovascular structures make gross tumor resection challenging. Stereotactic radiosurgery has been introduced as a valuable adjuvant therapy for recurrent or residual craniopharyngiomas. However, studies with large patient populations documenting long-term survival and progression-free survival rates are rare in the literature. The current study aims to report the long-term radiosurgical results and to define the prognostic factors in a large cohort of patients with a craniopharyngioma.MethodsA total of 137 consecutive patients who underwent 162 sessions of Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) treatments at the Taipei Veterans General Hospital between 1993 and 2012 were analyzed. The patients' median age was 30.1 years (range 1.5–84.9 years), and the median tumor volume was 5.5 ml (range 0.2–28.4 ml). There were 23 solid (16.8%), 23 cystic (16.8%), and 91 mixed solid and cystic (66.4%) craniopharyngiomas. GKS was indicated for residual or recurrent craniopharyngiomas. The median radiation dose was 12 Gy (range 9.5–16.0 Gy) at a median isodose line of 55% (range 50%–78%).ResultsAt a median imaging follow-up of 45.7 months after GKS, the rates of tumor control were 72.7%, 73.9%, and 66.3% for the solid, cystic, and mixed tumors, respectively. The actuarial progression-free survival rates plotted by the Kaplan-Meier method were 70.0% and 43.8% at 5 and 10 years after radiosurgery, respectively. After repeated GKS, the actuarial progression-free survival rates were increased to 77.3% and 61.2% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. The overall survival rates were 91.5% and 83.9% at the 5- and 10-year follow-ups, respectively. Successful GKS treatment can be predicted by tumor volume (p = 0.011). Among the 137 patients who had clinical follow-up, new-onset or worsened pituitary deficiencies were detected in 11 patients (8.0%). Two patients without tumor growth had a worsened visual field, and 1 patient had a new onset of third cranial nerve palsy.ConclusionsThe current study suggests that GKS is a relatively safe modality for the treatment of recurrent or residual craniopharyngiomas, and it is associated with improved tumor control and reduced in-field recurrence rates. Acceptable rates of complications occurred.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng-Chia Lee
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei
- 2Department of Surgery, Hsinchu Branch, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Hsinchu
- 3School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei
| | - Huai-Che Yang
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei
- 3School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei
| | - Ching-Jen Chen
- 6Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Yi-Chieh Hung
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei
- 3School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei
| | - Hsiu-Mei Wu
- 3School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei
- 4Department of Radiology and
| | - Cheng-Ying Shiau
- 3School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei
- 5Cancer Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; and
| | - Wan-Yuo Guo
- 3School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei
- 4Department of Radiology and
| | - David Hung-Chi Pan
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei
- 3School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei
| | - Wen-Yuh Chung
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei
- 3School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei
| | - Kang-Du Liu
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei
- 3School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kondziolka D, Shin SM, Brunswick A, Kim I, Silverman JS. The biology of radiosurgery and its clinical applications for brain tumors. Neuro Oncol 2014; 17:29-44. [PMID: 25267803 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nou284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) was developed decades ago but only began to impact brain tumor care when it was coupled with high-resolution brain imaging techniques such as computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. The technique has played a key role in the management of virtually all forms of brain tumor. We reviewed the radiobiological principles of SRS on tissue and how they pertain to different brain tumor disorders. We reviewed the clinical outcomes on the most common indications. This review found that outcomes are well documented for safety and efficacy and show increasing long-term outcomes for benign tumors. Brain metastases SRS is common, and its clinical utility remains in evolution. The role of SRS in brain tumor care is established. Together with surgical resection, conventional radiotherapy, and medical therapies, patients have an expanding list of options for their care. Clinicians should be familiar with radiosurgical principles and expected outcomes that may pertain to different brain tumor scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas Kondziolka
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York University, New York, New York (D.K., S.M.S., A.B., I.K., J.S.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York University, New York, New York (D.K., S.M.S., A.B., I.K., J.S.S.)
| | - Samuel M Shin
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York University, New York, New York (D.K., S.M.S., A.B., I.K., J.S.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York University, New York, New York (D.K., S.M.S., A.B., I.K., J.S.S.)
| | - Andrew Brunswick
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York University, New York, New York (D.K., S.M.S., A.B., I.K., J.S.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York University, New York, New York (D.K., S.M.S., A.B., I.K., J.S.S.)
| | - Irene Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York University, New York, New York (D.K., S.M.S., A.B., I.K., J.S.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York University, New York, New York (D.K., S.M.S., A.B., I.K., J.S.S.)
| | - Joshua S Silverman
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York University, New York, New York (D.K., S.M.S., A.B., I.K., J.S.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York University, New York, New York (D.K., S.M.S., A.B., I.K., J.S.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Zygourakis CC, Kaur G, Kunwar S, McDermott MW, Madden M, Oh T, Parsa AT. Modern treatment of 84 newly diagnosed craniopharyngiomas. J Clin Neurosci 2014; 21:1558-66. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2014] [Accepted: 03/08/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
22
|
Venegas E, Concepcion B, Martin T, Soto A. [Practice guideline for diagnosis and treatment of craniopharyngioma and parasellar tumors of the pituitary gland]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2014; 62:e1-13. [PMID: 25066506 DOI: 10.1016/j.endonu.2014.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2014] [Revised: 05/02/2014] [Accepted: 05/10/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Craniopharyngiomas are rare, locally aggressive epithelial tumors usually located in the sellar and suprasellar region. Diagnosis of craniopharyngioma is usually suggested by clinical and radiological findings that should be confirmed histologically. Surgery is the treatment of choice for most patients. The goal of surgery is to relieve compressive symptoms and to remove as much tumor as safely possible. Radiation therapy is the usual treatment to control postoperative tumor remnants and local recurrences. Parasellar lesions are low prevalent lesions and include neoplastic, inflammatory, infectious, developmental, and vascular diseases. Both their diagnosis and treatment depend on the type of lesion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Venegas
- Servicio de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, España.
| | - Blanco Concepcion
- Servicio de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, España
| | - Tomas Martin
- Servicio de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, España
| | - Alfonso Soto
- Servicio de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, España
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
This report is a review of findings on the diagnosis, treatment, clinical course, and prognosis of craniopharyngioma patients. Craniopharyngiomas are rare, partly cystic and calcified embryonic malformations of the sellar/parasellar region with low histological grade (WHO I°). A bimodal age distribution has been shown, with peak incidence rates in childhood-onset at 5-14 years and adult-onset craniopharyngioma at 50-74 years. Clinical manifestations are related to hypothalamic/pituitary deficiencies, visual impairment, and increased intracranial pressure. If the tumor is favorably localized, the therapy of choice is complete resection, with care taken to preserve optical and hypothalamic functions. In patients with unfavorable tumor localization (i.e., hypothalamic involvement), recommended therapy is a limited hypothalamus-sparing surgical strategy followed by local irradiation. Although overall survival rates are high (92%), recurrences and progressions are frequent. Irradiation has proven effective in reducing recurrences and progression, and timing of postsurgical irradiation in childhood-onset cases is currently under investigation in a randomized multinational trial (KRANIOPHARYNGEOM 2007). Anatomical involvement and/or surgical lesions of posterior hypothalamic areas can result in serious quality of life-compromising sequelae such as hypothalamic obesity, psychopathological symptoms, and/or cognitive problems. It is crucial that craniopharyngioma be managed as a frequently chronic disease, providing ongoing care of pediatric and adult patients' clinical and quality of life consequences by experienced multidisciplinary teams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hermann L Müller
- Department of Pediatrics, Klinikum Oldenburg, Medical Campus University Oldenburg, 26133 Oldenburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
Craniopharyngiomas are partly cystic embryogenic malformations of the sellar and parasellar region. With an overall incidence of 0.5-2.0 new cases per million population per year, approximately 30-50% of all cases represent childhood craniopharyngioma. Typical manifestations at diagnosis are some combination of headache, visual impairment, polyuria/polydypsia, growth retardation, and significant weight gain. Therapy of choice in patients with favorable tumor localization is complete resection with specific focus on maintaining functions of the optic nerve and hypothalamic-pituitary axes. In patients whose unfavorable tumor localization makes maintaining hypothalamic functionality surgically challenging, a limited resection followed by local irradiation is recommended. The overall survival rates are high (92%) but occurrences of reduced quality of life are also high. Recurrences after complete resection and progressions of residual tumor after incomplete resection are frequent postsurgical events. Because irradiation is efficient in preventing tumor progression, appropriate timing of postsurgical irradiation is currently under investigation in the randomized multinational trial KRANIOPHARYNGEOM 2007 that analyzes quality of life as primary endpoint. Childhood craniopharyngioma should be recognized as a chronic disease requiring constant monitoring of the clinical and quality of life consequences in order to provide optimal care of surviving patients.
Collapse
|
25
|
Mortini P, Gagliardi F, Boari N, Losa M. Surgical strategies and modern therapeutic options in the treatment of craniopharyngiomas. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2013; 88:514-29. [DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2013.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2013] [Revised: 07/11/2013] [Accepted: 07/17/2013] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
|
26
|
Wang JZ, Li JB, Wang W, Qi HP, Ma ZF, Zhang YJ, Fan TY, Shao Q, Xu M. Detection of interfraction displacement and volume variance during radiotherapy of primary thoracic esophageal cancer based on repeated four-dimensional CT scans. Radiat Oncol 2013; 8:224. [PMID: 24074144 PMCID: PMC4016114 DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-8-224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2013] [Accepted: 09/24/2013] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background To investigate the interfraction displacement and volume variation of primary thoracic esophagus carcinoma with enhanced four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) scanning during fractionated radiotherapy. Methods 4DCT data sets were acquired at the time of treatment simulation and every ten fraction for each of 32 patients throughout treatment. Scans were registered to baseline (simulation) 4DCT scans by using bony landmarks. The gross tumor volumes (GTVs) were delineated on each data set. Coordinates of the GTV centroids were acquired on each respiration phase. Distance between center of the GTV contour on the simulation scan and the centers on subsequent scans were used to assess interfraction displacement between fractions. Volumes were constructed using three approaches: The GTV delineated from the maximum intensity projection (MIP) was defined IGTVMIP, all 10 GTVs were combined to form IGTV10, GTVmean was the average of all 10 phases of each GTV. Results Interfraction displacement in left-right (LR), anterior-posterior (AP), superior-inferior (SI) directions and 3D vector were 0.13 ± 0.09 cm, 0.16 ± 0.12 cm, 0.34 ± 0.26 cm and 0.43 ± 0.24 cm, respectively between the tenth fraction and simulation 4DCT scan. 0.14 ± 0.09 cm, 0.19 ± 0.16 cm, 0.45 ± 0.43 cm and 0.56 ± 0.40 cm in LR, AP, SI and 3D vector respectively between the twentieth fraction and simulation 4DCT scan. Displacement in SI direction was larger than LR and AP directions during treatment. For distal esophageal cancer, increased interfraction displacements were observed in SI direction and 3D vector (P = 0.002 and P = 0.001, respectively) during radiotherapy. The volume of GTVmean, IGTVMIP, and IGTV10 decreased significantly at the twentieth fraction for middle (median: 34.01%, 33.09% and 28.71%, respectively) and distal (median: 22.76%, 25.27% and 23.96%, respectively) esophageal cancer, but for the upper third, no significant variation were observed during radiotherapy. Conclusions Interfractional displacements in SI direction were larger than LR and AP directions. For distal location, significant changes were observed in SI direction and 3D vector during radiotherapy. For middle and distal locations, the best time to reset position should be selected at the twentieth fraction when the primary tumor target volume changed significantly, and it was preferable to guide target correction and planning modification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin Zhi Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Chest Section), Shandong Cancer Hospital, Jinan, Shandong Province 250117, P,R, China.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
Radiotherapy remains the mainstay of multidisciplinary management of patients with incompletely resected and recurrent craniopharyngioma. Advances in imaging and radiotherapy technology offer new alternatives with the principal aim of improving the accuracy of treatment and reducing the volume of normal brain receiving significant radiation doses. We review the available technologies, their technical advantages and disadvantages and the published clinical results. Fractionated high precision conformal radiotherapy with image guidance remains the gold standard; the results of single fraction treatment are disappointing and hypofractionation should be used with caution as long term results are not available. There is insufficient data on the use of protons to assess the comparative efficacy and toxicity. The precision of treatment delivery needs to be coupled with experienced infrastructure and more intensive quality assurance to ensure best treatment outcome and this should be carried out within multidisciplinary teams experienced in the management of craniopharyngioma. The advantages of the combined skills and expertise of the team members may outweigh the largely undefined clinical gain from novel radiotherapy technologies.
Collapse
|
28
|
Saleem MA, Hashim ASM, Rashid A, Ali M. Role of gamma knife radiosurgery in multimodality management of craniopharyngioma. ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA. SUPPLEMENT 2013; 116:55-60. [PMID: 23417459 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7091-1376-9_9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the use of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery (GKS) along with other surgical procedures in the management of craniopharyngioma. METHODS Thirty-five patients (17 children and 18 adults) with craniopharyngioma were treated with GKS between May 2008 and August 2011. The age of the patients ranged from 2 to 53 years (mean 20 years). There were 26 males and 9 females. Craniopharyngiomas were solid in 7 patients, cystic in 4, and mixed in 24. Tumor size ranged from 1 to 33.3 cm(3) (mean 12 cm(3)). The prescription dose ranged from 8 to 14 Gy (mean 11.5 Gy). Maximum dose ranged from 16 to 28 Gy (mean 23 Gy). Before GKS 11 patients underwent subtotal resection of the neoplasm, 2 - neuroendocopic fenestration of the large cystic component, and 10 - stereotactic aspiration of the neoplastic cyst content. RESULTS The length of follow-up period varied from 6 to 36 months (mean 22 months). The tumor response rate and control rate were 77.1 % and 88.5 %, respectively. Clinical outcome was considered excellent in 10 cases, good in 17, fair in 4, and poor in 4. No one patient with normal pituitary function before GKS developed hypopituitarism thereafter. Deterioration of the visual function after treatment was noted in one patient. CONCLUSION After GKS tumor control can be achieved in significant proportion of patients with craniopharyngioma. Treatment-related neurological morbidity in such cases is rare. Therefore, radiosurgery may be considered useful for management of these tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Abid Saleem
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pakistan Gamma Knife and Stereotactic Radiosurgery Center, NeuroSpinal and Medical Institute, 100/1 Mansfield Street, M.A. Jinnah Road, Sadder, Karachi, 74400, Pakistan.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Jo KW, Shin HJ, Kong DS, Seol HJ, Nam DH, Lee JI. Treatment outcomes of pediatric craniopharyngioma : a 15-year retrospective review of 35 cases. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2012; 52:37-41. [PMID: 22993676 PMCID: PMC3440501 DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2012.52.1.37] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2011] [Revised: 03/07/2012] [Accepted: 04/15/2012] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study was to describe a single center's experience in the management of craniopharyngiomas in children over a 15-year period. Methods The clinical records of pediatric patients treated for craniopharyngiomas between December 1995 and February 2011 were reviewed. Thirty-five pediatric patients diagnosed with craniopharyngioma were treated, and their medical records and imaging data were analyzed retrospectively. Results The mean follow-up duration was 76 months (range, 10-195). Overall survival and local control rates at 10 years were 94.7±5.1% and 37.1±11.9%, respectively. The female-to-male ratio was 16 : 19, and the mean age was 8.6 years (range, 1-17). Initially, gross total resection (GTR) was performed in 30 patients; subtotal resection (STR) followed by radiotherapy was performed in 5 patients. Of the 14 cases that showed recurrence after GTR, 5 patients were treated with GTR, 1 with radiation therapy (RT), 4 with gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS), and 4 with subtotal resection followed by RT. No patients who underwent RT or GKRS had recurrences. Two cases with recurrence after STR followed by RT were treated with GTR. One patient died of hormonal insufficiency 64 months after the first surgery. The overall median time progression was 51.2 months (range, 3-182) : 49.7 months in the patients who underwent GTR and 60.2 months in the patients who underwent STR followed by RT. Conclusion If safe resection is possible, GTR at the initial treatment should be attempted to reduce the tumor recurrence. However, if the tumor recurs after the first surgery, RT or GKRS with/without reoperation may be an effective salvage treatment for recurrent craniopharyngioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kwang Wook Jo
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, Bucheon, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Pascual JM, Prieto R, Carrasco R. Infundibulo-tuberal or not strictly intraventricular craniopharyngioma: evidence for a major topographical category. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2011; 153:2403-25; discussion 2426. [PMID: 21918833 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-011-1149-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2011] [Accepted: 08/24/2011] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study investigates retrospectively the clinical, neuroradiological, pathological and surgical evidence verifying the infundibulo-tuberal topography for craniopharyngiomas (CPs). Infundibulo-tuberal CPs represent a surgical challenge due to their close anatomical relationships with the hypothalamus. An accurate definition of this topographical category is essential in order to prevent any undue injury to vital diencephalic centres. METHODS A systematic review of all scientific reports involving pathological, neuroradiological or surgical descriptions of either well-described individual cases or large series of CPs published in official journals and text books from 1892 to 2011 was carried out. A total of 1,232 documents providing pathological, surgical and/or neuroradiological evidence for the infundibulo-tuberal or hypothalamic location of CPs were finally analysed in this study. FINDINGS For a total of 3,571 CPs included in 67 pathological, surgical or neuroradiological series, 1,494 CPs (42%) were classified as infundibulo-tuberal lesions. This topography was proved in the autopsy of 122 non-operated cases. The crucial morphological finding characterizing the tubero-infundibular topography was the replacement of the third ventricle floor by a lesion with a predominant intraventricular growth. This type of CP usually presents a circumferential band of tight adherence to the third ventricle floor remnants, formed by a functionless layer of rective gliosis of a variable thickness. After complete surgical removal of an infundibulo-tuberal CP, a wide defect or breach at the floor of the third ventricle is regularly observed both in the surgical field and on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging studies. CONCLUSIONS Infundibulo-tuberal CPs represent a major topographical category of lesions with a primary subpial development at the floor of the third ventricle. These lesions expand within the hypothalamus itself and subsequently occupy the third ventricle; consequently, they can be classified as not strictly intraventricular CPs. A tight attachment to the hypothalamus and remnants of the third ventricle floor is the pathological landmark of infundibulo-tuberal CPs.
Collapse
|
31
|
Hofmann BM, Höllig A, Strauss C, Buslei R, Buchfelder M, Fahlbusch R. Results after treatment of craniopharyngiomas: further experiences with 73 patients since 1997. J Neurosurg 2011; 116:373-84. [PMID: 21942724 DOI: 10.3171/2011.6.jns081451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECT The authors report surgical and endocrinological results of a series of 73 cases of craniopharyngioma that they treated surgically since 1997 to demonstrate their change in treatment strategy and its effect on outcome compared with a previous series and results reported in the literature. METHODS A total of 73 patients underwent surgery for craniopharyngiomas between May 1997 and January 2005. In patients with poor clinical or neuropsychological condition, even following pretreatment, only stereotactic cyst aspiration took place (8 cases). In the remaining patients, gross-total resection (GTR) was intended and appeared to be possible. The most frequent approaches were subfrontal (27 cases) and transsphenoidal (26 cases); in some cases, a multistep approach was used. The rate of GTR, complications, and functional outcome (comparing pre- and postoperative endocrine and neuropsychological testing) were evaluated. The mean duration of follow-up was 25.2 months. RESULTS Gross-total resection was achieved in 88.5% of cases in which a transsphenoidal approach was used and 79.5% of those in which a transcranial approach was used (85.2% of those in which a subfrontal approach was used and 72.7% of those in which a frontolateral approach was used). In the total series, GTR was achieved in 83.1% of cases (vs 49.3% in the authors' former series). The complication rate was 13.8% without any mortality. New endocrine deficits were observed more frequently in patients treated with transcranial approaches over the years (16.3%-66.7% vs 2.6%-50.0%) but were less frequent after transsphenoidal approaches (5.2%-19.2% vs 2.9%-45.7%). CONCLUSIONS Open surgery with intended total resection remains the treatment of choice in most patients. Initial stereotactic cyst aspiration or medical pretreatment to improve the patients' condition and adequate choice of surgical approach(es) are essential to achieve that goal. Nevertheless, a moderate increase in endocrinological deficits has to be accepted. The authors recommend using radiotherapy only in cases in which there are tumor remnants or disease progression after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernd M Hofmann
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Liubinas SV, Munshey AS, Kaye AH. Management of recurrent craniopharyngioma. J Clin Neurosci 2011; 18:451-7. [PMID: 21316970 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2010.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2010] [Revised: 10/26/2010] [Accepted: 10/26/2010] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Craniopharyngioma accounts for approximately 1.2% to 4.6% of all intracranial tumours. Their close proximity to vital structures such as the hypothalamic-pituitary axis and optic apparatus makes them one of the most challenging and controversial management dilemmas in neurosurgery. Recurrence following initial transcranial resection is reported as 9% to 51% at a median time of 26 months to 96 months. Treatment options for recurrent craniopharyngioma include repeat surgery, radiotherapy, radiosurgery and intracystic therapies. We present a series of 54 recurrent craniopharyngiomas treated at The Royal Melbourne Hospital between 1991 and 2008 and discuss the management options now available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon V Liubinas
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan Street, Parkville, Victoria 3050, Australia.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Barriger RB, Chang A, Lo SS, Timmerman RD, DesRosiers C, Boaz JC, Fakiris AJ. Phosphorus-32 therapy for cystic craniopharyngiomas. Radiother Oncol 2011; 98:207-12. [PMID: 21269713 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2009] [Revised: 03/24/2010] [Accepted: 12/02/2010] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To examine control rates for predominantly cystic craniopharyngiomas treated with intracavitary phosphorus-32 (P-32). MATERIAL AND METHODS 22 patients with predominantly cystic craniopharyngiomas were treated at Indiana University between October 1997 and December 2006. Nineteen patients with follow-up of at least 6 months were evaluated. The median patient age was 11 years, median cyst volume was 9 ml, a median dose of 300 Gy was prescribed to the cyst wall, and median follow-up was 62 months. RESULTS Overall cyst control rate after the initial P-32 treatment was 67%. Complete tumor control after P-32 was 42%. Kaplan-Meier 1-, 3-, and 5-year initial freedom-from-progression rates were 68%, 49%, and 31%, respectively. Following salvage therapy, the Kaplan-Meier 1-, 3-, and 5-year ultimate freedom-from-progression rates were 95%, 95%, and 86%, respectively. All patients were alive at the last follow-up. Visual function was stable or improved in 81% when compared prior to P-32 therapy. Pituitary function remained stable in 74% of patients following P-32 therapy. CONCLUSIONS Intracystic P-32 can be an effective and tolerable treatment for controlling cystic components of craniopharyngiomas as a primary treatment or after prior therapies, but frequently allows for progression of solid tumor components. Disease progression in the form of solid tumor progression, re-accumulation of cystic fluid, or development of new cysts may require further radiotherapy or surgical intervention for optimal long-term disease control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Bryan Barriger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Craniopharyngiomas in children: how radical should the surgeon be? Childs Nerv Syst 2011; 27:41-54. [PMID: 21072523 DOI: 10.1007/s00381-010-1330-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2010] [Accepted: 10/26/2010] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Two main modes of management of craniopharyngiomas, namely, radical tumor removal and intentional incomplete removal followed by radiotherapy, are used. Recently, a half-way solution was added. Radical removal is reserved only for the tumors not involving hypothalamus. Such tumors, however, are not clearly defined. The goal of the study was to clarify the relationship of craniopharyngiomas with surrounding structures, especially hypothalamus, and to evaluate its clinical significance. METHODS Our policy of management of craniopharyngiomas was elaborated on the basis of the results of morphological studies of the topography and their correlation with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 115 adults and children operated on since 1991. Suitability of the policy in children and adolescents was verified by long-term outcome analysis in 41 consecutive patients. RESULTS The rate of morbidity and mortality was higher in patients with craniopharyngiomas located inside the third ventricle either partially (intraventricular and extraventricular craniopharyngiomas, IEVCs, 16 patients) or completely (intraventricular, one patient) than in tumors located outside the ventricle (suprasellar extraventricular, SEVCs, five patients; intrasellar and suprasellar, 19 patients). Postsurgical hypothalamic signs and symptoms occurred most often in intraventricular tumors; there were no mental disorders or obesity caused by primary removal of SEVCs including those severely compressing hypothalamus. CONCLUSIONS Radical removal of SEVCs is safer than of IEVCs despite an apparent involvement of hypothalamus. In majority of cases, they may be distinguished by indirect MRI signs; in others only according to operation findings; final decision about the optimal extent of tumor removal should be made during surgery.
Collapse
|
35
|
Stereotactic radiosurgery: a meta-analysis of current therapeutic applications in neuro-oncologic disease. J Neurooncol 2010; 103:1-17. [DOI: 10.1007/s11060-010-0360-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2009] [Accepted: 08/09/2010] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
36
|
Veeravagu A, Lee M, Jiang B, Chang SD. The role of radiosurgery in the treatment of craniopharyngiomas. Neurosurg Focus 2010; 28:E11. [PMID: 20367355 DOI: 10.3171/2010.2.focus09311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
The treatment of craniopharyngiomas is composed of an intricate balance of multiple modalities. Resection and radiotherapy have been combined to synergistically control tumor growth while preventing undue harm to crucial neurovascular structures. Although a craniopharyngioma is a benign lesion pathologically, it may induce severe neurological injury due to its location and rate of growth. More recently, the advent of targeted, fractionated radiotherapy has allowed for more aggressive tumor control while reducing the necessity for large resections. Initial studies have demonstrated significant tumor control in patients who are treated with resection combined with radiation therapy, versus surgery alone, with a lower rate of treatment-associated neurological deficits. In this review, a detailed account of the current studies evaluating the role of stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of craniopharyngiomas is presented. The authors also provide a short account of their experience to aid in defining the role of CyberKnife radiosurgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anand Veeravagu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Yang I, Sughrue ME, Rutkowski MJ, Kaur R, Ivan ME, Aranda D, Barani IJ, Parsa AT. Craniopharyngioma: a comparison of tumor control with various treatment strategies. Neurosurg Focus 2010; 28:E5. [PMID: 20367362 DOI: 10.3171/2010.1.focus09307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 128] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECT Craniopharyngiomas have a propensity to recur after resection, potentially causing death through their aggressive local behavior in their critical site of origin. Recent data suggest that subtotal resection (STR) followed by adjuvant radiotherapy (XRT) may be an appealing substitute for gross-total resection (GTR), providing similar rates of tumor control without the morbidity associated with aggressive resection. Here, the authors summarize the published literature regarding rates of tumor control with various treatment modalities for craniopharyngiomas. METHODS The authors performed a comprehensive search of the English language literature to identify studies publishing outcome data on patients undergoing surgery for craniopharyngioma. Rates of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined through Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS There were 442 patients who underwent tumor resection. Among these patients, GTR was achieved in 256 cases (58%), STR in 101 cases (23%), and STR+XRT in 85 cases (19%). The 2- and 5-year PFS rates for the GTR group versus the STR+XRT group were 88 versus 91%, and 67 versus 69%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year OS rates for the GTR group versus the STR+XRT group were 98 versus 99%, and 98 versus 95%, respectively. There was no significant difference in PFS (log-rank test) or OS with GTR (log-rank test). CONCLUSIONS Given the relative rarity of craniopharyngioma, this study provides estimates of outcome for a variety of treatment combinations, as not all treatments are an option for all patients with these tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isaac Yang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Hasegawa T, Kobayashi T, Kida Y. Tolerance of the optic apparatus in single-fraction irradiation using stereotactic radiosurgery: evaluation in 100 patients with craniopharyngioma. Neurosurgery 2010; 66:688-94; discussion 694-5. [PMID: 20190668 DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000367554.96981.26] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the limiting dose to the optic apparatus in single-fraction irradiation in patients with craniopharyngioma treated with gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS). METHODS One hundred patients with 109 craniopharyngiomas treated with GKRS were evaluated with a median follow-up period of 68 months. Tumor volume varied from 0.1 to 36.0 (median, 3.3) cm. Marginal doses varied from 10 to 18 (median, 11.4) Gy. Maximum dose to any part of the optic apparatus varied from 2 to 18 (median, 10) Gy. RESULTS The actuarial 5- and 10-year overall rates of survival of tumor progression after GKRS were 93% and 88%, respectively. Similarly, the actuarial 5- and 10-year progression-free survival rates were 62% and 52%, respectively. Among 94 patients in whom visual function was evaluable after GKRS, only 3 patients developed radiation-induced optic neuropathy, indicating an overall Kaplan-Meier radiation-induced optic neuropathy rate of 5%. Of these patients, 2 received 15 Gy or greater to the optic apparatus. Another patient who received 8 Gy or less had undergone previous fractionated radiation therapy with a biologically effective dose of 60 Gy. CONCLUSION The optic apparatus seems to be more tolerant of irradiation than previously thought. Careful dose planning is essential, particularly in patients who underwent prior external beam radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toshinori Hasegawa
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gamma Knife Center, Komaki City Hospital, Komaki, Japan.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Endocrinologic, neurologic, and visual morbidity after treatment for craniopharyngioma. J Neurooncol 2010; 101:463-76. [PMID: 20535527 PMCID: PMC3024496 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-010-0265-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2010] [Accepted: 05/30/2010] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Craniopharyngiomas are locally aggressive tumors which typically are focused in the sellar and suprasellar region near a number of critical neural and vascular structures mediating endocrinologic, behavioral, and visual functions. The present study aims to summarize and compare the published literature regarding morbidity resulting from treatment of craniopharyngioma. We performed a comprehensive search of the published English language literature to identify studies publishing outcome data of patients undergoing surgery for craniopharyngioma. Comparisons of the rates of endocrine, vascular, neurological, and visual complications were performed using Pearson’s chi-squared test, and covariates of interest were fitted into a multivariate logistic regression model. In our data set, 540 patients underwent surgical resection of their tumor. 138 patients received biopsy alone followed by some form of radiotherapy. Mean overall follow-up for all patients in these studies was 54 ± 1.8 months. The overall rate of new endocrinopathy for all patients undergoing surgical resection of their mass was 37% (95% CI = 33–41). Patients receiving GTR had over 2.5 times the rate of developing at least one endocrinopathy compared to patients receiving STR alone or STR + XRT (52 vs. 19 vs. 20%, χ2P < 0.00001). On multivariate analysis, GTR conferred a significant increase in the risk of endocrinopathy compared to STR + XRT (OR = 3.45, 95% CI = 2.05–5.81, P < 0.00001), after controlling for study size and the presence of significant hypothalamic involvement. There was a statistical trend towards worse visual outcomes in patients receiving XRT after STR compared to GTR or STR alone (GTR = 3.5% vs. STR 2.1% vs. STR + XRT 6.4%, P = 0.11). Given the difficulty in obtaining class 1 data regarding the treatment of this tumor, this study can serve as an estimate of expected outcomes for these patients, and guide decision making until these data are available.
Collapse
|
40
|
Non-adenomatous sellar lesions: experience of a single centre and review of the literature. Neurosurg Rev 2010; 33:465-76. [PMID: 20480381 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-010-0263-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2009] [Revised: 01/27/2010] [Accepted: 03/06/2010] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
41
|
Stereotactic radiotherapy using Novalis for craniopharyngioma adjacent to optic pathways. J Neurooncol 2010; 98:239-47. [DOI: 10.1007/s11060-010-0180-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2009] [Accepted: 03/31/2010] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
42
|
Aquilina K, Merchant TE, Rodriguez-Galindo C, Ellison DW, Sanford RA, Boop FA. Malignant transformation of irradiated craniopharyngioma in children: report of 2 cases. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2010; 5:155-61. [PMID: 20121363 DOI: 10.3171/2009.9.peds09257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Malignant transformation of craniopharyngioma is a rare event; only 3 cases have been reported in children, all in the Japanese literature. The authors describe 2 additional pediatric cases. Treatment in both of these cases consisted of multiple resections and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Malignant transformation occurred 7 and 8 years after EBRT. The authors also review another 6 cases in adults. A possible causative association with radiation therapy is discussed. As radiation is currently an important option in the management of craniopharyngiomas, this association requires further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristian Aquilina
- Department of Neurosurgery, Frenchay Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
|
44
|
Radiosurgery for craniopharyngioma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009; 78:64-71. [PMID: 20005637 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.1693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2009] [Revised: 07/02/2009] [Accepted: 07/10/2009] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To analyze the outcomes of gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for residual or recurrent craniopharyngiomas and evaluate the factors that optimized the tumor control rates. METHODS AND MATERIALS A total of 46 patients with craniopharyngiomas underwent 51 SRS procedures at University of Pittsburgh between 1988 and 2007. The median tumor volume was 1.0 cm(3) (range, 0.07-8.0). The median prescription dose delivered to the tumor margin was 13.0 Gy (range, 9-20). The median maximal dose was 26.0 Gy (range, 20-50). The mean follow-up time was 62.2 months (range, 12-232). RESULTS The overall survival rate after SRS was 97.1% at 5 years. The 3- and 5-year progression-free survival rates (solid tumor control) were both 91.6%. The overall local control rate (for both solid tumor and cyst control) was 91%, 81%, and 68% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. No patients with normal pituitary function developed hypopopituitarism after SRS. Two patients developed homonymous hemianopsia owing to tumor progression after SRS. Among the factors examined, complete radiosurgical coverage was a significant favorable prognostic factor. CONCLUSION SRS is a safe and effective minimally invasive option for the management of residual or recurrent craniopharyngiomas. Complete radiosurgical coverage of the tumor was associated with better tumor control.
Collapse
|
45
|
Abstract
Apart from pituitary adenomas, a number of tumours may arise from within the sella presenting a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge at a multidisciplinary specialist level. This article focus on the most commonly diagnosed non-adenomatous pituitary tumours (craniopharyngiomas, Rathke's cleft cysts and meningiomas) and provides data on their pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niki Karavitaki
- Department of Endocrinology, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Churchill Hospital, Old Rd, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Abstract
An approach toward treatment of tumors involving the optic apparatus is presented. When tumors cause mass effect, microsurgical excision or debulking is generally recommended. Radiosurgery has been controversial yet advances in imaging and high speed computer planning allow treatment of lesions involving the optic apparatus with low morbidity. Microsurgical and radiosurgical approaches to tumors involving the globe, orbit, suprasellar region and third ventricle are discussed. Gamma Knife radiosurgery for choroidal melanomas spares orbital excenteration. We have used a marginal dose of 2025 Gy for choroidal melanomas and generally limit the optic nerves and chiasm to less than 10 Gy in other cases. The effective dose for cavernous hemangiomas remains unclear, however we have had success with marginal doses in the range of 1620Gy. Lower doses may prove successful yet better spare vision in cases where vision is useful. Our combined microsurgical and radiosurgical approach to tumors involving the apparatus has had an excellent rate of sparing vision, a low overall morbidity and excellent success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan A Borden
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts-New England Medical Center, 750 Washington Street, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Surgical management of craniopharyngiomas. J Neurooncol 2009; 92:283-96. [PMID: 19357956 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-009-9841-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2008] [Accepted: 02/23/2009] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Surgical treatment of craniopharyngiomas has been historically challenging and, despite advancements in microsurgical and skull base techniques, continues to pose a challenge to modern day surgeons. In particular, proponents of subtotal resection in conjunction with radiotherapy argue that this less aggressive approach can yield equivalent control rates with lower morbidity, while others argue that gross total resection is superior. Regardless of whether gross total or subtotal resection is the goal, surgical planning must include a thorough endocrine and neuro-ophthalmologic evaluation as well as imaging, and the approach, whether transsphenoidal or transcranial, must take into account the nature of the tumor and its location. In addition, optimal management of craniopharyngiomas must consist of an individualized and multidisciplinary approach not only including neurological surgery, but also including endocrinology, neuro-ophthalmology, neuropsychology, and, often, radiation-oncology.
Collapse
|
48
|
Extended transsphenoidal surgery for suprasellar craniopharyngiomas: infrachiasmatic radical resection combined with or without a suprachiasmatic trans–lamina terminalis approach. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2009; 71:290-8, discussion 298. [DOI: 10.1016/j.surneu.2007.11.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2007] [Accepted: 11/02/2007] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
49
|
The role of fractionated radiotherapy and radiosurgery in the management of patients with craniopharyngioma. Neurosurg Rev 2009; 32:125-32; discussion 132. [DOI: 10.1007/s10143-009-0186-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2008] [Revised: 11/13/2008] [Accepted: 12/06/2008] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
50
|
Abstract
Radiotherapy has been used as primary or adjuvant treatment in a number of non-adenomatous masses arising from within the sella. It is particularly important in the therapeutic algorithm of craniopharyngiomas and meningiomas and has also been used in chordomas/chordosarcomas and less commonly, in other lesions. This review describes the place of irradiation in the management of these masses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Karavitaki
- Department of Endocrinology, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Churchill Hospital, Old Rd, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LJ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|