Intraoperative lidocaine injection into the carotid sinus during endarterectomy

The efficacy and efficiency of percutaneous lidocaine injection for minimizing the carotid reflex in carotid artery stenting: A single-center retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether local anesthetic infiltration could minimize the carotid baroreceptor reflex (CBR) which has an incidence after carotid artery stenting (CAS) that varies from 29% to 51%.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center study included 51 patients (mean age, 70.47 years) who underwent CAS for carotid stenosis. The groups included patients who underwent CAS for asymptomatic ischemic stroke (n=41) or symptomatic disease (n=10). Preprocedural percutaneous lidocaine injections (PPLIs) were administered to 70.6% and 5.9% of patients who underwent elective CAS and emergency CAS, respectively.

RESULTS

Among patients who received PPLIs, the mean degree of stenosis was 80.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: ±10.74, 51-98%). The mean distance from the common carotid artery bifurcation to the most stenotic lesion (CSD) was 8.3 mm (95% CI: ±0.97, 6.3-10.2 mm); the mean angle between the internal carotid artery and common carotid artery (CCA) trunk (IAG) was 65.6° (95% CI: ±2.39, 61-70°). Among patients who did not receive PPLIs, the mean degree of stenosis was 84.0% (95% CI: ±8.96, 70-99%). The mean CSD was 5.9 mm (95% CI: ±1.83, 1.9-9.9 mm); the mean IAG was 60.4° (95% CI: ±4.41, 51-70°). The procedure time was longer in the PPLI group than in the no PPLI group (28.19 [n=39] vs. 18.88 [n=12] days) (P=0.057); the length of intensive care unit stay was shorter in the PPLI group (20.01 [n=36] vs. 28.10 [n=5] days) (P=0.132).

CONCLUSIONS

Targeted PPLI administration to the carotid bulb decreased aberrant heart rates and blood pressure changes induced by carotid stent deployment and balloon inflation. As CBR sensitivity increases with decreasing distance to the stenotic lesion from the CCA bifurcation, PPLIs may help stabilize patients during procedures for stenotic lesions closer to the CCA.

The Carotid Sinus Nerve-Structure, Function, and Clinical Implications

Interest has been renewed in the anatomy and physiology of the carotid sinus nerve (CSN) and its targets (carotid sinus and carotid body, CB), due to recent proposals of surgical procedures for a series of common pathologies, such as carotid sinus syndrome, hypertension, heart failure, and insulin resistance. The CSN originates from the glossopharyngeal nerve soon after its appearance from the jugular foramen. It shows frequent communications with the sympathetic trunk (usually at the level of the superior cervical ganglion) and the vagal nerve (main trunk, pharyngeal branches, or superior laryngeal nerve). It courses on the anterior aspect of the internal carotid artery to reach the carotid sinus, CB, and/or intercarotid plexus. In the carotid sinus, type I (dynamic) carotid baroreceptors have larger myelinated A-fibers; type II (tonic) baroreceptors show smaller A- and unmyelinated C-fibers. In the CB, afferent fibers are mainly stimulated by acetylcholine and ATP, released by type I cells. The neurons are located in the petrosal ganglion, and centripetal fibers project on to the solitary tract nucleus: chemosensory inputs to the commissural subnucleus, and baroreceptor inputs to the commissural, medial, dorsomedial, and dorsolateral subnuclei. The baroreceptor component of the CSN elicits sympatho-inhibition and the chemoreceptor component stimulates sympatho-activation. Thus, in refractory hypertension and heart failure (characterized by increased sympathetic activity), baroreceptor electrical stimulation, and CB removal have been proposed. Instead, denervation of the carotid sinus has been proposed for the "carotid sinus syndrome." Anat Rec, 302:575-587, 2019. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Percutaneous injection of lidocaine within the carotid body area in carotid artery stenting: an "old-new" technique

Severe bradycardia is a common untoward effect during balloon angioplasty when performing carotid artery stenting. Therefore atropine injection even before dilatation and the presence of an anesthesiologist are advocated in all patients. In the surgical literature, injection of a local anesthetic agent into the carotid sinus before carotid endarterectomy was performed in an attempt to ameliorate perioperative hemodynamic instability. This study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that percutaneous infiltration of the carotid sinus with local anesthetic immediately before balloon dilatation reduces bradycardia and ameliorates the need for atropine injection or the presence of an anesthesiologist. Infiltration of the carotid sinus with 5 ml of 1% lidocaine, 3 min before dilatation, was performed in 30 consecutive patients. No one exhibited any significant rhythm change that required atropine injection. The anesthesiologist did not face any hemodynamic instability during the carotid artery stenting procedure.

Carotid Sinus Nerve Blockade to Reduce Blood Pressure Instability Following Carotid Endarterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Local anaesthetic infiltration into the carotid sinus during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been recommended to minimise blood pressure fluctuations but its use remains controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine whether intra-operative administration of local anaesthetic reduces the incidence of haemodynamic instability following CEA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search of the Medline, Pubmed and Embase databases and the Current Controlled Trials register identified four trials, which met the pre-defined inclusion criteria for data extraction. Pooled odds ratios with 95 per cent confidence intervals (c.i.) for the development of post-operative hypotension and hypertension were calculated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Outcomes of 432 patients were studied. Local anaesthetic blockade of the carotid sinus was associated with a pooled odds ratio of 1.25 (95 per cent c.i. 0.496 to 3.15); p=0.216) and 1.28 (95 per cent c.i. 0.699 to 2.33; p=0.428) for the development of post-operative hypotension and hypertension respectively. Although none reach significance there was a trend towards increased risk of developing a complication in those patients who received local anaesthetic.

CONCLUSIONS

There are insufficient data to determine the role of intra-operative local anaesthetic administration in reducing post-operative blood pressure lability following CEA. Conversely, the possibility of harm cannot be excluded on the basis of the currently available data.

Adjunctive pharmacologic use in carotid endarterectomy: a review

Although carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is now widely accepted as the surgical therapy for carotid stenosis, the role of and indications and evidence for many pharmacologic agents that are used adjunctively in the perioperative setting have not been conclusively established. Aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) is the pharmaceutical agent that has been studied most extensively in conjunction with CEA; other than aspirin and dextran, the use of many agents before, during, and after CEA has not been standardized. Prospective randomized trials are still needed to demonstrate efficacy, predict outcome, and determine the optimal use of these medications in their adjunctive use during CEA to improve patient care and obtain optimal surgical outcomes.

Effect of lignocaine injection in carotid sinus on baroreceptor sensitivity during carotid endarterectomy

OBJECTIVES

This study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that there is a neural basis for baroreceptor deterioration during carotid endarterectomy (CEA), by investigating intraoperative hemodynamic changes induced by intraluminal carotid stretch stimulation, before and after application of local anesthetic to the adventitial layer of the carotid sinus region.

METHODS

This was a prospective study of 20 patients undergoing elective CEA. During CEA, before removal of the atheroma, intraluminal stretch simulation of the carotid baroreceptors (rub test) was performed before and after injection of 1% lignocaine into adventitial tissue of the artery in the region of the carotid sinus. Continuous measurements of mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), electrocardiographic r-r intervals (R-R), heart rate, cardiac vagal tone, and carotid sinus baroreflex were recorded to determine alterations in baroreceptor function.

RESULTS

Rub test before injection of lignocaine was associated with a decrease in MAP and heart rate and an increase in R-R, cardiac vagal tone, and carotid baroreflex response, indicating a functioning baroreflex. After lignocaine injection and repetition of the rub test, no significant change was seen in MAP, heart rate, R-R, cardiac vagal tone, or carotid baroreflex response, indicating a nonfunctioning baroreflex. Comparing the peak responses to the rub test stimulus before and after lignocaine injection showed significant differences for all variables (P <.05), with carotid baroreflex response and heart rate being highly significant (P <.0005).

CONCLUSIONS

The baroreflex response to intraluminal stretch stimulation of the carotid sinus area is operational in patients undergoing CEA, and this response is abolished by infiltration of local anesthetic into the periadventitial tissue around the carotid sinus.