Carcinomatous meningitis: are surgery or gamma knife radiosurgery treatment risk factors?

Risk of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in patients with brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery

There is limited available literature examining factors that predispose patients to the development of LMC after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases. We sought to evaluate risk factors that may predispose patients to LMC after SRS treatment in this case-control study of patients with brain metastases who underwent single-fraction SRS between 2011 and 2016. Demographic and clinical information were collected retrospectively for 19 LMC cases and 30 controls out of 413 screened patients with brain metastases. Risk factors of interest were evaluated by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses and overall survival rates were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. About 5% of patients with brain metastases treated with SRS developed LMC. Patients with LMC (median 154 days, 95% CI 33-203 days) demonstrated a poorer overall survival than matched controls (median 417 days, 95% CI 121-512 days, p = 0.002). The most common primary tumor histologies  that lead to the development of LMC were non-small cell lung cancer (36.8%), breast cancer (26.3%), and melanoma (21.1%). No association was found between the risk of LMC and the location of the brain lesion or total volume of brain metastases. Prior surgical resection of brain metastases before SRS was associated with a 6.5 times higher odds (95% CI 1.45-29.35, p = 0.01) of developing LMC post-radiosurgery compared to those with no prior resections of brain metastases. Additionally, adjuvant WBRT may help to reduce the risk of LMC and can be considered in decision-making for patients who have had brain metastasectomy.

Comparative risk of leptomeningeal dissemination of cancer after surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery for a single supratentorial solid tumor metastasis

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that differential risks of developing leptomeningeal disease (LMD) exist in patients having a single supratentorial brain metastasis resected via a piecemeal or en bloc approach or treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).

METHODS

Between 1993 and 2006, 827 patients with a supratentorial brain metastasis underwent resection or SRS at The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. The primary outcome was the incidence of LMD.

RESULTS

Resection was performed piecemeal in 191 patients and en bloc in 351 patients; 285 patients received SRS. LMD occurred in 33 patients, 29 in the resection group and 4 in the SRS group. Risk of LMD was significantly higher with piecemeal tumor resection than with other procedures (SRS: hazard ratio [HR] for piecemeal, 5.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-17.2; P = 0.002; en bloc, HR for piecemeal, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.3-5.6; P = 0.009). The difference between piecemeal and en bloc was particularly pronounced in patients with a melanoma primary (HR, 8.4; 95% CI, 1.8-39.2; P = 0.007). The risk of LMD was not significantly different between en bloc resection and SRS (HR for en bloc, 2.1; 95% CI, 0.7-6.4; P = 0.21). Similar results were obtained when comparing effects of SRS and both resection approaches after limiting the sample to patients with tumors in a specific volume range.

CONCLUSION

Piecemeal resection of a supratentorial brain metastasis carries a higher risk of LMD than en bloc resection or SRS. Further assessment of the role of the 2 surgical resection approaches and SRS in a controlled prospective setting with large numbers of patients is warranted.

Brain metastases: current management and new developments

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the state-of-the-art and new developments in the management of patients with brain metastases.

RECENT FINDINGS

Treatment decisions are based on prognostic factors to maximize neurologic function and survival, while avoiding unnecessary therapies. Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is the treatment of choice for patients with unfavorable prognostic factors. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or surgery is indicated for patients with favorable prognostic factors and limited brain disease. In single brain metastasis, the addition of either stereotactic radiosurgery or surgery to WBRT improves survival. The omission of WBRT after surgery or radiosurgery results in a worse local and distant control, though it does not affect survival. The incidence of neurocognitive deficits in long-term survivors after WBRT remains to be defined. New approaches to avoid cognitive deficits following WBRT are being investigated. The role of chemotherapy is limited. Molecularly targeted therapies are increasingly employed. Prophylaxis with WBRT is the standard in small-cell lung cancer.

SUMMARY

Many questions need future trials: the usefulness of new radiosensitizers; the role of local treatments after surgery; and the impact of molecularly targeted therapies on subgroups of patients with specific molecular profiles. Quality of life and cognitive functions are recognized as major endpoints in clinical trials.

Boost radiosurgery for treatment of brain metastases after surgical resections

BACKGROUND

We evaluated results of resection surgery followed by boost radiosurgery for the treatment of brain metastases.

METHODS

We treated 21 patients (13 male, 8 female) with surgical resection (subtotal or total) followed by boost radiosurgery. The mean patient age was 61 years (range, 41-80 years); supratentorial lesions were treated in 12 patients, and posterior fossa lesions were treated in 9 patients. The most common primary cancers were lung (24%) and colon (24%). Fifty-three percent of patients had brain metastases only, whereas 47% had extracranial metastases. The radiosurgery dose plan was designed to radiate the operative cavity; the mean treatment volume (50% isodose) was 10.7 mL (range, 3.4-23.3 mL), and the mean marginal dose was 17 Gy (range, 13-20 Gy).

RESULTS

Local control was achieved in 16 (76%) patients. However, new intracranial lesions developed in 10 patients, and meningeal carcinomatosis occurred in 5 patients. Local tumor recurrence occurred more often for patients treated with lower radiotherapy doses (<18 vs > or =18 Gy, P = .03), and meningeal carcinomatosis occurred more often in patients with posterior fossa lesions (P = 0.05). Gamma knife radiosurgery was performed in 13 patients, and whole-brain radiation was performed in 2 patients. No patients experienced symptomatic radiation injury, and the median survival time was 20 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Although boost radiosurgery is less invasive and reduces morbidity, the radiosurgical dose must be higher than 18 Gy for the treatment to be most effective. Treatment of lesions of the posterior fossa must be considered carefully because of the higher frequency of meningeal carcinomatosis. Also, we recommend that the surgeons who operate on the metastatic tumors must try to decrease the resected cavity volume and to prevent cerebrospinal fluid dissemination at the operation for posterior fossa lesions.

Comparative risk of leptomeningeal disease after resection or stereotactic radiosurgery for solid tumor metastasis to the posterior fossa

Object

The authors tested the hypothesis that patients with metastatic posterior fossa lesions (MPFLs) treated with resection have a higher risk of leptomeningeal disease (LMD) than those with MPFLs treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).

Methods

Between 1993 and 2004, 379 patients with MPFLs were treated with resection or SRS at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. The authors' primary study outcome was the incidence of LMD, as diagnosed with cerebrospinal fluid cytological analysis and/or neuroimaging.

Results

Resection was performed in 260 patients, whereas 119 patients underwent SRS. The median patient age was 56 years, 51% of patients were male, and 93% had a Karnofsky Performance Scale score $ 70. The most common primary cancers were those of the lung, breast, and kidney, as well as melanoma. Leptomeningeal dissemination of cancer occurred in 33 patients: 26 in the resection group and 7 in the SRS group (resection group: rate ratio [RR] 2.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89–4.75, p = 0.09). Piecemeal tumor resection (137 cases) was associated with a significantly higher risk of LMD than en bloc resection (123 cases; RR 3.4, 95% CI 1.43–8.12, p = 0.006) or SRS (RR 3.37, 95% CI 1.41–8.04, p = 0.006), and there was no significant difference in the risk for LMD between en bloc resection and SRS (en bloc resection: RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.34–2.81, p = 0.98). The multivariate RR and significance associated with piecemeal resection, however, were consistent, with a strong effect (RR 2.45, 95% CI 1.19–5.02, p = 0.02) and no indication of biases associated with tumor size, location, or cystic/necrotic appearance.

Conclusions

There is an increased risk of LMD after piecemeal resection of an MPFL. This increase, although clinically and statistically significant, is not as alarming as previously reported and is absent when en bloc removal is achieved. Further assessment of the role of resection in a controlled prospective setting is warranted.