Cavernous angioma within an olfactory groove meningioma

Intracranial meningioma and concomitant cavernous malformation: A series description and review of the literature

OBJECTIVES

Intracranial meningioma with concomitant cavernous malformation has been rarely described in the literature. This study aimed to investigate the correct neurosurgical conduct.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrieved clinical and radiological data for 39 outpatients or patients that underwent surgery (mean age: 60 years; n = 25 females) for a single or multiple meningiomas and concomitant single or multiple cavernous malformations. Cavernous malformations were classified according to Zabramski's type scale. Our results were compared to results published in the literature.

RESULTS

All patients had at least one meningioma and at least one concomitant cavernous malformation. Most meningiomas and cavernous malformations were located in the supratentorial region. Nine patients (23 %) had multiple meningiomas and nine had concomitant multiple cavernous malformations. Cavernous malformations were classified as type I (n = 0), type II (n = 9), type III (n = 11), or type IV (n = 19). The surgical priority was meningioma removal. A single patient underwent simultaneous removal of a meningioma and a contiguous cavernous malformation. In the postoperative period and long term follow-up, no complications occurred related to cavernous malformations, intra- or extra-lesional bleeding, or morphology/size changes. Years after surgical treatment, a new type IV cavernous malformation occurred in two patients.

CONCLUSION

Our findings corroborate that meningioma removal should take priority in patients with intracranial meningioma and concomitant cavernous malformation. Concomitant cavernous malformations showed no change in morphology or size; therefore, they should merely be observed during follow-up. In patients that harbor a single meningioma, a type IV cavernous malformation should preferably be considered a concomitant cerebral microbleed.

Cavernous hemangioma of the skull and meningioma: association or coincidence?

Intraosseous cavernous hemangiomas of the skull are rare. Meningiomas are quite frequently encountered in a neurosurgical practice. The association between these two entities is nevertheless very uncommon. The authors present a case of a 72-year-old woman suffering from headache. The MRI showed a parietal meningioma with adjacent thick bone. The meningioma and the bone were removed. The histological examination confirmed the diagnosis of meningioma and revealed a cavernoma of the skull. The relationship between the lesions suggests more than a coincidental association. Several hypotheses are proposed to explain common causal connections.

Endoscopic skull base surgery: a comprehensive comparison with open transcranial approaches

Little data exists comparing endoscopic endonasal approaches to pathology of the anterior skull base with more traditional transcranial and transsphenoidal microscopic approaches. In order to more fully characterize the role of endoscopy in the management of pathology of the anterior cranial base, we conducted a systematic review of case series and case reports documenting surgical and clinical outcomes. We found that for craniopharyngiomas, clival chordomas, esthesioneuroblastomas and giant pituitary adenomas, the endonasal endoscopic approach can result in equivalent or higher rates of gross total resection than open approaches. For meningiomas, however, open transcranial approaches are still able to achieve higher rates of total resection. CSF leak rates are higher for patients undergoing endoscopic surgery for meningiomas and craniopharyngiomas, but not for chordomas, esthesioneuroblastomas or giant pituitary adenomas. In certain patients, the endonasal endoscopic approach may be a safe and effective alternative for the treatment of a wide variety of skull base pathology, particularly those with small midline tumours.

Endoscopic endonasal versus open transcranial resection of anterior midline skull base meningiomas

OBJECTIVE

To assess the advantages and limitations of the endoscopic endonasal approach to anterior skull base meningiomas, a minimally invasive approach that avoids extensive bone drilling, brain retraction, and manipulation of nerves and critical vessels, versus open transcranial surgery.

METHODS

A MEDLINE (2000-2010) search was performed to identify series for either olfactory groove meningiomas or tuberculum sellae (TS) or planum sphenoidale meningiomas. Statistical analyses of categorical variables such as extent of resection, morbidity, and visual outcome were performed using χ(2) and Fisher exact tests.

RESULTS

The literature review included 60 studies, involving 1426 patients. Open surgery achieved a higher rate of gross total resection (GTR) for both olfactory groove (P < 0.001) and TS and planum (P < 0.001) meningiomas. Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak occurred more frequently in the endoscopic cohort (P < 0.001). Other postoperative complications occurred more frequently in the open cohort, although this difference was not statistically significant. There were no significant differences in postoperative visual outcome between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the current literature, open transcranial approaches for olfactory groove and TS and planum sphenoidale meningiomas still result in higher rates of total resection with lower postoperative CSF leak rates. The endoscopic endonasal approach may be safe and effective for certain skull base meningiomas; careful patient selection and multilayer closure techniques are essential.