Quantitation of and landmarks for the muscular branches of the ulnar nerve to the forearm for application in peripheral nerve neurotization procedures

Cadaveric study of flexor digitorum profundus and superficialis and flexor pollicis longus innervation patterns for application in selective neurectomy

PURPOSE

Spasticity management in finger flexors (flexor digitorum profundus and superficialis and flexor pollicis longus) is a challenge. Recent studies demonstrated the short- and long-term efficacy of selective and hyperselective neurectomy for the spastic upper limb. However, hyperselective neurectomy of flexor digitorum profundus and flexor digitorum superficialis branches was incomplete, without impairing their muscular body and function. This cadaveric study describes a novel medial approach in the forearm, to reach all the muscular branches: flexor digitorum superficialis and profundus and flexor pollicis longus.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fourteen cadaveric fresh frozen upper limbs were used. The feasibility of the medial surgical approach was studied, as well as the number, length and point of emergence of the muscular branches from the median and ulnar nerves to the flexor pollicis longus, flexor digitorum profundus and flexor digitorum superficialis.

RESULTS

The medial approach to the forearm gave access to all the muscular branches from the median and ulnar nerves to the flexor pollicis longus, flexor digitorum superficialis and flexor digitorum profundus, in all cases. A Martin Gruber communicating branch was found in 7 cases out of 14.

CONCLUSION

The medial approach to the forearm gave access to all the muscular branches from the median and ulnar nerve to the flexor pollicis longus, flexor digitorum superficialis and flexor digitorum profundus, without extensive transmuscular dissection of the pronator teres or flexor digitorum superficialis muscles. This approach opens the way for selective neurectomy of the flexor pollicis longus, flexor digitorum profundus and flexor digitorum superficialis muscles.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Morphology and morphometry of the ulnar nerve in the forelimb of pigs

The knowledge of the morphology and morphometry of peripheral nerves is essential for developing neural interfaces and understanding nerve regeneration in basic and applied research. Currently, the most adopted animal model is the rat, even though recent studies have suggested that the neuroanatomy of large animal models is more comparable to humans. The present knowledge of the morphological structure of large animal models is limited; therefore, the present study aims to describe the morphological characteristics of the Ulnar Nerve (UN) in pigs. UN cross-sections were taken from seven Danish landrace pigs at three distinct locations: distal UN, proximal UN and at the dorsal cutaneous branch of the UN (DCBUN). The nerve diameter, fascicle diameter and number, number of fibres and fibre size were quantified. The UN diameter was larger in the proximal section compared to the distal segment and the DCBUN. The proximal branch also had a more significant number of fascicles (median: 15) than the distal (median: 10) and the DCBUN (median: 11) segments. Additionally, the mean fascicle diameter was smaller at the DCBUN (mean: 165 μm) than at the distal (mean: 197 μm) and proximal (mean: 199 μm) segments of the UN. Detailed knowledge of the microscopical structure of the UN in pigs is critical for further studies investigating neural interface designs and computational models of the peripheral nervous system.

Location of Ulnar Nerve Branches to the Flexor Carpi Ulnaris during Surgery for Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Cubital tunnel syndrome, the most common ulnar nerve entrapment neuropathy, is usually managed by simple decompression or anterior transposition. One of the concerns in transposition is damage to the nerve branches around the elbow. In this study, the location of ulnar nerve branches to the flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) was assessed during operations for cubital tunnel syndrome to provide information to reduce operation-related complications.

METHODS

A personal series (HJY) of cases operated for cubital tunnel syndrome was reviewed. Cases managed by transposition and location of branches to the FCU were selected for analysis. The function of the branches was confirmed by intraoperative nerve stimulation and the location of the branches was assessed by the distance from the center of medial epicondyle.

RESULTS

There was a total of 61 cases of cubital tunnel syndrome, among which 31 were treated by transposition. Twenty-one cases with information on the location of branches were analyzed. The average number of ulnar nerve branches around the elbow was 1.8 (0 to 3), only one case showed no branches. Most of the cases had one branch to the medial head, and one other to the lateral head of the FCU. There were two cases having branches without FCU responses (one branch in one case, three branches in another). The location of the branches to the medial head was 16.3±8.6 mm distal to the medial epicondyle (16 branches; range, 0 to 35 mm), to the lateral head was 19.5±9.5 mm distal to the medial epicondyle (19 branches; range, -5 to 30 mm). Branches without FCU responses were found from 20 mm proximal to the medial condyle to 15 mm distal to the medial epicondyle (five branches). Most of the branches to the medial head were 15 to 20 mm (50% of cases), and most to the lateral head were 15 to 25 mm (58% of cases). There were no cases of discernable weakness of the FCU after operation.

CONCLUSION

In most cases of cubital tunnel syndrome, there are ulnar nerve branches around the elbow. Although there might be some cases with branches without FCU responses, most branches are to the FCU, and are to be saved. The operator should be watchful for branches about 15 to 25 mm distal to the medial epicondyle, where most branches come out.

Nerve transfers in the forearm: potential use in spastic conditions

PURPOSE

Deformities of the spastic upper limb result frequently from the association of spasticity, muscle contracture and muscle imbalance between strong spastic muscles and weak non-spastic muscles. This study was designed to evaluate the feasibility of combining selective neurectomy of the usual spastic and strong muscles together with transfer of their motor nerves to the usual weak muscles, to improve wrist and fingers motion while decreasing spasticity.

METHODS

Twenty upper limbs from fresh frozen human cadavers were dissected. All motor branches of the radial and median nerve for the forearm muscles were identified. We attempted all possible end-to-end nerve transfers between the usually strong "donor" motor branches, namely FCR and PT, and the usually weak "recipient" motor branches (ERCL, ECRB, PIN, AIN).

RESULTS

 The PT had two nerve branches in 80%, thus allowing selective neurectomy. The proximal PT branch could be anastomosed end-to-end in 45% (AIN) to 85% (ECRL) of cases with the potential recipient branches. The distal PT branch could be anastomosed end to end to all potential recipient nerves. The FCR had a single branch in all cases. End-to-end anastomosis was possible in 90% for the ECRL and in 100% for all other recipient branches, but sacrificed all FCR innervation, ruling out hyperselective neurectomy.

CONCLUSION

 Selective neurectomies can be associated with distal nerve transfers at the forearm level in selected cases. The motor nerve to the PT is the best donor for nerve transfer combined with selective neurectomy, transferred to the ECRL, ECRB, PIN or AIN.

Possible points of compression of the ulnar nerve: Tricks and traps that await clinicians from an anatomical point of view

The ulnar nerve can be subject to numerous types of compression. The most common are cubital tunnel and ulnar tunnel syndromes, but there are many others with more uncommon etiologies. The existence of additional communicating branches, median nerve involvement, various types of injuries, and unusual anatomical variations can be a challenge for both diagnosis and treatment. This review presents a comprehensive depiction of ulnar nerve entrapment syndromes with particular reference to their anatomical background, risk factors, and clinical evaluation. Even common disorders can result from atypical morphological changes. It is important to be familiar with them as it is a key ability in daily medical practice.

Effect of fascicle composition on ulnar to musculocutaneous nerve transfer (Oberlin transfer) in neonatal brachial plexus palsy

OBJECTIVE Neonatal brachial plexus palsy (NBPP) continues to be a problematic occurrence impacting approximately 1.5 per 1000 live births in the United States, with 10%-40% of these infants experiencing permanent disability. These children lose elbow flexion, and one surgical option for recovering it is the Oberlin transfer. Published data support the use of the ulnar nerve fascicle that innervates the flexor carpi ulnaris as the donor nerve in adults, but no analogous published data exist for infants. This study investigated the association of ulnar nerve fascicle choice with functional elbow flexion outcome in NBPP. METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective study of 13 cases in which infants underwent ulnar to musculocutaneous nerve transfer for NBPP at a single institution. They collected data on patient demographics, clinical characteristics, active range of motion (AROM), and intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) (using 4 ulnar nerve index muscles). Standard statistical analysis compared pre- and postoperative motor function improvement between specific fascicle transfer (1-2 muscles for either wrist flexion or hand intrinsics) and nonspecific fascicle transfer (> 2 muscles for wrist flexion and hand intrinsics) groups. RESULTS The patients' average age at initial clinic visit was 2.9 months, and their average age at surgical intervention was 7.4 months. All NBPPs were unilateral; the majority of patients were female (61%), were Caucasian (69%), had right-sided NBPP (61%), and had Narakas grade I or II injuries (54%). IONM recordings for the fascicular dissection revealed a donor fascicle with nonspecific innervation in 6 (46%) infants and specific innervation in the remaining 7 (54%) patients. At 6-month follow-up, the AROM improvement in elbow flexion in adduction was 38° in the specific fascicle transfer group versus 36° in the nonspecific fascicle transfer group, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.93). CONCLUSIONS Both specific and nonspecific fascicle transfers led to functional recovery, but that the composition of the donor fascicle had no impact on early outcomes. In young infants, ulnar nerve fascicular dissection places the ulnar nerve at risk for iatrogenic damage. The data from this study suggest that the use of any motor fascicle, specific or nonspecific, produces similar results and that the Oberlin transfer can be performed with less intrafascicular dissection, less time of surgical exposure, and less potential for donor site morbidity.

Transfer of a Terminal Motor Branch Nerve to the Flexor Carpi Ulnaris for Triceps Reinnervation: Anatomical Study and Clinical Cases

PURPOSE

To analyze the anatomical feasibility of transferring a motor branch nerve to the flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) to the triceps upper medial head motor branch (UMHM) and to report the resultant outcome of the restoration of elbow extension in 5 patients with extensive brachial plexus injury.

METHODS

The ulnar and radial nerves were dissected in 10 cadavers. We measured the length and diameter of the branches to the FCU and the UMHM branch and counted the axons. Then, 5 male patients, mean age 30 years, underwent FCU nerve branch transfer for reconstruction of elbow extension. Elbow flexion was restored via a median nerve branch to biceps transfer.

RESULTS

Mean UMHM nerve length and diameter were 86 and 1.5 mm, respectively. Mean number of branches to the FCU muscle was 2.9. Mean FCU nerve length and diameter were 50 and 1.0 mm, respectively. Mean number of myelinated fibers was 818 and 743 for the UMHM and the longest branch to the FCU, respectively. Coaptation between nerves was possible without tension. All patients recovered functional active elbow extension at a mean follow-up of 19 months with a British Medical Research Council score of M4. After surgery, all patients retained a functional FCU with a British Medical Research Council score of M4.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonselective ulnar nerve fascicles at the root of the limb might not be adequate to restore elbow extension when combined with a median nerve branch transfer for elbow flexion. A selective distal ulnar motor fascicle such as a FCU motor branch could be harvested and connected to a triceps branch to restore elbow extension. Such a nerve transfer would also allow for later transfer of the still functional FCU tendon to the digital extensors.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

For patients with extensive brachial plexus injury and a preserved medial cord, transferring a motor branch nerve to the FCU is an effective technique for the reconstruction of elbow extension.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Transfer of a Motor Fascicle From the Ulnar Nerve to the Branch of the Radial Nerve Destined to the Long Head of the Triceps for Restoration of Elbow Extension in Brachial Plexus Surgery

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE:

Restoration of elbow extension has not been considered of much importance regarding functional outcomes in brachial plexus surgery; however, the flexion of the elbow joint is only fully effective if the motion can be stabilized, what can be achieved solely if the triceps brachii is coactivated. To present a novel nerve transfer of a healthy motor fascicle from the ulnar nerve to the nerve of the long head of the triceps to restore the elbow extension function in brachial plexus injuries involving the upper and middle trunks.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION:

Case 1 is a 32-year-old man sustaining a right brachial extended upper plexus injury in a motorcycle accident 5 months before admission. The computed tomography myelogram demonstrated avulsion of the C5 and C6 roots. Case 2 is a 24-year-old man who sustained a C5-C7 injury to the left brachial plexus in a traffic accident 4 months before admission. Computed tomography myelogram demonstrated signs of C6 and C7 root avulsion. The technique included an incision at the medial border of the biceps, in the proximal third of the involved arm, followed by identification of the ulnar nerve, the radial nerve, and the branch to the long head of the triceps. The proximal stump of a motor fascicle from the ulnar nerve was sutured directly to the distal stump of the nerve of the long head of the triceps. Techniques to restore elbow flexion and shoulder abduction were applied in both cases. Triceps strength Medical Research Council M4 grade was obtained in both cases.

CONCLUSION:

The attempted nerve transfer was effective for restoration of elbow extension in primary brachial plexus surgery; however, it should be selected only for cases in which other reliable donor nerves were used to restore elbow flexion.

Regional anatomic structures of the elbow that may potentially compress the ulnar nerve

HYPOTHESIS

Traumatic injuries to the ulnar nerve at the elbow are a frequent problem as it is vulnerable to stretching and compression with motion of the upper limb. The aim of the present study was to explore the course of the ulnar nerve at the elbow and forearm and to determine possible anatomical structures that may cause compression of this structure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We examined 12 upper limbs from cadavers. The length of any fibrous bands, and if present, their distance to the medial epicondyle was recorded.

RESULTS

On 5 sides a fibrous band originating from the medial intermuscular septum was observed to cross over the ulnar nerve. The average length of the fibrous band was 5.7 cm, and it attached to the medial epicondyle. The mean length of the ulnar nerve as it coursed in the cubital tunnel was 3.8 cm. In 4 of the cases, the ulnar nerve was covered by muscle fibers originating from the flexor digitorum superficialis and extending to the flexor carpi ulnaris. On 5 sides we observed fibrous thickenings, and on 8 sides vascular structures were found crossing over the ulnar nerve.

DISCUSSION

The cubital tunnel is the most common site of compression of the ulnar nerve. Numerous surgical procedures are recommended for cubital tunnel syndrome. Simple decompression is used most commonly. Although surgical procedures are reported to provide efficient pain relief and functional recovery, residual or recurrent symptoms have been reported. Reasons for such recurrences may be more proximal or distal compression of the ulnar nerve as seen in our study.

CONCLUSION

Knowledge of possible compression sites of the ulnar nerve is important to the surgeon so that complications are avoided and postoperative recurrence is decreased.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Basic science study.

Ulnar nerve anatomy

The anatomy of the ulnar nerve is described from its origin at the brachial plexus to its termination in the hand and digits. The critical anatomy surrounding the cubital tunnel and Guyon canal is emphasized, and clinically relevant anatomic variations, muscle anomalies, and peripheral nerve anastomoses are described.