Rodríguez-Hernández A, Josephson SA, Josephson AS, Langer D, Lawton MT. Bypass for the prevention of ischemic stroke.
World Neurosurg 2012;
76:S72-9. [PMID:
22182275 DOI:
10.1016/j.wneu.2011.06.032]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2011] [Revised: 04/21/2011] [Accepted: 06/22/2011] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
Although most ischemic strokes are thromboembolic in origin and their management is endovascular or medical, some are hemodynamic in origin and their management may be surgical. Extracranial-intracranial bypass with superficial temporal artery-to-middle cerebral artery (MCA) bypass, high-flow interposition grafts, and reconstructive techniques have been developed. Clinical indications and efficacy are controversial, and this review examines current practices.
METHODS
Bypass surgery is indicated for patients with athero-occlusive disease that results in chronic, low cerebral blood flow accompanied by episodes of ischemic symptoms. Specific diagnoses include: (1) internal carotid artery occlusion; (2) MCA occlusion and, rarely, high-grade MCA stenosis; (3) vertebrobasilar atherosclerotic steno-occlusive disease; (4) vasculitis resulting in severe occlusive disease; and (5) moyamoya disease.
RESULTS
Discouraging results from the Extracranial-Intracranial Bypass Trial demonstrated the importance of selecting surgical patients based on objective measures of hemodynamic insufficiency. Two such tests are xenon-enhanced computed tomography with acetazolamide challenge and positron emission tomography with measurement of oxygen extraction fraction. Perfusion computed tomography may be another, more practical test. Surgical series, systematic reviews of the literature, and two new randomized clinical trials that use these diagnostic techniques reveal contradictory results. Although they demonstrate that bypass surgery has a morbidity rate of less than 5% and a patency rate of more than 95%, they have not proven a clear benefit.
CONCLUSIONS
Patients with athero-occlusive disease and symptoms of hemodynamic insufficiency have significant risk of stroke if left untreated or managed medically. On the other hand, surgical intervention lacks supporting evidence. Clinicians must individualize their management recommendations until additional data are published or further consensus develops.
Collapse