Treatment of frontoethmoidal meningoencephalocele in Cambodia: a low-cost procedure for developing countries

Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation of Costs of Myelomeningocele and Meningocele Treatment and Screening

Background

The prevention of myelomeningocele (MMC) and meningocele (MC) is a public health concern. A systematic review on economic factors associated with MMC and MC can help the policy makers to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of screening and treatment. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review to provide up-to date pharmacoeconomic evidence of all economic studies present in literature on different aspects of MMC and MC.

Methods

We searched in the National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database (NHSEED), PubMed, Cost-effectiveness Analysis Registry (CEA Registry), Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD), Health Technology Assessment Database (HTAD), Cochrane Library, and Econlit. The PRISMA guidelines were followed in the search and evaluation of literature. Only articles in English not limited by the year of publication that fulfilled the eligibility criteria were included in this systematic review.

Results

Nineteen papers were included in the study. The studies were very heterogeneous and reported a comparison of the costs between prenatal versus postnatal repair, the cost of fetoscopic approach versus open surgery, the cost of ventriculoperitoneal shunting (VPS) versus endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV), and ETV with choroid plexus cauterization (ETV/CPC), the cost of hospitalization, and the cost of diagnosis for MMC.

Conclusion

The results of this study can help in implementing new policies in different countries to assist MC and MMC patients with the cost of treatment and screening.

The extracranial versus intracranial approach In frontoethmoidal encephalocele corrective surgery: a meta-analysis

The debate between the extracranial and the intracranial approach for frontoethmoidal (FEE) encephalocele corrective surgery was not summarized yet. The extracranial approach is traditionally believed being inferior to the intracranial approach, but convincing evidence was missing. To provide robust evidence, we conducted a meta-analysis on the incidence of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage, its progression to infection, the reoperation to treat the leakage, and the recurrence rate between the two techniques. We performed a meta-proportion pooled analysis and meta-analysis on eligible literature following the recommendation of PRISMA guidelines. The outcome of interest was the incidence of CSF leakage, the CSF leakage that progressed into an infection, the reoperation rate to treat the leakage, and the recurrence rate. We included 28 studies comprising 1793 patients in the pooled prevalence calculations. Of the 28 studies, nine studies describing 730 patients were eligible for meta-analysis. The prevalence of CSF leakage was 8% (95% CI, 0.04-0.12) in the intracranial approach and 10% (95% CI, 0.01-0.23) in the extracranial approach The subgroup analysis of the intracranial approach showed higher CSF leakage prevalence in the frontal craniotomy approach (9%; 95% CI, 0.03-0.16) than the subfrontal osteotomy (6%; 95% CI, 0.03-0.12). Meta-analysis study revealed a significantly higher risk of CSF leakage (OR 2.82; 95% CI, 1.03-7.72), a higher reoperation rate (OR 5.38; 95% CI: 1.13 - 25.76), and the recurrence rate (RR 4.63; 95% CI, 1.51-14.20) for the extracranial approach. The event of infected CSF leakage (OR 3.69; 95% CI, 0.52-26.37) was higher in the extracranial than intracranial approach without any statistical significance. The extracranial approach was associated with a higher risk of CSF leakage, reoperation rate to treat the CSF leakage, and the recurrence rates. The infected CSF leakage between the extracranial and intracranial approaches showed no significant difference.

Frontoethmoidal encephalocele: clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and complications in 400 cases

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to review a large series of frontoethmoidal encephalocele (FEE) regarding their clinical presentation, the progressiveness of the mass volume, the skin stigmata as well as its surgical approach and post-surgical complications.

METHOD

Records of all FEE patients treated in Soetomo General Hospital, Surabaya, and Charity Foundation Program from 2008 to 2015 were reviewed. Detailed patient's demography, clinical findings, radiology results, operative procedures, and complications were documented. Follow-up was organized in weekly basis for the first 1 month after surgery or more often when situation or complication occurred. Wound healing, neurological assessment for new or progressive deficit, pseudomeningocele, skin breakdown, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage, exposed implant, recurrent mass, and cosmetic results were documented. Since most of the patients had no direct phone line at their hometown, we relied on social worker to contact them.

RESULTS

One-stage surgery was performed for 400 patients with FEE (212 were male and 188 were female). Of 400 patients, 388 (97%) were younger than 18 years old. Most FEEs were nasoethmoidal, either isolated or combined with nasoorbital type (347 cases [86.75%]); nasofrontal subtypes were seen in 34 cases (8.5%) and nasoorbital in 14 cases (1.5%). The mean operative time was 2 h (range 30 min-3 h). There were only two patients (0.5%) needed postoperative blood transfusions. Mean hospitalization time was 5 days (range 4-7 days). Overall, complication rate in our series was 12.5%, mostly was CSF leakage and wound dehiscence.

CONCLUSION

The current socioeconomic conditions and local facility should be considered to treat these specific disease processes. The refined and meticulous technique, especially in choosing the approach and handling the dural closure, is essential in lowering the complication rate.

Economic Analysis of Children's Surgical Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Analysis

Background

Understanding the economic value of health interventions is essential for policy makers to make informed resource allocation decisions. The objective of this systematic review was to summarize available information on the economic impact of children’s surgical care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

Methods

We searched MEDLINE (Pubmed), Embase, and Web of Science for relevant articles published between Jan. 1996 and Jan. 2015. We summarized reported cost information for individual interventions by country, including all costs, disability weights, health outcome measurements (most commonly disability-adjusted life years [DALYs] averted) and cost-effectiveness ratios (CERs). We calculated median CER as well as societal economic benefits (using a human capital approach) by procedure group across all studies. The methodological quality of each article was assessed using the Drummond checklist and the overall quality of evidence was summarized using a scale adapted from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Findings

We identified 86 articles that met inclusion criteria, spanning 36 groups of surgical interventions. The procedure group with the lowest median CER was inguinal hernia repair ($15/DALY). The procedure group with the highest median societal economic benefit was neurosurgical procedures ($58,977). We found a wide range of study quality, with only 35% of studies having a Drummond score ≥ 7.

Interpretation

Our findings show that many areas of children’s surgical care are extremely cost-effective in LMICs, provide substantial societal benefits, and are an appropriate target for enhanced investment. Several areas, including inguinal hernia repair, trichiasis surgery, cleft lip and palate repair, circumcision, congenital heart surgery and orthopedic procedures, should be considered “Essential Pediatric Surgical Procedures” as they offer considerable economic value. However, there are major gaps in existing research quality and methodology which limit our current understanding of the economic value of surgical care.

Seasonal variations in frontoethmoidal meningoencephalocele births in Cambodia

OBJECT

Frontoethmoidal meningoencephalocele (fMEC) is relatively common in many Southeast Asian countries, with devastating aesthetic and social consequences for affected children. No cause has been detected to date. Among other factors, the authors of this paper attempt to identify a statistically significant difference in the spread of fMEC births throughout the year compared with other births. This seasonal variation in the incidence of fMEC births may provide clues to the causes of this condition.

METHODS

From a group of 175 children with fMEC who underwent surgery at the authors' humanitarian institution (Children's Surgical Centre) in Phnom Penh between 2004 and 2008, 86 children were studied. These children were born at full term and had an accurately recorded date of birth. The birth dates of this fMEC group were compared with a group of > 15,000 other live births at one of the main maternity units in Phnom Penh in 2005 and 2006.

RESULTS

Seasonal variation in incidence of fMEC by month of birth was highly statistically significant (p < 0.001), with the peak of births occurring in the dry season (between March and May). This is in contrast to the control group, in which there was an equal distribution of births throughout the year. More than 85% of the parents of children with fMEC who the authors treated were farmers, but this figure reflects the composition of the Cambodian population.

CONCLUSIONS

Uneven spread in the incidence of fMEC births throughout the year suggests that a seasonal factor during the wet season may be suspected in the pathogenesis of fMEC in Cambodia.

A model for neurosurgical humanitarian aid based on 12 years of medical trips to South and Central America

The pediatric neurosurgical mission trips led by physicians at Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) Health Systems began in 1996 with the formation of Medical Outreach to Children, founded by 1 of the authors (J.D.W.) after a visit to Guatemala. Since then, 19 surgical trips to 4 different countries in Central and South America have been coordinated from 1996 to 2008. This humanitarian work serves a number of purposes. First and foremost, it provides children with access to surgical care that they would otherwise not receive, thereby significantly improving their quality of life. Second, the visiting surgical team participates in the education of local physicians, parents, and caregivers to help improve the healthcare provided to the children. Last, the team works to promote sustainable global health solutions in the countries it travels to by generating a forum for clinical and public health research discourse. Thus far, a total of 414 children have undergone 463 operations, including 154 initial shunt surgeries, 110 myelomeningocele repairs, 39 lipoma resections, 33 tethered cord releases, 18 shunt revisions, 16 encephalocele repairs, 9 lipomyelomeningocele repairs, and 7 diastematomyelia repairs. The complication rate has been 5-8%, and the team has obtained reliable follow-up in approximately 77% of patients. A correlation was found between an increase in the number of trained neurosurgeons in the host countries and a decrease in the average age of patients treated by the visiting surgical team over time. It is also hypothesized that a decrease in the percentage of myelomeningocele repairs performed by the surgical team (as a fraction of total cases between 1996 and 2006) correlates to an increase in the number of local neurosurgeons able to treat common neural tube defects in patients of younger ages. Such analysis can be used by visiting surgical teams to assess the changing healthcare needs in a particular host country.