Sporadic osteochondroma of the cervical spine

Solitary Pediatric Osteochondroma of the Spine With Cord Compression

Osteochondromas typically arise in the appendicular skeleton, with axial lesions occurring less commonly. Osteochondroma of the spine resulting in cord compression and symptomatic myelopathy is relatively rare. Most cases are reported in adolescents and adults. Consequently, there is a scarcity of literature regarding its occurrence in the pediatric population. We report the case of a cervical osteochondroma of C4-6 with cord compression in a nine-year-old girl. Surgical excision with laminectomy and laminotomy successfully resolved all neurologic deficits. A literature review revealed 27 cases of pediatric osteochondromas with cord compression, suggesting that these lesions are not as rare in the pediatric population as previously thought.

Diagnosis, Management, and Treatment Options: A Cervical Spine Osteochondroma Meta-Analysis

Osteochondroma is described as a capped benign bony neoplasm that forms on the outer surface of bone. These tumors affect nearly 6 million people per year. Although osteochondromas most often involve the appendicular skeleton, many involve the spine, with many cases located in the cervical spine. When osteochondromas involve the spine, they can present with a variety of symptoms, including pain, radiculopathy, and myelopathy, which may necessitate surgical treatment. Spinal osteochondromas can be classified into 2 types: multiple osteochondromas in the context of patients with multiple hereditary exostosis (MHE) and solitary osteochondroma or solitary exostosis (SE). Previous reviews have captured only some of the available literature on cervical osteochondromas and have generally focused on either SE or those associated with MHE. The purpose of our review was to provide an extensive review of all previously reported cervical osteochondromas and to compare osteochondroma characteristics, clinical presentation, and outcomes in the context of MHE and SE.

Solitary Osteochondroma of the Spine-A Case Series: Review of Solitary Osteochondroma With Myelopathic Symptoms

STUDY DESIGN

Case series and literature review.

OBJECTIVE

There is a growing body of literature supporting that osteochondroma of the spine may not be as rare as previously documented. The purpose of this study was to perform an updated review and present our experience with 4 cases of solitary osteochondroma of the spine, including surgical treatment and subsequent outcomes.

METHODS

A review of 4 cases and an updated literature review.

RESULTS

All 4 cases were diagnosed as solitary osteochondroma of the spine based on clinical and histopathologic findings. Majority of the lesions arose from the posterior column with one case showing extension into the middle column with clinical neurologic sequelae. Treatment strategies for all cases included complete marginal excision of the lesions using a posterior approach. All 4 cases showed no radiographic evidence of recurrence. The literature review yielded 132 cases of solitary osteochondroma and 17 case associated with multiple hereditary exostosis. Out of the 132 cases, 36 presented with myelopathic symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Osteochondroma of the spine may not be as rare as previously reported. The best approach to treatment in almost all symptomatic cases include wide surgical excision of the tumor. This should include complete resection of the cartilaginous cap of the tumor in an effort to prevent recurrence. When excision is performed properly, the outcomes are excellent with very low recurrence of the tumor.

Spinal stenosis frequent in children with multiple hereditary exostoses

PURPOSE

Children with multiple hereditary exostoses (MHE) have numerous osteochondromas, with the most prominent lesions typically over the appendicular skeleton. A recent report noted a high rate of intracanal lesions in this patient population and recommended preventative spinal screening with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT). We sought to evaluate the prevalence of spinal stenosis from intracanal osteochondromas at our pediatric orthopedic center in order to evaluate if routine screening is warranted.

METHODS

All pediatric patients treated for MHE were retrospectively identified. Records were reviewed to determine demographics, previous orthopedic surgery, and indication and results of axial spine imaging (CT or MRI). Imaging studies were reviewed to evaluate the presence of intracanal and compressive spinal lesions.

RESULTS

Between 1990 and 2011, axial imaging was performed in nine patients with MHE due to concerns of pain, weakness, and/or dizziness. These patients had moderate disease involvement, with a mean of 4.9 previous orthopedic surgeries to address skeletal osteochondromas. Two patients with MHE had cervical spinal stenosis secondary to intracanal osteochondromas. Both children successfully underwent spinal decompression. Thus, of our MHE population undergoing axial imaging, 22 % were noted to have intracanal lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience reveals a >20 % rate of compressive intracanal osteochondromas in MHE patients undergoing spinal imaging. These two patients represent 5 % of the MHE patients treated at our center. These lesions may be slow growing, and significant consequences can occur if not identified promptly. Thus, we confer that routine axial screening of the spinal canal may be warranted in these children.