Closed posterior superior iliac spine impeding pediculocorporeal S-1 screw insertion

The sacral screw placement depending on morphological and anatomical peculiarities

PURPOSE

Various pathologies of the lumbosacral junction require fusion of the L5/S1 segment. However, pseudarthroses, which often come along with sacral screw loosening, are problematic. The aim of the present investigation was to elaborate the morphological features of the L5/S1 segment to define a so-called "safe zone" for bi- or tricortical screw placement without risking a damage of the iliac vessels.

METHODS

A total of one hundred computed tomographies of the pelvis were included in this investigation. On axial and sagittal slices, pedicle morphologies, the prevertebral position of the iliac vessels, the spinal canal and the area with the largest bone density were analyzed.

RESULTS

Beginning from the entry point of S1-srews iliac vessels were located at an average angle of 7° convergence, the spinal canal at 38°. Bone density was significantly higher centrally with a mean value of 276 Hounsfield Units compared to the area of the Ala ossis sacri. The largest intraosseous screw length could be achieved at an angle of 25°. The average pedicle width was 20 mm and the pedicle height 13 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

A "safe-zone" for bicortical screw placement at S1 with regard to the course of the iliac vessels could be defined between 7° and 38° convergence. Regarding the area offering the largest bone density and the maximal possible screw length, a convergence of 25° is recommended at S1 to reduce the incidence of screw loosening. Screw diameter, as a further influence factor on screw holding, is limited by pedicle height not pedicle width.

L5 spinal nerve injury caused by misplacement of outwardly-inserted S1 pedicle screws

PURPOSE

To evaluate L5 nerve root injuries caused by outwardly misplaced S1 pedicle screws. Pedicle screws remain the criterion standard for fixation of L5-S1 to correct lumbosacral instability. When inserting S1 pedicle screws, it is possible to injure the L5 nerve root if screws are inserted outwardly and the tip of the screw perforates the anterior cortex of the sacrum. Despite this risk, to our knowledge this type of injury has never been reported as a case series.

METHODS

We experienced 2 cases of L5 nerve root injury caused by outwardly-inserted S1 pedicle screws. In both cases, bilateral S1 pedicle screws were inserted outwardly using a free-hand technique, and on one side, screws induced severe pain by impinging on an L5 root. Computed tomography after the selective rootgraphy of the injured nerve showed the nerve compressed laterally by screw threads in Case 1 and crushed between the screw threads and the sacral body in Case 2.

RESULTS

In both cases, leg pain disappeared immediately after the infiltration of the nerve with lidocaine, but symptoms recurred within a few days in Case 1 and within an hour in Case 2. Conservative treatment of three spinal nerve infiltrations was effective in Case 1, but reinsertion of the rogue screw was necessary in Case 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeons should recognize that lateral inclination of S1 pedicle screws can cause L5 nerve root injury, which may require reinsertion of the screw, especially in cases where insertion is difficult because of overlapping surrounding muscle or bony tissue.

Can intermuscular cleavage planes provide proper transverse screw angle? Comparison of two paraspinal approaches

PURPOSE

The goal of this study was to determine which paraspinal approach provided a better transverse screw angle (TSA) for each vertebral level in lower lumbar surgery.

METHODS

Axial computed tomography (CT) images of 100 patients, from L3 to S1, were used to measure the angulation parameters, including transverse pedicle angle (TPA) and transverse cleavage plane angle (TCPA) of entry from the two approaches. The difference value between TCPA and TPA, defined as difference angle (DA), was calculated. Statistical differences of DA obtained by the two approaches and the angulation parameters between sexes, and the correlation between each angulation parameter and age or body mass index (BMI) were analyzed.

RESULTS

TPA ranged from about 16° at L3 to 30° at S1. TCPA through the Wiltse's and Weaver's approach ranged from about -10° and 25° at L3 to 12° and 32° at S1, respectively. The absolute values of DA through the Weaver's approach were significantly lower than those through the Wiltse's approach at each level. The angulation parameters showed no significant difference with sex and no significant correlation with age or BMI.

CONCLUSIONS

In the lower lumbar vertebrae (L3-L5) and S1, pedicle screw placement through the Weaver's approach may more easily yield the preferred TSA consistent with TPA than that through the Wiltse's approach. The reference values obtained in this paper may be applied regardless of sex, age or BMI and the descriptive statistical results may be used as references for applying the two paraspinal approaches.

Metric study of Egyptian sacrum for lumbo-sacral fixation procedures

Lumbo-sacral fixation for the management of lumbo-sacral instability includes insertion of screws to the sacrum, most commonly into the posterior aspect of the pedicles of the first sacralvertebra. This study was carried out to determine the normal anatomical parameters of the Egyptian sacrum, particularly of the first sacral vertebra and its pedicles, to find the safest approach for sacral screw placement in lumbo-sacral fixation procedures, and to describe racial characteristics, if any. In this study, 45 adult Egyptian dry sacra of unknown sex were used. Eleven sacral parameters were measured using the Vernier sliding caliper which is accurate to 0.1 millimeter. In this study, the sacrum showed a mean height of 11.43 ± 0.88 centimeters a mean width of 10.39 ± 0.91 centimeters with a mean sacral index of 90.82 ± 1.80 %. The first sacral pedicle had a mean anterior height of 1.83 ± 0.49 centimeters, a mean depth of 2.99 ± 0.53 centimeters and a mean posterior height of 2.38 ± 0.50 centimeters. A medialtrajectory path (representing an anteromedially-oriented first sacral pedicle screw) starting from the infero-lateral border of the S1 facet to the sacral promontory in the middle line was 5.23 ± 0.52 cm. The findings of the present study could provide accurate and specific parameters of the sacrum among Egyptians that could enhance the safety of insertion of sacral screws during lumbo-sacral fixation procedures upon Egyptian patients.

[Submuscular approach to the lumbar spine and extraforaminal cage implantation]

The posterior median approach to the lumbar spine may cause significant injury to the erector spinae muscles (ESM) which is minimized using the paralateral approach suggested by Ray. We have adopted this approach and have extended it into the disc space to allow cage implantation from outside the foramen (EPLIF - extraforaminal posterior lumbar interbody fusion). The initial exposure of the posterior vertebral elements between the ESM and the deep lumbar fascia is sufficient to attain the entry points of pedicle screws. The intervertebral foramen and posterior annulus fibrosus are then exposed after which distant lateral disc herniations may be removed, the foramen/lateral recess may be decompressed or an EPLIF performed following clearing and vertical distraction of the disc space. This is followed by ipsilateral transpedicular fixation (TpF), contralateral fixation (second approach) by TpF or translaminar screws. Indications are given for foraminal and extraforaminal disc herniation, stenosis of the foramen and/or of the lateral recess, posterolateral fusion, TpF and EPLIF. The submuscular approach and EPLIF have proven to be valuable alternatives to standard techniques.

Neurovascular risks of sacral screws with bicortical purchase: an anatomical study

The aim of this cadaver study is to define the anatomic structures on anterior sacrum, which are under the risk of injury during bicortical screw application to the S1 and S2 pedicles. Thirty formaldehyde-preserved human male cadavers were studied. Posterior midline incision was performed, and soft tissues and muscles were dissected from the posterior part of the lumbosacral region. A 6 mm pedicle screw was inserted between the superior facet of S1 and the S1 foramen. The entry point of the S2 pedicle screw was located between S1 and S2 foramina. S1 and S2 screws were placed on both right and the left sides of all cadavers. Then, all cadavers were turned into supine position. All abdominal and pelvic organs were moved away and carefully observed for any injury. The tips of the sacral screws were marked and the relations with the anatomic structures were defined. The position of the sacral screws relative to the middle and lateral sacral arteries and veins, and the sacral sympathetic trunk were measured. There was no injury to the visceral organs. In four cases, S1 screw tip was in direct contact with middle sacral artery. In two cases, S1 screw tip was in direct contact with middle sacral vein. It was observed that the S1 screw tips were in close proximity to sacral sympathetic trunk on both right and the left sides. The tip of the S2 screw was in contact with middle sacral artery on the left side only in one case. It is found that the tip of the S2 screw was closely located with the middle sacral vein in two cases. The tip of the S2 pedicle screw was in contact with the sacral sympathetic trunk in eight cases on the right side and seven cases on the left side. Lateral sacral vein was also observed to be disturbed by the S1 and S2 screws. As a conclusion, anterior cortical penetration during sacral screw insertion carries a risk of neurovascular injury. The risk of sacral sympathetic trunk and minor vascular structures together with the major neurovascular structures and viscera should be kept in mind.