1
|
Kitaya S, Kanamori H, Ishii R, Katsumi M, Ikeda R, Higashi K, Kakuta R, Ohkoshi A, Katori Y. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of persistent bacteremia in patients with head and neck cancer in a tertiary care hospital. Front Med (Lausanne) 2024; 11:1406983. [PMID: 38983366 PMCID: PMC11232632 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1406983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 06/07/2024] [Indexed: 07/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Compared to other cancers, research on bloodstream infection in head and neck cancer is scarce, lacking comparative studies on persistent versus transient bacteremia outcomes. Methods This retrospective survey examined patients with head and neck cancer undergoing blood culture at our center from June 2009 to May 2023. Blood culture-positive cases suspected of infection were divided into persistent bacteremia and transient bacteremia groups. We investigated their clinical, epidemiological, and microbiological features, including risk factors for persistent bacteremia and mortality. The primary outcome was 90-day mortality. Results In this 97-patient cohort, 14 (14%) cases were assigned to the persistent bacteremia group. Catheter-related bloodstream infections were the leading cause of infection in both groups, consistently contributing to a high proportion of overall bloodstream infections. The mortality rate was generally higher in the persistent bacteremia group than in the transient bacteremia group (odds ratio [OR], 2.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6-11.1), particularly in the non-clearance subgroup (OR, 9; 95% CI, 0.5-155.2). Pyogenic spondylitis was a key risk factor for persistent bacteremia, while hypoalbuminemia increased mortality. Conclusion In patients with bacteremia and head and neck cancer, persistent bacteremia was associated with higher mortality than was transient bacteremia. Adittionally, bacteremia clearance in persistent bacteremia is thus crucial for prognostic improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shiori Kitaya
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Internal Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Hajime Kanamori
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Internal Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Ryo Ishii
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Makoto Katsumi
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan
| | - Ryoukichi Ikeda
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Iwate Medical University, Shiwa, Iwate, Japan
| | - Kenjiro Higashi
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Risako Kakuta
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Akira Ohkoshi
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Yukio Katori
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ucisik FE, Huell D, Choi J, Gidley PW, DeMonte F, Hanna EY, Learned KO. Post-Treatment Imaging Evaluation of the Skull Base. Semin Roentgenol 2023; 58:217-236. [PMID: 37507165 DOI: 10.1053/j.ro.2023.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Revised: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- F Eymen Ucisik
- Department of Neuroradiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Derek Huell
- Department of Neuroradiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jeanie Choi
- Department of Neuroradiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Paul W Gidley
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX
| | - Franco DeMonte
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX
| | - Ehab Y Hanna
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX
| | - Kim O Learned
- Department of Neuroradiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Verduijn GM, Petit SF, Lauwers I, van Norden Y, Sijtsema ND, Sewnaik A, Mast H, Capala M, Nout R, Baker S, van Meerten E, Hoogeman MS, van der Lugt A, Heemsbergen WD. Post radiation mucosal ulcer risk after a hypofractionated stereotactic boost and conventional fractionated radiotherapy for oropharyngeal carcinoma. Acta Oncol 2023; 62:40-47. [PMID: 36576773 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2022.2159772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE Post radiation mucosal ulcers (PRMU) after treatment for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) can have a huge negative impact on patients' quality of life, but little is known concerning risk factors and the impact of fraction size. Therefore, the goal of this study was to determine the pattern of PRMU development and to identify risk factors after a hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy boost (SBRT) compared to conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for OPSCC. MATERIAL AND METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study (N = 332) of OPSCC patients with ≥ 1-year disease-free survival, treated with 46 Gy Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) (2 Gy fractions) followed by either an SBRT boost of 16.5 Gy (5.5 Gy fractions) (N = 180), or 24 Gy IMRT (2 Gy fractions) (N = 152). PRMU (grade ≥ 2) was scored when observed > three months after the last radiotherapy (RT) fraction (CTCAE v5.0). Potential risk factors were analyzed with Cox regression models using death as competing risk. Dose at the PRMU site was calculated by projecting delineated PRMU on the planning CT. RESULTS All cases of PRMU (N = 64) occurred within 24 months; all were grade 2. The cumulative incidence at 2 years in the SBRT boost group was 26% (N = 46) vs. 12% (N = 18) for conventional fractionation (p = 0.003). Most PRMU developed within nine months (N = 48). PRMU occurring > nine months (N = 16) were mainly observed in the SBRT boost group (N = 15). Sex (p = 0.048), acute tube feeding (p = < 0.001), tumor subsite tonsil (p = 0.001), and N stage (p = 0.017) were associated with PRMU risk at multivariable regression in the hypofractionated SBRT boost group. All 25 delineated PRMU were located within the high dose regions. CONCLUSION The risk of PRMU should be included in the cost benefit analysis when considering future research using a hypofractionated SBRT boost for OPSCC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerda M Verduijn
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Steven F Petit
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris Lauwers
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yvette van Norden
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nienke D Sijtsema
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Aniel Sewnaik
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hetty Mast
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marta Capala
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Remi Nout
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sarah Baker
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther van Meerten
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mischa S Hoogeman
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Aad van der Lugt
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wilma D Heemsbergen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Carr CM, Benson JC, DeLone DR, Diehn FE, Kim DK, Ma D, Nagelschneider AA, Madhavan AA, Johnson DR. Manifestations of radiation toxicity in the head, neck, and spine: An image-based review. Neuroradiol J 2022; 35:427-436. [PMID: 35499087 PMCID: PMC9437506 DOI: 10.1177/19714009221096824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Radiation therapy is an important component of treatment in patients with malignancies of the head, neck, and spine. However, radiation to these regions has well-known potential side effects, many of which can be encountered on imaging. In this manuscript, we review selected radiographic manifestations of therapeutic radiation to the head, neck, and spine that may be encountered in the practice of radiology. METHODS We conducted an extensive literature review of known complications of radiation therapy in the head, neck, and spine. We excluded intracranial and pulmonary radiation effects from our search. We selected complications that had salient, recognizable imaging findings. We searched our imaging database for illustrative examples of these complications. RESULTS Based on our initial literature search and imaging database review, we selected cases of radiation-induced tumors, radiation tissue necrosis (osteoradionecrosis and soft tissue necrosis), carotid stenosis and blowout secondary to radiation, enlarging thyroglossal duct cysts, radiation myelopathy, and radiation-induced vertebral compression fractures. CONCLUSIONS We describe the clinical and imaging features of selected sequelae of radiation therapy to the head, neck, and spine, with a focus on those with characteristic imaging findings that can be instrumental in helping to make the diagnosis. Knowledge of these entities and their imaging findings is crucial for accurate diagnosis. Not only do radiologists play a key role in early detection of these entities, but many of these entities can be misinterpreted if one is not familiar with them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carrie M Carr
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - John C Benson
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - David R DeLone
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Felix E Diehn
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Dong K Kim
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Daniel Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dejanovic D, Specht L, Czyzewska D, Kiil Berthelsen A, Loft A. Response Evaluation Following Radiation Therapy With 18F-FDG PET/CT: Common Variants of Radiation-Induced Changes and Potential Pitfalls. Semin Nucl Med 2022; 52:681-706. [PMID: 35835618 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2022.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Revised: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) is one of the cornerstones in cancer treatment and approximately half of all patients will receive some form of RT during the course of their cancer management. Response evaluation after RT and follow-up imaging with 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) can be complicated by RT-induced acute, chronic or consequential effects. There is a general consensus that 18F-FDG PET/CT for response evaluation should be delayed for 12 weeks after completing RT to minimize the risk of false-positive findings. Radiation-induced late side effects in normal tissue can take years to develop and eventually cause symptoms that on imaging can potentially mimic recurrent disease. Imaging findings in radiation induced injuries depend on the normal tissue included in the irradiated volume and the radiation therapy regime including the total dose delivered, dose per fraction and treatment schedule. The intent for radiation therapy should be taken in consideration when evaluating the response on imaging, that is palliative vs curative or neoadjuvant vs adjuvant RT. Imaging findings can further be distorted by altered anatomy and sequelae following surgery within the radiation field. An awareness of common PET/CT-induced changes/injuries is essential when interpreting 18F-FDG PET/CT as well as obtaining a complete medical history, as patients are occasionally scanned for an unrelated cause to previously RT treated malignancy. In addition, secondary malignancies due to carcinogenic effects of radiation exposure in long-term cancer survivors should not be overlooked. 18F-FDG PET/CT can be very useful in response evaluation and follow-up in patients treated with RT, however, variants and pitfalls are common and it is important to remember that radiation-induced injury is often a diagnosis of exclusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danijela Dejanovic
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Lena Specht
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Dorota Czyzewska
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anne Kiil Berthelsen
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Annika Loft
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yeh R, Amer A, Johnson JM, Ginat DT. Pearls and Pitfalls of 18FDG-PET Head and Neck Imaging. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2022; 32:287-298. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nic.2022.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
7
|
Imaging of Complications of Chemoradiation. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2021; 32:93-109. [PMID: 34809846 DOI: 10.1016/j.nic.2021.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Chemoradiation for head and neck cancer is associated with a variety of early and late complications. Toxicities may affect the aero-digestive tract (mucositis, salivary gland injury), regional osseous and cartilaginous structures (osteoradionecrosis (ORN) and chondronecrosis), vasculature (progressive radiation vasculopathy and carotid blow out syndromes), and neural structures (optic neuritis, myelitis, and brain injury). These may be difficult to distinguish from tumor recurrence on imaging, and may necessitate the use of advanced MRI and molecular imaging techniques to reach the correct diagnosis. Secondary radiation-induced malignancies include thyroid cancer and a variety of sarcomas that may manifest several years after treatment. Checkpoint inhibitors can cause a variety of adverse immune events, including autoimmune hypophysitis and encephalitis.
Collapse
|
8
|
Albano D, Benenati M, Bruno A, Bruno F, Calandri M, Caruso D, Cozzi D, De Robertis R, Gentili F, Grazzini I, Micci G, Palmisano A, Pessina C, Scalise P, Vernuccio F, Barile A, Miele V, Grassi R, Messina C. Imaging side effects and complications of chemotherapy and radiation therapy: a pictorial review from head to toe. Insights Imaging 2021; 12:76. [PMID: 34114094 PMCID: PMC8192650 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-021-01017-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2021] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Newer biologic drugs and immunomodulatory agents, as well as more tolerated and effective radiation therapy schemes, have reduced treatment toxicity in oncology patients. However, although imaging assessment of tumor response is adapting to atypical responses like tumor flare, expected changes and complications of chemo/radiotherapy are still routinely encountered in post-treatment imaging examinations. Radiologists must be aware of old and newer therapeutic options and related side effects or complications to avoid a misinterpretation of imaging findings. Further, advancements in oncology research have increased life expectancy of patients as well as the frequency of long-term therapy-related side effects that once could not be observed. This pictorial will help radiologists tasked to detect therapy-related complications and to differentiate expected changes of normal tissues from tumor relapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Domenico Albano
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, 20161, Milan, Italy. .,Sezione di Scienze Radiologiche, Dipartimento di Biomedicina, Neuroscienze e Diagnostica Avanzata, Università Degli Studi di Palermo, Via del Vespro 127, 90127, Palermo, Italy. .,Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via della Signora 2, 20122, Milan, Italy.
| | - Massimo Benenati
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via della Signora 2, 20122, Milan, Italy.,Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia, Oncologia ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Bruno
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Unit, Maggiore Hospital "C. A. Pizzardi", 40133, Bologna, Italy
| | - Federico Bruno
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via della Signora 2, 20122, Milan, Italy.,Department of Biotechnology and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Marco Calandri
- Radiology Unit, A.O.U. San Luigi Gonzaga di Orbassano, Department of Oncology, University of Torino, 10043, Turin, Italy
| | - Damiano Caruso
- Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome - Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | - Diletta Cozzi
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via della Signora 2, 20122, Milan, Italy.,Department of Emergency Radiology, University Hospital Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50123, Florence, Italy
| | - Riccardo De Robertis
- U.O.C. Radiologia BT, Ospedale Civile Maggiore - Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale A. Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Gentili
- Unit of Diagnostic Imaging, Department of Radiological Sciences, University of Siena, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy
| | - Irene Grazzini
- Department of Radiology, Section of Neuroradiology, San Donato Hospital, Arezzo, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Micci
- Sezione di Scienze Radiologiche, Dipartimento di Biomedicina, Neuroscienze e Diagnostica Avanzata, Università Degli Studi di Palermo, Via del Vespro 127, 90127, Palermo, Italy.,Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via della Signora 2, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Palmisano
- Experimental Imaging Centre, Radiology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,School of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlotta Pessina
- Department of Radiology, University of Brescia, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123, Brescia, Italy
| | - Paola Scalise
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Pisa University Hospital, Via Paradisa 2, 56124, Pisa, Italy
| | - Federica Vernuccio
- Sezione di Scienze Radiologiche, Dipartimento di Biomedicina, Neuroscienze e Diagnostica Avanzata, Università Degli Studi di Palermo, Via del Vespro 127, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Antonio Barile
- Department of Biotechnology and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Vittorio Miele
- Department of Emergency Radiology, University Hospital Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50123, Florence, Italy
| | - Roberto Grassi
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via della Signora 2, 20122, Milan, Italy.,Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - Carmelo Messina
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, 20161, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rao D, Behzadi F, Le RT, Dagan R, Fiester P. Radiation Induced Mucositis: What the Radiologist Needs to Know. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2020; 50:899-904. [PMID: 33279307 DOI: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2020.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 10/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Radiation induced oral mucositis (RIOM) is a common and debilitating complication of radiation therapy for head and neck cancers. RIOM can lead to oral pain, dysphagia, and reduced oral intake, which can be severe enough to necessitate placement of a feeding tube or utilization of total parenteral nutrition. When severe, RIOM can cause premature termination of radiation therapy and can alter treatment plans leading to suboptimal treatment doses. While patient reporting of RIOM symptoms has been the gold standard of documenting RIOM progression, little has been described in the radiology literature concerning the typical imaging findings of RIOM. Herein, we review the pathophysiology and clinical presentation that underlies the development of RIOM with illustrative cases to highlight the relevant imaging findings related to RIOM for the practicing radiologist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dinesh Rao
- Department of Radiology, UF Health Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Fardad Behzadi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Aventura Hospital and Medical Center, Aventura, FL
| | - Rebecca T Le
- Department of Radiology, UF Health Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL; Department of Radiology, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, NY.
| | - Roi Dagan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UF Proton Center, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Peter Fiester
- Department of Radiology, UF Health Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gillespie J. Imaging of the post-treatment neck. Clin Radiol 2020; 75:794.e7-794.e17. [PMID: 32690240 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2020.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Accepted: 06/19/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Post-treatment imaging of the neck is complex. It is important to have an understanding of the expected treatment related appearances as well as the possible complications. Common findings after radiation therapy include generalised soft-tissue oedema and thickening of the skin and platysma muscle. There are a number of complications of radiation that may be seen on imaging, including osteoradionecrosis, chondronecrosis, and accelerated atherosclerosis. Surgical procedures are variable depending on the primary tumour site and extent. The use of flap reconstructions can further complicate the imaging appearances. Any new nodule of enhancement or bone/cartilage erosion should raise concern for tumour recurrence. It is also important to assess for nodal recurrence. A standardised approach to reporting may help to increase accuracy and guide treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Gillespie
- Department of Medical Imaging, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, 4029, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Level 6, Oral Health Centre, Herston Road, Herston, QLD, 4006 Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
González Moreno I, Torres del Río S, Vázquez Olmos C. Seguimiento del cáncer de cabeza y cuello tratado. Lo que el radiólogo debe conocer. RADIOLOGIA 2020; 62:13-27. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rx.2019.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2018] [Revised: 05/27/2019] [Accepted: 07/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
12
|
|
13
|
Abstract
A 53-year-old man with T4aN2cM0 tongue base squamous cell carcinoma received definitive chemoradiation. FDG PET/CT at 6 weeks showed partial metabolic response with soft tissue air indicating radiation necrosis at primary site and complete response in the neck. At 9 weeks, contrasted CT showed worsening but nonenhancing ulceration, area biopsied demonstrating a minute carcinoma focus with treatment effect. At 12 weeks, PET/CT showed increased primary site uptake interpreted as disease progression; however, no viable tumor was found at salvage surgery. Because nonenhancing ulceration predicts pure radiation necrosis with no viable tumor, contrasted CT may guide treatment selection in challenging cases.
Collapse
|
14
|
Varoquaux A, Rager O, Dulguerov P, Burkhardt K, Ailianou A, Becker M. Diffusion-weighted and PET/MR Imaging after Radiation Therapy for Malignant Head and Neck Tumors. Radiographics 2015; 35:1502-27. [PMID: 26252192 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2015140029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Interpreting imaging studies of the irradiated neck constitutes a challenge because of radiation therapy-induced tissue alterations, the variable appearances of recurrent tumors, and functional and metabolic phenomena that mimic disease. Therefore, morphologic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging, positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET/CT), and software fusion of PET and MR imaging data sets are increasingly used to facilitate diagnosis in clinical practice. Because MR imaging and PET often yield complementary information, PET/MR imaging holds promise to facilitate differentiation of tumor recurrence from radiation therapy-induced changes and complications. This review focuses on clinical applications of DW and PET/MR imaging in the irradiated neck and discusses the added value of multiparametric imaging to solve diagnostic dilemmas. Radiologists should understand key features of radiation therapy-induced tissue alterations and potential complications seen at DW and PET/MR imaging, including edema, fibrosis, scar tissue, soft-tissue necrosis, bone and cartilage necrosis, cranial nerve palsy, and radiation therapy-induced arteriosclerosis, brain necrosis, and thyroid disorders. DW and PET/MR imaging also play a complementary role in detection of residual and recurrent disease. Interpretation pitfalls due to technical, functional, and metabolic phenomena should be recognized and avoided. Familiarity with DW and PET/MR imaging features of expected findings, potential complications, and treatment failure after radiation therapy increases diagnostic confidence when interpreting images of the irradiated neck. Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur Varoquaux
- From the Department of Imaging, Divisions of Radiology (A.V., A.A., M.B.) and Nuclear Medicine (O.R.); Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Division of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (P.D.); and Department of Medical Genetics and Laboratory, Division of Clinical Pathology (K.B.); Geneva University Hospital, University of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle Perret Gentil 4, 1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland
| | - Olivier Rager
- From the Department of Imaging, Divisions of Radiology (A.V., A.A., M.B.) and Nuclear Medicine (O.R.); Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Division of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (P.D.); and Department of Medical Genetics and Laboratory, Division of Clinical Pathology (K.B.); Geneva University Hospital, University of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle Perret Gentil 4, 1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland
| | - Pavel Dulguerov
- From the Department of Imaging, Divisions of Radiology (A.V., A.A., M.B.) and Nuclear Medicine (O.R.); Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Division of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (P.D.); and Department of Medical Genetics and Laboratory, Division of Clinical Pathology (K.B.); Geneva University Hospital, University of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle Perret Gentil 4, 1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland
| | - Karim Burkhardt
- From the Department of Imaging, Divisions of Radiology (A.V., A.A., M.B.) and Nuclear Medicine (O.R.); Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Division of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (P.D.); and Department of Medical Genetics and Laboratory, Division of Clinical Pathology (K.B.); Geneva University Hospital, University of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle Perret Gentil 4, 1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland
| | - Angeliki Ailianou
- From the Department of Imaging, Divisions of Radiology (A.V., A.A., M.B.) and Nuclear Medicine (O.R.); Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Division of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (P.D.); and Department of Medical Genetics and Laboratory, Division of Clinical Pathology (K.B.); Geneva University Hospital, University of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle Perret Gentil 4, 1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland
| | - Minerva Becker
- From the Department of Imaging, Divisions of Radiology (A.V., A.A., M.B.) and Nuclear Medicine (O.R.); Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Division of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (P.D.); and Department of Medical Genetics and Laboratory, Division of Clinical Pathology (K.B.); Geneva University Hospital, University of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle Perret Gentil 4, 1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Late term tolerance in head neck cancer patients irradiated in the IMRT era. Radiat Oncol 2013; 8:259. [PMID: 24192223 PMCID: PMC4229314 DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-8-259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2013] [Accepted: 10/23/2013] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim was to quantify severe transient and persisting late term effects in our single institution head neck cancer (HNC) cohort treated with curatively intended intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Hypothesis was if a 2-year follow up (FU) is sufficient to estimate the long term tolerance in HNC irradiated in the IMRT era. Methods Between 01/2002-8/2012, 707/1211 (58%) consecutively treated IMRT patients met the inclusion criteria of a FU time >12 months and loco-regional disease control (LRC). 45% presented with loco-regionally advanced disease; 55% were referred for curative definitive IMRT (66 Gy-72 Gy in 30–35 fractions), 45% underwent postoperative IMRT (60-66 Gy in 30–33 fractions). Systemic concomitant therapy was administered in 85%. Highly consistent treatment procedures were performed with respect to contouring processes, dose constraints, radiation schedules, and the use of systemic therapy. Grade 3/4 late term effects were prospectively assessed and analyzed with respect to subgroups at particular risk for specific late effects. Results Mean/median FU of the cohort was 41/35 months (15–124). 13% of the patients (92/707) experienced any grade 3/4 late effects (101 events in 92/707 patients), 81% in the first 12 months after radiation. 4% of all developed persisting late grade 3/4 effects (25 events in 25/707 patients). Conclusions IMRT led to a high late term tolerance in loco-regionally disease free HNC patients. The onset of any G3/4 effects showed a plateau at 2 years. The question of the cervical vessel tolerance in disease free long time survivors is still open and currently under evaluation at our institution.
Collapse
|
16
|
Debnam JM, Guha-Thakurta N. Retropharyngeal and prevertebral spaces: anatomic imaging and diagnosis. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2013; 45:1293-310. [PMID: 23153750 DOI: 10.1016/j.otc.2012.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Cross-sectional imaging plays an important role in the evaluation of the retropharyngeal space (RPS) and the prevertebral space (PVS). Because of their deep location within the neck, lesions arising within these spaces are difficult, if not impossible, to evaluate on clinical examination. This article details the cross-sectional anatomy and imaging appearances of primary and secondary diseases involving the RPS and PVS, including metastasis and spread from adjacent spaces. The role of image-guided biopsy is also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Matthew Debnam
- Section of Neuroradiology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, TX 77005, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Saito N, Nadgir RN, Nakahira M, Takahashi M, Uchino A, Kimura F, Truong MT, Sakai O. Posttreatment CT and MR imaging in head and neck cancer: what the radiologist needs to know. Radiographics 2013; 32:1261-82; discussion 1282-4. [PMID: 22977017 DOI: 10.1148/rg.325115160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
In patients with head and neck cancer, posttreatment imaging can be complicated and difficult to interpret because of the complexity of the surgical procedures performed and the postirradiation changes, but such imaging is critical for the evaluation of (a) the response to therapy and (b) tumor control. Posttreatment changes are affected by the type of surgery performed, reconstruction, neck dissection, and radiation therapy. Three types of flaps are used for reconstruction in the head and neck region: (a) the local flap, with geometric repositioning of adjacent tissue; (b) the pedicle flap, with rotation of donor tissue and preservation of the original vascular system; and (c) the free flap, with transfer of tissue that is revascularized by using microvascular surgical techniques. The posttreatment imaging findings in patients with head and neck cancer can be divided into four groups: altered anatomy secondary to surgical reconstruction, tumor recurrence, potential postsurgical complications, and possible postirradiation changes. Potential postsurgical complications are wound infection, abscess, fistula, flap necrosis, hematoma, chylous fistula, and serous retention. Possible postirradiation changes include mucosal necrosis, osteoradionecrosis, radiation-induced vasculopathy, radiation pneumonitis, radiation lung fibrosis, radiation-induced brain necrosis, and radiation-induced secondary malignancies. A familiarity with the imaging characteristics of posttreatment changes and of the potential complications caused by surgery and irradiation and an ability to differentiate these findings from tumor recurrence are essential for posttreatment surveillance and follow-up management of patients with head and neck cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naoko Saito
- Department of Radiology, Saitama International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama 350-1298, Japan.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiation therapy can result in osteoradionecrosis (ORN) and mucosal ulceration predisposing to infection. METHODS Fourteen patients presenting with infectious sequelae related to mandibular ORN were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS In most patients, infection followed diagnosis of ORN; but in 4 patients, ORN was not diagnosed until after the time of infection and imaging. An early imaging finding of ORN was lingual cortical defects near the last molar. Pain followed by erythema, purulent drainage, and subperiosteal abscess by imaging were the most common signs of infection. In most patients, conservative management eventually failed and segmental mandibulectomies were required. CONCLUSIONS Soft tissue infection with characteristic bone findings such as subperiosteal abscess and cortical bone erosions helps to distinguish infected ORN from recurrent tumor or sterile ORN. In patients previously treated with radiation who present with infection, pain or an avid PET scan with bone involvement, the mandible should be scrutinized.
Collapse
|
19
|
Bharatha A, Yu E, Symons SP, Bartlett ES. Pictorial Essay: Early- and Late-term Effects of Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Imaging. Can Assoc Radiol J 2012; 63:119-28. [DOI: 10.1016/j.carj.2010.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2009] [Revised: 06/19/2010] [Accepted: 09/02/2010] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to illustrate the cross-sectional imaging appearance of postradiation changes and complications of radiotherapy in the head and neck. Radiotherapy is an important treatment modality for head and neck cancer, and is often used in conjunction with chemotherapy. Recognition of the varied effects of radiotherapy to the head and neck region is essential to correctly interpret posttreatment imaging and may help prevent further complication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aditya Bharatha
- Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Medical Imaging, London Health Sciences Centre–Victoria Hospital, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Medical Imaging, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eugene Yu
- Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Medical Imaging, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sean P. Symons
- Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Medical Imaging, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eric S. Bartlett
- Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Medical Imaging, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Debnam JM, Guha-Thakurta N, Mahfouz YMM, Garden AS, Benjamin RS, Sturgis EM, Ginsberg LE. Radiation-associated head and neck sarcomas: spectrum of imaging findings. Oral Oncol 2012; 48:155-61. [PMID: 21937260 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2011.08.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2011] [Accepted: 08/23/2011] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Sarcomas developing after radiation treatment for primary malignancies of the head and neck are often detected clinically when they are very aggressive. We reviewed the patient demographics and imaging findings in 21 patients with radiation-associated sarcomas (RAS) of the head and neck treated at our institution. Twenty-one RAS of the head and neck were retrospectively reviewed. The lesions were assessed for presence of a soft tissue mass, enhancement pattern, bone destruction, characteristics of tumor matrix, and FDG avidity. The RAS developed 4.5-25 years (mean 12.7 years) after irradiation. On both CT and MRI, all 21 lesions presented with a soft tissue mass. A variable imaging appearance was noted on CT, MR, and PET/CT, most, but not all, demonstrated aggressive features. At a median follow-up time of 19.1 months, 11 of the 21 patients had died from the sarcoma. RAS have variable imaging appearances. While most demonstrate aggressive features, some appear benign, which can lead to misdiagnosis. Head and neck radiologists, surgeons and oncologists who manage patients after radiation treatment should be aware of the wide range of clinical presentations and imaging features of RAS, because failure to diagnose can delay appropriate treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Matthew Debnam
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Section of Neuroradiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Debnam JM. Imaging of the Head and Neck following Radiation Treatment. PATHOLOGY RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2011; 2011:607820. [PMID: 21660277 PMCID: PMC3108502 DOI: 10.4061/2011/607820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2010] [Accepted: 03/12/2011] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck occurs in approximately 40,000 patients annually in the United States and is often treated with radiation therapy. Radiological studies are obtained following treatment for head and neck malignancies to assess for recurrent tumor, posttreatment changes, and associated complications. Radiation treatment creates a difficult clinical picture for oncologists, head and neck surgeons, neuroradiologists, and neuropathologists. As post-treatment imaging studies are often discussed at radiology/pathology working conferences, knowledge of the imaging appearance of radiation-associated changes in the head and neck and the terminology used by neuroradiologists may not only aid in interpretation of the pathologic specimen, but also assist in communications with neuroradiologists and referring clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Matthew Debnam
- Section of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Yoo JS, Rosenthal DI, Mitchell K, Ginsberg LE. Osteoradionecrosis of the hyoid bone: imaging findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010; 31:761-6. [PMID: 19942694 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a1892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE ORN is a postradiation complication that has been well-documented in the medical literature. Most cases in the head and neck have been described in the mandible or larynx. Only a handful of cases in the hyoid bone are documented, all in the clinical literature. Our purpose is to present the clinical and imaging features of ORN involving the hyoid bone. MATERIALS AND METHODS We present a case series of 13 patients with imaging findings highly suggestive of hyoid ORN after radiation therapy for head and neck cancers, in which we observed progressive features of hyoid disruption along with adjacent soft-tissue ulceration. RESULTS Pretreatment imaging, when available, showed a normal hyoid. Typical postradiation imaging findings included an initial tongue base ulcerative lesion with air approaching the hyoid bone, and subsequent observation of hyoid fragmentation, often with intraosseous or peri-hyoid air and the absence of associated mass-like enhancement. CONCLUSIONS Findings of hyoid fragmentation, cortical disruption, and soft tissue or intraosseous air in the postradiation therapy patient should strongly suggest the diagnosis of hyoid ORN. It is important recognize this entity because the diagnosis may preclude potentially harmful diagnostic intervention and allow more appropriate therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J S Yoo
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, 77030, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|