Safety of protected carotid artery stenting in patients with severe carotid artery stenosis and carotid intraplaque hemorrhage

Findings of Angiography and Carotid Vessel Wall Imaging Associated with Post-Procedural Clinical Events after Carotid Artery Stenting

PURPOSE

Vessel wall imaging (VWI) for carotid plaque is better for detecting unstable carotid plaque such as intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH), lipid-rich necrotic core (LRNC), and thin/ruptured fibrous cap. However, the role of VWI before carotid artery stenting (CAS) is unclear. Thus, this study aimed to determine the findings of symptomatic carotid stenosis before CAS on angiography and carotid VWI and to evaluate the imaging findings associated with post-procedural clinical events after CAS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 173 consecutive patients who underwent carotid VWI, CAS, and post-procedural diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) after CAS. Findings of unstable plaque on carotid VWI and unstable findings on angiography were analyzed. We also analyzed the incidence of post-procedural clinical events, any stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and death within 30 days of CAS.

RESULTS

Of 173 patients, 101 (58.4%) had initial ischemic symptoms and positive findings on DWI. Symptomatic patients were significantly higher in patients with IPH than in patients without IPH (62.4% vs. 45.8%, P=0.031). Degree of stenosis, thrombus of the stenotic lesion, flow delay of internal carotid artery, and flow arrest by filter thrombus had significantly higher prevalence in the symptomatic group. Twenty patients (11.6%) had post-procedural clinical events such as any stroke, clinical symptoms, and/or MI. Hyperlipidemia and intraluminal thrombus on angiography were identified as significant factors influencing post-procedural events after CAS.

CONCLUSION

An intraluminal thrombus on angiography was identified as a significant factor influencing post-procedural clinical events after CAS.

T1-T2 Mismatch Sign as a Predictor of Ipsilateral Ischemic Change After Carotid Artery Stenting

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance (MR)-plaque imaging reflects the characteristics of carotid plaque. We evaluated the relationship between MR-plaque images and ischemic change after carotid artery stenting (CAS).

METHODS

MR-plaque images were acquired from patients with carotid artery stenosis before CAS treatment. We calculated the relative signal intensity of plaque components compared with that of the sternocleidomastoid muscle and evaluated the presence/absence of T1-T2 mismatch and match sign. We then assessed the appearance of new ischemic lesions after CAS on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Factors associated with the appearance of a high-intensity lesion on DWI were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 64 patients with carotid artery stenoses treated with CAS were included in this study. In univariate analysis, T1-T2 mismatch sign was associated with the appearance of high-intensity lesions on DWI after CAS (odds ratio [OR], 12.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.593-40.072; P < 0.0001), whereas T1-T2 match sign and high intensity on T2-weighted imaging were negatively associated (OR, 0.061, 95% CI, 0.007-0.502, P = 0.009 and OR, 0.085; 95% CI, 0.022-0.334, P = 0.0004, respectively). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, T1-T2 mismatch sign was independently associated with the appearance of a high-intensity lesion on DWI after CAS (OR, 16.695; 95% CI, 1.324-210.52; P = 0.0295).

CONCLUSIONS

T1-T2 mismatch sign on MR-plaque imaging is significantly associated with the appearance of new ischemic lesions after CAS. T1-T2 mismatch sign may be useful in considering treatment strategies for carotid artery stenosis.

Protected carotid artery stenting in patients with severe stenosis

Intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) and ulcers are the major findings of unstable plaques. In addition, initial symptoms are associated with postprocedural complications after carotid artery stenting (CAS). The aim of this study was to determine the safety of CAS using an embolic protection device in symptomatic patients with severe carotid artery stenosis and unstable plaques such as IPH and ulcers. This retrospective study included 140 consecutive patients with severe carotid stenosis. These patients underwent preprocedural carotid vessel wall imaging to evaluate the plaque status. We analyzed the incidence of initial clinical symptoms, such as headache, nausea, and vomiting, after CAS. The primary outcomes analyzed were the incidence of stroke, myocardial infarction, and death within 30 days of CAS. Sixty-seven patients (47.9%) had IPH, and 53 (38.9%) had ulcers on carotid wall imaging/angiography. Sixty-three patients (45.0%) had acute neurological symptoms with positive diffusion-weighted image findings. Intraluminal thrombi on initial angiography and flow arrest during CAS were significantly higher in patients with IPH and symptomatic patients. Symptoms were significantly higher in patients with IPH than in those without (63.5% vs 35.1%, P < .001). There were no significant differences in clinical symptoms after stenting or in primary outcomes, regardless of IPH, ulcer, or initial symptoms. IPH and plaque ulceration are risk factors in symptomatic carotid stenosis. However, IPH and plaque ulceration were not a significant risk factors for cerebral embolism during protected carotid artery stent placement in patients with carotid stenosis. Protected CAS might be feasible and safe despite the presence of unstable plaques.

Clinical Outcomes of Second- versus First-Generation Carotid Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Single-cohort studies suggest that second-generation stents (SGS; “mesh stents”) may improve carotid artery stenting (CAS) outcomes by limiting peri- and postprocedural cerebral embolism. SGS differ in the stent frame construction, mesh material, and design, as well as in mesh-to-frame position (inside/outside). Objectives: To compare clinical outcomes of SGS in relation to first-generation stents (FGSs; single-layer) in CAS. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies with FGSs and SGS (PRISMA methodology, 3302 records). Endpoints were 30-day death, stroke, myocardial infarction (DSM), and 12-month ipsilateral stroke (IS) and restenosis (ISR). A random-effect model was applied. Results: Data of 68,422 patients from 112 eligible studies (68.2% men, 44.9% symptomatic) were meta-analyzed. Thirty-day DSM was 1.30% vs. 4.11% (p < 0.01, data for SGS vs. FGS). Among SGS, both Casper/Roadsaver and CGuard reduced 30-day DSM (by 2.78 and 3.03 absolute percent, p = 0.02 and p < 0.001), whereas the Gore stent was neutral. SGSs significantly improved outcomes compared with closed-cell FGS (30-day stroke 0.6% vs. 2.32%, p = 0.014; DSM 1.3% vs. 3.15%, p < 0.01). At 12 months, in relation to FGS, Casper/Roadsaver reduced IS (−3.25%, p < 0.05) but increased ISR (+3.19%, p = 0.04), CGuard showed a reduction in both IS and ISR (−3.13%, −3.63%; p = 0.01, p < 0.01), whereas the Gore stent was neutral. Conclusions: Pooled SGS use was associated with improved short- and long-term clinical results of CAS. Individual SGS types, however, differed significantly in their outcomes, indicating a lack of a “mesh stent” class effect. Findings from this meta-analysis may provide clinically relevant information in anticipation of large-scale randomized trials.

Predictors of Ipsilateral New Ischemic Lesions on Diffusion-Weighted Imaging after Carotid Artery Stenting in Asymptomatic Patients: A Retrospective Observational Study with Conventional Multicontrast MRI

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to identify the independent risk factors for ipsilateral new ischemic lesions (NILs) during carotid artery stenting (CAS).

METHODS

In patients treated with CAS, the association between postoperative ipsilateral NILs on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and patient demographics, intraoperative factors, the presence of plaque components, the semiquantitative grading of component size on multicontrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Ipsilateral NILs on DWI were detected in 85 (39.2%) patients. The debris was observed on the surface embolic protection devices in 70.97% of patients. Univariate analysis showed that different stages of intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) (along with lipid-rich necrotic core [LRNC]) (P < 0.001), size of IPH (P < 0.001), calcification (CA) (P = 0.045), and LRNC (without IPH) (P < 0.001) as well as postdilation (P < 0.001)), stent type (P = 0.001), and aortic arch ulcer (P = 0.004) were associated with postoperative ipsilateral NILs. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the acute and recent IPH (along with LRNC) (odds ratio [OR]: 5.77, P < 0.002 and OR: 28.66, P < 0.001, respectively), LRNC size in Grade 2 (OR: 6.10, P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for ipsilateral NILs. Aortic arch ulcer (OR: 3.44, P = 0.002), postdilation (OR: 4.72, P = 0.04) and open cell stent (OR: 2.88, P < 0.016) were also significantly related to ipsilateral NILs on DWI after CAS. There was a significant correlation between IPH at different stages and their grade of size (correlation coefficient: 0.89; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The IPH and larger LRNC along with the aortic arch ulcer, postdilation and open cell stent are associated with increased risk of ipsilateral NILs on DWI after CAS procedure. Preoperative staging of IPH and semiquantitative grading of size of plaque components based on multi-contrast MRI may be useful for predicting ipsilateral cerebral ischemic events after CAS.

Recent Intraplaque Hemorrhage Is Associated with a Higher Risk of Ipsilateral Cerebral Embolism During Carotid Artery Stenting

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to identify which stage of intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) is an independent risk factor for ipsilateral new ischemic lesions (NILs) after carotid artery stenting (CAS).

METHODS

In 268 patients treated with CAS, the association between postoperative ipsilateral NILs on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and patient demographics, intraoperative factors, and plaque characteristics on multicontrast atherosclerosis characterization sequence was retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 268 patients were enrolled in the study. Ipsilateral NILs on DWI were detected in 32.8% of patients. Univariate analysis showed that the stage of IPH (along with lipid-rich necrotic core [LRNC]) (P < 0.001) in the carotid plaque, predilation (P = 0.012), stent type (P = 0.002), and aortic arch ulcer (P = 0.009) were associated with postoperative ipsilateral NILs, whereas other patient-related factors (P >0.05), type of embolic protection device (P = 0.072), postdilation (P = 0.388), calcification (P = 0.140), and LRNC (without IPH) (P = 0.086) were not. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the acute and recent IPH (along with LRNC) (odds ratio [OR], 3.78, P = 0.011 and OR, 16.73, P < 0.001, respectively), aortic arch ulcer (OR, 2.46; P = 0.006), predilation (OR, 4.78; P = 0.015), and open cell stent (OR, 4.19; P < 0.001) were significantly associated with postoperative ipsilateral NILs on DWI.

CONCLUSIONS

Screening for recent IPH in carotid plaques using multicontrast atherosclerosis characterization sequence may identify plaques at a higher risk for cerebral embolism during CAS.

Quantification of Carotid Intraplaque Hemorrhage: Comparison between Manual Segmentation and Semi-Automatic Segmentation on Magnetization-Prepared Rapid Acquisition with Gradient-Echo Sequences

Purpose: Carotid intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) increases risk of territorial cerebral ischemic events, but different sequences or criteria have been used to diagnose or quantify carotid IPH. The purpose of this study was to compare manual segmentation and semi-automatic segmentation for quantification of carotid IPH on magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition with gradient-echo (MPRAGE) sequences. Methods: Forty patients with 16–79% carotid stenosis and IPH on MPRAGE sequences were reviewed by two trained radiologists with more than five years of specialized experience in carotid plaque characterization with carotid plaque MRI. Initially, the radiologists manually viewed the IPH based on the MPRAGE sequence. IPH volume was then measured by three different semi-automatic methods, with high signal intensity 150%, 175%, and 200%, respectively, above that of adjacent muscle on the MPRAGE sequence. Agreement on measurements between manual segmentation and semi-automatic segmentation was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: There was near-perfect agreement between manual segmentation and the 150% and 175% criteria for semi-automatic segmentation in quantification of IPH volume. The ICC of each semi-automatic segmentation were as follows: 150% criteria: 0.861, 175% criteria: 0.809, 200% criteria: 0.491. The ICC value of manual vs. 150% criteria and manual vs. 175% criteria were significantly better than the manual vs. 200% criteria (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The ICC of 150% and 175% criteria for semi-automatic segmentation are more reliable for quantification of IPH volume. Semi-automatic classification tools may be beneficial in large-scale multicenter studies by reducing image analysis time and avoiding bias between human reviewers.

Associations between carotid intraplaque hemorrhage and new ipsilateral ischemic lesions after carotid artery stenting: a quantitative study with conventional multi-contrast MRI

The risk of cerebral embolism after CAS in patients with carotid IPH is still controversial. This study was to further investigate the relationship between IPH and new ipsilateral ischemic lesion (NIIL) after CAS, and to perform a volumetric analysis of IPH for predicting the risk of NIIL following CAS. One hundred and seventeen patients with carotid stenosis undergoing CAS were prospectively enrolled. Preprocedural multi-contrast carotid MRI was performed. NIIL was evaluated by brain DWI before and after CAS. IPH volume, wall volume at the plaque (WV_plaque) and relative IPH volume were calculated. Associations between IPH and postprocedural NIIL were studied. NIILs were shown in 52 patients. IPH were identified in 53 patients. NIILs were found more frequently in IPH-positive (33/53, 62.3%) than in IPH-negative patients (19/64, 29.7%, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference of WV_plaque between NIIL-positive and NIIL-negative patients (1166.6 ± 432.0 mm³ vs 1124.6 ± 410.4 mm³, p = 0.592). The IPH volume from NIIL-positive group was significantly larger than that of NIIL-negative group (252.8 ± 264.9 mm³ vs 59.3 ± 131.1 mm³, p < 0.001), with also higher relative IPH volume (20.4 ± 19.1% vs 5.7 ± 12.2%, p < 0.001). ROC curve showed that 183.45 mm³ of the IPH volume was the most reliable cutoff value for predicting NIIL with a specificity of 92.3% and a positive predictive value of 86.1%. Larger IPH volume is associated with increased risk of NIIL after CAS procedure. Quantification of IPH volume may be useful for predicting cerebral ischemic events after CAS.

Plaque Imaging to Decide on Optimal Treatment: Medical Versus Carotid Endarterectomy Versus Carotid Artery Stenting

Many of the current guidelines for the management of carotid atherosclerosis are based on clinical trial findings published more than 2 decades ago. The lack of plaque information in clinical decision making represents a major shortcoming and highlights the need for contemporary trials based on characteristics of the atherosclerotic lesion itself, rather than luminal stenosis alone. This article summarizes the major dilemmas clinicians face in current practice, and discusses the rationale and evidence that plaque imaging may help to address these challenges and optimize the clinical management of carotid artery disease in the future.

The association between carotid intraplaque hemorrhage and outcomes of carotid stenting: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine whether carotid stenting patients with intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) identified on preoperative MRI were more likely to suffer perioperative ischemic complications compared with patients without IPH.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive literature search of studies published between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2015 reporting perioperative outcomes of carotid stenting among patients with and without IPH on hemorrhage sensitive carotid MRI sequences. Clinical outcomes included perioperative (≤30 days post-stenting) minor stroke, major stroke, death, and a composite outcome combining stroke, death, and myocardial infarction (MI). We also compared the rate of silent ischemia on diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) between groups. Statistical analysis was performed using a random effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

9 studies with 491 unique patients (198 in the IPH group and 293 in the non-IPH group) were included. The rate of the composite outcome of any stroke, death, or MI within 30 days was 8.1% (13/160) in the IPH group and 2.1% (5/239) in the non-IPH group (OR=4.45, 95% CI 1.61 to 12.30, p<0.01). There were no significant differences between groups in the rates of minor stroke, major stroke, or death when considered individually. The rate of postoperative infarct on DWI was 49.7% (75/161) for the IPH group and 33.6% (81/241) for the non-IPH group (OR=2.01, 95% CI 1.31 to 3.09, p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Our systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that patients with IPH on pre-carotid stenting MRI had higher rates of silent ischemia as well as of a composite outcome of perioperative stroke, death, and MI compared with those without IPH.

Associations between Cerebral Embolism and Carotid Intraplaque Hemorrhage during Protected Carotid Artery Stenting

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Carotid artery stent placement in patients with intraplaque hemorrhage remains controversial because of the incidence of cerebral embolism after the procedure. The purpose of this study is to determine if intraplaque hemorrhage is a significant risk factor for cerebral embolism during carotid artery stent placement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study assessed 94 consecutive patients with severe carotid stenosis. These patients underwent preprocedural carotid MR imaging and postprocedural DWI after carotid artery stent placement. Intraplaque hemorrhage was defined as the presence of high signal intensity within the carotid plaque that was >200% of the signal from the adjacent muscle on MPRAGE. We then analyzed the incidence of postprocedural ipsilateral ischemic events on DWI and primary outcomes within 30 days of carotid artery stent placement.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients (45.7%) had intraplaque hemorrhage on an MPRAGE image. There was no significant difference in the incidence of postprocedural ipsilateral ischemic events and primary outcomes between the intraplaque hemorrhage and non-intraplaque hemorrhage group. However, postprocedural ipsilateral ischemic events were more frequently observed in the symptomatic group (17/41 [41.5%]) than in the asymptomatic group (8/53 [15.1%]; P = .005).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraplaque hemorrhage was not a significant risk factor for cerebral embolism during carotid artery stent placement in patients with severe carotid stenosis. Symptomatic patients should receive more careful treatment during carotid artery stent placement because of the higher risk of postprocedural ipsilateral ischemic events.

Carotid artery stenting for vulnerable plaques on MR angiography and ultrasonography: utility of dual protection and blood aspiration method

Background

Carotid artery stenting (CAS) for internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis with vulnerable plaques is controversial. We analyzed the effect of a dual protection and blood aspiration method during CAS in patients with vulnerable plaques.

Methods

A total of 111 patients with ICA stenosis underwent CAS using the dual protection (simultaneous flow reversal and distal filter) and blood aspiration method. In 103 of 111 patients, preoperative carotid plaque was estimated by both 3 T MRI and ultrasonography (US). ICA plaques with a high intensity signal on time-of-flight-MR angiography (TOF-MRA) and/or mobile component on US were defined as vulnerable plaques. We assessed major adverse events (MAE) (ie, major stroke, myocardial infarction, and death) and hyperintense spots on diffusion-weighted images (DWI) after CAS. We then evaluated the visible debris captured by dual protection and blood aspiration during CAS.

Results

The preoperative ICA plaque on TOF-MRA and US was judged to be vulnerable in 48.5% (50/103 patients). The success rate of the CAS procedure was 100% with no MAE within 30 days. DWI showed small hyperintense spots in 18% (9/50 patients) and 18.9% (10/53 patients) in the vulnerable and non-vulnerable plaque groups, respectively. Visible debris was captured in 68% (34/50 patients) and 45.3% (24/53 patients) in the vulnerable and non-vulnerable plaque groups, respectively (p=0.0286).

Conclusions

The combination of dual protection and blood aspiration could provide effective distal embolic protection although vulnerable plaques on TOF-MRA and US had a high incidence of debris during CAS. Thus, CAS using dual protection and blood aspiration is safe in patients with vulnerable plaques.