Revisiting the risk of intraparenchymal hemorrhage following aneurysm treatment by flow diversion

Bailout Strategies and Complications Associated with the Use of Flow-Diverting Stents for Treating Intracranial Aneurysms

Background

Flow-diverting stents (FDS) have revolutionized the endovascular management of unruptured, complex, wide-necked, and giant aneurysms. There is no consensus on management of complications associated with the placement of these devices. This review focuses on the management of complications of FDS for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms.

Summary

We performed a systematic, qualitative review using electronic databases MEDLINE and Google Scholar. Complications of FDS placement generally occur during the perioperative period.

Key Message

Complications associated with FDS may be divided into periprocedural complications, immediate postprocedural complications, and delayed complications. We sought to review these complications and novel management strategies that have been reported in the literature.

Periprocedural safety of Pipeline therapy for unruptured cerebral aneurysms: Analysis of 279 Patients in a multihospital database

The relative safety of unruptured aneurysm treatment with coiling versus flow diversion therapy is unknown. Most data available on flow diversion reflect highly focused patient groups and very experienced operators. We evaluated a national, multihospital patient database to examine periprocedural morbidity and mortality in patients treated with endovascular flow diversion therapy. The Premier Perspective database was used to identify patients hospitalized between May 2011 and March 2013 for unruptured aneurysm who underwent flow diversion therapy with a Pipeline embolization device. The risk of in-hospital mortality and morbidity was determined using ICD 9 codes. A total of 279 unruptured aneurysm patients at 18 medical centers underwent endovascular therapy with a Pipeline device. Adverse outcomes included in-hospital mortality in two cases (0.7%), discharge to long-term care in 22 cases (7.9%), ischemic complications in 14 cases (5.0%), hemorrhagic complications in four cases (1.4%), and postoperative neurological complications in nine cases (3.2%). This study of a large cohort of patient hospitalizations in the United States provides preliminary data on flow diversion in a "real world" scenario and demonstrates that the periprocedural morbidity and mortality is not negligible and must be considered in the context of the natural history of the aneurysms that are being treated.

Middle cerebral artery pressure changes following Pipeline flow diversion

Objective Pipeline embolization devices (PED) are commonly used for endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms but changes in intracranial hemodynamics after PED deployment are poorly understood. Here, we assess middle cerebral artery (MCA) and systemic blood pressure before and after PED treatment. Methods Records of patients with cerebral aneurysms proximal to the internal carotid artery terminus treated with PED at our institution between 2015 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were included if ipsilateral MCA pressure measurements were available. Ipsilateral MCA pressure was transduced via the microcatheter before and after PED deployment. Systemic arterial blood pressure was also simultaneously recorded. MCA, systemic blood pressure, and ratios of MCA to systemic blood pressure values were compared before and after treatment among the study cohort using the two-sample paired Student t test. Results Fourteen patients were included. Mean age was 54 years. Among the entire cohort, the ratio of MCA to systemic systolic and mean blood pressure were significantly higher after treatment (respectively 0.76 vs. 0.69, p = 0.01, and 0.94 vs. 0.89, p = 0.03), and the ratio of MCA to systemic diastolic pressures showed an increasing trend (1.08 vs. 1.03, p = 0.09). The percentage of ratio increase was independent of aneurysm size ( r = -0.24, p = 0.42 for systolic ratio; r = -0.09, p = 0.74 for diastolic ratio; r = -0.09; p = 0.76 for mean ratio, respectively). Conclusions Following PED deployment, the ratio of ipsilateral MCA to systemic systolic and mean blood pressure increased. These pressure changes should be further evaluated in a larger sample size.

Intracranial Aneurysms Treated by Flow-Diverting Stents: Long-Term Follow-Up with Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography

PURPOSE

Long-term data on aneurysm treatment with flow-diverting stents are still sparse, and follow-up protocols differ widely between institutions. We present long-term results, with a focus on the usefulness of contrast-enhanced MR angiography (ceMRA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Interventions and follow-up imaging of patients with aneurysms treated by flow-diverting stents ("Pipeline," "Silk" and "FRED" models) without additional coiling were analyzed. All MRI scans included dedicated two-phase ceMRA. Aneurysm occlusion rates, size of the aneurysmal sac and complications were evaluated on MRI and digital subtraction angiography (DSA), where available. The ability of ceMRA to depict aneurysm occlusion and stent patency was graded on a three-point scale.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients with 102 MRI scans were included. The median duration of follow-up was 830 days. Aneurysm occlusion rates were 52% at 3 months (10 of 19 patients), 72% at 6 months (18/25) and 84% overall (21/25). Shrinkage of the aneurysmal sac was found in 19 patients (76%) and in 12 cases to <50% of the original size (48%). CeMRA assessability of aneurysmal occlusion was graded as good in all cases. When compared to DSA (18 cases), ceMRA had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 91% regarding aneurysm remnant detection. Assessability of the stent lumen varied and was limited in most cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Flow-diverter treatment achieves high occlusion rates and can cause major aneurysm shrinkage. CeMRA is highly valuable regarding imaging of the aneurysmal sac. There are limitations regarding the assessability of the stent lumen on ceMRA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4, Case Series.

Changes in contrast transit times on digital subtraction angiography post-Pipeline Embolization Device deployment

It is postulated that hemodynamic changes occur in the distal vascular bed post-deployment of Pipeline Embolization Devices (PEDs). In this paper, we evaluate changes in the contrast transit times (TTs) on digital subtraction angiography (DSA) post-PED interventions. DSA films were analyzed using custom-made software for the time-density relationship at baseline and compared to post-PED deployment. All analyses were performed within the middle cerebral artery (MCA) M1 segment. Analyses included TT10%-100% (time needed for the contrast to change from 10% image intensity to 100%), TT100%-10%, and TT25%-25%. Forty-four patients were included. We found a significant decrease in TT10%-100% (2.79 to 2.24 seconds, p < 0.001) post-PED. There was a significant correlation between the percentage change in TT100%-10% and aneurysm size ( p = 0.02). There was also a significant decrease in TT25%-25% (7.07 to 6.41 seconds, p = 0.02) post-PED. Moreover, there was a significant correlation between the absolute or percentage changes in TT25%-25% and aneurysm size (rho = 0.54, p = 0.05 and rho = 0.29, p = 0.05, respectively). Statistically significant distal intracranial hemodynamic changes occur post-PED deployment. These hemodynamic changes appear to be more pronounced with large and giant aneurysms.

Use of flow diverters in the treatment of unruptured saccular aneurysms of the anterior cerebral artery

BACKGROUND

Few publications have dealt exclusively with the use of flow diverter stents for the treatment of aneurysms of the anterior cerebral artery (ACA).

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy of flow-diverting stents in the treatment of small, unruptured aneurysms of the ACA.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our database of prospectively collected information for all patients treated with flow diversion for an unruptured saccular aneurysm of the ACA between September 2009 and July 2016. The aneurysm fundus size, neck size, number and type of flow-diverting stent (FDS), complications, and follow-up data were recorded.

RESULTS

In total 26 patients, with 27 aneurysms were identified that matched our inclusion criteria (11 male and 15 female). The average age of the patients was 59.3 years (range 27-77 years). All patients, except one, had a single aneurysm affecting the ACA. Fourteen aneurysms were located on the left (51.9%). The average aneurysm fundus size was 2.9 mm (range 2-6 mm). Twenty patients had follow-up angiographic studies. In total, 16 aneurysms were completely excluded, 1 aneurysm showed a very small remnant, and no follow-up angiographic data are available for the remaining patients. One patient had a treatment-related complication.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of aneurysms arising from the ACA with flow diverters is technically feasible and carries a high degree of success with low complication rate.

Flow Diversion for Intracranial Aneurysm Management: A New Standard of Care

Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with complex morphologies such as giant, wide-necked, or fusiform aneurysms is challenging. Stent-assisted coiling and balloon-assisted coiling are alternative techniques to treat such complex aneurysms, but studies have shown less-than-expected efficacy, as suggested by their high rate of recanalization. The management of complex aneurysms via microsurgery or conventional neuroendovascular strategies has traditionally been poor. However, over the last few years, flow-diverting stents (FDS) have revolutionized the treatment of such aneurysms. FDS are implanted within the parent artery rather than the aneurysm sac. By modifying intra-aneurysmal and parent-vessel flow dynamics at the aneurysm/parent vessel interface, FDS trigger a cascade of gradual intra-aneurysmal thrombosis. As endothelialization of the FDS is complete, the parent vessel reconstructs while preserving the patency of normal perforators and side branch vessels. As with any intervention, the practice and application of flow-diversion technology is inherent, with risks that include vessel rupture or perforation, in-stent thrombosis, perforator occlusion, procedural and delayed hemorrhages, and perianeurysmal edema. Herein, we review the devices, their mechanisms of actions, clinical applications, complications, and ongoing studies.

Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms With Pipeline Embolization Device: Newer Applications and Technical Advances

OPINION STATEMENT

Pipeline embolization device (PED) is a flow diverter used in the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms, particularly those with unfavorable configurations. It works by causing progressive flow redirection leading to thrombosis within the aneurysm. PED was initially approved for adults with large or giant wide-necked (≥4 mm or no discernible neck) aneurysms of the internal carotid artery (ICA) from the petrous to the superior hypophyseal segments. Studies have shown a superior aneurysm occlusion rate of 85 % at 6 months for the PED and mortality ranging from 2.6 to 4 %. There appears to be a knowledge gap in terms of the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy and efficacy of assessing platelet inhibition. However, increasing operator experience and favorable longer-term outcome data have led to the exploration of PED for a wide array of off-label uses. Given the paucity of good-quality studies comparing PED with other endovascular/surgical treatment options, several multicenter randomized trials are currently underway to answer these important questions.

Can the Windkessel Hypothesis Explain Delayed Intraparenchymal Haemorrhage After Flow Diversion? A Case Report and Model-Based Analysis of Possible Mechanisms

BACKGROUND

Delayed ipsilateral intraparenchymal haemorrhage is a recently recognised complication after endovascular flow diversion for intracranial aneurysms. Although the mechanism of this phenomenon is not understood, one proposed explanation (the windkessel hypothesis) is that removal of aneurysmal compliance increases distal pulse pressure.

METHODS

We present a case of delayed haemorrhage after placement of a Pipeline stent, discuss the proposed mechanisms, and describe a novel electrical analogue model that was used to evaluate the likely haemodynamic effect of stent placement.

RESULTS

Model-based analysis suggests that stenting is not likely to produce a significant change in distal pulse pressure. Moreover, basic fluid dynamics principles suggest that a local reduction in disturbed flow in the region of the aneurysm could produce only a minor increase in distal pressure (a few mmHg), which is unlikely to be the main cause of the observed haemorrhage.

CONCLUSION

The windkessel hypothesis is unlikely to explain the occurrence of delayed ipsilateral intraparenchymal haemorrhage after flow diversion; however, other mechanisms involving altered haemodynamics distal to the treated aneurysm may play a role. Further studies involving the assessment of haemodynamic changes after flow diversion would be useful to understand, and eventually mitigate, this currently unpredictable risk.

Flow diverters for intracranial aneurysms

Flow diverters (pipeline embolization device, Silk flow diverter, and Surpass flow diverter) have been developed to treat intracranial aneurysms. These endovascular devices are placed within the parent artery rather than the aneurysm sac. They take advantage of altering hemodynamics at the aneurysm/parent vessel interface, resulting in gradual thrombosis of the aneurysm occurring over time. Subsequent inflammatory response, healing, and endothelial growth shrink the aneurysm and reconstruct the parent artery lumen while preserving perforators and side branches in most cases. Flow diverters have already allowed treatment of previously untreatable wide neck and giant aneurysms. There are risks with flow diverters including in-stent thrombosis, perianeurysmal edema, distant and delayed hemorrhages, and perforator occlusions. Comparative efficacy and safety against other therapies are being studied in ongoing trials. Antiplatelet therapy is mandatory with flow diverters, which has highlighted the need for better evidence for monitoring and tailoring antiplatelet therapy. In this paper we review the devices, their uses, associated complications, evidence base, and ongoing studies.