Small pipes: preliminary experience with 3-mm or smaller pipeline flow-diverting stents for aneurysm repair prior to regulatory approval

Pipeline versus non-pipeline flow diverter treatment for M1 aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The flow diversion treatment of aneurysms located distal to the Circle of Willis has recently increased in frequency. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical and radiological outcomes of flow diverter (FD) embolization in treating M1 aneurysms.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, and Scopus were searched up to May 2024 using the Nested Knowledge platform. We included studies assessing the long-term clinical and radiological outcomes for M1 aneurysms. Results of FDs classified as Pipeline Embolization Devices (PED) versus other types of FDs. Angiographic occlusion rates, ischemic and hemorrhagic complications, and favorable clinic outcomes were included. All data were analyzed using R software version 4.2.2.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies with 112 total patients (58 patients for PED and 54 patients for other FD devices) were included in our meta-analysis. The overall adequate (complete + near-complete) occlusion rates were 85.1%. The complete occlusion rate was higher with PED than with other FD devices (72.9% PED and 41.6% for non-PED FDs, respectively, p-value <.01). The ischemic complications were 9.9% and 9.0% for the PED and non-PED groups, respectively (p-value = .89). The overall modified Rankin Scale 0-2 was 100% for the non-PED and 97.1% for the PED group (p-value = .51). In-stent stenosis rate was 7.5% for PED devices compared to 2.6% in the non-PED group (p-value = .35).

CONCLUSIONS

This relatively small meta-analysis showed high rates of adequate and complete occlusion in FD treatment of M1 segment aneurysms, with favorable safety profiles. PEDs were associated with higher rates of complete aneurysm occlusion compared to other types of FDs.

Safety and efficacy profile of off-label use of the Pipeline Embolization Device: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The off-label utilization of the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) is a common practice in numerous medical centers globally. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the overall outcomes of this off-label usage of PEDs.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, and Scopus were searched up to February 2023 using the Nested Knowledge platform to identify studies assessing the off-label use of PEDs. Any use of PED outside of the FDA-approved indication granted in 2018 is considered off-label use. Overall angiographic occlusion rates, ischemic and hemorrhagic complications, mortality, retreatment rates, and favorable clinic outcomes were included. Statistical analyses were performed to compare the overall outcome rates of anterior cerebral artery(ACA) vs. middle cerebral artery(MCA) and anterior vs posterior circulation subgroups.

RESULTS

We included 26 studies involving a total of 1,408 patients. The overall rate of complete occlusion was 80.3 % (95 % CI= 76.0-84.1). Subgroup analysis demonstrated a statistically significant difference in the rate of complete occlusion between anterior circulation (78.9 %) and posterior circulation (69.2 %) (p value=0.02). The rate of good clinical outcomes was 92.8 % (95 % CI= 88.8-95.4). The mortality rate was 1.4 % (95 % CI= 0.5-2.7). The overall rate of ischemic complications was 9.5 % (95 % CI= 7.7-11.6), with a comparable difference between anterior circulation (7.7 %) and posterior circulation (12.8 %) (p value=0.07). There was no statistically significant difference in MCA vs ACA subgroups in all parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Off-label use of PEDs can be a safe and effective treatment option for intracranial aneurysms. However, there is a need for more prospective, high-quality, non-industry-funded registry studies and randomized trials to test the efficacy and safety of off-label usage of PEDs and to expand its indications.

Technical success, procedural safety, and efficacy of the Silk Vista Baby in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms over a mid-to-long-term follow-up

Background

Long-term follow-up of cerebral aneurysms treated with the Silk Vista Baby (SVB) flow diverter is lacking. This study aimed to assess the technical success, procedural safety, and efficacy of the SVB (Balt, Montmorency, France) for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms in small cerebral vessels over a mid-to long-term follow-up.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed a prospectively maintained database of patients treated with the SVB between September 2018 and June 2021. Data regarding patient demographics, aneurysm characteristics, and technical procedures were also collected. Angiographic and clinical findings were recorded during the procedure and over a period of at least 12 months.

Results

Angiographic and clinical follow-up data were available for 50 patients/50 aneurysms. The procedural complication rate was 8%. At 12 months, the final results showed a technical success rate of 100%, the re rupture rate was 0%, neuromorbidity and mortality rates of 4 and 0%, respectively, and an almost complete occlusion rate of 94%.

Conclusion

Treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms with the SVB was safe and effective. Long-term results showed high rates of adequate and stable occlusions.

Predictors of In-Stent Stenosis Following the Implantation of Pipeline Embolization Devices for the Treatment of Aneurysms Located at or beyond the Circle of Willis in the Anterior Circulation

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In-stent stenosis is commonly observed after stent implantation. There is no consensus on the contributing factors for in-stent stenosis, especially for aneurysms located at or beyond the circle of Willis in the anterior circulation. This study aimed to investigate the morbidity and determinants of in-stent stenosis in distal anterior circulation aneurysms following the implantation of Pipeline Embolization Devices.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent Pipeline Embolization Device treatment at our center between January 1, 2018, and June 15, 2023, were enrolled. Distal anterior circulation aneurysms were defined as those occurring at or beyond the circle of Willis, including anterior communicating artery aneurysms, anterior cerebral artery aneurysms, and MCA aneurysms. Baseline information, aneurysm characteristics, and follow-up data of patients were analyzed. Patients were divided into 2 groups: the in-stent stenosis group (patients with a loss of >25% of the lumen diameter of the parent artery) and the non-in-stent stenosis group. Binary logistic regression and restricted cubic spline curves were used to explore risk factors.

RESULTS

We included 85 cases of 1213 patients treated with flow-diverter devices at our hospital. During an average follow-up period of 9.07 months, the complete occlusion rate was 77.64%. The overall incidence of in-stent stenosis was 36.47% (31/85), of which moderate stenosis accounted for 9.41% (8/85), and severe stenosis, 5.88% (5/85) (triglyceride-glucose index ≥ 8.95; OR = 6.883, P = .006). The difference in diameters between the stent and parent artery of ≥0.09 mm (OR = 6.534, P = .015) and 55 years of age or older (OR = 3.507, P = .036) were risk factors for in-stent stenosis. The restricted cubic spline curves indicated that the risk of in-stent stenosis increased as the difference in diameter between stent and parent artery and the triglyceride-glucose index increased.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the on-label use of Pipeline Embolization Devices, the rate of in-stent stenosis did not obviously increase when treating distal anterior circulation aneurysms with these devices. The incidence of in-stent stenosis was 36.47% when defined as a lumen diameter loss of >25%, and 15.2% when defined as a lumen diameter loss of >50%. Stent-size selection and biochemical indicators can potentially impact the incidence of in-stent stenosis.

Low-Profile Visualized Intraluminal Support Junior Flow-Diversion Properties Used for Stabilization of a Superior Cerebellar Artery Pseudoaneurysm

BACKGROUND

Pseudoaneurysms of the posterior circulation pose a unique management challenge. The fragile nature of the pseudoaneurysm wall presents a high risk of rupture and demands treatment. Small vasculature, particularly distal in the posterior circulation, can preclude management with traditional flow diverters, where the alternative of vessel sacrifice is unacceptable. Small stents can have flow-diversion properties and can be used in these high-risk, difficult-to-access aneurysms.

METHODS

We describe a 40-year-old woman presenting with a ruptured dissecting right superior cerebellar artery pseudoaneurysm after minor trauma. Given the aneurysm's small size and morphology, it was not amenable to coiling and parent vessel sacrifice was potentially morbid. The pseudoaneurysm was initially stabilized with a Low-Profile Visualized Intraluminal Support Junior (LVIS Jr.) stent due to its reported flow-diverting properties.

RESULTS

At six-month follow-up the pseudoaneurysm was stable and the vasospasm had resolved. At this point, definitive treatment with a "FRED Jr." (Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device Junior) flow diverter was pursued. Complete obliteration of the pseudoaneurysm was seen at 12 months' follow-up after staged treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to the unique challenges associated with ruptured pseudoaneurysms located on small-caliber vessels, the options for definitive treatment are limited. The small size of the LVIS Jr. stent and its flow-diverting properties make it a practical treatment option in a difficult situation. This case report provides further support for the flow-diverting properties of the LVIS Jr. and its potential application in the treatment of ruptured pseudoaneurysms in small-caliber intracranial vessels.

Flow diversion via telescoping stent with Low-profile Visualized Intraluminal Support Junior for treatment of ruptured dissecting aneurysm located at proximal posterior inferior cerebellar artery

Dissecting aneurysm involving the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) are challenging because of its nature and anatomic relationship to medulla and lower cranial nerve. We introduce a case of ruptured dissecting aneurysm located at the proximal PICA treated with telescoping stents for flow diversion and dissection healing. A 49 years old female visited to the emergency room for ruptured dissecting aneurysm at right proximal PICA. Telescoping stent was deployed along the right vertebral artery to PICA covering the dissecting aneurysm bleb using two Low-profile Visualized Intraluminal Support Jr (LVIS Jr) stents. Three months follow up angiography revealed a disappearance of aneurysm bleb and healing of dissection by parent artery remodeling. Telescoping stent with LVIS Jr may be an effective treatment for dissecting aneurysm with small diameter (<2 mm) parent artery. Convenient navigation and targeted telescoping stent for minimizing metal coverage at perforating arteries are an advantage for this method.

The Silk Vista Baby - The UK experience

BACKGROUND

The Silk Vista Baby (SVB) flow diverter (FDS) is the only FDS deliverable via a 0.017 inch microcatheter and is specifically designed for the distal vasculature. We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the SVB.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective review to identify SVB cases at 4 tertiary neurosurgical centres within the U.K. Clinical, procedural, angiographic and follow-up data were collected.

RESULTS

We identified 60 patients (35 female, 58%) of average age 54 ± 10.5 (range 30-72) with 61 aneurysms, 50 (81.9%) located in the anterior circulation. The majority of the aneurysms treated were unruptured (46, 75.4%) and saccular (46, 75.4%). Dome size was 6.2 ± 6.2 mm (range 1-36mm) and parent vessel diameter was 2.3 ± 0.4 mm (range 1.2-3.3 mm).An average number of 1.07 devices were implanted. Coils or other devices were implanted in 14 aneurysms (23.3%). At last angiographic follow-up (n = 55), 7.5 ± 4.2 months post-procedure, 32 aneurysms (57.1%) were graded as RRC I, 7 (12.5%) RRC II, and 17 RRC III (30.4%).Clinical complications, excluding death, were seen in 4 patients (6.8%) including 1 delayed aneurysm rupture and 3 symptomatic ischaemic events. Only one patient had permanent morbidity (mRS 1). 3 patients died during follow-up (5.1%); 2 deaths were related to the aneurysms (3.4%) - one ruptured dissecting MCA aneurysm, and one giant partially thrombosed posterior circulation aneurysm. 93% of patients were mRS ≤ 2 at last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The SVB has high rates of technical success and an acceptable safety profile. Distal aneurysms may occlude slower due to relative oversizing of the devices.

Pipeline embolization of cerebral aneurysms in pediatric patients: combined systematic review of patient-level data and multicenter retrospective review

OBJECTIVE

Cerebral aneurysms in the pediatric population are rare and optimal treatment strategies are not as well characterized as in adults. The Pipeline embolization device (PED) is an endoluminal flow diverter that is commonly used to treat aneurysms in adults, but experience with this device in children is limited. The authors sought to further characterize PED use and outcomes in this specific population by performing both a systematic review of patient-level data from studies reporting the use of the PED to treat pediatric aneurysms and a retrospective review of their experience.

METHODS

A systematic review of the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases was performed to identify studies reporting the use of the PED in pediatric patients (age ≤ 18 years). Disaggregated data regarding demographics, aneurysm characteristics, treatment, and outcomes were collected. Retrospective data from the authors' two institutions were also included.

RESULTS

Thirty studies comprising patient-level data on 43 pediatric patients with 47 aneurysms were identified. An additional 9 patients with 9 aneurysms were included from the authors' institutions for a total of 52 patients with 56 aneurysms. The mean patient age was 11.1 years. Presentations included aneurysm rupture (17.3%) and symptomatic mass effect (23.1%). Aneurysms were located in the anterior circulation in 55.4% of cases, and 73.2% were described as nonsaccular. Imaging follow-up was available for 89.3% with a mean follow-up of 13.3 months. Aneurysm occlusion was reported in 75%, with 1 case each (1.8%) demonstrating significant in-stent stenosis and parent vessel occlusion. Clinical follow-up was reported in 90.4% with a mean follow-up of 14.7 months. Good functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-1 or Glasgow Outcome Scale score of 5) were reported in 65.4% of the total population. Two major complications were reported, including 1 death.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite substantial differences in aneurysm location and type between published pediatric and adult patient populations treated with the PED, the use of the PED in the pediatric population appears to be safe. While the short-term effectiveness is also similar to that of adults, additional studies are needed to further characterize the long-term outcomes and better define the use of this device in pediatric patients.

The p48 MW flow modulation device for treatment of unruptured, saccular intracranial aneurysms: a single center experience from 77 consecutive aneurysms

Background

The p48 MW Flow Modulation Device (phenox, Bochum Germany) is a low profile flow diverter stent (FDS), designed for implantation into intracranial arteries with a diameter of less than 3.5 mm.

Objective

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the p48 MW FDS in the treatment of unruptured aneurysms located at intracranial arteries with less than 3.5 mm diameter based on a retrospective analysis from a single tertiary neurovascular center.

Methods

A prospectively maintained database was retrospectively reviewed to identify all cases of intracranial saccular aneurysms treated electively with the p48 MW device. Records were made of basic demographics, aneurysmal characteristics, interventional procedures, adverse events, clinical outcomes and occlusion rates on angiographic follow-ups.

Results

A total of 77 aneurysms and 74 patients were included. The mean size of the treated aneurysms was 3.5 ± 2.4 mm and the mean aspect ratio was 1.3 ± 0.4. A total of 80 endovascular procedures were performed with a total of 12 (15%) adverse events leading to two (2.5%) permanent morbidities/mortalities. Technical issues were encountered in 3 (3.9%) cases. Adequate occlusion of the treated aneurysm was recorded in 55.6% and 63.9% on the first and latest available DSA follow-ups, respectively. There were no cases of side-branch occlusion.

Conclusions

The p48 MW is an easy-to-use implant with very good safety margins. Side branch occlusion and significant in-stent stenosis are infrequently encountered. The time from implantation to sufficient aneurysm occlusion takes longer than with FDS with lower porosity.

Endovascular Treatment of Posterior Cerebral Artery Aneurysms With Flow Diversion: Case Series and Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Flow diversion of posterior cerebral artery (PCA) aneurysms has not been widely reported, possibly owing to concerns regarding parent vessel size and branch vessel coverage.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the safety and effectiveness of PCA aneurysm flow diverter treatment.

METHODS

Retrospective review of PCA aneurysms treated with the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED; Medtronic Inc, Dublin, Ireland) at 3 neurovascular centers, including periprocedural complications and clinical and angiographic outcomes. Systematic review of the literature identified published reports of PCA aneurysms treated with flow diversion. Rates of aneurysm occlusion and complications were calculated, and outcomes of saccular and fusiform aneurysm treatments were compared.

RESULTS

Ten PCA aneurysms in 9 patients were treated with the PED. There were 2 intraprocedural thromboembolic events (20%), including 1 symptomatic infarction and 1 delayed PED thrombosis. Eight of 10 patients returned to or improved from their baseline functional status. Complete aneurysm occlusion with parent vessel preservation was achieved in 75% (6/8) of cases at mean follow-up of 16.7 mo. Eleven of 12 (92%) major branch vessels covered by a PED remained patent. Including the present study, systematic review of 15 studies found a complete aneurysm occlusion rate of 88% (30/34) and complication rate of 26% (10/38), including 5 symptomatic ischemic strokes (13%; 5/38). Fusiform aneurysms more frequently completely occluded compared with saccular aneurysms (100% vs 70%; P = .03) but were associated with a higher complication rate (43% vs 9%; P = .06).

CONCLUSION

The safety and effectiveness profile of flow diverter treatment of PCA aneurysms may be acceptable in select cases.

Flow diversion treatment of anterior communicating artery region aneurysms

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Reports on flow diversion treatment of aneurysms beyond the Circle of Willis are limited, with few series dedicated to anterior communicating artery region aneurysms. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the pipeline embolization device in the treatment of anterior communicating artery region aneurysms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The neuro-interventional database of a single institution was retrospectively reviewed for anterior communicating artery aneurysms treated with the pipeline embolization device between November 2016 and December 2018. Data on clinical presentation, aneurysm location, type, vessel size, procedural complications, clinical and imaging follow-up were analyzed.

RESULTS

Ten patients with 11 anterior communicating artery aneurysms were included. Procedural success was achieved in 9/10 patients (90%). Flow diversion with the pipeline embolization device yielded occlusion in 100% of patients at 6.5 months. Symptomatic ischemic complications occurred in 2/10 patients (20%); only one of who had permanent symptoms. Hemorrhagic groin complications were encountered in 2/10 patients (20%). There were no deaths and no cerebral hemorrhagic complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Flow diversion therapy may provide a feasible solution for anterior communicating artery region aneurysms that are not amenable to traditional surgical or endovascular modalities.

Flow diversion for small caliber vessel aneurysms: efficacy, safety, and functional outcome

BACKGROUND

Flow-diverting stents had gained prominence among neurointerventionalists. Aneurysms originating from distal vessels, particularly dissecting or fusiform, pose more technical challenges. The aim of the following single center large series was to report the safety, efficacy, and functional outcome of flow diversion for aneurysms originating from small caliber vessel and compare to proximal vessels group.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of a prospectively maintained database for subjects treated with flow diversion from 2010-2019.

RESULTS

A total of 598 aneurysms were treated during a period extending from 2010-2019 (87.8% large caliber group versus 12.20% small caliber group); 84.28% (N.=504) were females and the average age was 55.5 years. Ischemic stroke occurred at a rate of 2.99% with a non-significant difference between both groups. Delayed aneurysmal rupture and distal intraparenchymal bleed occurred at a rate of 3.70% with a non-significant difference between both groups. Complete aneurysms occlusion was seen at a rate of 75.3% with a non-significant difference between both groups. Morbidity rate occurred at a rate of 5.8% with non-significant difference between both groups. Multivariate logistic regression showed that small vessel was an independent predictor of aneurysm obliteration with a 2.6-fold-higher likelihood.

CONCLUSIONS

Flow-diverting stents are being used to treat diverse types of aneurysms and in various locations, in distal small caliber vessels where other treatment options pose a considerable risk. Small caliber group had similar complication and occlusion rates compared to proximal vessel group.

Impact of age on cerebral aneurysm occlusion after flow diversion

The purpose of this study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of the pipeline embolization device (PED) in different patient age groups with unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA). All patients with UIA treated with the PED between 2011 and 2017 were included. Based on their age, patients were trichotomized to: young (≤45 years), middle-aged (46 to <65 years) and older (≥65 years) groups. Patient's vascular risk factors, presenting symptoms and mRS on admission were collected. Follow-up imaging was evaluated for presence/absence of aneurysm occlusion. Clinical outcome at discharge, 3-9 months and 12-18 months was also documented when available. A total of 260 patients harboring 307 aneurysms (young = 57, middle-age = 144 and older age group = 64). Most aneurysms were located in the anterior circulation (94.8%). Overall morbidity and mortality was 2.3% each (6/260). At 3-9 months near complete to complete aneurysm occlusion was 82.5% (47/57) in the young age group, 82.6% (100/121) in the middle age, and 70.2% (40/57) in the older age group. At 12-18-month, near complete to complete occlusion was 100% in the young age group (32/32), 91.4% (64/70) in the middle age, and 78.4% (29/37) in the older age group. After adjustment for potential confounders, older age patients less frequently achieved near complete to complete occlusion by 3 years than younger subjects (p = 0.009, HR 1.34 95%, CI 1.08-1.66). Our results indicate feasibility and safety of PED across different age groups. Further study is required to determine age-related factors relating to aneurysm occlusion after PED to improve outcome and patient counseling.

Pipeline for Distal Cerebral Circulation Aneurysms

BACKGROUND

Pipeline embolization device (PED; Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland) utilization is not limited to the treatment of giant wide-necked aneurysms. It has been expanded to handle small blisters, fusiforms, and dissecting intracranial aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE

To report the use of the PED in various off-label distal cerebral circulation (DCC) arteries with a follow-up to assess clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Between 2011 and 2016, of 437 consecutive patients, 23 patients with aneurysms located in DCCs were treated with PED. Data on patient presentation, aneurysm characteristics, procedural outcomes, postoperative course, and aneurysm occlusion were gathered. To control confounding, we used multivariable logistic regression and propensity score conditioning.

RESULTS

A total of 437 patients (mean age 52.12 years; 62 women [14.2%]) underwent treatment with PED in our institution. Twenty-three of 437 (5.2%) received a pipeline in a distal artery: 11/23 middle cerebral artery, 6/23 posterior cerebral artery, 3/23 anterior cerebral artery (A1/A2, pericallosal artery), and 3/23 posterior inferior cerebellar artery. Twenty percent of the aneurysms were treated in the past, 10% had previously ruptured, and 5.9% ruptured at presentation to our hospital. The mean aneurysm size was 9.0 ± 6 mm. The mean follow-up was 12 mo (SD = 12.5). In multivariable logistic regression, no associations were found between PED deployment in DCCs and aneurysm occlusion or thromboembolic complications. PED use in DCC was associated with a good clinical outcome. Twenty-two people of 23 (95%) had a good clinical outcome in the latest follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of DCC aneurysms with PED is technically challenging mainly because of the small caliber and tortuosity of the parent arteries. The results of this study further support the safety of flow diverters in the treatment of various distal aneurysms.

Tiny Pipes: 67 Cases of Flow Diversion for Aneurysms in Distal Vessels Measuring Less Than 2.0 mm

BACKGROUND

Flow diversion is increasingly used for off-label treatments of distal circulation aneurysms. Reports of use in sub-2.0-mm vessels are scant.

METHODS

A prospectively collected, institutional review board-approved cerebral aneurysm database was reviewed to identify patients who underwent flow diversion with a 2.5-mm diameter Pipeline embolization device.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven aneurysms were treated in 67 procedures (66 [99%] successful, 64 [96%] single device, 2 [3%] with 2 devices) in 57 patients. Average age was 56 years and 60% were female. Aneurysm location was 51 (76%) anterior cerebral artery, 14 (21%) middle cerebral artery, and 2 (3%) posterior cerebral artery. Aneurysm size was 4.1 ± 3.0 mm (1-20 mm). Safety outcomes included 3 major strokes (4.5%) resulting in permanent neurologic deficit (modified Rankin Scale score 6,4,4), including 1 mortality (1.5%). Acute stent thrombosis was observed intraprocedurally or within 24 hours of each stroke. There were 2 small-volume (<10 cm³, 40 cm³) dependent intracerebral hemorrhage (3.0%) that resolved without permanent neurologic deficit. For effectiveness, 71% of patients underwent follow-up angiography. Complete occlusion was achieved by 88% at 6 months, 86% at 12 months, and 89% at last follow-up. A slight vessel diameter reduction was apparent on average 6.9 months after the procedure, which was statistically significant at the proximal (P = 0.001) but not distal (P = 0.317) device end. Preoperative average parent vessel diameter was 1.9 mm proximally (range, 1.1-2.6 mm) and 1.7 mm distally (range, 1.0-2.3 mm) of the Pipeline embolization device. Follow-up average vessel diameter was 1.7 mm proximally (range, 0.7-2.4 mm) and 1.6 mm distally (range, 0.6-2.1 mm). Flow delay associated with vessel diameter reduction occurred once. There were no cases of asymptomatic vessel occlusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Flow diversion can be safe and effective for aneurysms originating from vessels <2.0 mm in diameter. Heightened vigilance for the prevention and management of acute stent and vessel thrombosis is warranted in these cases.

Multicenter Experience with FRED Jr Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device for Intracranial Aneurysms in Small Arteries

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Flow diverters are emerging as an endovascular treatment alternative for proximally located intracranial aneurysms. However, treatment of aneurysms at and beyond the circle of Willis is not well-established. We assessed the clinical safety and efficacy of the Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device Jr (FRED Jr) dedicated to small-vessel diameters between 2.0 and 3.0 mm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a multicenter observational clinical study of 42 patients with 47 aneurysms treated by a flow-direction technique with the FRED Jr. The primary end point for clinical safety was the absence of death, major or minor stroke, and TIA. The primary end point for treatment efficacy was complete and near-complete occlusion according to the O'Kelly-Marotta grading scale at follow-up after 1, 6, and 12 months.

RESULTS

The FRED Jr deployment was technically successful in all cases. In 39/42 (93%) patients, the primary safety end point was reached; in the 3 remaining patients, 1 disabling ischemic stroke, 1 minor stroke with complete recovery at discharge, and 1 TIA were observed. Two asymptomatic, completely reversible side-branch occlusions occurred. Angiographic (DSA or flat panel CT) and clinical follow-up were available after 1 month in 41/47 (87%), 6 months in 27/47 (57%), and 12 months in 11/47 (23%) aneurysms. The primary efficacy end point was reached at 1 month in 27/41 (66%), at 6 months in 21/27 (78%), and at 12 months in 11/11 (100%) aneurysms.

CONCLUSIONS

Deployment of the FRED Jr is safe and effective in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms located in small vessels.

Matched Comparison of Flow Diversion and Coiling in Small, Noncomplex Intracranial Aneurysms

BACKGROUND: Flow diversion is typically reserved for large, giant, or morphologically complex aneurysms. Coiling remains a first-line treatment for small, morphologically simple aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: To compare coiling and flow diversion in small, uncomplicated intracranial aneurysms (typically amenable to coiling).

METHODS: Forty patients treated with the pipeline embolization device (PED) for small (&lt;10 mm), morphologically simple aneurysms that would have also been amenable to coiling were identified. These patients were matched in a 1:1 fashion with 40 patients with comparable aneurysms treated with coiling. Matching was based on age, gender, aneurysm size, and aneurysm morphology.

RESULTS: The 2 groups were comparable with regard to baseline characteristics including age, gender, and aneurysm size. The complication rate did not differ between the 2 groups (2.5% with coiling vs 5% with PED; P = .6). Multivariate analysis did not identify any predictor of complications. Complete occlusion (100%) at follow-up was significantly higher in patients treated with PED (70%) than coiling (47.5%, P = .04). In multivariate analysis, treatment with PED predicted aneurysm obliteration (P = .04). A significantly higher proportion of coiled patients (32.5%) required retreatment compared with flow diversion (5%, P = .003). In multivariate analysis, coiling predicted retreatment (P = .006). All patients achieved a favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale: 0-2) regardless of group.

CONCLUSION: This matched analysis suggests that flow diversion provides higher occlusion rates, lower retreatment rates, and no additional morbidity compared with coiling in small, simple aneurysms amenable to both techniques. These results suggest a potential benefit for flow diversion over coiling even in small, uncomplicated aneurysms.

Optimal pediatric dosing of anti-platelet agents for pipeline stent embolization -a case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Various strategies are emerging for dosing antiplatelet therapies in preparation for pipeline stent embolization in adults. Hyper-response is associated with hemorrhagic complications. Hypo-response is associated with thromboembolic events. Dosing of antiplatelet agents is highly variable, with little consensus among experts for adults-and even more so for children. To date, pipeline stents have been deployed in 11 pediatric patients, ages 4-15. A variety of clopidogrel and aspirin dosing regimens have been used, with response tested in only three patients, who were all therapeutic. Thrombotic events occurred in two patients, neither of whom were tested.

CASE

We describe here the first case of a hemorrhagic complication in a hyper-responsive pediatric patient undergoing placement of a pipeline stent.

DISCUSSION

As the use of endovascular therapies requiring dual anti-platelet agents becomes more established, there is an increasing need to develop titration protocols that minimizes the risk of thrombotic and hemorrhagic events.

Endovascular flow diversion for treatment of anterior communicating artery region cerebral aneurysms: a single-center cohort of 50 cases

BACKGROUND

Flow diversion represents a novel but definitive treatment for recurrent and difficult-to-coil aneurysms of the anterior communicating artery (ACoA) region, of which reports are limited.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness of the Pipeline embolization device (PED) in treating aneurysms in the ACoA region.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed an IRB-approved database of patients with an aneurysm at a single institution for patients with ACoA or A1-A2 aneurysms treated with PED. Data analyzed included demographics, aneurysm characteristics, procedural details, follow-up results, and outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 50 procedures were performed on 41 patients, including seven patients who underwent bilateral 'H-pipe' PED placement. The average age was 56 years and 46% of the patients were female. The average aneurysm size was 4.5 mm, and two large (>10 mm) aneurysms were treated. The vessel of origin was either the ACoA (26 aneurysms, 63%) or the A1-A2 junction (15 aneurysms, 37%). Eighteen patients (44%) had prior subarachnoid hemorrhage and 20 had previously been treated either with clipping (6 aneurysms, 15%) or coiling (14 aneurysms, 34%). Procedural success was achieved in 48/50 cases (96%) and two cases were aborted. Coils were deployed adjunctively in two cases (4%). Procedural outcomes included no deaths, one major ischemic stroke (2%), and two patients with intracranial hemorrhage (4%). Complete aneurysm occlusion was achieved in 81% of patients at 6 months and 85% of patients at last follow-up digital subtraction angiography.

CONCLUSIONS

The PED can be used safely and effectively in the treatment of aneurysms of the ACoA region. This represents a good alternative treatment option to microsurgical clipping and endovascular coiling.

Endovascular treatment of PICA aneurysms with a Low-profile Visualized Intraluminal Support (LVIS Jr) device

OBJECTIVE

To describe the treatment of posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) aneurysms with the Low-profile Visualized Intraluminal Support Device (LVIS Jr) stent.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The databases of three institutions were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent endovascular treatment of PICA aneurysms using a reconstructive technique where the LVIS Jr stent was totally or partially deployed into the PICA were included in the analysis. Clinical presentation, aneurysm and PICA sizes, procedural complications, and clinical and angiographic follow-up information was recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

Seven patients who underwent endovascular treatment of PICA aneurysms with an LVIS Jr stent were identified. Four aneurysms were treated in the acute phase of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). There were no symptomatic complications. One patient had spasm distal to the stent as a result of mechanical straightening of the vessel. One patient was treated in the acute phase of SAH and required a gycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor after the stent was implanted. This patient needed to be re-treated to complete embolization. All patients had good clinical outcomes (Glasgow Outcome Scale 5). No in-stent stenosis or occlusion was seen on short-term angiographic follow-up and the aneurysms were occluded.

CONCLUSIONS

This small series suggests that the use of a reconstructive technique with the LVIS Jr stent for the treatment of PICA aneurysms is feasible, safe and effective in the short term.